This study aims to examine and analyze financial statement fraud from the perspective of the hexagon theory using secondary data. The research sample was selected through purposive sampling, consisting of Ministries and Agencies in Indonesia. The research method employing the OLS (ordinary least squares) approach involves testing the model’s suitability through the F-statistical test, evaluating the coefficient of determination by examining, and conducting hypothesis testing using EViews. The findings of this study suggest that pressure and sscapability do not significantly influence financial reporting fraud. In contrast, opportunity, rationalization, arrogance, and collusion positively and significantly impact financial fraud reports. Implementing a whistleblowing system is crucial for ensuring that e-procurement encompasses all elements of government organizations, serving as a means of transparency and accountability to mitigate the occurrence of fraudulent financial reports within government entities, particularly in Ministries and Agencies in Indonesia. The financial audit opinion is not intended to detect fraud but to assess conformity with government accounting standards, the extent of disclosure, compliance with legislation, and the effectiveness of the government's internal control system. This can encourage institutions in other countries to strengthen the financial security of their organizations.

ACFE. (1998). E “ Fraud Examiners Manual , Third Edition 2000.

AICPA. (2011). AICPA, “Objective of Financial Statement (FASB) Statement.” Teori Akuntansi”. Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada.

Aini. (2019). Pengaruh Management Change, Financial Distress, Ukuran Perusahaan Klien, Dan Opini Audit Terhadap Auditor Switching. 4(2), 245–258.

Albrecht. (2008). No Title. Asset Misappropriation Research White Paper for the Institute for Fraud Prevention.

Apriani. (2020). Pengaruh komponen-komponen fraud star terhadap korupsi dengan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) sebagai variabel moderasi (Studi kasus pada Mahkamah Agung RI). Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 7(1).

Aprilia. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard. ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 8(2), 105–118.

Aviantara. (2021). The Association Between Fraud Hexagon and Government’s Fraudulent Financial Report. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 6(1), 26–42.

Desviana. (2021). Analisis Kecurangan pada Pengelolaan Dana Desa dalam Perspektif Fraud Hexagon. Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1), 50–73.

Erlim, K. W., & Juliana, R. (2017). Pengaruh Tingkat Edukasi Dan Spesialisasi Pendidikan Ceo Terhadap Performa Perusahaan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Maranatha, 16(2), 177–186.

Faiza Dwi Rahmadhani, H Herliani, Adi Setiawan, & Tiara Muthiarsih. (2024). The Effect of Green Marketing and Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Image of Emina Products. Apollo: Journal of Tourism and Business, 2(1), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.58905/apollo.v2i1.294

Faradiza, S. A. (2018). Fraud Pentagon Dan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. EkBis: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 1–22.

Hartina, S. F. and. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Fraud Pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (Skpd) Di Kota Bogor. Jurnal Akunida, 3(2), 2442–3033.

Huafner. (2010). Local government fraud: The Roslyn Scholl District Case. Management Research Review, 33(3), 198–209.

Jensen, M. C. & W. H. M. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Kusumosari, L., & Solikhah, B. (2021). . “Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Fraud Hexagon Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2014-2018.” 1–243.

Larum. (2021). “Fraudulent Financial Reporting : Menguji Potensi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan Dengan Menggunakan Teori Fraud Hexagon.” Accounting and Financial Review, 4(1), 82–94.

Marks. (2012). The Mind Behind the Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Elements. Crowe Horwarth LLP.

Muna, A., Ausat, A., Al Bana, T., & Gadzali, S. S. (2023). Basic Capital of Creative Economy: The Role of Intellectual, Social, Cultural, and Institutional Capital. Apollo: Journal of Tourism and Business, 1(2), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.58905/APOLLO.V1I2.21

Mursalam dkk. (2024). Hexagon Fraud Perspective on Financial Statement Fraud in Indonesia Insurace Companies. KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi, 16(01). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.16.1.2024.172-184

Mutmainah, I., & Eha Hasni Wahidhani. (2024). Examining the Determinant of Purchase Intention and Purchase Decision for Green Product: SEM Analysis. Apollo: Journal of Tourism and Business, 2(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.58905/apollo.v2i1.212

Nuril, J., Lia, R., Nanda, W. (2022). The Effect of Fraud Hexagon Model on Fraud Financial Statements in Companies in the Financial Sector. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Pajak, 6(2), 64–76.

Omukaga. (2019). Is the fraud diamond perspective valid in Kenya. Journal of Financial Crime. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2019-0141

Preicilia, C., Wahyudi, I., & Preicilia, A. (2022). Analisa kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan perspektif teori Fraud Hexagon. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(3), 1467–1479. https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v5i3.2476

Rahman. (2019). Pendeteksian Potensi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan Dengan Beneish Model (Studi Pada Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara yang Terdaftar di BEI). Jurnal Bisnis: Teori Dan Implementasi, 10, 80–86.

Oktavia, R., Rinaldo, NSM. (2024). Unveiling Fraud: The Hexagon Theory’s Revolutionary Approach to Detecting Financial Statement Manipulations. Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset), 16(01).

Rustriani. (2019). Fraud triangle in public procurement: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(4). https://doi.org/951-968. doi:10.1108/JFC-11-2018-0121

Safrizal, S., & Julianti, J. (2023). Analysis Debt Outside Country In Growth Economy Indonesia. Apollo: Journal of Tourism and Business, 1(2), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.58905/APOLLO.V1I2.41

Said. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility Dalam Perspektif Governance. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Sari, S. P., & Nugroho, N. K. (2020). Financial Statements Fraud dengan Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model: Tinjauan pada Perusahaan Terbuka di Indonesia. St Annual Conference of Ihtifaz.

Sari, D. ratna. (2021). Pengaruh Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris Perusahaan Manufaktur Sektor Industri Dasar dan Kimia yang Terdaftar di Bei Periode 2017-2019). Equity (Jurnal Akuntansi), 2(1).

Semendawai, Abdul Haris, E. a. (2011). Memahami Whistle Blower. Jakarta: Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban.

Steinbart, M. B. R. dan P. J. (2014). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Accounting Information System. Prentice Hall.

Suryandari., & V. P. (2021). “Determinan Fraud Dana Desa: Pengujian Elemen Fraud Hexagon, Machiavellian, Dan Love of Money.” Review Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 5(1), 55–78.

Utomo. (2018). Kecurangan Dalam Laporan Keuangan “Menguji Teori Fraud Triangle.” Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pajak, 19(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jap.v19i1.241

Vousinas. (2019). Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia. Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 26(1), 372–381.

Wibowo. (2015). “Perancangan Sistem EProcurement Pada PT. Multi Eraguna Usaha.” Yogyakarta : UPN Veteran, 128–138.

Widiyarta. (2017). Pengaruh Kompetensi Aparatur, Budaya Organisasi, Whistleblowing dan Sistem Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa (Studi Empiris Terhadap Pemerintah Desa di Kabupaten Buleleng). E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 8(2).

Yasinta. (2024). Determinan Faktor-Faktor Capability sebagai Perspektif Fraud Diamond terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Owner (Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi), 08(01). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v8i1.1880

Zuberi, O., & Mzenzi, S. I. (2019). Analysis of employee and management fraud in Tanzania. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(2), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2018-0012