Architecture for a technological observatory as an intelligent system for entrepreneurship in Latin America
Vol 8, Issue 13, 2024
VIEWS - 16 (Abstract) 1 (PDF)
Abstract
Technological management has promoted distinctive characteristics in the socio-productive development of the regions. Its usefulness in entrepreneurial activity is studied to design the architecture of a technological observatory as an intelligent system for entrepreneurship in Latin America. Using a descriptive-explanatory method, data obtained from the application of two instruments directed to 18 experts in information and communication technologies and 174 entrepreneurs distributed 92 in Lima-Peru and 82 in Santiago de Cali-Colombia are processed. The findings show informational and training barriers and a weak or non-existent technological platform for effective entrepreneurial development. Added to the low development of plans and alliances mediated by technologies, whose experience supports public policies that strengthen entrepreneurship as an emerging economy. The architecture supports the functional and operational aspects of the system. Its scalability in other regions dynamizes the services-processes required prior to the detection of needs directed towards the projection of sustainable entrepreneurship.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Albarracín, C. E. M., Salgado, W. E. B., & Salgado, N. M. G. (2021). Information source observatories: Concepts and theoretical review. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurial Studie, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.37956/JBES.V5I3.187
Al-Obaidy, H., Ebrahim, A., Aljufairi, A., Mero, A., & Eid, O. (2024). Software Engineering for Developing a Cloud Computing Museum-Guide System. International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcac.339200
Castillo-Anzules, M., & Guaña-Moya, J. G.-M. (2024). Kanban: An agile methodology for efficient workflow management in software development, a systematic review (Spanish). Revista Ingenio Global, 3(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.62943/rig.v3i1.68
Chincoya-Benitez, L. I., & Barrón-Villaverde, D. (2023). Using analytical methods as part of strategic planning for an astronomical observatory housed in a public research institute. DYNA, 90(228), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v90n228.108585
Educational maps of Peru. [Maps of Peru]. Recovered: December 2023. Available: http://mapasenpdf.com/didacticos/peru
Elias, M., Ruckhaus, E., Draffan, E. A., James, A., Suarez-Figueroa, M. C., Lohmann, S., Khiat, A., & Auer, S. (2020). Accessibility and personalization in opencourseware: An inclusive development approach. Proceedings - IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2020, 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00091
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. GEM Report review. (Spanish) Informe GEM España 2022-2023. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.22429/euc2023.003.
International Labour Organization (2023). World Employment and Social Outlook. ILO. https://doi.org/10.54394/szdi5436
Khattak, M. S., Wu, Q., Ahmad, M., & Hattab, I. (2024). The role of managerial overconfidence in digital transformation and sustainable competitive performance in emerging SMEs: The role of digital culture. Business Strategy & Development, 7(3), e403. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSD2.403
Khribi, M. K., Othman, A., & Al-Sinani, A. (2022). Toward Closing the Training and Knowledge Gap in ICT Accessibility and Inclusive Design Harnessing Open Educational Resources. Proceedings - 2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2022, 289–291. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00093
Law, P., Page, A., & Storrar, R. (2020). Using an Open Educational Resources Platform to Support Underserved Groups. 25, 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120200000025005
Lerman, L. V., Benitez, G. B., Müller, J. M., de Sousa, P. R., & Frank, A. G. (2022). Smart green supply chain management: a configurational approach to enhance green performance through digital transformation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 27(7), 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-02-2022-0059
Li, J., & Yao, M. (2021). New Framework of Digital Entrepreneurship Model Based on Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing. Mobile Information Systems, 2021(1), 3080160. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3080160
Lin, Y. K., & Maruping, L. M. (2021). Open Source Collaboration in Digital Entrepreneurship. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Orsc.2021.1538, 33(1), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1287/ORSC.2021.1538
Maps to Color. (s.f). [Maps of Colombia]. Recovered: December 2023. Available: https://www.mapasparacolorear.com/colombia/mapa-colombia.php
Mihale-Wilson, C., & Carl, K. V. (2024). Designing incentive systems for participation in digital ecosystems—An integrated framework. Electronic Markets, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00703-5
