This study examines innovative teaching approaches’ effect on the quality of education for prospective primary teachers. A mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques was employed. Initially, the two data sets were analyzed separately—qualitative data through thematic analysis and quantitative data through statistical methods. The themes emerging from the qualitative analysis were then cross-referenced with the quantitative findings to evaluate whether the trends supported each other. For instance, if a qualitative theme indicated that teachers felt more confident using innovative methods, this was supported by quantitative data showing improvements in teacher performance scores or student outcomes. The study had 200 participants, and the study findings revealed a significant positive impact of innovative teaching approaches on the quality of education for future primary teachers. Participants reported increased engagement, improved critical thinking, and enhanced adaptability in classroom settings. The study findings reveal that innovative approaches significantly improve the quality of education for prospective primary teachers by fostering more interactive, technology-enhanced, and student-centered learning environments. To maintain these improvements, it is essential to invest in infrastructure, provide ongoing support for teacher educators, and continuously update curricula to reflect emerging educational technologies and practices. These findings emphasize the importance of innovation in teacher training to meet the evolving demands of primary education.

Abedi, E. A. (2023). Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices. Journal of Computers in Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6

Abildina, S., Sarsekeyeva, Z., Mukhametzhanova, A., Kopbalina, K., & Nurgaliyeva, S. (2024). Enhancing reading literacy among elementary school learners in Kazakhstan: The application and effectiveness of modern teaching techniques. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8), 5905. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.5905

Adeoye, M. A., Prastikawati, E. F., & Abimbowo, Y. O. (2024). Empowering Learning: Pedagogical Strategies for Advancing 21st Century Skills and Quality Education. Journal of Nonformal Education, 10(2), 10–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v10i1.1451

Benitt, N., Schmidt, T., & Legutke, M. K. (2019). Teacher learning and technology-enhanced teacher education. Second handbook of English language teaching, 1171-1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_58

Chen, C. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2021). In-service teachers’ conceptions of mobile technology-integrated instruction: Tendency towards student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 170, 104224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104224

Chen, R. H. (2021). Fostering students’ workplace communicative competence and collaborative mindset through an inquiry-based learning design. Education sciences, 11(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010017

Chiu, T. K. (2022). School learning support for teacher technology integration from a self-determination theory perspective. Educational technology research and development, 70(3), 931–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10096-x

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Mixed methods research: Designing and conducting. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x

Cui, C., & Yin, Y. (2023). How professional training impacts teaching innovation among ideological and political teachers: the mediating and moderating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1246951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.

Czajka, C. D., & McConnell, D. (2019). The adoption of student-centered teaching materials as a professional development experience for college faculty. International Journal of Science Education, 41(5), 693-711. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1578908

Day, C. (2019). Policy, teacher education and the quality of teachers and teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 25(5), 501-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1651100

Dörnyei, Z., & Muir, C. (2019). Creating a motivating classroom environment. Second handbook of English language teaching, 719-736. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_36

Elm, A., Nilsson, K. S., Björkman, A., & Sjöberg, J. (2023). Academic teachers’ experiences of technology enhanced learning (TEL) in higher education–A Swedish case. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2237329. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2237329

Fletcher, J., Everatt, J., Subramaniam, Y. D. B., & Ma, T. (2023). Perceptions about innovative and traditional learning spaces: Teachers and students in New Zealand primary schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 58(1), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-023-00280-9

Garira, E. (2020). A Proposed Unified Conceptual Framework for Quality of Education in Schools. Sage Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899445

Granero-Gallegos, A., Escaravajal, J. C., López-García, G. D., & Baños, R. (2022). Influence of Teaching Styles on the Learning Academic Confidence of Teachers in Training. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030071

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Karabassova, L. (2021). English-medium education reform in Kazakhstan: comparative study of educational change across two contexts in one country. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(5), 553-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.1884436

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International journal of STEM education, 5, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6

Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., & Jotsov, V. (2023). A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: a systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of education, 48(1), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389

Lombardi, L., Thomas, V., Rodeyns, J., Mednick, F. J., De Backer, F., & Lombaerts, K. (2024). Primary school teachers’ experiences of teaching strategies that promote pupils’ critical thinking. Educational Studies, 50(5), 683-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1990017

Mebert, L., Barnes, R., Dalley, J., Gawarecki, L., Ghazi-Nezami, F., Shafer, G., ... & Yezbick, E. (2020). Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 30-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306

Mingisheva, N. (2023). Development and Challenges of Standardized Testing in Kazakhstan: Transition from National to International Standards. Journal of Educational Sciences, 76(3), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.26577/JES.2023.v76.i3.08

Mingorance Estrada, Á. C., Granda Vera, J., Rojas Ruiz, G., & Alemany Arrebola, I. (2019). Flipped classroom to improve university student centered learning and academic performance. Social Sciences, 8(11), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8110315

Muganga, L., & Ssenkusu, P. (2019). Teacher-centered vs. student-centered: An examination of student teachers’ perceptions about pedagogical practices at Uganda’s Makerere University. Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry, 11(2), 16-40. https://doi.org/10.18733/cpi29481

Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: Envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 575-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1055128

