On whether bureaucracy is a major obstacle to public administration reform

Kailun Li

Article ID: 2661
Vol 6, Issue 3, 2023

VIEWS - 694 (Abstract) 72 (PDF)

Abstract


Public administration reform is a very critical reform activity of the government, the government changing the function, structure, behavior, and process of public administration. The change of public administration involves many aspects, this reform has many complex and multifaceted issues. The central idea of bureaucracy is entirely contrary to the concept of public administration reform, and bureaucracy has a deep-rooted impact on the administration of most countries. Hence bureaucracy is the main obstacle to the public administration reform. Besides, incomplete decentralization and imperfect supervision are also challenges of public administration reform. Devolution is an essential measure to promote the public administration reform, which can solve many problems of the old system effectively.  Therefore, to carry out the public administrative reform effectively, it is necessary to simplify managerial procedures, delegate powers to lower levels and strengthen supervision, and management.


Keywords


Bureaucratic; Public Administration Reform; Decentralization

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Asatryan, Z., Heinemann, F., and Pitlik H. (2015). Reforming the Public Administration: The Role of Crisis and the Power of Bureaucracy. Discussion Paper, PP15-049.

2. Bulut,E., and B, Abdow. (2018). Decentralization and Poverty Reduction: Opportunities and Challenges in Kenya. Sosyoekonomi, Vol.26p.179-197.

3. Balla, S., and Gormley W. (2017). Bureaucracy and democracy: Accountability and performance. London: sage.

4. Gotz, A., Grotz, F., and Weber T. (2018). Party Government and Administrative Reform: Evidence From the German Länder. Administration and Society, 50(6), pp. 778–811.

5. Hugue, A., and Ferdous, J. (2019). Bureaucratic and political leadership in Bangladesh: dynamics of administrative reform and the public interest. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp169-180.

6. Kim, S., and Han C. (2015). Administrative reform in South Korea: New Public Management and the bureaucracy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 81(4) 694–712.

7. Koo, J., and Kim, B. (2018). Two faces of decentralization in south korea. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(3), 291-302.

8. Kuldeep, M., and Navdeep M. (2017). Assessing Administrative Reform in India. Chinese Political Science Review, Vol.2(1), pp.40-55.

9. Mathur, K., and Mathur N. (2017). Assessing Administrative Reform in India. Chinese Political Science Review. pp40-55.

10. Seregina, T. (2015). Administrative-territorial reform as a part decentralization in the republic of Estonia. Is Part of Aspekti Publìčnogo Upravlìnnâ, Vol.3.

11. Wagana,D., Lravo, A., Nzulwa, D., and Kihoro M. (2016). The Moderating Effects of E-Government on the Relationship Between Administrative Decentralization and Service Delivery In County Governments In Kenya. European Scientific Journal, Vol.12(17).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/ijmss.v6i3.2661

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.