Exploring the relationship between legitimacy, innovation, uncertainty and electric vehicle purchase intention: Empirical evidence from Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece

Alberto-Tomás Delso-Vicente, Luis Diaz-Marcos, Óscar Aguado-Tevar, María García de Blanes-Sebastián

Article ID: 9196
Vol 8, Issue 12, 2024

VIEWS - 258 (Abstract)

Abstract


This study analyzes the interaction between legitimacy, innovation, uncertainty, and electric vehicle (EV) purchase intention in Spain, Portugal, Italy, and Greece. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and data from 2016 to 2023, the relationships between these key variables are assessed. The results show that legitimacy has a positive impact on purchase intention, while innovation influences legitimacy but does not directly affect purchase intention. Uncertainty moderates these relationships in complex ways. The findings suggest that enhancing the perception of legitimacy is crucial to increase EV purchase intention, and strategies promoting innovation and managing uncertainty can improve market acceptance.


Keywords


legitimacy; innovation; uncertainty; purchase intention; electric vehicles

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Aaker, J., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). When Good Brands Do Bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1086/383419
  2. Adobor, H., Darbi, W. P. K., & Damoah, O. B. O. (2021). Strategy in the era of “swans”: the role of strategic leadership under uncertainty and unpredictability. Journal of Strategy and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-09-2020-0242
  3. Agrawal, R., Agrawal, S., Samadhiya, A., et al. (2024). Adoption of green finance and green innovation for achieving circularity: An exploratory review and future directions. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(4), 101669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101669
  4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  5. Al-Adwan, A. S., Alrousan, M. K., Yaseen, H., et al. (2022). Boosting Online Purchase Intention in High-Uncertainty-Avoidance Societies: A Signaling Theory Approach. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030136
  6. Alamer, A., & Marsh, H. (2022). Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling In Second Language Research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(5), 1477–1500. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263121000863
  7. Alanazi, F. (2023). Electric Vehicles: Benefits, Challenges, and Potential Solutions for Widespread Adaptation. Applied Sciences, 13(10), 6016. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106016
  8. Alexiou, K., & Wiggins, J. (2018). Measuring individual legitimacy perceptions: Scale development and validation. Strategic Organization, 17(4), 470–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018772862
  9. Anastasiadou, K., & Gavanas, N. (2022). State-of-the-Art Review of the Key Factors Affecting Electric Vehicle Adoption by Consumers. Energies, 15(24), 9409. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249409
  10. Angkiriwang, R., Pujawan, I. N., & Santosa, B. (2014). Managing uncertainty through supply chain flexibility: reactive vs. proactive approaches. Production & Manufacturing Research, 2(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2014.882804
  11. Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2021). Frank Knight, uncertainty and knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Institutional Economics, 17(6), 1005–1031. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137421000527
  12. Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 473. https://doi.org/10.1086/209186
  13. Becker, J.-M., Cheah, J.-H., Gholamzade, R., et al. (2022). PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-04-2022-0474
  14. Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty. Operations Research, 30(5), 961–981. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.30.5.961
  15. Bergman, E. M., Feser, E. J. (2020). Industrial and regional clusters: concepts and comparative applications. West Virginia University, Regional Research Institute.
  16. Bernstein, S. (2011). Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18(1), 17–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290903173087
  17. Bevan, L. D. (2022). The ambiguities of uncertainty: A review of uncertainty frameworks relevant to the assessment of environmental change. Futures, 137, 102919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.102919
  18. Bian, Q., & Forsythe, S. (2012). Purchase intention for luxury brands: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1443–1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.010
  19. Blanco-González, A., Cachón-Rodríguez, G., Hernández-Perlines, F., et al. (2023). Effects of social responsibility on legitimacy and revisit intention: The moderating role of anxiety. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113583
  20. Blanco-González, A., Prado-Román, C., & Díez-Martín, F. (2017). Building a European Legitimacy Index. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(5), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217693282
  21. Block, F. L., Keller, M. R. (2015). State of innovation: the US government's role in technology development. Routledge.
