Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has both positive and negative impacts, particularly in term of increasing plagiarism. This research analyzes Indonesia’s plagiarism regulations and offers solutions. It uses doctrinal methods with legislative, case, and comparative studies, revealing that plagiarism is regulated but not specifically for AI involvement. The results show that plagiarism in scientific work has actually been regulated through several regulations. On the other hand, there is no regulation governing the involvement of AI in the process of preparing scientific articles. Comparative studies show that the US, Singapore, and the EU have advanced regulations for AI in education. The US has copyright laws for AI works and state regulations, Singapore’s Ministry of Education has guidelines for AI integration and ethics, and the EU has the Artificial Intelligence Act. To tackle AI-related plagiarism in Indonesia, the study suggests enacting AI-specific laws and revising existing ones. Ministerial and Rector statutes should address technical aspects of AI use and plagiarism checks. The Ministry should issue guidelines for universities to develop Standard Procedures for Writing and Checking Scientific Work, using reliable AI-checking software. These measures aim to prevent plagiarism in Indonesia’s educational sector.

1. AASA. (2023). Exploring ChatGPT’s Potential. https://www.aasa.org/resources/resource/exploring-chatgpt-potential
2. American Historical Association. (2023). Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct. https://www.historians.org/jobs-and-professional-development/statements-standards-and-guidelines-of-the-discipline/statement-on-standards-of-professional-conduct
3. Aravik, H., and Tohir, A. (2023). Sosialisasi Software Cek Plagiat Pada Mahasiswa Semester Akhir. AD; Jurnal Abdi Dosen Dan Mahasiswa, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.61930/jurnaladm.v1i1.209
4. Boston, J. (2016). Governing for the Future: Designing Democratic Institutions for a Better Tomorrow. Emerald Publishing Limited.
5. Brown, S. J., and Hammond, K. (2022). Plagiarism in Higher Education: Navigating a Perfect Storm. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.5.452
6. Carter, D. (2023). The Influence of Ancient Greece: A Historical and Cultural Analysis. International Journal of Science and Society, 5(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i3.743
7. Cook, T. (2014). The Scourge of Plagiary: Perversions of Imitation in the English Renaissance. University of Toronto Quarterly, 83(1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.83.1.39
8. Disemadi, H. S., and Kang, C. (2021). Self-Plagiarism dalam Dunia Akademik Ditinjau dari Perspektif Pengaturan Hak Cipta di Indonesia. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v13i1.236
9. European Parliament. (2023). EU AI Act: First regulation on artificial intelligence. Topics | European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
10. Gaffar, H., and Albarashdi, S. (2024). Copyright Protection for AI-Generated Works: Exploring Originality and Ownership in a Digital Landscape. Asian Journal of International Law, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251323000735
11. Gandharv, K. (2024, Januari 4). California Proposes AI Legislation to Promote Responsible Use in State Agencies. Metaverse Post. https://mpost.io/california-proposes-ai-legislation-to-promote-responsible-use-in-state-agencies/
12. Goli, M., Sahu, A. K., Bag, S., and Dhamija, P. (2023). Users’ Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 19(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.318481
13. Gourvitz, E., and Ameri, S. L. (2023). Can Works Created with AI Be Copyrighted? Copyright Office Issues Formal Guidance. Ropes and Gray. https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/alerts/2023/03/can-works-created-with-ai-be-copyrighted-copyright-office-issues-formal-guidance
14. Govtech Singapore. (2023). Tech and education: How automation and AI are powering learning in Singapore. https://www.tech.gov.sg/media/technews/tech-and-education-how-automation-and-ai-is-powering-learning-in-singapore
15. Granitz, N., & Loewy, D. (2007). Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9171-9
16. Haris, M. T. A. R., & Tantimin, T. (2022). Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence Di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v8i1.44408
17. ISTE. (2017). ISTE Seal of Alignment Adds Kyte Learning to Growing List of Approved Resources for Educators. https://iste.org/news/iste-seal-of-alignment-adds-kyte-learning-to-growing-list-of-approved-resources-for-educators
18. Jadek, A. (2024). The AI Act: A Leap Towards Regulating Artificial Intelligence in the EU. Jadek & Pensa. https://jadek-pensa.si/en/the-ai-act-a-leap-towards-regulating-artificial-intelligence-in-the-eu/
19. K, D. H., & Suriyani, A. (2023). Upaya Penanganan Plagiarisme Di Institusi Perguruan Tinggi. INDOPEDIA (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Dan Pendidikan), 1(4), Article 4.
