Policy-Making Report: New Policies on Releasing the “Double Reduction” Impact from the Perspective of Stakeholder Theory and Policy Network

Yifang Chen

Article ID: 4036
Vol 6, Issue 6, 2023

VIEWS - 125 (Abstract) 163 (PDF)

Abstract


The CPC Central Committee General Office and the State Council General Office jointly promulgated the Opinions on Further
Reducing the Homework and Off-campus Training Burden of Compulsory Education Students in in July 2021. The opinions makes it clear
the hours of after-school service, and allow schools to coordinate teachers in the implementation of “ working hours” in a flexible manner.
Schools are thus required to make improvement in the after-class service quality, organize interest-cultivation groups and various club ac_x005ftivities. However, this regulation change seem to create burden for several different interest groups in China.This study will concentrate on
analyzing the underlying causes and contradictions in the process of policy implementation by combining the policy network theory and the
relevant stakeholder analysis tools, and look for the optimization strategies meeting the interests and needs parties. Hence, it will certainly
facilitate the implementation of after-school services in an all-around manner under the background of “double reduction” policy.

Keywords


Double Reduction; Educational Policy; Policy Network; Case Study

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. [1] Cao ZH. (2011). China’s governance system and its stability mechanism Sociological Research (01), 1-40+243.

2. [2] Chen QL. (2021). “Double reduction” policy network structure, interest game and governance path Teacher Education Forum (10),

3. 8-12.

4. [3] China Education News Network: Flexible Work Schedule in primary and secondary schools: More Active or Lazy (November 15,

5. 2022). Retrieved November 25, from: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1749549876533133808&wfr=spider&for =pc.

6. [4] Chinese Entrepreneu. (2021). The K-12 Education is Dead! What will Happen to the 700,000 education and training institutions

7. that employ 10 million people?

8. [5] De Mesquita, B.B., Downs, G.W., Smith, A., & Cherif, F. M. (2005). Thinking inside the box: A closer look at democracy and hu_x005fman rights. International Studies Quarterly, 49(3), 439-457.

9. [6] Deng XF (2021-09-20). School education does this to reduce the burden and increase the quality. Sichuan Daily,003.

10. [7] Dickson, Bruce J.(2003), Red Capitalist in China:The Party, Private Entrepreneurs, and Prospects for Political Change. Cambridge,

11. England:Cambridge University Press.

12. [8] Gao W, Zhou J & Li ZY. 2011. After-school services in primary and secondary schools in the context of “double reduction”: A review of problems and practices beyond. China Education (05), 35-41+58.

13. [9] Ge LL. (2017). Research on the influence of online public opinion on the process of public policy formulation in China. Moderni-zation of Education (09), 211-212.

14. [10] Huang LY. (2022). The attribution of primary school teachers’ job burnout under the background of “double reduction” - from the

15. perspective of gender Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) (03), 50-62.

16. [11] Jin YF, Sun BB & Zhang MY. (2021). The history, problems, and prospects of after-school services in primary and secondary

17. schools. Educational Science Research (11), 5-10.

18. [12] Kang, LY. (2020). Promoting children’s growth: A discussion on the collaborative education of multiple subjects in after-school

19. services. Chinese Journal of Education (03), 22-26.

20. [13] Krone, R. M. (1985). Systems analysis and policy sciences; theory and practice.

21. [14] Li YZ. (2014). Inter governmental linkage from the perspective of policy network - a case study based on the implementation of

22. Chongqing’s local ticket policy China Administration (10), 95-100.

23. [15] Liu SH, Li MT & Zhu XH. (2018). A study on labor pricing, differential compensation and micro-incentives for comprehensive

24. treatment of rural teachers. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) (04), 183-189.

25. [16] Liu SS and Liu DH. (2022). The Game Dilemma and Breakthrough of the Implementation of “Double Reduction”Policy from the

26. Perspective of Stakeholders. Contemporary Educational Science (08), 11-17.

27. [17] Long BX. (2021). The Orientation and Improvement of Schools’ After-school Service under the Background of City, Yunnan

28. Province. China Electrochemical Education(11),17-22+31.

29. [18] Marsh, D. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

30. [19] Ma JS. & Zou W. (2019). The “3:30 Phenomenon” and Its Governance: An Analysis Based on the Perspective of School Multifunctionality. Educational Research (04), 118-125.

