Applied Chemical Engineering

Microplastic pollution has emerged as a significant environmental concern, with potential direct and indirect impacts on ecosystems. Microplastics are pervasive, found in water, food, and even the air we breathe. While their influence on human health is still unclear, microplastics are known to possess endocrine-disrupting properties and can accumulate persistent organic pollutants. Accurate measurement and categorization of microplastics are crucial to understanding their prevalence and impact on contamination. Fortunately, there are several methods available, such as visual analysis, fluorescence techniques, vibrational spectroscopy, and electron microscopy, that offer optimal accuracy in detecting and quantifying microplastics. The increasing presence of microplastics in the food chain has prompted global research efforts to assess potential risks to human health. However, despite ongoing advancements, challenges remain in standardizing analytical procedures and developing methods capable of detecting microplastics as small as nanometers. Visual classification-based methods, though limited in detecting smaller microplastics, show promise for improvement through integration with advanced technologies. This study primarily focuses on microplastic sampling strategies, detection methods, and their respective advantages and disadvantages, shedding light on the advancements and challenges in the field.

microplastics; microplastics classification; microplastics persistence; sampling methods; detection methods; FTIR; Raman; biosensors

1. Viršek MK, Palatinus A, Koren Š, et al. Protocol for microplastics sampling on the sea surface and sample analysis. Journal of Visualized Experiments 2016; 118: e55161. doi: 10.3791/55161

2. da Silva VH, Murphy F, Amigo JM, et al. Classification and quantification of microplastics (<100 μm) using a focal plane array-Fourier transform infrared imaging system and machine learning. Analytical Chemistry 2020; 92(20): 13724–13733. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01324

3. Shim WJ, Hong SH, Eo SE. Identification methods in microplastic analysis: A review. Analytical Methods 2017; 9(9): 1384–1391. doi: 10.1039/c6ay02558g

4. Zarfl C. Promising techniques and open challenges for microplastic identification and quantification in environmental matrices. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2019; 411: 3743–3756. doi: 10.1007/s00216-019-01763-9

5. Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, et al. A detailed review study on potential effects of microplastics and additives of concern on human health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020; 17(4): 1212. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041212

6. Microplastics in drinking-water. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/326499/9789241516198-eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 10 August 2022).

7. Prata JC, da Costa JP, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos T. Methods for sampling and detection of microplastics in water and sediment: A critical review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2019; 110: 150–159. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.029

8. Cole M, Lindeque P, Halsband C, Galloway TS. Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2011; 62(12): 2588–2597. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025

9. Wang T, Li B, Zou X, et al. Emission of primary microplastics in mainland China: Invisible but not negligible. Water Research 2019; 162: 214–224. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.042

10. Naidu BC, Xavier KAM, Shukla SP, et al. Comparative study on the microplastics abundance, characteristics, and possible sources in yellow clams of different demographic regions of the northwest coast of India. Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters 2022; 3: 100051. doi: 10.1016/j.hazl.2022.100051

11. Lu HC, Ziajahromi S, Neale PA, Leusch FDL. A systematic review of freshwater microplastics in water and sediments: Recommendations for harmonisation to enhance future study comparisons. Science of the Total Environment 2021; 781: 146693. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146693

12. Akdogan Z, Guven B. Microplastics in the environment: A critical review of current understanding and identification of future research needs. Environmental Pollution 2019; 254(Part A): 113011. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113011

13. La Daana KK, Officer R, Lyashevska O, et al. Microplastic abundance, distribution and composition along a latitudinal gradient in the Atlantic Ocean. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2017; 115(1–2): 307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.12.025

14. Sharma S, Sharma V, Chatterjee S. Microplastics in the Mediterranean Sea: Sources, pollution intensity, sea health, and regulatory policies. Frontiers in Marine Science 2021; 8: 634934. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.634934

15. Sunitha TG, Monisha V, Sivanesan S, et al. Micro-plastic pollution along the Bay of Bengal coastal stretch of Tamil Nadu, South India. Science of the Total Environment 2021; 756: 144073. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144073

