Decontamination of surface water from organic pollutants using graphene membranes

Stefano Bellucci

Article ID: 2033
Vol 6, Issue 1, 2023

VIEWS - 1009 (Abstract) 235 (PDF)

Abstract


In this paper, we deal with one of the most urgent and relevant topics nowadays, i.e., water pollution. The problem is finding a valid candidate for the absorption and removal of different kinds of pollutants commonly found in water. There are already some indications about graphene oxide as a potential candidate. In the present work, we take a step forward to show how graphene nanoplatelets (rather than the oxide form of this material) are capable of decontaminating water. In this starting step, we use a specific substance as a model pollutant, i.e., acetonitrile, leaving for the future steps, to extend the analysis to additional types of pollutants. In addition to laboratory-produced graphene nanoplatelets, we already examined in the past; now we wish to consider also commercially available ones, so that the new results will not be bound to a laboratory (low technology readiness level) material, but will become interesting also from the industrial point of view, thanks to the scalability of the nanoplatelets production. For this aim, we compare the performance of two types of filters based on two classes of nanomaterials, i.e., those produced by microwave and ultrasound assisted exfoliation, already analyzed in our earlier works, with those commercially distributed by an Italian company, i.e., NANESA, http://www.nanesa.com/. The latter is an innovative SME involved in the production of graphene-based nanomaterials. We focus here in the graphene nanoplatelets, commercially available in industrial batches (GXNan grades). The present study leads to determine which filtering membrane, among the various types of commercial graphene considered, shows the greatest stability, and the lack of breakage of the membrane, concentrating on such accessory features, given that all types of graphene showed excellent adsorption properties.


Keywords


Water Decontamination; Graphene Nanoplatelets; Acetonitrile; Filtering Membranes

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Chuanuwatanakul S, Dungchai W, Chailapakul O, Motomizu S. Determination of trace heavy metals by sequential injection-anodic stripping voltammetry using bismuth film screen-printed printed carbon electrode. Analytical Sciences 2008; 24(5): 589–594. doi: 10.2116/analsci.24.589.

2. Sui Zh, Meng Q, Zhang X, et al. Green synthesis of Carbon nanotube-graphene hybrid aerogels and their use as versatile agents for water purification. Journal of Materials Chemistry 2012; 22(18): 8767–8771. doi: 10.1039/C2JM00055E.

3. Wang H, Yuan X, Wu Y, et al. Adsorption characteristics and behaviors of graphene oxide for Zn(II) removal from aqueous solution. Applied Surface Science 2013; 279: 432–440. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.133.

4. Ferrari AC, Meyer JC, Scardaci V, et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Physical Review Letters 2006; 97(18): 87401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401.

5. Ferrigno L, Cataldo A, Sibilia S, et al. A monitorable and renewable pollution filter based on graphene nanoplatelets. Nanotechnology 2020; 31: 075701. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab5072.

6. Miele G, Bellucci S, Cataldo A, et al. Electrical impedance spectroscopy for real-time monitoring of the life cycle of graphene nanoplatelets filters for some organic industrial pollutants. Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2021; 70: 1503912. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2021.3089247.

7. Gomez CV, Guevara M, Tene T, et al. The liquid exfoliation of graphene in polar solvents. Applied Surface Science 2021; 546: 149046. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149046.

8. Sibilia S, Bertocchi F, Chiodini S, et al. Temperature-dependent electrical resistivity of macroscopic graphene nanoplatelet strips. Nanotechnology 2021; 32: 275701. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/abef95.

9. Nanesa [Internet]. Available from: http://nanesa.com/en-US/Graphene.

10. Dabrowska A, Bellucci S, Cataldo A, et al. Nanocomposites of epoxy resin with graphene nanoplates and exfoliated graphite: Synthesis and electrical properties. Basic Solid State Physics 2014; 251(12): 2599–2602. doi: 10.1002/pssb.201451175.

11. Bellucci S. Study of graphene epoxy/nanoplatelets thin films subjected to aging in corrosive environments. Journal of Composites Science 2022; 6(2): 39. doi: 10.3390/jcs6020039.

12. Almasian A, Mahmoodi NM, Olya ME. Tectomer grafted nanofiber: Synthesis, characterization and dye removal ability from multicomponent system. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 2015; 32: 85–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.08.002.

13. Mahmoodi NM, Ghezelbash M, Shabanian M, et al. Efficient removal of cationic dyes from colored wastewaters by dithiocarbamate-functionalized graphene oxide nanosheets: From synthesis to detailed kinetics studies. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 2017; 81: 239–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.10.011.

14. Hosseini F, Sadighian S, Monfared HH, Mahmoodi NM. Dye removal and kinetics of adsorption by magnetic chitosan nanoparticles. Desalination and Water Treatment 2016; 57: 24378–24386. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1143879.

15. Almasian A, Olya ME, Mahmoodi NM. Preparation and adsorption behavior of diethylenetriamine/polyacrylonitrile composite nanofibers for a direct dye removal. Fibers and Polymers 2015; 16(9): 1925–1934. doi: 10.1007/s12221-015-4624-3.

16. Hayati B, Mahmoodi NM, Arami M, Mazaher F. Dye removal from colored textile wastewater by poly(propylene imine) dendrimer: Operational parameters and isotherm studies. Clean Soil, Air, Water 2011; 39: 673–679. doi: 10.1002/clen.201000182.

17. Mahmoodi NM, Bashiri M, Moeen SJ. Synthesis of nickel–zinc ferrite magnetic nanoparticle and dye degradation using photocatalytic ozonation. Materials Research Bulletin 2012; 47: 4403–4408. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.09.036.

18. Mahmood NM. Equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics of dye removal using alginate in binary systems. Research on Chemical Intermediates 2015; 41: 3743–3757. doi: 10.1021/je101276x.

19. Mahmoodi NM. Synthesis of magnetic carbon nanotube and photocatalytic dye degradation ability. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2014; 186: 5595–5604. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3805-7.

20. Mahmoodi NM, Hayati B, Bahrami H, Arami M. Dye adsorption and desorption properties of Mentha pulegium in single and binary systems. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2011; 122: 1489–1499. doi: 10.1002/app.34235.

21. Sharam R, Leila M, Mazaheri F, Mahmoodi NM. Degumming of Persian silk with mixed proteolytic enzymes. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2007; 106: 267–275. doi: 10.1002/app.26492.

22. Mahmoodi NM, Moghimi F, Arami M, et al. Silk degumming using microwave irradiation as an environmentally friendly surface modification method. Fibers and Polymers 2010; 11: 234–240. doi: 10.1007/S12221-010-0234-2.

23. Mahmoodi NM, Saffar-Dastgerdi MH, Hayati B. Environmentally friendly novel covalently immobilized enzyme bionanocomposite: From synthesis to the destruction of pollutant. Composites Part B: Engineering 2020; 184: 107666. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107666.

24. Asefi D, Arami M, Sarabi AA, Mahmoodi NM. The chain length influence of cationic surfactant and role of nonionic co-surfactants on controlling the corrosion rate of steel in acidic media. Corrosion Science 2009; 51(8): 1817–1821. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.05.007.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/can.v6i1.2033

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Stefano Bellucci

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.