Border studies in southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities
Vol 8, Issue 15, 2024
VIEWS - 41 (Abstract) 25 (PDF)
Abstract
The centers of trade and economic activities in the region of Southeast Asia rank from a huge and modern to a small and traditional pattern. Malacca and Singapore have been cases in point for huge and modern patterns, while the border areas in eastern Indonesia, East Malaysia, and the Philippines are the cases for small and traditional centers. This paper will argue that with global connectivity and regional dynamics, the small and traditional trade and economic centers could shift to modern ones. History records that the introduction of the Southeast Asian region by the outside world, especially in relation to trade and economic activities, was largely derived from the significant role played by the people in the mainland of Southeast Asia regarding the silk roads route and the role of the people in the insular or islands of Southeast Asia regarding the spice trade route in the premodern time. Later in the modern time in Southeast Asia, the role of Islam, the Europeans and the center trade of Malacca around the 17th and 18th centuries played a significant role. Indeed, huge trade centers like Malacca in the 17th C and 18th C and later by Singapore in the 9th C have been very important throughout the history of trade in the Southeast Asian region. However, we must not ignore the roles of the border areas in the Southeast Asian archipelago, especially in eastern Indonesia, East Malaysia, and the border region of the Philippines which have played a dominant role in trade and economic activities. These activities have been smaller and more traditional than the Malacca and Singapore cases, but economic activities could develop rapidly with the global connection and its interconnectivity. Besides, those border areas have also become an important key for security issues not only in the Southeast Asia region in particular but also in the Asia Pacific or Indo Pacific region as well. The security of the region of Southeast Asia and even Indo Pacific could be affected by the situation in those border areas. Interconnectivity is a challenge as well as an opportunity for these border areas to become the future of trade and economic activities within the region of Southeast Asia that also connects with the region of Indo Pacific, especially China, South Korea, and Taiwan. The planning of Indonesian capital movement to East Kalimantan will add opportunities for those border areas located near the proposed new capital. About the above issues, this paper will address several issues: firstly, the history of trade and economic activities in Malacca, Singapore, and the border areas in eastern Indonesia, East Malaysia, and the Philippines; secondly, the different patterns of trade and economic developments of the Malacca, Singapore, and the border areas in eastern Indonesia, East Malaysia, and Philippines; thirdly, the challenges and opportunities of the border areas in eastern Indonesia, East Malaysia, and the Philippines to develop bigger trade centers in the future; fourth, the interconnectivity of those border areas to Asia Pacific region. This paper uses an interdisciplinary approach in the fields of social sciences and humanities. With this study, it is hoped that a better understanding of regional dynamics will be obtained, especially in the border areas. The period that we use is from 1998 until present time regarding if there was changing policy due to the end of Old Order to the Reformation period of Indonesian government. As a result, the development of border areas had been in existence before the colonial time in which people moved freely and had trade contacts. Even though they used to have the same ethnic linkage, after the formation of a modern state where they have different citizenships, in reality they can relate to each other in harmony and peace because of the similarity of ethnic linkages they had in the past. Colonial powers intended to replace the powers of traditional kingdoms with the idea of civilizing the colonialized areas. Therefore, to overcome the gap between the Indonesian population who live in border areas bordering foreign countries, management is needed that is no longer informal (traditional ways), but formal and modern. For that reason, the existence of competition due to differences in the quality of human resources they have, often causes competition which also becomes a medium for illegal trade, illegal trafficking, illegal drugs that affect or disrupt good relations between the two countries that border each other. With the change in policy from the centralistic and authoritarian during the New Order which was in power for 32 years since 1966, when the New Order era ended, the reform era began which prioritized transparent accountability towards a more democratic society. The paradigm shift in the context of this policy is expected to contribute to the management of border areas from the traditional or informal to the modern and formal towards the development of peaceful and sustainable border areas.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, Taufik and Yekti, Maunati 1998. “Introduction”. Towards the Promotion of Southeast Asian Studies in Southeast Asia. Taufik Abdullah and Yekti Maunati (eds.) Jakarta: Program of Southeast Asian Studies Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
Abdullah, Taufik. 2004. “Local Collective Memories and National Unity”, Identity, Multiculturalism and the Formation of Nation States in Southeast Asia. Jakarta: Research Center for Regional Resources-Indonesian Institute of Sciences and Japan Foundation.