16. Kanhai LDK, Gardfeldt K, Krumpen T, et al. Microplastics in sea ice and seawater beneath ice floes from the Arctic Ocean. Scientific Reports 2020; 10(1): 5004. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61948-6

17. Yin L, Wen X, Du C, et al. Comparison of the abundance of microplastics between rural and urban areas: A case study from East Dongting Lake. Chemosphere 2020; 244: 125486. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125486

18. Sajjad M, Huang Q, Khan S, et al. Microplastics in the soil environment: A critical review. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2022; 27: 102408. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102408

19. Büks F, Kaupenjohann M. Global concentrations of microplastics in soils—A review. Soil 2020; 6(2): 649–662. doi: 10.5194/soil-6-649-2020

20. Chen HL, Gibbins CN, Selvam SB, Ting KN. Spatio-temporal variation of microplastic along a rural to urban transition in a tropical river. Environmental Pollution 2021; 289: 117895. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117895

21. Monkul MM, Özhan HO. Microplastic contamination in soils: A review from geotechnical engineering view. Polymers 2021; 13(23): 4129. doi: 10.3390/polym13234129

22. Talbot R, Chang H. Microplastics in freshwater: A global review of factors affecting spatial and temporal variations. Environmental Pollution 2022; 292(Part B): 118393. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118393

23. Shahul Hamid F, Bhatti MS, Anuar N, et al. Worldwide distribution and abundance of microplastic: How dire is the situation? Waste Management & Research 2018; 36(10): 873–897. doi: 10.1177/0734242x18785730

24. Mani T, Hauk A, Walter U, Burkhardt-Holm P. Microplastics profile along the Rhine River. Scientific Reports 2015; 5(1): 17988. doi: 10.1038/srep17988

25. Fuschi C, Pu H, MacDonell M, et al. Microplastics in the Great Lakes: Environmental, health, and socioeconomic implications and future directions. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2022; 10(43): 14074–14091. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c02896

26. Blettler MCM, Garello N, Ginon L, et al. Massive plastic pollution in a mega-river of a developing country: Sediment deposition and ingestion by fish (Prochilodus lineatus). Environmental Pollution 2019; 255: 113348. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113348

27. Li Y, Lu Z, Zheng H, et al. Microplastics in surface water and sediments of Chongming Island in the Yangtze Estuary, China. Environmental Sciences Europe 2020; 32(1): 15. doi: 10.1186/s12302-020-0297-7

28. Wright SL, Ulke J, Font A, et al. Atmospheric microplastic deposition in an urban environment and an evaluation of transport. Environment International 2020; 136: 105411. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105411

29. Thushari GGN, Senevirathna JDM. Plastic pollution in the marine environment. Heliyon 2020; 6(8): e04709. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04709

30. Zhao X, Zhou Y, Liang C, et al. Airborne microplastics: Occurrence, sources, fate, risks and mitigation. Science of the Total Environment 2023; 858: 159943. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159943

31. Allen S, Allen D, Phoenix VR, et al. Atmospheric transport and deposition of microplastics in a remote mountain catchment. Nature Geoscience 2019; 12: 339–344. doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0335-5

32. Liu Q, Schauer JJ. Airborne microplastics from waste as a transmission vector for COVID-19. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 2021; 21(1): 200439. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2020.07.0439

33. Razeghi N, Hamidian AH, Wu C, et al. Microplastic sampling techniques in freshwaters and sediments: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 2021; 19(6): 4225–4252. doi: 10.1007/s10311-021-01227-6

34. Covernton GA, Pearce CM, Gurney-Smith HJ, et al. Size and shape matter: A preliminary analysis of microplastic sampling technique in seawater studies with implications for ecological risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment 2019; 667: 124–132. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.346

35. Zheng Y, Li J, Sun C, et al. Comparative study of three sampling methods for microplastics analysis in seawater. Science of the Total Environment 2021; 765: 144495. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144495

