Verbal Humor in Chinese Debate From the Perspective of Cooperative Principle ——Taking Let’s Talk for Example
Vol 7, Issue 10, 2024
VIEWS - 9 (Abstract) 12 (PDF)
Abstract
mainly three findings: firstly, the essence of debating language is violating the maxim of quantity. Secondly, sometimes it is necessary for
debaters to confound some concepts to confuse opponents and create humor. Thirdly, the violations of CP frequently emerging in debating
can be employed as a strong strategy to create humor, engage and persuade audience. This paper hopes to provide rhetorical and pragmatic
strategies for debaters in Chinese debating.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. [1]Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and Conversation [A]. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics [C]. New York: Academic
2. Press. 45-46.
3. [2]Raskin, V. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor [M]. Dordreche: Reidel.
4. [3]Sperber, D. & D. Wilson 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction [J]. Philosophy 3: 143-184.
5. [4]Tao Guo Wentao (Guo, Wentao), 2013, humorous interpretation from the perspective of cooperative principles ——takes The Adventures of Huckleberry feen as an example [D], master's thesis. Jinan: Shandong University of Finance and Economics.
6. [5]Li Qing (Li, Qi), Shi Xiaoling (Shi, Xiaoling), 2013, Humor in the Big Bang Theory from the perspective of Glass’s Cooperation
7. Principles [J], Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition) (1): 46-58.
8. [6]Li Advanced (Li, Xianjin), 2013, research on Chinese humorous text characteristics based on the corpus [J], Journal of Foreign Language Studies (6): 47-50.
9. [7]Liu Naishi (Liu, Naishi), 2002, trial analysis of the pragmatic cooperation principles of humor [J], Tsinghua University Education
10. Research (1): 140-144.
11. [8]Liu Xiangyu (Liu, Xiangyu), 2016, verbal humor research of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone [D] from the perspective of conversation cooperation principle, master’s thesis. Changchun: Jilin University.
12. [9]Ma Congcong (Ma, Congcong), 2021, research on the position expression mode of the debate talk program——takes the opening
13. link of "Strange Talk" and The Debaters as examples [D], master's thesis. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
14. [10]Su Yihua (Su, Yi), 2015, Speech humor mechanism and quantitative research [J], Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching (3): 68-86.
15. [11]Sun Xiaojiao (Sun, Xiaojiao), 2018, discourse research [D], master’s thesis. Qufu: Qufu Normal University.
16. [12]Yan Haiying (Yan, Haiying), 2010, Compliance and violation of the principle of Cooperation [J], Journal of Liaoning Engineering
17. And Technical University (Social Science Edition) (1): 76-78.
18. [13]Zheng Min (Zheng, Min), 2019, online entertainment talk show “Strange Talk” humorous language research [D], master’s thesis.
19. Jinhua: Zhejiang Normal University.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/ijmss.v7i10.10156
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.