Miller, H., Clifton, K., Akar, G., Tufte, K., Gopalakrishnan, S., MacArthur, J., Irwin, E., Ramnath, R., & Stiles, J. (2021). Urban Sustainability Observatories: Leveraging Urban Experimentation for Sustainability Science and Policy. Harvard Data Science Review, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608F92.2025202B
National Institute of Statistics and Informatics (2023). National production decreased by 0. 43% in the first quarter of 2023. https://www.comexperu.org.pe/articulo/produccion-nacional-disminuyo-un-043-en-el-primer-trimestre-de-2023
Nguyen, B., Schinckus, C., Canh, N. P., & Thanh, S. D. (2021). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Entrepreneurship: A Bad for a Good? The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 30(1), 81–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355720974819
Odrekhivskyi, M., Pshyk-Kovalska, O., Zhezhukha, V., & Ivanochko, I. (2022). Intelligent Management of Enterprise Business Processes. Mathematics 2023, Vol. 11, Page 78, 11(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/MATH11010078
Paredes-Chacín, A.J., Díaz-Bejarano, S., Marín-González, F., & Vega-Ramírez, E. (2024) Relationship between knowledge transfer and sustainable innovation in interorganizational environments of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 20(1), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.7341/2024201
Passaro, R., Quinto, I., Rippa, P., & Thomas, A. (2020). Evolution of Collaborative Networks Supporting Startup Sustainability: Evidences from Digital Firms. Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 9437, 12(22), 9437. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12229437
Pathak, S., & Muralidharan, E. (2020). A two-staged approach to technology entrepreneurship: Differential effects of intellectual property rights. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(6), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1364
Pichugina, M., & Artemenko, L. (2022). Project development of open education platform for the company competitiveness. Serbian Journal of Management, 17(2), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm17-31970
Puente Márquez, Y. (2016). Social Observatories: Information Science Research Notebooks. (Spanish). 1, 80–100. https://doi.org/10.34295/cuinci.vi1.8
Shinkevich, A., Lubninа, A. A., & Raiskiy, I. A. (2021). Trends of innovative development of processing industries. Izvestiya of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 23(4), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.37313/1990-5378-2021-23-4-51-56
Sodhi, S., & Dwivedi, A. K. (2024). Differently Abled Entrepreneurs: A Systematic Literature Review on Fifty Years of Research—Exploring Thoughts and Debate with Reference to Entrepreneurship. The Journal of Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557241234022
Sotnyk, I., Zavrazhnyi, K., Kasianenko, V., Roubík, H., & Sidorov, O. (2020). Investment Management of Business Digital Innovations. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.1-07
Tariq, N., Alsirhani, A., Humayun, M., Alserhani, F., & Shaheen, M. (2024). A fog-edge-enabled intrusion detection system for smart grids. Journal of Cloud Computing, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-024-00609-9
Tironi Rodo, M., & Valderrama Barragán, M. (2023). From copper mining to data extractivism? Data worth making at Chile’s Data Observatory Foundation. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/02637758231183719, 41(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758231183719
Velychko, V., Omelchenko, S., & Fedorenko, O. (2021). Open Access to ICT and Electronic Educational Resources as a Guarantee of Sustainable Development of Society. 79–85. https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210120.017
Vieira, J. K. M., de Farias, I. H., & de Moura, H. P. (2023). Evaluating a Conceptual Model for Projects Observatories through a Survey. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1145/3592813.3592928
Vieira, J. K. M., Farias, I. H. De, & Moura, H. P. De. (2022). Evaluating and Evolving a Conceptual Model for Projects Observatories. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Par F180474. https://doi.org/10.1145/3535511.3535540
Voloshchuk, V. (2020). Methodological approaches to determining the effectiveness of innovative development of enterprises. innovative economy, 0(7–8), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.37332/2309-1533.2020.7-8.10
Yáñez-Valdés, C. (2022). Technological entrepreneurship: present conditions and future perspectives for Latin America. Management Research, 20(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-09-2021-1230/FULL/XML
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9193
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Enrique Castro-Guzman, Ana Judith Paredes-Chacín, Eduardo Franco-Chalco, Jairo Lozano-Moreno
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.