  22. Bohnsack, R., Kolk, A., Pinkse, J., et al. (2020). Driving the electric bandwagon: The dynamics of incumbents’ sustainable innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 727–743. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2430
  23. Boyce, D. E., Nijkamp, P., & Shefer, D. (Eds.). (1991). Regional Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76311-3
  24. Braithwaite, V., Levi, M. (1998). Trust and governance. Russell Sage Foundation.
  25. Brown, A. D. (1998). Narrative, Politics and Legitimacy in an IT Implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 35(1), 35–58. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00083
  26. Buhmann, K. M., & Criado, J. R. (2023). Consumers’ preferences for electric vehicles: The role of status and reputation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 114, 103530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103530
  27. Bunduchi, R., Smart, A. U., Crisan-Mitra, C., et al. (2022). Legitimacy and innovation in social enterprises. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 41(4), 371–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426221102860
  28. Cao, X. (2023). The application of structural equation model in psychological research. CNS Spectrums, 28(S1), S17–S19. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852923000858
  29. Capar, I., Kuby, M., Leon, V. J., et al. (2013). An arc cover–path-cover formulation and strategic analysis of alternative-fuel station locations. European Journal of Operational Research, 227(1), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.033
  30. Carriero, A., Clark, T. E., & Marcellino, M. (2018). Endogenous Uncertainty. Working Paper (Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland). https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-201805
  31. Castrogiovanni, G. J. (1991). Environmental Munificence: A Theoretical Assessment. The Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 542. https://doi.org/10.2307/258917
  32. Chawla, U., Mohnot, R., Mishra, V., et al. (2023). Factors Influencing Customer Preference and Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: A Journey towards More Sustainable Transportation. Sustainability, 15(8), 7020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15087020
  33. Chen, H., Chen, H., & Tian, X. (2022). The dual-process model of product information and habit in influencing consumers’ purchase intention: The role of live streaming features. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 53, 101150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101150
  34. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
  35. Confente, I., Scarpi, D., & Russo, I. (2020). Marketing a new generation of bio-plastics products for a circular economy: The role of green self-identity, self-congruity, and perceived value. Journal of Business Research, 112, 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.030
  36. Corradi, C., Sica, E., & Morone, P. (2023). What drives electric vehicle adoption? Insights from a systematic review on European transport actors and behaviours. Energy Research & Social Science, 95, 102908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102908
  37. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants And Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590. https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
  38. Dantzig, G. B. (1955). Linear Programming under Uncertainty. Management Science, 1(3–4), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1.3-4.197
  39. Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852
  40. Del-Castillo-Feito, C., Blanco-González, A., & Delgado-Alemany, R. (2020). The Relationship between Image, Legitimacy, and Reputation as a Sustainable Strategy: Students’ Versus Professors’ Perceptions in the Higher Education Sector. Sustainability, 12(3), 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031189
  41. Dess, G. G., Picken, J. C. (2000). Changing roles: Leadership in the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), 18-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)88447-8
  42. Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Miotto, G. (2021). The impact of state legitimacy on entrepreneurial activity. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(2), 935–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00724-4
  43. Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2020). The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4), 1007–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00380-6
  44. Dill, W. R. (1958). Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(4), 409. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390794
  45. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  46. Duchek, S. (2019). Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
  47. Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392145
  48. Dunn, B., Kamath, H., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2011). Electrical Energy Storage for the Grid: A Battery of Choices. Science, 334(6058), 928–935. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212741
  49. Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation. (2013). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. In: Barjis, J., Gupta, A., & Meshkat, A. (editors). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  50. Eurostat. (2023). Avaliable online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ (accessed on 29 June 2024).
  51. Eurostat. (n.d.). Business and consumer surveys. Avaliable online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/ei_bcs_esms.htm (accessed on 29 June 2024).