36. Monteiro SS, da Costa JP. Methods for the extraction of microplastics in complex solid, water and biota samples. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry 2022; 33: e00151. doi: 10.1016/j.teac.2021.e00151

37. Hidalgo-Ruz V, Gutow L, Thompson RC, Thiel M. Microplastics in the marine environment: A review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environmental Science & Technology 2012; 46(6): 3060–3075. doi: 10.1021/es2031505

38. Franzellitti S, Canesi L, Auguste M, et al. Microplastic exposure and effects in aquatic organisms: A physiological perspective. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 2019; 68: 37–51. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2019.03.009

39. Wieczorek AM, Morrison L, Croot PL, et al. Frequency of microplastics in mesopelagic fishes from the Northwest Atlantic. Frontiers in Marine Science 2018; 5: 39. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00039

40. Shruti VC, Pérez-Guevara F, Elizalde-Martínez I, Kutralam-Muniasamy G. Current trends and analytical methods for evaluation of microplastics in stormwater. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry 2021; 30: e00123. doi: 10.1016/j.teac.2021.e00123

41. Adhikari S, Kelkar V, Kumar R, Halden RU. Methods and challenges in the detection of microplastics and nanoplastics: A mini-review. Polymer International 2021; 71(5): 543–551. doi: 10.1002/pi.6348

42. dos Santos Galvão L, Fernandes EMS, Ferreira RR, et al. Critical steps for microplastics characterization from the atmosphere. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022; 424: 127668. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127668

43. Peñalver R, Arroyo-Manzanares N, López-García I, Hernández-Córdoba M. An overview of microplastics characterization by thermal analysis. Chemosphere 2020; 242: 125170. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125170

44. Sturm MT, Horn H, Schuhen K. The potential of fluorescent dyes—Comparative study of Nile red and three derivatives for the detection of microplastics. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2021; 413: 1059–1071. doi: 10.1007/s00216-020-03066-w

45. Nel HA, Chetwynd AJ, Kelleher L, et al. Detection limits are central to improve reporting standards when using Nile red for microplastic quantification. Chemosphere 2021; 263: 127953. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127953

46. Lv L, Qu J, Yu Z, et al. A simple method for detecting and quantifying microplastics utilizing fluorescent dyes-Safranine T, fluorescein isophosphate, Nile red based on thermal expansion and contraction property. Environmental Pollution 2019; 255: 113283. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113283

47. Jung S, Cho SH, Kim KH, Kwon EE. Progress in quantitative analysis of microplastics in the environment: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal 2021; 422: 130154. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130154

48. Bai CL, Liu LY, Hu YB, et al. Microplastics: A review of analytical methods, occurrence and characteristics in food, and potential toxicities to biota. Science of the Total Environment 2022; 806: 150263. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150263

49. Dey T. Microplastic pollutant detection by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS): A mini-review. Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering 2022; 8: 41–48. doi: 10.1007/s41204-022-00223-7

50. Fang C, Luo Y, Zhang X, et al. Identification and visualisation of microplastics via PCA to decode Raman spectrum matrix towards imaging. Chemosphere 2022; 286: 131736. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131736

51. Xu G, Cheng H, Jones R, et al. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy facilitates the detection of microplastics <1 μm in the environment. Environmental Science & Technology 2020; 54(24): 15594–15603. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02317

52. Mikac L, Rigó I, Himics L, et al. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for the detection of microplastics. Applied Surface Science 2023; 608: 155239. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155239

53. Li J, Liu H, Chen JP. Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection. Water Research 2018; 137: 362–374. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.056

54. Lv L, Yan X, Feng L, et al. Challenge for the detection of microplastics in the environment. Water Environment Research 2021; 93(1): 5–15. doi: 10.1002/wer.1281

55. Liu Y, Li R, Yu J, et al. Separation and identification of microplastics in marine organisms by TGA-FTIR-GC/MS: A case study of mussels from coastal China. Environmental Pollution 2021; 272: 115946. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115946

