Advances in forest transition theory research
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2021
VIEWS - 1036 (Abstract) 238 (PDF)
Abstract
Forest transition is a trend change process from decreasing to increasing forest area in a country or region. Since the 1990s, ecological and environmental problems such as climate change and loss of biodiversity have received constant attention. The research theory and method of forest transformation has gradually become the frontier and hot topic pursued by international academic circle. With forest transformation as the theme, on the basis of introducing the origin of forest transformation research, along the development vein and internal logic of forest transformation research, this paper reviews the research progress of forest transition theory from the perspectives of Kuznets curve of forest environment and forest transition path, and summarizes the major issues in forest transformation research. The main direction of future research is proposed, including the impact of economic globalization on forest transition, the refinement of research units and the analysis of forest quality transition.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Mather AS. The forest transition. Area 1992; 24(4): 367–379.
2. Barbier EB, Tesfaw A. Explaining forest transitions: The role of governance. Ecological Economics 2015; 119(11): 252–261.
3. Kauppi PE, Ausubel JH, Jingyu F, et al. Returning forests analyzed with the forest identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006; 103(46): 17574–17579.
4. Mather AS, Needle CL. The forest transition: A theoretical basis. Area 1998; 30(2): 117–124.
5. Rudel TK, Coomes OT, Moran E, et al. Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environment Change 2005; 15(1): 23–31.
6. Smith WB, Miles PD, Vissage JS. Forest resources of the United States in General Technology Republication NC–241. Saint Paul, Minnesota: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. North Central Research Station; 2002.
7. Mather AS, Needle CL, Fairbairn J. Environmental Kuznets curve and forest trends. Geography 1999; 84(362): 55–65.
8. Foster A, Rosenzweig MR. Economic growth and the rise of forests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2003; 118(2): 601–637.
9. Mather AS. Recent Asian forest transitions in relation to forest transition theory. International Forestry Review 2007; (9): 491–501.
10. Bruggeman D, Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF. Forest cover changes in Bhutan: Revisiting the forest transition. Applied Geography 2016; 67(2): 49–66.
11. Grossman GM, Krueger AB. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1995; 110(2): 353–377.
12. Li L, Liu J, Xu L. Forest transition: A Literature Review. Forestry Economics 2012; (10): 98–103.
13. Bhattarai M, Hammig M. Institutions and the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: A cross–country analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia. World Development 2001; 29(6): 995–1010.
14. Cropper M, Griffiths C. The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. The American Economic Review 1994; 84(2): 250–254.
15. Culas RJ. REDD and forest transition: Tunneling through the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 2012; 79(7): 44–51.
16. Barbier EB, Burgess JC. The economics of tropical deforestation. Journal of Economic Surveys 2001; 15(3): 413–433.
17. Allen JC, Barnes DF. The causes of deforestation in developing countries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1985; 75(2): 163–184.
18. Palo M. Population and deforestation. In: Pearce DW, Brown K (editors). The causes of tropical deforestation. London: UCL Press; 1994. p. 42–56.
19. Tole L. Sources of deforestation in tropical developing countries. Environmental Management 1998; 22(1): 19–33.
20. Barbier EB. Explaining agricultural land expansion and deforestation in developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2004; 86(5): 1347–1353.
21. Combes MP, Pirard R, Combes JL. A methodology to estimate impacts of domestic policies on deforestation: Compensated successful efforts for “Avoided Deforestation” (REDD). Ecological Economics 2009; 68(3): 680–691.
22. Barbier EB. The Economics of tropical deforestation and land use: An introduction to the special issue. Land Economics 2001; 77(2): 155–171.
23. Grainger A. Difficulties in tracking the long–term global trend in tropical forest area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008; 105(2): 818–823.
24. Zhang Y, Tachbana S, Nagata S. Impact of socioeconomic factors on the changes in forest areas in China. Forest Policy & Economics 2006; (9): 63–76.
25. Wang S, Liu C, Wilson B. Is China in a later stage of a U-shaped forest resource curve? A re–examination of empirical evidence. Forest Policy and Economics 2007; 10(1/2): 1–6.
26. Liu C, Lu J. Zhongguo senlin ziyuan huanjing kuziniezi quxian wenti yanjiu (Chinese) [On China’s forest resource environmental Kuznets curve]. Research of Institutional Economics 2010; (2): 138–161.
27. Xu L. Jiyu mianban shuju moxing de woguo senlin zhuanxing yingxiang yinsu de shizheng yanjiu (Chinese) [An empirical study on the influencing factors of China’s forest transition based on panel data model] [PhD thesis]. Beijing: Renmin University of China; 2012.
28. Wang K. Jingji zengzhang, jianpin he zhongguo senlin zhuanxing (Chinese) [Economic growth, poverty reduction and forest transformation in China] [PhD thesis]. Beijing: Renmin University of China; 2013.
29. Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P. Land use transitions: Socioecological feedback versus socio–economic change. Land Use Policy 2010; (27): 108–118.
30. Mathera S, Fairbairn J. From floods to reforestation: The forest transition in Switzerland. Environment and History 2000; 6(4): 399–421.
31. Xu J, Yang Y, Jefferson F, et al. Forest transition, its causes and environmental consequences: Empirical evidence from Yunnan of Southwest China. Tropical Ecology 2007; 48(2): 137–150.
32. Uddin SN, Taplin R, Yang XJ. Energy, environment and development in Bhutan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2007; 11(9): 2083–2103.
33. Nagendra H. Drivers of reforestation in human–dominated forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007; 104(39): 15218–15223.
34. Meyfroidt P, Rudel TK, Lambin EF. Forest transitions, trade and the global displacement of land use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010; 107(49): 20917–20922.
35. Hecht SB, Kandel S, Gomes I, et al. Globalization, forest resurgence, and environmental politics in El Salvador. World Development 2006; 34(2): 308–323.
36. Klooster D. Forest transitions in Mexico: Institutions and forests in a globalized countryside. Professional Geographer 2003; 55(2): 227–237.
37. Jorgensen AK. Structural integration and the trees: An analysis of deforestation in less–developed countries 1990–2005. The Sociological Quarterly 2008; 49(3): 503–527.
38. Zoomers A. Globalization and the foreignization of space: Seven processes driving the current global land grab. Journal of Peasant Studies 2010; 37(2): 429–447.
39. Kull CA, Ibrahim CK, Meredith TC. Tropical forest transitions and globalization: Neo–liberalism, migration, tourism, and international conservation agendas. Society & Natural Resources 2007; 20(8): 723–737.
40. Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011; 108(9): 3465–3472.
41. Wittemyer G, Elsen P, Bean WT, et al. Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges. Science 2008; 321(5885): 123–126.
42. Gao T. Foreign direct investment and growth under economic integration. Journal of International Economics 2005; 67(1): 157–174.
43. Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF. Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009; 106(38): 16139–16144.
44. Michon G, Foresta HD, Levang P, et al. Domestic forests: A new paradigm for integrating local communities’ forestry into tropical forest science. Ecology and Society 2007; 12(2): 1–24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/sf.v4i2.1608
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Lingchao Li, Jinlong Liu, Weina Sun, Baodong Cheng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.