Amal. M. Adnan. N.d. Kepulauan Rempah-rempah: Perjalanan Sejarah Maluku Utara, 1250—1950. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia-KPG).
Anna Mutmainah, 2024. Peradaban Asia Timur: Perjalanan Sejarah Asia Timur dari Peradaban Kuno hingga Modern. Yogyakarta: Anak Hebat Indonesia.
Ardhana, I Ketut and Yekti Maunati. 2004. Identity, Multiculturalism and the Formation of Nation States in Southeast Asia. Jakarta: Research Center for Regional Resources-the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PSDR-LIPI) and the Japan Foundation.
Ardhana, I Ketut and Yekti Maunati. 2009a. “Bugis Diaspora in the Tawau District of Sabah, East Malaysia: Challenges and Trends in the Context of Managing Multicultural Society”. Global and International Migration: Realities of labor Movements and International Marriages. Nestor Castro (ed.). International Social Science Organizations.
Ardhana, I Ketut, Jayl Langub, and Daniel Chew. 2004. “Borders of Kinship and Ethnicity: Cross-Border Relations between the Kelalan Valley, Sarawak, and the Bawan Valley, East Kalimantan”. Borneo Research Bulletin, 35. Jayl Langub, Daniel Chew, and I Ketut Ardhana. Sarawak: Universiti Malaysia.
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2003. “Introduction: The Interplay between Tradition and Modernity in the Context of Tourism”. Tourism on the Malaysian Peninsula: the Interplay between Tradition and Modernity. Jakarta: Research Center for Regional Resources-the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PSDR-LIPI).
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2004. “Legal and Illegal Trade on the Border between Thailand and Burma”. Trade Contacts in the Cross-Border Areas between Thailand and Burma, 1900—2002. Jakarta:
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2004. “The Economic Aspect of Tourist Development in Thailand”. Tourism in Thailand: Its Challenges and Opportunities. Yekti Maunati and I Ketut Ardhana (eds.) Jakarta: Research Center for Regional Resources-the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PSDR-LIPI).
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2005. “Laos as a Landlocked Country: A Glimpse of Its History”. Trade Contacts in the Cross Border Areas between Laos and Thailand. Jakarta: Research Center for Regional Resources-the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PSDR-LIPI).
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2006. “From Silk Village to Border Market: Economic Aspect of Tourism in Vietnam from A Local Perspective”. Tourism in Vietnam, Cultural Conservation, History, the Environment and Global Competition. Yekti Maunati, I ketut Ardhana, Mayasuri Presila and Yose Hermana (eds.) Jakarta: Research Center for Regional Resources-the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PSDR-LIPI).
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2007a. “The Minority Groups and Multiculturalism in Sabah Malaysia”, Ethnicity: Socio-Cultural and Economic Challenges. Carmencita T. Aguilar (ed.) International Federation of Social Science Organizations (IFSSO).
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2007b. “Interaksi Etnisitas dan Perdagangan di Wilayah Perbatasan Krayan, Ba Kelalan dan Long Pasia”. Dinamika Etnisitas dam Hubungan Ekonomi Pada Wilayah Perbatasan di Kalimantan Timur-Sabah. Jakarta: The Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2007c. “Viet Nam and Laos: History and Early Development Up to the Beginnings of the Twenty First Century”. The Trade Contacts in the Border Areas between Vietnam and Laos. I Ketut Ardhana et al (eds.). Jakarta: Research Center for Regional Resources-the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PSDR-LIPI).