31. [20] Ministry of Finance Policy Information, (2022), available from: http://www.gov. cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-11/01/content_5722900.htm.

32. [21] Oliver Wyman. (2020). China K12 Education Training To B Market Development Report

33. [22] Policy Information of Shenzhen Education Bureau (2022) available from: http://www.sz.gov.cn/cn/xxgk/zfxxgj/bmdt/content/

34. post_10227355.html

35. [23] Rhodes, R.A.W. & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European journal of political research,

36. 21(1‐2), 181-205.

37. [24] Shi DS, Li L, Zhao SN & Chu L. (2022).“ Research on Primary School After-school Services under the Background of “Double

38. Reduction” Policy: Current Situation, Problems and Countermeasures——Based on the Investigation and Analysis of Nine Counties and

39. One District in HAnnouncement of Shenzhen Education Bureau, (2022) available from: http://www.sz.gov.cn/cn/xxgk/zfxxgj/bmdt/ content/

40. post_10227355.html.

41. [25] Teets, J. (2018). The power of policy networks in authoritarian regimes: Changing environmental policy in China. Governance,

42. 31(1), 125-141.

43. [26] Tencent News, (2021) https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20210826A089KF00

44. [27] The “Double Reduction” Policy. Journal of Beijing Institute of Education (06), 1-11.

45. [28] Wang Y. (2021). Education experts talk about “double reduction”: “reduction” will be “increased” after “reduction”. Xinmin

46. Weekly (35), 8-11.

47. [29] Wang WF, Wang TT(2022). Journal of Fuyang Vocational and Technical College (03), 101-105.

48. [30] Wang J. (2022). Problems and strategies of basic education reform in the context of the “double reduction” policy Journal of Yuzhang Normal University (04), 121-124.

49. [31] Wu HH & Hu JS. (2017). Why custodianship has become an unbearable burden for compulsory education schools - A reality

50. check based on Guangzhou city. Journal of Education Science, Hunan Normal University (05), 27-34.

51. [32] Xiong X & Liu YJ. (2019). The way of emergence, development difficulties, and experiences of after-school education in elementary and secondary schools in the United States. Educational Science Research (06), 81-86.

52. [33] Yang MW & Li XY. (2022). Problems and coping strategies in after-school services in primary schools: Based on the perspective

53. of social work. Journal of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University(04),49-53+123.

54. [34] Yu XD & Chen C. (2021). Guangzhou Exploration: “Double Reduction” dilemma and Countermeasures —— 2021 “Basic Education Governance and Innovation Research Center after-school Care and External Training Governance” of South China Normal University.

55. Modern education theory(06), 91-92.

56. [35] Yu H. (2021). Rebuilding Publicity of Fundamental Education in the Era of“Double Reduction”and Concerns of Equity. Nanjing

57. Social Sciences (12), 145-153+170.

58. [36] Yu MA. (2022). Challenges and responses of after-school services in primary and secondary schools in the context of “double reduction”-an analysis based on Jiangsu Province. Shanghai Educational Research (03), 11-16.

59. [37] Zhang SC & Xiong LT. (2022).“ The dilemma and solution of the implementation of “double reduction”. Journal of Southwest

60. University (Social Science Edition)(05),149-158.

61. [38] Zhou LA. (2008). Differences in Public Services of Local Governments in China: A Theoretical Hypothesis and Evidence, Journal

62. of Xinyu College (04), 5-6.

63. [39] Zhou LA. Administrative contract system [J]. Journal of society, 2014, (6) : 1-38.

64. [40] Zhou ZR & Jiang MJ. (2013). Analysis of the Chinese government’s cross sectoral coordination mechanism - a narrative and diagnostic framework Pu. Public Administration Review(01),91-117+170.

65. [41] Zhaopin. (2021). 2021 Analysis Report on the Talent Market of the Education and Training Industry. Available from: https://www.199it.com/archives/1365971.html.

66. [42] Zhang, W. (2022). Can After-school Service in Primary and Secondary Schools Promote Educational Equity?. Best Evidence in

67. Chinese Education, 10(1), 1344-1345.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/ijmss.v6i6.4036

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.