This article is devoted to studying the principles of the relationship between democracy and demo ethics as tools for transforming the sustainable development of society. The study is based on the assumption that the effective functioning of democracy is associated with such social phenomena as elections and electoral behavior. The study examined electoral behavior and surveyed members of society about the qualities of candidates to which they pay special attention. An analysis of qualitative and quantitative data demonstrating the democratic foundations of elections of members of society was conducted, and an analysis of the choice of voters in the extraordinary elections of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan by region was conducted. In this study, Bayesian network modeling is experimentally applied to formalize the problem of identifying and analyzing the behavior of virtuous personality traits. A sociological survey of public opinion was conducted using the questionnaire method with the participation of 826 people from all regions of Kazakhstan from May to June 2023. A questionnaire was used to collect data, the main purpose of which was to compare attitudes and find out what values are considered important for people, what norms of behavior are considered acceptable, and to understand what values and norms prevail in society. It is concluded that the concept of demo ethics promotes a positive transformation of humanity and helps to form a new leader of virtue, a ruler of the city, capable of making ethical rational decisions that can ensure a balance between the economic, social, and environmental needs of humanity.

Adugna, G. Migration patterns and emigrants’ transnational activities: Comparative findings from two migrant origin areas in Ethiopia. Comp. Migr. Stud. 2019, 7, 5.

Ahmad, T.; Van Looy, A. Business Process Management and Digital Innovations: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176827.

Akpinar, T.; Akdemir, A. Intellectual capital. First Int. Jt. Symp. Bus. Adm. Chall. Bus. Adm. 2000, 82, 721–722.

Algan, Y.; Cahuc, P. Trust, Growth, and Well-being: New Evidence and Policy Implications. Handbook Econ. Growth 2014, 2, 49–120.

Almond, G.A.; Verba, S. The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Sage Publications: London, UK, 1989.

Al-Rahmi, W.M.; Al-Adwan, A.S.; Al-Maatouk, Q.; Othman, M.S.; Alsaud, A.R.; Almogren, A.S.; Al-Rahmi, A.M. Integrating Communication and Task–Technology Fit Theories: The Adoption of Digital Media in Learning. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108144.

Alshammari, A.F. Digital transformation, environmental protection, and technology competence: An integrated analysis of sustainability preferences. Amazonia Investiga 2023, 12(72), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.72.12.13.

Bakeeva, E.V.; Biricheva, E.V. “I” and collective responsibility. Vestn. St. -Peterbg. Univ. Filos. I Konfl. 2021, 37, 41–52.

Balashova, A.N. Electoral Campaign Technology in Western Political Science. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science 2000, 2, 62–79.

Barbolin, M.P.; Kolesov, V.I. The Spiritual and Moral Ideology of Education is the Genetic and Generating Core of Sustainable Human and Social Development in Modern Conditions of a Market Economy. Vestnik of Kostroma State University 2009, 15, 16–24. Available online: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48967968 (accessed on 12 February 2024).

Becker, G. Human Capital; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1964.

Berger, A.N. The Economic Effects of Technological Progress: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 2003, 35(2), 141–176. https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2003.0009.

Borojević, T.; Petrović, N.; Radaković, J.A.; Glomazić, H.; Radojičić, M.; Milenković, N.; Maletič, D.; Maletič, M. Youth Participation for Sustainable Value Creation: The Role and Prioritization of SDGs. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316456.

Bowman, B.M.; Abbott-Donnelly, I.; Barsoum, J-F.; Williams, P.; Hunt, D.V.L.; Rogers, C.D.F. The Water Pivot: Transforming Unsustainable Consumption to Valuing Water as a Resource for Life. Front. Sustain. Cities 2023, 4, 1177574. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1177574.

Brigida, V.; Golik, V.I.; Voitovich, E.V.; Kukartsev, V.V.; Gozbenko, V.E.; Konyukhov, V.Y.; Oparina, T.A. Technogenic Reservoirs Resources of Mine Methane When Implementing the Circular Waste Management Concept. Resources 2024, 13, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13020033.

Camus, A.; Paneva-Marinova, D.; Luchev, D. Digital Humanities: Challenges of the Transformation of Tools and Objects of Knowledge in Contemporary Humanities. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage 2013, 3, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2013.3.11.