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2008a. “The Past Relationship between Malaysia and Singapore”, The Trade Contacts in the Border Areas between Malaysia and Singapore. I Ketut Ardhana, et al. (eds.) Jakarta: The Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2008b. “Local Economy and Community Based Tourism: From Conflict to Local Economic Development: The Cambodian Development”, The Development of Tourism in Cambodia: Cultural Conservation, History and Environment. Jakarta: The Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2009b. “The Local Economy and the Tourism Industry in Laos: The Paths of Development”. Cultural, Historical and Environmental Tourism in Laos: An Innovative Step in Development. Yekti Maunati, I Ketut Ardhana and Mayasuri Presilla (eds.) Jakarta: LIPI Press.
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2009c. “A Short Description of the Border Areas in Southeast Asia: The Case of Malaysia and the Philippines”. The Trade Contacts in the Border Areas between Malaysia and the Philippines. I Ketut Ardhana, Yekti Maunati and Lamijo (eds.) Jakarta: The Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2010a. “Laos History: ‘Open Door Policy and the Early Development of the Tourism Industry”. Cultural, Historical and Environmental Tourism in Laos: An Innovative Step in Development. I Ketut Ardhana et al. (eds.), Jakarta: Research Center for Regional Resources-Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2010b. Pulau Nunukan dan Pulau Sebatik: Tinjauan Sejarah dan Kekhususannya”. Etnisitas Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lokal dan Potensi Perdagangan Internasional Dalam Rangka Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Nunukan-Kalimantan Timur. Yekti Maunati, I Ketut Ardhana, Dundin Zaenuddin and Mayasuri Presila (eds.). Jakarta: LIPI Press.
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2013. “Early Harbours in Eastern Nusa Tenggara”. Ancient Harbours in Southeast Asia: The Archeology of Early Harbours and Evidence of Inter-Regional Trade. John N. Miksic and Goh Geok Yiao (eds.). SEAMEO SPAFA: Regional Center for Archeology and Fine Arts.
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2014. Konflik Sumberdaya Alam antara Masyarakat, Pengusaha dan Pemerintah di Kalimantan”. Roots of Conflict and Its Resolution: The Exploitation of Natural Resources and the Making of Megacity. Yekti Maunati (ed.). Jakarta: Research Center for Regional Resources-Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
Ardhana, I Ketut. 2024. Perkembangan Muhammadijah di Bali 1934—1968. Denpasar: Majelis Pustaka dan Informasi Pimpinan Wilayah Muhammadiyah di Bali.
Ardhana, I Ketut. IPS Wibawa, dan M. A. Widiatmika (eds.). 2023. Direktori Teknokrat Hindu Indonesia. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. Desember 2006. Wilayah Laut Cina Selatan, Laut Sulawesi dan Wilayah Papua/ Pasifik: Kontrak Perjanjian Perbatasan Republik Indonesia, Jilid I. Jakarta: Penerbitan Naskah Sumber Arsip.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. Desember 2008. Wilayah Perbatasan Palau, Perbatasan Australia dan Lautan Indonesia: Kontrak Perjanjian Wilayah Perbatasan Republik Indonesia, Jilid III, Jakarta: Penerbitan Naskah Sumber Arsip.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. Desember 2009. Pulau-pulau Terdepan Wilayah Perbatasan Indonesia: Kontrak Perjanjian Wilayah Perbatasan Republik Indonesia, Jilid IV. Jakarta: Penerbitan Naskah Sumber Arsip.
Aswi Warman Adam (et al.). 2023. Identitas Etnik Tionghoa Di Tengah Demokratisasi dan Globalisasi. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Blusse, Leonard. 1986. Strange Company: Chinese Settlers, Mestizo Women and the Dutch in VOC Batavia. Dordrecht: Foris Publication.
Bond, Nathan. 2020. Seeking the State from Margins: From Tidung Lands to Borderlands in Borneo. PhD thesis, School for Social and Political Sciences, Melbourne University. Melbourne Australia.