  52. Farida, I., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Business Strategies and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Performance and Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030163
  53. Featherman, M., Jia, S. (Jasper), Califf, C. B., & Hajli, N. (2021). The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120847
  54. Fernández-Portillo, A., Almodóvar-González, M., & Hernández-Mogollón, R. (2020). Impact of ICT development on economic growth. A study of OECD European union countries. Technology in Society, 63, 101420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101420
  55. Ferracuti, E. (2022). Information uncertainty and organizational design. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 74(1), 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101493
  56. Fishbein, M. (1979). A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications.In: Proceedings of Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. pp. 65–116.
  57. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139192675
  58. Furr, N. R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2021). Strategy and Uncertainty: Resource-Based View, Strategy-Creation View, and the Hybrid Between Them. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1915–1935. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211011760
  59. Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. (2018). Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240
  60. Ghahtarani, A., Sheikhmohammady, M., & Rostami, M. (2020). The impact of social capital and social interaction on customers’ purchase intention, considering knowledge sharing in social commerce context. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.004
  61. Gilley, B. (2006). The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: Results for 72 countries. European Journal of Political Research, 45(3), 499–525. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00307.x
  62. Goodenough, J. B., & Kim, Y. (2009). Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries. Chemistry of Materials, 22(3), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm901452z
  63. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & accountability: changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice hall.
  64. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T., et al. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526415066
  65. Griffin, M. A., & Grote, G. (2020). When Is More Uncertainty Better? A Model of Uncertainty Regulation and Effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 45(4), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0271
  66. Guo, H., Shen, R., & Su, Z. (2019). The Impact of Organizational Legitimacy on Product Innovation: A Comparison Between New Ventures and Established Firms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 66(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2018.2803061
  67. Guo, J., Li, Y., Xu, Y., et al. (2021). How Live Streaming Features Impact Consumers’ Purchase Intention in the Context of Cross-Border E-Commerce? A Research Based on SOR Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767876
  68. Guo, R., Tao, L., Li, C. B., et al. (2015). A Path Analysis of Greenwashing in a Trust Crisis Among Chinese Energy Companies: The Role of Brand Legitimacy and Brand Loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2672-7
  69. Gupta, A., & Kumar, H. (2022). Multi-dimensional perspectives on electric vehicles design: A mind map approach. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 8, 100483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100483
  70. Han, J., Guo, J.-E., Cai, X., et al. (2022). An analysis on strategy evolution of research & development in cooperative innovation network of new energy vehicle within policy transition period. Omega, 112, 102686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102686
  71. Harris, J. E., & Gleason, P. M. (2022). Application of Path Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling in Nutrition and Dietetics. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 122(11), 2023–2035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2022.07.007
  72. Haustein, S., Jensen, A. F., & Cherchi, E. (2021). Battery electric vehicle adoption in Denmark and Sweden: Recent changes, related factors and policy implications. Energy Policy, 149, 112096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112096
  73. Herberz, M., Hahnel, U. J. J., & Brosch, T. (2020). The importance of consumer motives for green mobility: A multi-modal perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 139, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.021
  74. Hermundsdottir, F., & Aspelund, A. (2021). Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124715
  75. Higueras-Castillo, E., Guillén, A., Herrera, L.-J., et al. (2020). Adoption of electric vehicles: Which factors are really important? International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(10), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1818330
  76. Höflinger, P. J., Nagel, C., & Sandner, P. (2018). Reputation for technological innovation: Does it actually cohere with innovative activity? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.08.002
  77. Hofman, P. S., Blome, C., Schleper, M. C., et al. (2020). Supply chain collaboration and eco‐innovations: An institutional perspective from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2734–2754. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2532
  78. Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., & Vomberg, A. (2022). Handbook of Market Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4
