Sapindus emarginatus extract embedded with gold nanoparticles: An antiproliferative agent against MCF7 breast cancer cell line

S Vignesh Kumar, V Kavimani

Article ID: 1293
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2021

VIEWS - 999 (Abstract) 265 (PDF)

Abstract


There are numerous studies reported on the usage of the sapindus emarginatus (SE) fruit in cancer and other treatments in the past few years. In this study, crude SE fruit extract was prepared and it was further used to synthesis gold nanoparticles (Au Nps). The synthesized Au Nps were left embedded in the SE fruit extract. The Au Nps embedded in the SE fruit extract (SE-Au Nps) were characterized using UV-Visiable Spectroscopy, Centrifugal Particle Size analyzer (CPS), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). MTT assay was carried out for both SE fruit extract and SE-Au Nps on MCF7 breast cancer cell line and thus compared. The UV-Visible Absorbance for the SE-Au Nps was obtained at 543 nm. The centrifugal particle size analysis of the Au Nps embedded in SE fruit extract showed the size of the nanoparticles to be widely varying with higher fraction of particles between the size ranges of 15 to 20 nm. The morphology of the Au Nps embedded in SE fruit extract was observed using SEM. The presence of Au Nps in SE fruit extract was confirmed using FTIR. The results of the MTT assay on MCF7 breast cancer cell line proved that the % cell viability was less for SE-Au Nps than that of the SE fruit extract alone. Thus, the antiproliferative activity of the SE fruit extract was significantly enhanced by embedding it with Au Nps and it can be effectively used in therapeutic applications after further studies.


Keywords


Gold Nanoparticles; Sapindus Emarginatus; Antiproliferative; MCF7

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Manoharan S, Palanimuthu D, Baskaran N, et al. Modulating effect of lupeol on the expression pattern of apoptotic markers in 7, 12-dimethylbenz (a) anthracene induced oral carcinogenesis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2012; 13(11): 5753–5757.

2. Chow AY. Cell cycle control by oncogenes and tumor suppressors: Driving the transformation of normal cells into cancerous cells. Nature Education 2010; 3(9): 7.

3. Suriamoorthy P, Zhang X, Hao G, et al. Folic acid-CdTe quantum dot conjugates and their appli-cations for cancer cell targeting. Cancer Nano 2010; 1: 19–28.

4. Dite GS, Whittemore A, Knight JA, et al. Increased cancer risks for relatives of very early-onset breast cancer cases with and without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. British Journal of Cancer 2010; 103: 1103–1108.

5. Parveen S, Sahoo SK. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and mechanism of apoptosis of doxorubicin using folate-decorated chitosan nanoparticles for targeted delivery to retinoblastoma. Cancer Nano 2010; (1)1: 47–62.

6. Holliday DL, Speirs V. Choosing the right cell line for breast cancer research. Breast Cancer Research 2011; 13: 215.

7. Selim ME, Hendi AA. Gold nanoparticles induce apoptosis in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2012; 13(4): 1617–1620

8. Florescu A, Amir E, Bouganim N, et al. Immune therapy for breast cancer in 2010 — Hype or hope? Current oncology 2011; 18(1): 9–18.

9. Parekh J, Chanda S. In vitro antibacterial activity of the crude methanol extract of Woodfordia fruticose Kurz. Flower (Lythraceae). Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 2007; 38: 204–207.

10. Mahar KS, Rana TS, Ranade SA, et al. Genetic variability and population structure in Sapindus emarginatus Vahl from India. Gene 2011; 485(1): 32–9.

11. Chattopadhyay D, Arunachalam G, Mandal SC, et al. CNS activity of Mallotus peltatus (Geist) Muell Arg. leaf: An ethnomedicine of Onge. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2003; 85(1): 99–105.

12. Nair R, Kalariya T, Chanda S. Antibacterial activity of some selected Indian medicinal flora. Turkish Journal of Biology 2005; 29: 41–47.