Chen Da-Sheng. 1994. “Strategic Topics in Collaborative Research on Southeast Asia and an Introduction of China Maritime Silk Route Studies Centre”. Towards the Promotion of Southeast Asian Studies in Southeast Asia. Taufik Abdullah and Yekti Maunati (eds.). Jakarta; Program of Southeast Asian Studies – Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
Clements, Jonathan. 2019. A Brief History of China: Dynasty, Revolution and Transformation: From the Middle Kingdom to the People’s Republic. Tokyo: Tuttle Publishing.
Cotterell, Arthur. 2014. A History of Southeast Asia. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Editions.
Cottilon, Hannah. 2017. Territorial Disputes and Nationalism: A Comparative Case Study of China and Vietnam”. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. 1,
Djoko Marihandono and Bondan Kanumoyoso. N. d. Rempah, Jalur Rempah dan Dinamika Masyarakat Nusantara. Jakarta: Direktorat Sejarah dan Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Evans. Grant, Christopher Hutton and Kuah Khun Eng (eds.). Where China meets Southeast Asia: Social and Cultural Change in the Border Regions. Bangkok-Singapore: White Lotus and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Grundy-Warr, Carl and Elaine Wong. “Geopolitics of Drugs and Cross-Border Relation Burma-Thailand” in Clive Schofield and Shelagh Furness. 2001. Boundary and Security Bulletin, 9 (1). Durham: International Boundaries Research Unit, Mountjoy Research Center.
Judith Schlehe. 2020. “Social Sciences in Southeast Asia: An Anthropological Perspective”, in Hermin Indah Wahyuni and Vssia Ita Yulianto (eds. Social Science in the Age of Transformation and Disruption: Its Relevance, Role and Challenge. Yogyakarta: Center for Southeast Asia-Social Studied Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Mak Sithirith and Carl Grundy-Warr. 2013. Floating Lives of the Tonle Sap. Regional Centre for Social Science and Sustainable Development (RCSD).
Maunati, Yekti. 2006. “Dinamika Etnisitas dan Identitas”. Dinamika Etnisitas dan Hubungan Ekonomi pada Wilayah Perbatasan di Kalimantan Timur: Studi Kasus di Wilayah Krayan dan Long Pasiah. Jakarta: Proyek Kompetitif LIPI, 2006.
Maunati, Yekti. 2007. “Dinamika Etnisitas dan Identitas”. Dinamika Etnisitas dan Hubungan Ekonomi pada Wilayah Perbatasan di Kalimantan Timur: Studi Kasus di Wilayah Krayan dan Long Pasiah. Jakarta: Proyek Kompetitif LIPI, 2007.
Maunati, Yekti. 2008. Etnisitas di Nunukan. Etnisitas, Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lokal dan Pottensi Perdagangan Internasinal dalam Rangka Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Nunukan Kalimanta Timur. Jakarta: LIPI Press
Ndan Imang. 2003. From Shifting Cultivation towards ‘Daleh Cluster’: Case Study in a Bahau Saq Community in East Kalimantan”. Sustainable Agricultural Development in Southeast Asia. I Ketut Ardhana, Yekti Maunati and Erni Budiwanti (eds.). Jakarta: Research Center for Regional Resources-the Indonesian Institute of Sciences
Nguyen Thi My Hanh. 2018. “Tributary Relations of Vietnam and Japan with China during the Feudal Period: Some Reference Points”. Suvannabhumi: Multi-disciplinary Journal of Southeast Asia Studies, 10 (1) Busan, Korea: Institute for Southeast Asia Studies, Busan University of Foreign Studies, ISEAS/ BUFS.
Nuryahman. 2024. “Kekuasaan Belanda di Kesultanan Dompu, Nusa Tenggara”. In Ida Aytu Wirasmini Sidemen dan Slamat Trisila. Merekonstruksi Peristiwa Sejara, Merangkai Pemikiran Humaniora (Persembahan Purnatugas Dr. Drs. I Wayan Tagel Eddy MS. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan.