  79. Hou, X., & Li, P. (2020). Whose Legitimacy? China’s Drive for Electric Vehicles. Sociology of Development, 6(1), 66–90. https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2020.6.1.66
  80. Hu, B., Zhang, T., & Yan, S. (2020). How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Business Model Innovation: The Mediating Role of Organizational Legitimacy. Sustainability, 12(7), 2667. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072667
  81. Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015
  82. Hund, A., Wagner, H.-T., Beimborn, D., et al. (2021). Digital innovation: Review and novel perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 30(4), 101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101695
  83. Hwang, J. (2019). Managing the innovation legitimacy of the sharing economy. International Journal of Quality Innovation, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-018-0026-0
  84. Innovation Scoreboard. (n.d.). Available online: https://projects.research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/en/statistics/performance-indicators/european-innovation-scoreboard/eis (accessed on16 May 2024)
  85. Islam, T., & Hussain, M. (2022). How consumer uncertainty intervene country of origin image and consumer purchase intention? The moderating role of brand image. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(11), 5049–5067. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-08-2021-1194
  86. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., et al. (2012). Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1994490
  87. Juntunen, J. K., Halme, M., Korsunova, A., et al. (2018). Strategies for Integrating Stakeholders into Sustainability Innovation: A Configurational Perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(3), 331–355. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12481
  88. Khatua, A., Ranjan Kumar, R., & Kumar De, S. (2023). Institutional enablers of electric vehicle market: Evidence from 30 countries. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 170, 103612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103612
  89. Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001
  90. Kivimaa, P., Laakso, S., Lonkila, A., et al. (2021). Moving beyond disruptive innovation: A review of disruption in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 38, 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.12.001
  91. Kok, K. P. W., de Hoop, E., Sengers, F., et al. (2022). Governing translocal experimentation in multi-sited transition programs: Dynamics and challenges. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 43, 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.05.001
  92. Korsunova, A., Horn, S., & Vainio, A. (2021). Understanding circular economy in everyday life: Perceptions of young adults in the Finnish context. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.038
  93. Kreye, M. E. (2022). Uncertainty driving the dynamic development of inter-organisational relationships in engineering services over time. Industrial Marketing Management, 101, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.11.006
  94. Krishnan, V. V., & Koshy, B. I. (2021). Evaluating the factors influencing purchase intention of electric vehicles in households owning conventional vehicles. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(3), 1122–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.05.013
  95. Kumar, A., Prakash, G., & Kumar, G. (2021). Does environmentally responsible purchase intention matter for consumers? A predictive sustainable model developed through an empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102270
  96. Kumar, P., & Ghodeswar, B. M. (2015). Factors affecting consumers’ green product purchase decisions. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(3), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-03-2014-0068
  97. Kumar, R. R., & Alok, K. (2020). Adoption of electric vehicle: A literature review and prospects for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119911
  98. Kushwah, S., Dhir, A., & Sagar, M. (2019). Understanding consumer resistance to the consumption of organic food. A study of ethical consumption, purchasing, and choice behaviour. Food Quality and Preference, 77, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.04.003
  99. Lambsdorff, J. G., Taube, M., & Schramm, M. (2004). The New Institutional Economics of Corruption. Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413920
  100. LaMonaca, S., & Ryan, L. (2022). The state of play in electric vehicle charging services – A review of infrastructure provision, players, and policies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 154, 111733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111733
  101. Lashari, Z. A., Ko, J., & Jang, J. (2021). Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Electric Vehicles: Influences of User Attitude and Perception. Sustainability, 13(12), 6778. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126778
  102. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391211
  103. Li, J., Guo, F., Xu, J., et al. (2022). What Influences Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Innovative Products: Evidence From China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.838244
  104. Li, L., Wang, Z., & Wang, Q. (2020). Do policy mix characteristics matter for electric vehicle adoption? A survey-based exploration. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 102488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102488
  105. Li, L., Wang, Z., Li, Y., et al. (2021). Impacts of consumer innovativeness on the intention to purchase sustainable products. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.002
