Exploring internal factors of capacity expansion decision-making in Hungarian family businesses in food industry: Introducing a novel model

Kinga Nemes, Márta Konczos-Szombathelyi, Péter Kovács

Article ID: 9263
Vol 8, Issue 14, 2024

VIEWS - 1359 (Abstract)

Abstract


The purpose of the research on which this paper is based was to test and validate the decision-making model previously set up by the authors. The model presents the internal factors influencing the decisions of family businesses regarding capacity expansion and the possible decision outcomes. The distinctiveness of the model is that it presents the internal factors affecting decisions related to capacity expansion, thereby helping family businesses to make decisions. For collecting data, both qualitative and quantitative techniques were used. As qualitative data collection techniques, in-depth interviews and focus group interviews were conducted. As quantitative method, an online questionnaire was used, whose questions were compiled based on previous research of the authors. The questions indirectly assess the internal factors influencing capacity expansion decisions of family businesses and the possible outcome of the decisions. The questionnaire was sent to the VOSZ (National Association of Entrepreneurs), MAPI (Hungarians on the Market Club) and the Association of Family Entrepreneurs, which means approximately 500 addresses. After data cleaning, 135 completed questionnaire were analyzed with SPSS software. In-depth interview was conducted with the heads of five family businesses, whose results were analyzed using tagging and artificial intelligence. The model previously set up by the authors was validated by both qualitative and quantitative research. It can be concluded that the following three internal factors influence the decision of family businesses regarding capacity expansion: socio-emotional wealth, cooperation between generations, and heterogeneous top management team. The family businesses themselves are not necessarily aware of this, so the model enriches the scientific literature and helps in the conscious operation of family businesses.


Keywords


decision on capacity expansion; family businesses; influencing factors; model testing; SME