13. Kuznetzova TA, Anisimov MM, Popov AM. A comparative study in vitro of physiological activity of triterpene glycosides of marine invertebrates of echinoderm type. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 1982; 73C: 41–43.

14. Rao AV, Sung MK. Saponins as anticarcinogens. Journal of Nutrition 1995; 125: 717S–724S.

15. Konoshima T, Takasaki M, Tokuda H, et al. Anti-tumor-promoting activity of majonoside-R2 from Vietnamese ginseng, Panax vietnamensis HA et GRUSHV. (I). Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 1998; 21: 834–838.

16. Marino SD, Iorizzi M, Palagiano E, et al. Starfish saponins. 55. Isolation, structure elucidation, and biological activity of steroid oligoglycosides from an Antarctic starfish of the family Asteriidae. Journal of Natural Products 1998; 61: 1319–1327.

17. Mimaki Y, Kuroda M, Kameyama A, et al. Steroidal saponins from the underground parts of Ruscus aculeatus and their cytostatic activity on HL-60 cells. Phytochemistry 1998; 48: 485–493.

18. Podolak I, Elas M, Cieszka K. In vitro antifungal and cytotoxic activity of triterpene saponosides and quinoid pigments from Lysimachia vulgaris L. Phytotherapy Research 1998; 12: S70–S73.

19. Jeyabalan S, Palayan M. Antihyperlipidemic activity of Sapindus emarginatus in Triton WR-1339 induced albino rats. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2009; 2(2): 319–323.

20. Hebestreit P, Weng A, Bachran C, et al. Enhancement of cytotoxicity of lectins by Saponinum album. Toxicon 2006; 47(3): 330–335.

21. Datar RH, Richard JC. Nanomedicine: Concepts, status and the future. Medical Innovation & Business 2010; 2(3): 6–17.

22. Han G, Ghosh P, Rotello VM. Functionalized gold nanoparticle for drug delivery system. Nano-medicine 2007; 2: 113–123.

23. Jain PK, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA. Au nanoparticles target cancer. Nanotoday 2007; 2: 18.

24. Mukherjee P, Pathangey LB, Bradley JB, et al. MUC1-specific immune therapy generates a strong anti-tumor response in a MUC1-tolerant colon cancer model. Vaccine 2007; 25(9): 1607–1617.

25. Singh AK, Tripathi YB, Pandey N, et al. Enhanced anti-lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced changes in macrophage functions by Rubia cordifolia (RC) embedded with Au nanoparticles. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 2013; 65: 217–223.

26. Prawat U, Tuntiwachwuttikul P, Taylor WC. Steroidal saponins of Costus lacerus. Science Asia 1989; 15: 139–147.

27. Pina EML, Araújo FWC, Souza IA, et al. Pharmacological screening and acute toxicity of bark roots of Guettarda platypoda. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 2012; 22(6): 1315–1322.

28. Firdhouse MJ, Lalitha P, Sripathi SK. An undemanding method of synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Pisonia grandis (R.Br.) Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures. 2014; 9: 385–393.

29. Fang J, Chen X, Liu B, et al. Liquid-phase chemoselective hydrogenation of 2- ethylanthraquinone over chromium-modified nanosized amorphous Ni-B catalysts. Journal of Catalysis 2005; 229: 97–104.

30. Parida UK, Bindhani BK, Nayak P. Green synthesis and characterization of old nanoparticles using onion (Allium cepa) extract. World Journal of Nanoscience and Engineering 2011; 1: 93–98.

31. Elia P, Zach R, Hazan S, et al. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using plant extracts as reducing agents. International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014; 9: 4007–4021.

32. Baker S, Satish S. Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles by Pseudomonas veronii AS41G inhabiting Annona squamosa L. Spectrochemica Acta Part A: Molecular and Bimolecular Spectroscopy 2015; 150: 691–695.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/can.v4i2.1293

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.