Puryanti, Lina. 2017. Garuda di Dadaku, Malaysia di Perutku: Bordering and Social Transformatios of Bugis in Indonesia Sebtik Border Island. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Southeast Asian Studies, National University of Singapore. Singapore.
Regnier, Philippe. 1990. Singapore: A City-State in Southeast Asia. Kualalumpur: Synergy Books International.
Reid, Anthony. 1993. Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450—1680, Volume Two, Expansion and Crisis. New Haven dan London. Yale University Press.
Research Center for Regional Resources-the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PSDR-LIPI).
Riwanto Tirtosudarmo. 2012. “Migration, Ethnicity and Conflict in Southeast Asia”. Jurnal Kajian Wilayah, 3 (1)
Rose, A. J. 2000. Patterns of Cities. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd.
Smail, John R. W. 1961. “On the Possibility of an Autonomous History of Modern Southeast Asia”, Journal of Southeast Asian History, 2 (2) Indonesia. Being a Collection of Papers Submitted to the 1st International Conference of Southeast Asian Historians, Singapore, January 16-21, 1961 (Jul., 1961), pp. 72-102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sudarman. 2023. “Jalur Rempah dan Pola Islamisasi di Pantai Barat Sumatra Abad XVII-XVIII M”, in Abdurakhman and Linda Sunarti (eds.). Meniti Ombak Sejarah: Suntingan Kenangan untuk Profesor Susanto Zuhdi. Jakarta: Penerbit Serat Alam Media.
Suebsantiwongse S. 2022. “Candi Pembakaran at Ratu Boko: Possible Function and Association with the Mediaeval Sri Lankan Monastery at Anuradhapura”. The Creative South: Buddhist and Hindu Art in Mediaeval Maritime Asia. Andrea Acri, and Peter Sharrock. (eds.) London: SOAS University of London, Alphawood Foundation Chicago and ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.
Sumolang, Steven. 2018. Pembangunan Kawasan Perbatasan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal EHA dalam Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Alam: Studi di Kepulauan Nanusa, Kabupaten Talaud. Yogyakarta: Amara Books.
Sundberg, Jeffrey. 2022. “Hydro-architectonic Conceptualization in Central Javanese, Khmers, and South Indian Religious Architecture: The Prambanan Temple as Sahasralinga Mechanism for the Consecration of Water”, The Creative South: Buddhist and Hindu Art in Mediaeval Maritime Asia. Andrea Acri, and Peter Sharrock. (eds.) London: SOAS University of London, Alphawood Foundation Chicago, and ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.
Touwen, Jeroen. 1997. Extremes in the Archipelago: Trade and Economic Development in the Outer Islands of Indonesia, 1900—1942. Holland: Historische Wettenschappen (SHW) and Nederlandse Organizatie voor Wettenschappelijk Onderzoek (NOW).
Vannarith, Chheang. 2022. “Cambodian Perceptions of China: A Chinese Learners’ Perspective”, in Leo Suryadinata and Benjamin Loh (eds.). Rising China and New Chinese Migrants in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Yusof Ishak Institute.
Vatikiotis, Michael. April 2006. “Resolving Internal Conflicts in Southeast Asia: Domestic Challenges and Regional Perspectives”, in Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 28 (1)
Winzeler, Robert L. 1997. Indigeneous Peoples and the State: Politics, Land, and Ethnicity in the Malayan Peninsula and Borneo. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies, Monograph 46/Yale Southeast Asia Studies.
Wolters, O. W. 1999. History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives (Studies on Southeast Asia): Southeast Asia Program Publications; Revised edition. January 1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9604
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Piers Andreas Noak, I. Ketut Ardhana, Ni Made Putri Ariyanti, Ni Wayan Radita Novi Puspitasari
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.