Optimization strategy of national park resource utilization system—Take Bawangling Zone of Hainan Tropical Rain Forest National Park as an example

Shuwen Xiao, Chen Zhan, Mengqiao Wang, Qiaoyun Sun, Yujun Zhang

Article ID: 1607
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2021

VIEWS - 916 (Abstract) 238 (PDF)

Abstract


The national park with Chinese characteristics is the highest level of protection of a kind of natural protection, its establishment marks the park will implement the strictest ecological protection means. It is of great value to construct the utilization system of national park resources under the new natural protected area system in the new era to avoid the misunderstanding of “ecological protection only” and explore how to carry out the sustainable utilization of resources in the reform of national park system and mechanism. According to the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Delphi method, the evaluation framework, indicators, reference standards and weights of resource utilization under the national park system were determined in combination with the requirements of constructing the protected natural area system and the total value of resource ecosystem services (including harvest value, existence value and future value). Based on the application research of Bawangling zone of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park, the optimal resource utilization system in the future was proposed, and two optimization strategies of ecological adjustment of resource utilization system and construction of suitable resource utilization system were put forward.


Keywords


National Park; Resources Utilization; Ecosystem Service Value; Industrial Structure; Sustainable Development

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Ma H. Shenme shi zhongguotese de guojiagongyuan he ziranbaohudi tixi (Chinese) [What is the Chinese characteristic system of national parks and nature reserve] [Internet]. 2021 [accessed 2001 March 1]. Available from: https://cenews.com.cn/opinion/202103/t20210301_970940.html.

2. Wang D, Qiao Y, Zhang B, et al. Consideration about strategy of national parks’ construction and development. Forest Resources Management 2018; (4): 6–9.

3. Bi Y, Li L, Zhang Y. Interests coordination mechanism establishment for stakeholders of three-river-source national park. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry 2019;17(3): 35–39.

4. Bi Y, Li L, Zhang Y. DART model construction of value co-creation for national park stakeholders in China. Chinese Landscape Architecture 2019; 35(7): 97–101.

5. Zheng Y, Jia Q, Zhang Y. On the adaptive co-management of national park ecosystem. Journal of Beijing forestry university (Social Sciences) 2017; 16(4): 21–26.

6. Su H, Luo M, Su Y. “The strictest protection” should be “the strictest conservation based on science”: Analysis of “National Parks Should Perform the Strictest Conservation”. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science) 2019; 18(1): 13–21.

7. Yang R. Thinking on the Six Characteristics of Chinese national park system construction. Environmental Protection 2019; 47(Z1): 24–27.

8. Ma L, Meng L. Guojia gongyuan baohu yu liyong de bianzheng guanxi (Chinese) [The dialectical relationship between protection and utilization of national parks and countermeasures for coordinated development]. Journal of Chongqing University of Education 2020; 33(5): 24–27.

9. Yang R. Guard Chinese national parks against deterioration. Environmental Protection 2015; 43(14): 34–37.

10. Luo S. Study on the planning of traditional utilization area of national parks [PhD thesis]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University; 2017.

11. Fu M, Zhu Y. Study on ecological protection path of three-river-source national park. Environmental Ecology 2021; 3(3): 97–102.

12. Yang J, Shang Q, Zhang Y. Research on community participation mechanism in national parks management in China. World Forestry Research 2018; 31(4): 76–80.

13. Cheng Z. Jiyu ziyuan pingjia de guojia gongyuan youqi zhanshiqu gongneng fenqu moxing yanjiu (Chinese) [Research on functional zoning model of national park recreation exhibition Area based on resource evaluation] [PhD thesis]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2018.

14. Zang Z, Xu W, Ouyang Z. Exploration on the value realization of ecological products in China’s national park system pilots. Biodiversity Science 2021, 29(3): 275–277.

15. Ma W. Yinchun guoyou linqu shengtai baohu yu jignji zhuanxing wenti yanjiu (Chinese) [Research on ecological protection and economic transformation in Yichun State-owned forest region] [PhD thesis]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University; 2012.

16. Zhi R. Neimenggu linye chanye jiegou youhua yanjiu (Chinese) [Research on optimization of forestry industrial structure in inner mongolia] [PhD thesis]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University; 2019.

17. Huang S. Mianxiang SDGs de ziran ziyuan kechixu liyong de pingjia yanjiu (Chinese) [Evaluation of sustainable use of natural resources for SDGs] [PhD thesis]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University; 2020.

18. Zhang Y, Xue B. Guojia gongyuan kaizhan shengtai lvyou he youqi huodong de shiyixing tantao (Chinese) [Study on the suitability of ecotourism and recreation activities in national parks]. Tourism Tribune 2018; 33(8): 14–16.

19. Zhang Y, Zhang H. Guojia gongyuan de youqi liyong guizhi (Chinese) [Recreational utilization regulations in national parks]. Tourism Science 2019; 34(3): 5–7.