20. Kemp, T. (2024). Introducing the California AI Transparency Act. Medium. https://tomkemp00.medium.com/introducing-the-california-ai-transparency-act-586aab595464
21. Khong, D. W. K. (2006). The Historical Law and Economics of the First Copyright Act. Erasmus Law and Economics Review, 2(1), 35–69.
22. Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1
23. Lim, C. K., & Seah, C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence 2023. Chambers and Partners. https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/artificial-intelligence-2023/singapore/trends-and-developments
24. Lucchi, N. (2023). ChatGPT: A Case Study on Copyright Challenges for Generative Artificial Intelligence Systems. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.59
25. Mancheva, G. (2021). European Union Regulatory Framework on Artificial Intelligence (SMEs). The Journal of Development Studies, 2(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.52340/jds.2021.03
26. Maynard, A. (2024, Maret 10). What does EU Artificial Intelligence regulation mean for AI in education? https://futureofbeinghuman.com/p/eu-ai-act-and-education
27. Memon, A. R. (2020). Similarity and Plagiarism in Scholarly Journal Submissions: Bringing Clarity to the Concept for Authors, Reviewers and Editors. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 35(27), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e217
28. Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709
29. Nuryadin, R., & Marlina, M. (2023). The Use of AI (Artificial Intelligence) in Education—(Literature Review). Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v7i2.64290
30. Park, C. (2003). In Other (People’s) Words: Plagiarism by university students—Literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301677
31. PDPC Singapore. (2024). Public Consultation on the Proposed Advisory Guidelines on the PDPA for Children’s Personal Data. https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/guidelines-and-consultation/2023/07/public-consultation-on-the-proposed-advisory-guidelines-on-the-pdpa-for-childrens-personal-data
32. Perigo, B. (2023). California Bill Proposes Regulating AI at State Level. TIME. https://time.com/6313588/california-ai-regulation-bill/
33. Pietsch, M. (2001). International Copyright Infringement and the Internet: An Analysis of the Exisiting Means of Enforcement. UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal, 24(2), 273.
34. Plate, L. (2011). Women’s Rewriting as Counter-memory: An ABC of ‘Stolentelling’ (Authorship, Branding, and Copyright). Dalam L. Plate (Ed.), Transforming Memories in Contemporary Women’s Rewriting (hlm. 66–93). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294639_3
35. Putra, G. A., Taniady, V., & Halmadiningrat, I. M. (2023). Tantangan Hukum: Keakuratan Informasi Layanan AI Chatbot Dan Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Penggunanya. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v12i2.1258
36. Ray, N., & Wang, A. H. (2024). California’s SB 1047 establishes stringent requirements for large-scale AI models. Littler Mendelson P.C. https://www.littler.com/publication-press/press/californias-sb-1047-establishes-stringent-requirements-large-scale-ai-models
37. Rommetveit, K., & van Dijk, N. (2022). Privacy engineering and the techno-regulatory imaginary. Social Studies of Science, 52(6), 853–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221119424
38. Rosa, N. (2024). Waduh, Peneliti Temukan Banyak Jurnal Akademis yang Ternyata Ditulis ChatGPT. detikedu. https://www.detik.com/edu/edutainment/d-7256390/waduh-peneliti-temukan-banyak-jurnal-akademis-yang-ternyata-ditulis-chatgpt
39. Sari, N. K. (2009). Pentingnya Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Dalam Era Globalisasi. Qistie, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v3i3.578
40. Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.
41. Ta, R., & West, D. M. (2023). Should schools ban or integrate generative AI in the classroom? Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/should-schools-ban-or-integrate-generative-ai-in-the-classroom/
42. Teach For America. (2023). The Promises and Perils of Generative AI in Education: TFA’s Evolving Perspective. https://www.teachforamerica.org/one-day/ideas-and-solutions/the-promises-and-perils-of-generative-ai-in-education-tfas-evolving
43. Teh, B. S. (2019). Consequences of Plagiarism. Singapore Assignment Help. https://www.singaporeassignmenthelp.com/blogs/consequences-of-plagiarism/
44. UCLA Dean of Students. (2021). Student Conduct Code. https://deanofstudents.ucla.edu/individual-student-code
45. US Department of Education. (2021). Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). US Department of Education (ED). https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html
46. Yulia, Y., Zainol, Z. A., & F, F. (2023). Protection of Performers’ Rights in Indonesian Copyright Law: Copyrighted Works Uploaded to YouTube. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.1092.pp300-317
47. Zhuk, A. (2023). Navigating the legal landscape of AI copyright: A comparative analysis of EU, US, and Chinese approaches. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00299-0