Nagima, B., Saniya, N., Gulden, Y., Saule, Z., Aisulu, S., & Nazigul, M. (2022). Influence of Special Learning Technology on the Effectiveness of Pedagogical Ethics Formation in Future Teachers. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(1), 1-6.Available at: https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i1.4313

Naz, F., & Murad, H. S. (2017). Innovative teaching has a positive impact on the performance of diverse students. Sage Open, 7(4), 215824401. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017734

Nurgabyl, D., Satkulov, B., & Kagazbayeva, A. (2023). Formation and development of mathematical literacy in the context of evaluative – Study tasks of PISA. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4), 701-722. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp701-722

Nurgaliyeva, S., Bolatov, A., Abildina, S., Zeinolla, S., Kurbonova, B., & Kyyakbayeva, U. (2024). COVID-19 Online Learning Challenges: Kazakhstan Secondary Schools Case Study. In Frontiers in Education, 9, 1448594. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1448594

Nurgaliyeva, S., Iztleuova, Z., Maigeldiyeva, S., Zhussupova, Z., Saduakas, G., & Omarova, G. (2023). Examining the relationships between teachers' job satisfaction and technological competencies. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 11(4), 898-912. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3375

Ospankulov, Y., Zhumabayeva, A., & Nurgaliyeva, S. (2023). The impact of folk games on primary school students. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(2), 125–131.Available at: https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i2.4473

Pfitzner-Eden, F. (2016). Why do I feel more confident? Bandura's sources predict preservice teachers' latent changes in teacher self-efficacy. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1486. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01486

Ratova, N., Japashov, N., Aitjanov, N., Abdulbakioglu, M., Maxutov, S., & Sapabek, A. (2024). Job Satisfaction of School Teachers in Kazakhstan: A Comparative Analysis of Survey Results by Demographic Factors. International Journal of Religion, 5(5), 1023-1040. https://doi.org/10.61707/07cqen46

Rögele, S., Rilling, B., Apfel, D. and Fuchs, J. (2022). Sustainable development competencies and student-centered teaching strategies in higher education institutions: the role of professors as gatekeepers. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(6), 1366-1385. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2021-0069

Rossoni, A. L., de Vasconcellos, E. P. G., & de Castilho Rossoni, R. L. (2024). Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review. Management Review Quarterly, 74(3), 1841-1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1

Sánchez, V. V., & Gutiérrez-Esteban, P. (2023). Challenges and enablers in the advancement of educational innovation. The forces at work in the transformation of education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, 104359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104359

Schweighofer, P., Weitlaner, D., Ebner, M. and Rothe, H. (2019). Influential factors for technology-enhanced learning: professionals’ views. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 12(3), 268-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-09-2017-0023

Serrano, D. R., Dea‐Ayuela, M. A., Gonzalez‐Burgos, E., Serrano‐Gil, A., & Lalatsa, A. (2019). Technology‐enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12330

Siphukhanyo, L., & Olawale, B. E. (2024). Chronicling the experiences of life sciences teachers and learners on the usage of enquiry-based learning in enhancing learners’ academic performance. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 7(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2024.2

Sivarajah, R. T., Curci, N. E., Johnson, E. M., Lam, D. L., Lee, J. T., & Richardson, M. L. (2019). A review of innovative teaching methods. Academic radiology, 26(1), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.03.025

Surma, T., Camp, G., de Groot, R., & Kirschner, P. A. (2022). Novice teachers’ knowledge of effective study strategies. In Frontiers in Education, 7, 996039. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.

Tajibayeva, Z., Nurgaliyeva, S., Aubakirova, K., Ladzina, N., Shaushekova, B., Yespolova, G., & Taurbekova, A. (2023). Investigation of the psychological, pedagogical and technological adaptation levels of repatriated university students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 11(3), 755-774. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3336

Tang, K. H. D. (2023). Student-centered Approach in Teaching and Learning: What Does It Really Mean?. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.218

Tang, T., Vezzani, V., & Eriksson, V. (2020). Developing critical thinking, collective creativity skills and problem solving through playful design jams. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100696

Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and information technologies, 28(6), 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Yakavets, N., Winter, L., Malone, K., Zhontayeva, Z., & Khamidulina, Z. (2023). Educational reform and teachers’ agency in reconstructing pedagogical practices in Kazakhstan. Journal of Educational Change, 24(4), 727-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09463-5

Zhang, A., Olelewe, C. J., Orji, C. T., Ibezim, N. E., Sunday, N. H., Obichukwu, P. U., & Okanazu, O. O. (2020). Effects of Innovative and Traditional Teaching Methods on Technical College Students’ Achievement in Computer Craft Practices. Sage Open, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020982986

Zhang, L., Basham, J. D., Carter Jr, R. A., & Zhang, J. (2021). Exploring Factors associated with the implementation of student-centered instructional practices in US classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103273

Zhumash, Z., Zhumabaeva, A., Nurgaliyeva, S., Saduakas, G., Lebedeva, L. A., & Zhoraeva, S. B. (2021). Professional teaching competence in preservice primary school teachers: Structure, criteria and levels. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i2.5699