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Almeida, F. (2021). Open-Innovation Practices: Diversity in Portuguese SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030169
  2. Arnold, T., Kleve, H., & Roth, S. (2023). Within a mesh of expectations: Dealing with dilemmas in business families using systemic tools from family coaching. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 40(4), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2962
  3. Biel, M., & Ślusarczyk, B. (2022). Management methods and tools in family businesses: Impact on the effectiveness of achieving goals. Journal of International Studies, 15(4), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2022/15-4/11
  4. Birdthistle, N., & Hales, R. (2022a). What is a family business and their contribution to the global economy? In Emerald Publishing Limited eBooks (pp. 11–15). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80382-487-120221002
  5. Birdthistle, N., & Hales, R. (2022b). Family Businesses and Their Importance to Worldwide Economies. In Emerald Publishing Limited eBooks (pp. 9–13). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80382-573-120221002
  6. Bite, P., & Konczos-Szombathelyi, M. (2020). Employer branding concept for small- and medium-sized family firms. Journal of International Studies, 13(3), 143-160. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-1/1
  7. Braun, M., Latham, S., & Porschitz, E. (2016). All together now: strategy mapping for family businesses. Journal of Business Strategy/the Journal of Business Strategy, 37(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-12-2014-0154
  8. Brundin, E., & Languilaire, J. E. (2023). When the display of emotion is not enough: An emotion boundary management perspective on the quality of strategic decisions. Long Range Planning, 56(5), 102245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102245
  9. Bürgel, T. R., & Hiebl, M. R. W. (2023). Conflict Management Strategies and the digitalization of family Firms: The moderating role of generational ownership Dispersion. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2023.3293855
  10. Catalano F., Bianchi B., Berardi A., Leone A., Tamborrino A., 2021, Experimental trials and dynamical simulation of the potential biogas production in a frozen food industry. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 87, 295–300.
  11. Central Statistics Office https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/regiok/gyorkkv12.pdf
  12. Central Statistics Office https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/gsz/hu/gsz0018.html
  13. Cioca, A., Wehbe, K., Popescu, D., & Popescu, C. (2020). The main drivers for sustainable decisions in a family business that impact the company’s performance. Sustainability, 12(20), 8659. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208659
  14. Civelek, M., Ključnikov, A., Fialová, V., Folvarčná, A., & Stoch, M. (2021). Major obstacles in innovative activities of family-owned SMEs: Evidence from Czechia. Economics & Sociology, 14(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2021/14-2/7
  15. Csiba-Herczeg A., Koteczki R., Lukács B., Balassa B. E., 2023, Case study-based scenario analysis comparing GHG emissions of wine packaging types. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 15, 100649.
  16. Da Silva Hounsell, M., Coelho, A., Sousa, N., & Quesado, P. R. (2021). Family Business Management: A case study in the Portuguese footwear industry. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010055
  17. Dangelico R.M., Nastasi A., Pisa S., 2019, A comparison of family and nonfamily small firms in their approach to green innovation: A study of Italian companies in the agri‐food industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 1434–1448.
  18. Delgado‐García, J. B., Mazagatos, V. B., Romero‐Merino, M. E., & Díaz‐Portugal, C. (2023). Family CEO affect and R&D investments of family firms: The moderation effect of family ownership structure. Long Range Planning, 56(5), 102230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102230
  19. Dőry T., (2023) Key Factors of Sustainability-Oriented Innovation on Competitiveness of SMEs: A Review, Chemical Engineering Transactions, Vol 107, 31.-36, https://doi.org/10.3303/CET23107006
  20. European Commission https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/smes/supporting-entrepreneurship/family-business_en, downloaded 2023. 11. 24.
  21. Ferreira, J., & Coelho, A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, innovation and branding capabilities and their impact on competitive advantage and SME’s performance in Portugal: the moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(3), 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis-10-2018-0108
  22. Gerő, H. E. J., Kincses, Á., & Tóth, G. (2021). Spatial characteristics of domestic micro, small and medium enterprises. Területi Statisztika, 61(6), 769–796. https://doi.org/10.15196/ts610604
  23. Guedes, M. J., Patel, P. C., Kowalkowski, C., & Oghazi, P. (2022). Family business, servitization, and performance: Evidence from Portugal. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122053
  24. Hernández‐Linares, R., & Fernández, M. C. L. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, market orientation, and organizational performance: Family firms versus non-family firms. European Journal of Family Business, 10(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v10i1.6780
  25. Herrero, I. (2017). Family involvement and Sustainable Family Business: Analysing their effects on diversification strategies. Sustainability, 9(11), 2099. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112099
  26. Howorth, C., & Ali, Z. a. H. (2001). Family business succession in Portugal: an examination of case studies in the furniture industry. Family Business Review, 14(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00231.x
  27. Hsueh, J. W., Campopiano, G., Tetzlaff, E., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2023). Managing non-family employees’ emotional connection with the family firms via shifting, compensating, and leveraging approaches. Long Range Planning, 56(5), 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102274
  28. Jang, J. A., Lee, E., & Jung, H. (2022). A Study of Consumers’ Perceptions of Take-Out Food before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak: Applying Big Data Analysis. Sustainability, 14(19), 11889. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911889
  29. Jones, O., & Li, H. (2017). Effectual entrepreneuring: sensemaking in a family-based start-up. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 29(5–6), 467–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1297854
  30. Kathuria, A., Karhade, P. P., Ning, X., & Konsynski, B. R. (2023). Blood and Water: Information technology investment and control in family-owned businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40(1), 208–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2172770
  31. Keßler, A., & Zipper-Weber, V. (2023). Born-again global internationalization in family businesses as a process: a dynamic capabilities perspective in the context of socioemotional wealth. Journal of Family Business Management, 13(4), 1366–1391. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfbm-01-2023-0005
  32. Kleve, H., Koellner, T., Von Schlippe, A., & Rüsen, T. A. (2020). The business family 3.0: Dynastic business families as families, organizations and networks—Outline of a theory extension. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 37(3), 516–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2684
  33. Kotlar, J., Fang, H., De Massis, A. V., & Frattini, F. (2014). Profitability Goals, Control Goals, and the R&D Investment Decisions of Family and Nonfamily Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12165
  34. Lee, C., Chen, H. C., Peng, C. L., & Chen, S. H. (2023). Sustainability of Taiwanese SME family Businesses in the Succession Decision-Making Agenda. Sustainability, 15(2), 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021237
  35. Liu, T., & Yu, X. (2023). Micro-foundations of strategic decision-making in family business organisations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Long Range Planning, 56(5), 102198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102198
  36. Madari, Z. (2021). Prospects of the Hungarian mid-sized enterprises in agriculture. Köz-gazdaság, 16(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.14267/retp2021.01.05
  37. Mitrović, S., Marić, M., Subotić, M., Dudić, B., & Greguš, M. (2019). Family entrepreneurship and personal career preferences as the factors of differences in the development of entrepreneurial potential of students. Sustainability, 11(20), 5693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205693
  38. Mucci, D. M., Jorissen, A., Frezatti, F., & De Souza Bido, D. (2021). Managerial controls in private family firms: the influence of a family’s decision premises. Sustainability, 13(4), 2158. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042158
  39. Nemes K., Konczos-Szombathelyi M., (2023), Capacity Expansion for Sustainable Development in Family Businesses – Recyclable Packaging Materials in Food Industry, Chemical Engineering Transactions, vol.107, 181-186 DOI:10.3303/CET23107031
  40. Nemes, K., & Konczos-Szombathelyi, M. (2023). On the way to a new model for decision-making regarding capacity expansion in small and medium sized family businesses: a systematic literature review. In E. Pinto da Costa, M. do Rosario Anjos, & L. Lovrencic Butkovic (Eds.). 98th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development. Book of Proceedings. pp. 304-311. Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency
  41. Németh, K., & Nèmeth, S. (2018). Professzionalizálódó családi vállalkozások Magyarországon [Professionalizing family businesses in Hungary]. Prosperitas, 5(3), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.31570/prosp_2018_03_2
  42. Putritamara, J. A., Hartono, B., Toiba, H., Utami, H. N., Rahman, M. S., & Masyithoh, D. (2023). Do Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation Improve Business Resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Insights from Beekeeping MSMEs in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(3), 1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031760
  43. Schell, S., De Groote, J. K., Richard, S., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2023). The role of affect in the selection of nonfamily top management team members in family businesses. Long Range Planning, 56(5), 102288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102288
  44. Utrilla, P. N., Moreno, V. M., Corpas-Iglesias, F. A., & Cortés‐García, F. J. (2018). Family businesses transitioning to a circular economy model: the case of “Mercadona.” Sustainability, 10(2), 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020538
  45. Van, H. T., Huu, A. T., & Ushakov, D. (2017). Liberal reforms & economic growth: Current issues and interrelations. Journal of International Studies, 10(4), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-4/8
  46. Vieira, E. (2017). Board of directors characteristics and performance in family firms and under the crisis. Corporate Governance, 18(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-01-2017-0010
  47. Wei, X., & Chen, L. (2022). Dispersion of family ownership and innovation input in family firms. Sustainability, 14(14), 8418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148418
  48. Yong, J. Y., & Acosta, R. F. (2024). Innovation and business diversification for family business continuity. In Emerald Publishing Limited eBooks (pp. 83–89). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-760-020241009


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9263

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Kinga Nemes, Márta Konczos-Szombathelyi, Péter Kovács

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.