A Comparative Analysis of Old and New High School Mathematics Textbooks from the Perspective of Mathematics Core Literacy -- Taking the Trigonometric Function Content of the Human Education Edition as an Example

Hui Liu, Fang Tian

Article ID: 3731
Vol 6, Issue 5, 2023

VIEWS - 396 (Abstract) 145 (PDF)

Abstract


The promulgation of the Curriculum Standards for ordinary high School (2017 edition, 2020 revision) has effectively promoted the reform of high school mathematics classroom. In order to cope with the change of textbook content in the new curriculum reform, it has become one of the important tasks for high school mathematics teachers to implement teaching activities better and sort out and analyze the differences between the old and new textbooks. This paper analyzes the differences between old and new textbooks from the three dimensions of system structure, course content and example exercises, and gives some reasonable teaching suggestions. Among them, the new textbook uses 2019 "Ordinary High School Textbook" person-taught A version of Compulsory Mathematics 1, and the old textbook uses 2004 "Ordinary High School Mathematics Curriculum Standard Experimental Textbook" person-taught A version of compulsory Mathematics 4. In general, the adjustment of the new teaching materials is more in line with the cognitive characteristics of students, pay attention to the penetration of mathematical culture and pay attention to the development of students' mathematical core literacy.


Keywords


Mathematics Core Accomplishment; High School Mathematics; Textbook Comparison; Trigonometric Function

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Mathematics Curriculum Standard for ordinary high school (revised in 2017 edition 202) [M]. Beijing: People's Education Out Society,2020.

2. Lin JN. Simultaneous Cultivation of "Five Educations" : An Exploration of Assisted teaching Behavior in Senior Mathematics classroom based on moral cultivation [J]. Journal of Mathematics Teaching,2022,No.796(15):3-5+12.

3. Xu JX, Chen LZ. A comparative study on the contents of the Concept of Trigonometric Functions in the two textbooks [J]. Fujian High School, 2020, No. 344(08):20-23.

4. Xiang YY, Ye ML. Comparative analysis of high school mathematics textbooks from the perspective of Core literacy: A case study of solid geometry [J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 201,36(08):25-31+52.

5. Xie LL. Implementing Reasoning and Operational Literacy in Algebraic Demonstration: A Comparative analysis of the contents of "Basic Inequalities" in the new and old textbooks of the A edition of Human Education [J]. Mathematical Letters, 2021, No.847(02): 8-11.

6. Xin JX. Textbook Context Design based on new curriculum Standards: Connotation, significance and strategy [J]. Curriculum. Teaching Materials. Teaching Methods, 202, 42(12): 67-73.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/ijmss.v6i5.3731

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.