Study on the Legal Mechanism of Grassroots Governance in the Song Dynasty

Ning Wang

Article ID: 5068
Vol 7, Issue 3, 2024

VIEWS - 68 (Abstract) 55 (PDF)

Abstract


The organic combination of clans, townships and scholars constituted the grassroots social governance order in the Song Dynasty.
The development of the commodity economy and the change of land policy in the Northern Song Dynasty promoted the class differentiation
and the change of values in the rural society. In the face of numerous civil lawsuits, the limited governance resources of the government
could not adequately respond to the needs of grassroots governance, and the local elites often took the initiative to assume the responsibility
of grassroots governance in order to seek social status, thus forming the governance structure of “the imperial power to rule the country, and
the gentry to build the society”. In addition, the state policy of ruling the country by literature and the development of the imperial examination system in the Song Dynasty promoted the rise of the scholarly class, who attempted to reshape the grass-roots social order by Confucian
rituals and rule, and invested in the practice of governance of the vernacular society together with the gentry, whose grass-roots governance
practices, such as clan autonomy and township covenant, mediated disputes with the family law and the Confucian scriptures and doctrines,
which embodied the Confucian ideals of indoctrination and education to transform people into a customary society.

Keywords


Song Dynasty Grassroots Governance; National Law; Civil Law

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. [1] Luo Guannan. Legal Mechanisms and Experiences of Grassroots Governance in Traditional Chinese Society [J]. Politics and Law

2. Forum, 2021, 39(02): 129-137.

3. [2] Wang Zhiqiang, “Value Orientation in Southern Song Judicial Adjudication - A Primer on Southern Song Book Judgements,” in

4. Chinese Social Sciences, No. 6, 1998.

5. [3] Li Xiaoyan. The Double Logic of Social Mobilisation: Social Rationality and Elite Governance[J]. Party and Government Research, 2020, (05): 109-118.

6. [4] Fei Zhengqing. The United States and China[M], The Commercial Press, 1987.

7. [5] Dong Jianhui. “Township Covenant” is not equal to “Township Rules and Regulations”[J]. Xiamen University Journal (Philosophy

8. and Social Science Edition), 2006, (02): 51-58.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/ijmss.v7i3.5068

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.