Carrera, L. Active aging and urban policies: the space as an instrument for an inclusive and sustainable city. Front. Sociol. 2023, 8:1257926. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1257926.

CEC of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The results of the early elections of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan according to the data of the Central Election Commission of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2022. Available online: https://www.election.gov.kz/rus/news/releases/index.php?ID=8012 (accessed on 21 November 2023).

Coleman, J. S. Grundlagen der Sozialtheorie. Bd. 1. Oldenburg: München, Germany, 1991.

Dahri, N.A.; Al-Rahmi, W.M.; Almogren, A.S.; Yahaya, N.; Vighio, M.S.; Al-maatuok, Q.; Al-Rahmi, A.M.; Al-Adwan, A.S. Acceptance of Mobile Learning Technology by Teachers: Influencing Mobile Self-Efficacy and 21st-Century Skills-Based Training. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8514. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118514.

Daly, Н. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston: Beacon Press, 1997. 264 p.

Danko, A.V. Security of the state, society and the individual. In Collection of scientific papers of the Department of Management and Informatics; MFA Russia: Moscow, Russia, 2002; pp. 80.

Diamond, L. Ill winds: saving democracy from Russian rage. Chinese Ambit. Am. Complacency. Penguin Press: New York, USA, 2019.

Dlimbetova, G.; Kurmanbayev, R.; Akimish, D.; Toktaganova, G.; Zharmenova, B. The effectiveness of socio-economic mechanisms in environmental education of young people in Kazakhstan. Economic Annals-XXI 2023, 203(5-6), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V203-07.

Freedom House. Countries and Territories. 2020. Available online: https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores (accessed on 10 March 2024)

Fukuyama, F. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. Profile Books: Macmillan, 2014.

Fukuyama, F. Trust: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. Free Press, 1996.

Gallagher, S. Embodied rationality. In The Mystery of Rationality. Bronner, G, Di Iorio, F., Eds; Springer: Cham, 2018; pp. 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94028-1_7.

Gallese, V.; Mastrogiorgio, A.; Petracca, E.; Viale, R. Embodied bounded rationality. In Palgrave Handbook of Bounded Rationality; R. Viale, R.; Eds; Routledge: London, UK, 2021; pp. 377–390. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/2904786 (accessed on 14 February 2024).

Gilyazova, O.S.; Zamoshchansky, I.I. Specific features of universal competences of higher education in Russia in the context of competence-based education: conceptual analysis. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania – Perspectives of Science and Education 2022, 56 (2), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.2.5.

Golik, V.I.; Klyuev, R.V.; Martyushev, N.V.; Kondratiev, V.V.; Tynchenko, V.S.; Gladkikh, V.A.; Iushkova, L.V.; Brigida, V. Reuse and Mechanochemical Processing of Ore Dressing Tailings Used for Extracting Pb and Zn. Materials 2023, 16, 7004. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16217004.

Gomes, S.; Lopes, J.M. Unlocking the potential of circular consumption: The influence of circular habits, environmental concerns and the search for pro-sustainable information on circular consumption. Business Strategy & Development 2023, 7, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.327.

Grimes, M. Organizing consent: The Role of Procedural Fairness in Political Trust and Compliance. European Journal of Political Research 2006, 45, 285–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00299.x.

Grimes, M. Procedural fairness and political trust. In Handbook on political trust; Zmerli, S., Van der Meer, T.W.G., Eds; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2017; pp. 256–269.

Gulevich, О.; Guseva, В. A Methodology to Measure Procedural Justice in the Political Sphere. PS 2023, 16, 6. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v16i91.1457.

Ha, J.W.; Jeon, E.C.; Park, S.K. Status of environmental awareness and participation in Seoul, Korea and factors that motivate a green lifestyle to mitigate climate change. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability 2023, 5, 100211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2023.100211.

Han, J.; Song. Y; Chen, J. Reducing the “digital divide” to reap the “digital dividend”: spatial differences and convergence of the digital economy in cities of China. Front. Sustain. Cities 2024, 6, 1283604. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2024.1283604.

Hsieh, N.-H. Does global business have a responsibility to promote just institutions? Business Ethics Quarterly 2009, 19(2), 251–73. doi:10.5840/beq200919213.