56. Löder MGJ, Kuczera M, Mintenig S, et al. Focal plane array detector-based micro-Fourier-transform infrared imaging for the analysis of microplastics in environmental samples. Environmental Chemistry 2015; 12(5): 563–581. doi: 10.1071/en14205

57. Tagg AS, Sapp M, Harrison JP, Ojeda JJ. Identification and quantification of microplastics in wastewater using focal plane array-based reflectance micro-FT-IR imaging. Analytical Chemistry 2015; 87(12): 6032–6040. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00495

58. Primpke S, Lorenz C, Rascher-Friesenhausen R, Gerdts G. An automated approach for microplastics analysis using focal plane array (FPA) FTIR microscopy and image analysis. Analytical Methods 2017; 9(9): 1499–1511. doi: 10.1039/c6ay02476a

59. Hale RC, Seeley ME, La Guardia MJ, et al. A global perspective on microplastics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 2020; 125(1): e2018JC014719. doi: 10.1029/2018jc014719

60. Huang CJ, Narasimha GV, Chen YC, et al. Measurement of low concentration of micro-plastics by detection of bioaffinity-induced particle retention using surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Biosensors 2021; 11(7): 219. doi: 10.3390/bios11070219

61. Woo H, Kang SH, Kwon Y, et al. Sensitive and specific capture of polystyrene and polypropylene microplastics using engineered peptide biosensors. RSC Advances 2022; 12(13): 7680–7688. doi: 10.1039/d1ra08701k

62. Scheller M, Jansen C, Koch M. Analyzing sub-100-μm samples with transmission terahertz time domain spectroscopy. Optics Communications 2009; 282(7): 1304–1306. doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2008.12.061

63. Li Y, Yao J, Nie P, et al. An effective method for the rapid detection of microplastics in soil. Chemosphere 2021; 276: 128696. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128696

64. Iri AH, Shahrah MHA, Ali AM, et al. Optical detection of microplastics in water. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021; 28: 63860–63866. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12358-2

65. Zhan H, Chen R, Miao X, et al. Size effect on microparticle detection. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology 2018; 8(5): 477–481. doi: 10.1109/tthz.2018.2845115

66. Wietzke S, Jansen C, Rutz F, et al. Determination of additive content in polymeric compounds with terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. Polymer Testing 2007; 26(5): 614–618. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.03.002

67. Withayachumnankul W, Ferguson B, Rainsford T, et al. Simple material parameter estimation via terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. Electronics Letters 2005; 41(14): 800–801. doi: 10.1049/el:20051467

68. Wietzke S, Jansen C, Krumbholz N, et al. Terahertz spectroscopy: A powerful tool for the characterization of plastic materials. In: Proceedings of 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Solid Dielectrics; 4–9 July 2010; Potsdam, Germany.

69. Jin YS, Kim GJ, Jeon SG. Terahertz dielectric properties of polymers. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 2006; 49(2): 513–517.

70. Im J, Goo T, Kim J, et al. Detection of microplastic in salts using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. Sensors 2021; 21(9): 3161. doi: 10.3390/s21093161

71. Gongi W, Touzi H, Sadly I, et al. A novel impedimetric sensor based on cyanobacterial extracellular polymeric substances for microplastics detection. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 2022; 30: 4738–4748. doi: 10.1007/s10924-022-02555-6

72. Chaczko Z, Wajs-Chaczko P, Tien D, Haidar Y. Detection of microplastics using machine learning. In: Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC); 7–10 July 2019; Kobe, Japan.

73. Alloghani M, Al-Jumeily D, Mustafina J, et al. A systematic review on supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms for data science. In: Berry MW, Mohamed A, Yap BW (editors). Supervised and Unsupervised Learning for Data Science. Springer; 2019. pp. 3–21.

74. Lv L, He L, Jiang S, et al. In situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for detecting microplastics and nanoplastics in aquatic environments. Science of the Total Environment 2020; 728: 138449. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138449

75. Kang J, Zhou L, Duan X, et al. Degradation of cosmetic microplastics via functionalized carbon nanosprings. Matter 2019; 1(3): 745–758. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2019.06.004