  106. Liu, W., Placke, T., & Chau, K. T. (2022). Overview of batteries and battery management for electric vehicles. Energy Reports, 8, 4058–4084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.016
  107. Lu, B., & Chen, Z. (2021). Live streaming commerce and consumers’ purchase intention: An uncertainty reduction perspective. Information & Management, 58(7), 103509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103509
  108. Lu, J. (2015). Which Nonprofit Gets More Government Funding? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(3), 297–312. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21124
  109. Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.07
  110. Mascarenhas, B. (1982). Coping with Uncertainty in International Business. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490552
  111. Matos, S., Viardot, E., Sovacool, B. K., et al. (2022). Innovation and climate change: A review and introduction to the special issue. Technovation, 117, 102612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102612
  112. McCraw, T. K. (2010). Prophet of Innovation. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x0gh3
  113. Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(3), 527–556. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222333
  114. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  115. Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty about the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty. The Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.2307/257999
  116. Mostaghel, R., & Chirumalla, K. (2021). Role of customers in circular business models. Journal of Business Research, 127, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.053
  117. Mou, J., Cohen, J., Dou, Y., et al. (2019). International buyers’ repurchase intentions in a Chinese cross-border e-commerce platform. Internet Research, 30(2), 403–437. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-06-2018-0259
  118. Nguyen, T. T. H., Yang, Z., Nguyen, N., et al. (2019). Greenwash and Green Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Green Skepticism. Sustainability, 11(9), 2653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092653
  119. Nilsson, M., & Nykvist, B. (2016). Governing the electric vehicle transition – Near term interventions to support a green energy economy. Applied Energy, 179, 1360–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.056
  120. Nuttavuthisit, K., & Thøgersen, J. (2015). The Importance of Consumer Trust for the Emergence of a Market for Green Products: The Case of Organic Food. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5
  121. Nylén, D., & Holmström, J. (2015). Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. Business Horizons, 58(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.001
  122. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
  123. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.2307/258610
  124. Omri, A. (2020). Technological innovation and sustainable development : Does the stage of development matter? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 83, 106398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106398
  125. Park, D.-H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.2753/jec1086-4415110405
  126. Park, J., Lennon, S. J., & Stoel, L. (2005). On-line product presentation: Effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention. Psychology and Marketing, 22(9), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20080
  127. Parray, Z. A., Iqbal, J., & Mushtaq, R. (2023). Customer perception of corporate social responsibility and its impact on customer engagement: critical significance of corporate reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 29(4), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-05-2023-0063
  128. Pavlou, Liang, & Xue. (2007). Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148783
  129. Peña-García, N., Gil-Saura, I., Rodríguez-Orejuela, A., et al. (2020). Purchase intention and purchase behavior online: A cross-cultural approach. Heliyon, 6(6), e04284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04284
  130. Pennings, J. M. (1981). Strategically interdependent organizations. Handbook of Organizational Design, 1, 433-455.
  131. Persaud, A., & Schillo, S. R. (2017). Purchasing organic products: role of social context and consumer innovativeness. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(1), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-01-2016-0011
  132. Peters, A., McEwen, B. S., & Friston, K. (2017). Uncertainty and stress: Why it causes diseases and how it is mastered by the brain. Progress in Neurobiology, 156, 164–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.05.004
  133. Piber, M., Demartini, P., & Biondi, L. (2018). The management of participatory cultural initiatives: learning from the discourse on intellectual capital. Journal of Management and Governance, 23(2), 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9435-7
  134. Qu, Y., & Mardani, A. (2023). Market orientation, technological opportunity, and new product innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113841
  135. Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015). Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 34, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010
  136. Rigdon, E., Sarstedt, M., & Moisescu, O. (2023). Quantifying model selection uncertainty via bootstrapping and Akaike weights. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(4), 1596–1608. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12906
  137. Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In: An integrated approach to communication theory and research. Routledge. pp. 432-448.