Hussain, S.; Hussain, E.; Saxena. P.; Sharma. A; Thathola, P.; Sonwani, S. Navigating the Impact of Climate Change in India: a Perspective on Climate Action (SDG13) and Sustainable Cities and Communities (SDG11). Front. Sustain. Cities 2024, 5, 1308684. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.1308684.

Iaremenko, O. Contradictory Unity of Economic Efficiency and Social Justice as a Factor For Economic System Functioning and Evolution. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya = Economic Theory 2016, 14. 19–32. Available online: 32. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-429807 (accessed on 14 June 2023).

Inshakova, N. The Perfection of Chaos: What is Entropy and How to Live in Complete Uncertainty. Forbes 2022. Available online: https://www.forbes.ru/forbeslife/482498-bezuprecnost-haosa-cto-takoe-entropia-i-kak-zit-v-polnoj-neopredelennosti (accessed on 14 December 2023).

Kerimov, T. The persistence of critique and the impasses of postcritique. Filosofiya. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki 2023, 7(2), 60-85. https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2023-2-60-85

Kirillova, N.B.; Shlykova, O.V. Modifying the humanities: global challenges of the digital revolution. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania – Perspectives of Science and Education 2022, 59 (5), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.5.1.

Kirillova, N.B. New concepts of media science in the sociocultural system of the information civilization. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania – Perspectives of Science and Education 2021, 54(6), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.6.1.

Klyuev, R.V.; Brigida, V.S.; Lobkov, K.Y.; Stupina, A.А.; Tynchenko, V.V. On the issue of monitoring crack formation in natural-technical systems during earth surface displacements. MIAB. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin 2023, 11(1), 292-304. https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2023_111_0_292

Kusumadani, A.I.; Rahardjo, S.B.; Yamtinah, S.; Prayitno, B.A. Development of High-Order Thinking Skills (HOTs) Instruments with a Socio-Scientific Problem-Based Learning Approach on the Subject of Viruses. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 2023, 107, pp.140–164. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2023.107.009

Lehmann, J.; Joseph, S.M. (Eds.). Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology (1st ed.). London, Routledge. 2009. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849770552.

Li, M.; Jiang, S.; Jotikasthira, N. Developing A Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development Education Through Digital Tools: Qualitative Insights from Southwest China. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching 2024, 13(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n1p119.

Li, W.; Cai, J.; Zhu, Y. et al. Can digital finance development drive green transformation in manufacturing? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2024, 31, 23876–23895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32402-1.

Lin, C.-C.; Dong, C.-M. Exploring Consumers’ Purchase Intention on Energy-Efficient Home Appliances: Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior, Perceived Value Theory, and Environmental Awareness. Energies 2023, 16, 2669. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062669.

Liu, H-Y. Editorial: Citizen engagement and innovative approaches in sustainable urban transitions. Front. Sustain. Cities 2023, 5, 1341568. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.1341568.

Liu, T.; Han, G.; Nie, W. Optimal Residence: Does Air Quality Affect Settlement Decisions of Urban Floating Migrants? Sustainability 2022, 14, 8042. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138042.

Loginov, A.V.; Rudenkin, D.V. Neither conflict, no concord: Performing ideology in contemporary Russia. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia 2020, 36(2), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.211.

Ma, Z.; Guo, Y. Leveraging Intangible Cultural Heritage Resources for Advancing China’s Knowledge-Based Economy. Journal of the knowledge economy 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01643-9.

Malyukova, L.S.; Martyushev, N.V.; Tynchenko, V.V.; Kondratiev, V.V.; Bukhtoyarov, V.V.; Konyukhov, V.Y.; Bashmur, K.A.; Panfilova, T.A.; Brigida, V. Circular Mining Wastes Management for Sustainable Production of Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511671.

Mandal, A. Digital Humanities. The Year’s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory 2016, 24(1), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/ywcct/mbw015.

March, J.; Olsen, J.P. The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 1984, 78, 734–749.

Mastrogiorgio, A.; Petracca, E. Embodying rationality. In Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology; Magnani, L., Casadio, C., Eds; Springer: Cham, 2016; pp. 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38983-7_12.

Mill, J.S. On liberty. London: John Parker, 1859.

Millard, J.; Fucci, V. The role of social innovation in tackling global poverty and vulnerability. Front. Sociol. 2023, 8, 966918. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.966918.