20. He F. Guangxiqu linye youshi chanye kechixu fazhan yanjiu (Chinese) [Research on sustainable development of forestry advantageous industries in Guangxi] [PhD thesis]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology; 2016.

21. Zhang L. Jiyu dingxing yu dingliang jiehe de Qinghaisheng xitong meixue jiazhi zonghe pinggu yanjiu (Chinese) [Research on comprehensive evaluation of ecosystem aesthetic value in Qinghai province based on the combination of qualitative and quantitative] [PhD thesis]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University; 2015.

22. Ouyang Z, Lin Y, Song C. Research on gross ecosystem product (GEP): Case study of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province. Environment and Sustainable Development 2020; 45(6): 80–85.

23. Kong L, Zheng H, Ouyang Z. Ecological protection and restoration of forest, wetland, grassland and cropland based on the perspective of ecosystem services: A case study in Dongting Lake Watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2019; 39(23): 8903–8910.

24. Zhang X, Li Y. Ecosystem services and sustainable sevelopment. Ecological Science 2004; (3): 286–288.

25. Primack RB. Conservation biology. Beijing: Science Press; 2013.

26. Lal R, Smith P, Jungkunst HF. The carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2018; 73(6): 145A.

27. Robert C, Ralph D, Rudolf DG. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological ecology Economics 1998; 25(1): 253–260.

28.

29. Cao A, Wang J, Su Y, et al. Study on construction and application of evaluation index system for sustainable development of urban social forestry. Forest Economics 2019; 41(1): 104–111.

30. Zhang J, Liu Q, Shi J, et al. Analysis and inspiration from international typical sustainable development index system. China Environmental Management 2020; 12(4): 89–95.

31. Xiang C. Linnong fuhe shengtai xitong pingjia zhibiao tixi tantao (Chinese) [Discussion on the evaluation index system of forest-agricultural complex ecosystem]. Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology 1994; (3): 30–35.

32. Li J, Chen Y, Dong L, et al. Analysis of the optimization on environmental profit and loss within green development indicator system. Ecological Economy 2020; 36(11): 209–214.

33. Wang X, Gao Y. Quyu lvyou kechixu fazhanli pingjia zhibiao tixi goujian yu pingjia shizheng yanjiu (Chinese) [Construction and empirical study of evaluation index system of regional tourism sustainable development capability]. Exploration of Economic Problems 2008; (1): 137–140.

34. Tao B. Shengtai lvyou chanye kechixu fazhan yanjiu (Chinese) [Research on sustainable development of eco-tourism industry] [PhD thesis]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology; 2012.

35. Wu Z. Shengwu duoyangxing jaince zhibiao tixi goujian yanjiu jinzhn (Chinese) [Research progress on the construction of biodiversity monitoring index system]. Bioscience World 2015; (5): 2.

36. Liao P, Jiang Z, Luo W, et al. Progress of research and prospect on evaluation methods of carbon sink. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Sciences 2011; 27(1): 39–43.

37. Xu H, Li M, Liang H, et al. Review of the evaluation index system for degraded forest ecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2018; 38(24): 9034–9042.

38. Chen X. Woguo tese xiaozhen zhudao chanye xuanze yanjiu (Chinese) [Research on the selection of leading industries in characteristic towns in my country] [PhD thesis]. Jinan: Shandong Jianzhu University; 2017.

39. Cheng X. Xiangcun chanye xuanze yu fazhan yanjiu (Chinese) [Research on the selection and development of rural industries] [PhD thesis]. Xi’an: Northwest University; 2018.

40. Leng S, Liu Y. A conceptual framework of sustainable developmental indicators of fragile environment of China. China Population, Resources and Environment 1999; (2): 42–47.

41. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Indicators of sustainable development: Guidelines and methodologies. New York: United Nations Publications; 2007.

42. China Center for International Economic Exchanges, Earth Institute of Columbia University. Evaluation Report of China’s Sustainable Development (2019). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press; 2019.

43. National Forestry and Grassland Administration. China Forestry and Grassland Yearbook 2019. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House; 2019.

44. Sutton PC, Duncan SL, Anderson SJ. Valuing our national parks: An ecological economics perspective. Land 2019; 8(4): 1–17.

45. Malczewski J. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview. Progress in Planning 2004; 62(1): 3–65.

46. Hopkins LD. Methods for driving land suitability maps: A comparative Evaluation. In: Ndubisi FO (editor). The Ecological Design and Planning Reader. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2014.

47. Cengiz T, Akbulak C. Application of analytical hierarchy process and geographic information systems in land-use suitability. The evaluation: A Case Study of Dümrek Village (Çanakkale, Turkey). International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 2009; 16: 286–294.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/sf.v4i2.1607

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Shuwen Xiao, Chen Zhan, Mengqiao Wang, Qiaoyun Sun, Yujun Zhang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.