  138. Sadiq, M., Adil, M., & Paul, J. (2021). An innovation resistance theory perspective on purchase of eco-friendly cosmetics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102369
  139. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
  140. Salari, N. (2022). Electric vehicles adoption behaviour: Synthesising the technology readiness index with environmentalism values and instrumental attributes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 164, 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.07.009
  141. Sanguesa, J. A., Torres-Sanz, V., Garrido, P., et al. (2021). A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges. Smart Cities, 4(1), 372–404. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010022
  142. Saputra, M. C., & Andajani, E. (2023). Analysis of Factors Influencing Intention to Adopt Battery Electric Vehicle in Indonesia. ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI), 5(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.34306/ajri.v5i2.993
  143. Sawamura, H., & Dumez, H. (2021). How do start-ups manage uncertainties of innovation ecosystem development? : The case of a start-up using Electric Vehicles for Corporate Employee Transport Service in Bangalore, India [PhD thesis]. Institut polytechnique de Paris.
  144. SCOTT, W. R. (2014). W. Richard SCOTT (1995), Institutions and Organizations. Ideas, Interests and Identities. M@n@gement, 17(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.172.0136
  145. Sharma, P. N., Liengaard, B. D., Hair, J. F., et al. (2022). Predictive model assessment and selection in composite-based modeling using PLS-SEM: extensions and guidelines for using CVPAT. European Journal of Marketing, 57(6), 1662–1677. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-08-2020-0636
  146. Sherman, L. W. (2002). Trust and confidence in criminal justice. National Institute of Justice Journal, 248, 22-31.
  147. Simmons, A. J. (1999). Justification and Legitimacy. Ethics, 109(4), 739–771. https://doi.org/10.1086/233944
  148. Snihur, Y., & Wiklund, J. (2019). Searching for innovation: Product, process, and business model innovations and search behavior in established firms. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.05.003
  149. Soewarno, N., Tjahjadi, B., & Fithrianti, F. (2019). Green innovation strategy and green innovation. Management Decision, 57(11), 3061–3078. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-05-2018-0563
  150. Spender, J. C., & Kessler, E. H. (1995). Managing the Uncertainties of Innovation: Extending Thompson (1967). Human Relations, 48(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800103
  151. Spiller, R., Rudeloff, C., & Döbler, T. (2022). Schlüsselwerke: Theorien (in) der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37354-2
  152. Stanaland, A. J. S., Lwin, M. O., & Murphy, P. E. (2011). Consumer Perceptions of the Antecedents and Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0904-z
  153. State Legitimacy. (n.d.). Available online: https://fragilestatesindex.org/indicators/p1/ (accessed on 16 May 2024).
  154. Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., Ter Hofstede, F., & Wedel, M. (1999). A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299906300204
  155. Subramanian, A., & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24(6), 631-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00031-X
  156. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
  157. Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101
  158. Syafiq, M., Sirojuzilam, Badaruddin, & Purwoko, A. (2022). Integrated structural equation modeling and causal steps in evaluating the role of the mediating variable. MethodsX, 9, 101777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101777
  159. Taran, Y., Boer, H., & Lindgren, P. (2015). A Business Model Innovation Typology. Decision Sciences, 46(2), 301–331. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12128
  160. Tsai, P.-H., Lin, G.-Y., Zheng, Y.-L., et al. (2020). Exploring the effect of Starbucks’ green marketing on consumers’ purchase decisions from consumers’ perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 56, 102162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102162
  161. Tu, J.-C., & Yang, C. (2019). Key Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchase of Electric Vehicles. Sustainability, 11(14), 3863. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143863
  162. Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034514
  163. Unterluggauer, T., Rich, J., Andersen, P. B., et al. (2022). Electric vehicle charging infrastructure planning for integrated transportation and power distribution networks: A review. ETransportation, 12, 100163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etran.2022.100163