Mincer, J.; Polachek, S. Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women. In Gender and Economics; Jane, H., Ed.; Edward Elgar: Aldershot, UK, 1995; pp. 317–349.

Muñoz-García, I.M.; Alcántara-Manzanares, J.; Medina Quintana, S. Key Aspects of Adolescents’ Environmental Attitudes with a View to Transformative Education. Education Sciences 2022, 12(9), 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090591.

Nicolaou, C.; Matsiola, M.; Kalliris, G. The Challenge of an Interactive Audiovisual-Supported Lesson Plan: Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) in Adult Education. Education Sciences 2022, 12(11), 836. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110836.

Nisnevich, Yu.A. About actors of political responsibility. Problem analysis and public management design 2013, 6(3), 82–87.

Olsen, M. The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. Yale University Press, 1982.

Patterson, J. Into the Wild: Uncertain Frontiers and Sustainable Human–Nature Interactions. Front. Sociol. 2024, 9, 1325963. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1325963.

Pena-Vega, A.; Cohen, M.; Flores, L.M.; Le Treut, H.; Lagos, M.; Castilla, J.C.; Gaxiola, A.; Marquet, P. Young People Are Changing Their Socio-Ecological Reality to Face Climate Change: Contrasting Transformative Youth Commitment with Division and Inertia of Governments. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215116.

Petracca, E. Embodying Bounded Rationality: From Embodied Bounded Rationality to Embodied Rationality. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 710607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710607.

Piscitelli, A.; D’Uggento, A.M. Do young people really engage in sustainable behaviors in their lifestyles?. Social Indicators Research 2022, 163, 1467–1485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02955-0.

Popov, A.V. Politics and strategy. Bulletin of Moscow University. 12: Political Science. 2015, 4, 91–98.

Pushkareva, G.V. The study of electoral behavior: the contours of the cognitive model. Polis. Political Studies 2003, 3, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2003.03.12.

Putilova, E.; Tsiplakova, Y.; Diachkova, A.; Knysh, E. Environmental education and its principles. E3S Web of Conferences 2023, 431, 09003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343109003.

Putilova, E.; Tsiplakova, Y.; Pyrina, M. Network user behavior and media risks in modern education. E3S Web of Conferences 2023, 431, 05004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343105004.

Putnam, R.D. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press: New Jersey, USA, 1993.

Rahman, H.A.; Dahalan, D.; Bakar, A.S.A. Effects of an Environmental Education Intervention on Environmental Sustainability Among Youth in Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 2023, 11(3), 873-886. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i3.1036.

Rasinski, K.A.; Tyler, T.R. Fairness and vote choice in the 1984 presidential election. American Politics Quarterly 1988, 16, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8801600101.

Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. URSS: LENAND: Moscow, Russia, 2017.

Restuputri, D. P.; Amalia, F.; Masudin, I.; Widayat, W. The influence of industry 4.0, internet of things, and physical-cyber systems on human factors: a case study of workers in Indonesian oil and gas refineries. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2023, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2023.2284295.

Russel, S.J.; Noving, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall: New Jersey, USA, 2003.

Scherer, A.G.; Palazzo, G. Toward a political conception of corporate social responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review 2007, 32(4), 1096–1120. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26585837.

Shutaleva, A. Ecological Culture and Critical Thinking: Building of a Sustainable Future. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13492. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813492.

Shutaleva, A.; Martyushev, N.; Starostin, A.; Salgiriev, A.; Vlasova, O.; Grinek, A.; Nikonova, Z.; Savchenko, I. Migration Potential of Students and Development of Human Capital. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050324.

Spellman, B.A.; Schnall, S. Embodied rationality. Queen’s Law J. 2009, 35, 117–164. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1404020.

Tahat, D.N.; Habes, M.; Tahat, K.; Pasha, S.A.; Attar, R.W.; Al-Rahmi, W.M.; Alblehai, F. Technology Enhanced Learning in Undergraduate Level Education: A Case Study of Students of Mass Communication. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15280. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115280.

Thornton, P.K. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010, 365, 2853–2867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134.

Tocqueville, A. Democracy in America. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USA, 2002.