  164. van Zyl, L. E., & ten Klooster, P. M. (2022). Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: Practical Guidelines and Tutorial With a Convenient Online Tool for Mplus. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795672
  165. Wells, Valacich, & Hess. (2011). What Signal Are You Sending? How Website Quality Influences Perceptions of Product Quality and Purchase Intentions. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 373. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044048
  166. Whitecross, W. M., & Smithson, M. (2023). Open or opposed to unknowns: How do curious people think and feel about uncertainty? Personality and Individual Differences, 209, 112210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112210
  167. Wilson, T. A. (2011). Supporting Social Enterprises to Support Vulnerable Consumers: The Example of Community Development Finance Institutions and Financial Exclusion. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9182-5
  168. Wu, S.-I., & Chen, Y.-J. (2014). The Impact of Green Marketing and Perceived Innovation on Purchase Intention for Green Products. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v6n5p81
  169. Wu, Y., & Huang, H. (2023). Influence of Perceived Value on Consumers’ Continuous Purchase Intention in Live-Streaming E-Commerce—Mediated by Consumer Trust. Sustainability, 15(5), 4432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054432
  170. Wu, Y., & Zhu, W. (2021). The Role of CSR Engagement in Customer-Company Identification and Behavioral Intention During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.721410
  171. WUI. (n.d.). Available online: https://worlduncertaintyindex.com/data/ (accessed on 16 May 2024).
  172. Xia, Z., Wu, D., & Zhang, L. (2022). Economic, Functional, and Social Factors Influencing Electric Vehicles’ Adoption: An Empirical Study Based on the Diffusion of Innovation Theory. Sustainability, 14(10), 6283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106283
  173. Xie, R., An, L., & Yasir, N. (2022). How Innovative Characteristics Influence Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Electric Vehicle: A Moderating Role of Lifestyle. Sustainability, 14(8), 4467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084467
  174. Yang, F., Shinkle, G. A., & Goudsmit, M. (2022). The efficacy of organizational control interactions: External environmental uncertainty as a critical contingency. Journal of Business Research, 139, 855–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.026
  175. Yang, S., Cheng, P., Li, J., et al. (2019). Which group should policies target? Effects of incentive policies and product cognitions for electric vehicle adoption among Chinese consumers. Energy Policy, 135, 111009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111009
  176. Ye, F., Kang, W., Li, L., et al. (2021). Why do consumers choose to buy electric vehicles? A paired data analysis of purchase intention configurations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 147, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.02.014
  177. Yoon, S., McClean, S. T., Chawla, N., et al. (2021). Working through an “infodemic”: The impact of COVID-19 news consumption on employee uncertainty and work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(4), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000913
  178. Yuan, C., Zhang, C., & Wang, S. (2022). Social anxiety as a moderator in consumer willingness to accept AI assistants based on utilitarian and hedonic values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102878
  179. Zayadin, R., Zucchella, A., Anand, A., et al. (2022). Entrepreneurs’ Decisions in Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. British Journal of Management, 34(2), 831–848. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12612
  180. Zhang, M., Qin, F., Wang, G. A., et al. (2019). The impact of live video streaming on online purchase intention. The Service Industries Journal, 40(9–10), 656–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2019.1576642
  181. Zhao, J. L., Fan, S., & Yan, J. (2016). Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue. Financial Innovation, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-016-0049-2
  182. Zhou, M., Govindan, K., Xie, X., et al. (2021). How to drive green innovation in China’s mining enterprises? Under the perspective of environmental legitimacy and green absorptive capacity. Resources Policy, 72, 102038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102038
  183. Zimm, C. (2021). Improving the understanding of electric vehicle technology and policy diffusion across countries. Transport Policy, 105, 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.012


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.9196

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Alberto-Tomás Delso-Vicente, Luis Diaz-Marcos, Óscar Aguado-Tevar, María García de Blanes-Sebastián

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.