Tomyuk, O. N.; Diachkova, A. V.; Dudchik, A. Yu.; Kerimov, A. A. The educational potential of media content in the context of the formation of the individual legal culture. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania – Perspectives of Science and Education 2022, 60(6), 583-597. https://doi.org/ 10.32744/pse.2022.6.35.

Trudeau, P.E. The Essential Trudeau. M&S: Toronto, Canada, 1998.

Tyler, T.R.; Caine, A. The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981, 41, 642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.642.

Tyler, T.R.; Rasinski, K.A.; McGraw, K.M. The influence of perceived injustice on the endorsement of political leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1985, 15, 700–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb02269.x.

Tyler, T.R.; Van der Toorn, J. Social justice. In The Oxford handbook of political psychology, 2nd ed; Huddy, L., Sears, D.O., Levy, J.S., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 627–661.

Uda, S.; Basrowi, B. Environmental education using SARITHA-Apps to enhance environmentally friendly supply chain efficiency and foster environmental knowledge towards sustainability. Uncertain Supply Chain Management 2024, 12(1), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.9.015.

UNESCO. World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development: Conference Report by the General Rapporteur; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2015; Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232888 (accessed on 10 April 2024).

United Nations. About Democracy and Human Right. Available online: https://www.ohchr.org/en/about-democracy-and-human-rights (accessed on 14 February 2024).

Ursul, A.D., Marushevsky, G.B. Moral and ethical problems of humanity in the perspective of the transition to sustainable development. Sociodynamics 2013, 11, 1–68. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.11.1024.

Usikova, L. Political culture. Vestnik of Sholokhov Moscow State University for the Humanities: History and Political Science Series 2010, 1, 90–101. Available online: http://j-locus.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Vestnik-1-2010.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2024).

Vasconcelos, C.; Paz, M. Inquiring children and elementary school teachers to diagnose their conceptions about islands. Frontiers in Education 2023, 8, 1115984. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1115984.

Viale, R. La razionalità limitata ‘embodied’ alla base del cervello sociale ed economico. Sistemi Intelligenti 2019, 31, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1422/92942.

Whelan, G. The Political Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Research Agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly 2012, 22(4), 709–737. doi:10.5840/beq201222445.

Williams, B. A Fair State: Review of John Rawls. Political Liberalism’, London Review of Books 1993, 15. Available online: https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v15/n09/bernard-williams/a-fair-state (accessed on 14 February 2024).

Yachina, N. The Problem of Spiritual and Moral Formation of Personality. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015, 197, 1575–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.113.

Zhanbaev, R.; Maksimov, D.; Tansykbayeva, G.; Nurkenova, M.; Abdykadyrkyzy, R.; Tomanov, M.; Kozhakanova, M.; Sadykova М. Features of the Relationship 4D = “D + 3D”: Demoetic – Demographic – Democratic – Demoeconomic and Environmental Components in the Assessment of Sustainable Development of Regions. International Journal of Pedagogical Advances in Technology-Mediated Education 2022, 2, 01–09. Available online: http://patme-journal.iatels.com/index.php/patme/article/view/51 (accessed on 12 February 2023).

Zhanbayev, R.A.; Irfan, M.; Shutaleva, A.V.; Maksimov, D.G.; Abdykadyrkyzy, R.; Filiz, Ş. Demoethical Model of Sustainable Development of Society: A Roadmap towards Digital Transformation. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612478.

Zhanbayev, R.A.; Maksimov, D.G.; Sagintayeva, S.S.; Madenova, A.E. Demoeconomics: the interconnection of water resources and demoethical values. Bulletin of the Karaganda university Economy series 2024, 29, 1(113), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.31489/2024ec1/121-131.

Zhanbayev, R.A; Temirbaeva, G.R.; Aibossynova, D.A.; Yerkin, A.Y.; Maksimov, D.G. Quasi-public Sector: Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and Tools for Their Integration into Corporate Strategies. Scientific Journal “Bulletin of NAS RK” 2022, 5, 253–269. https://doi.org/10.32014/2022.2518-1467.375.

Zhanbayev, R.A; Yerkin, A.Y; Shutaleva, A.V; Irfan, M; Gabelashvili, K; Temirbaeva, G.R.; Chazova, I.Y.; Abdykadyrkyzy, R. State asset management paradigm in the quasi-public sector and environmental sustainability: Insights from the Republic of Kazakhstan. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 10, 1037023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1037023.