Technological management has promoted distinctive characteristics in the socio-productive development of the regions. Its usefulness in entrepreneurial activity is studied to design the architecture of a technological observatory as an intelligent system for entrepreneurship in Latin America. Using a descriptive-explanatory method, data obtained from the application of two instruments directed to 18 experts in information and communication technologies and 174 entrepreneurs distributed 92 in Lima-Peru and 82 in Santiago de Cali-Colombia are processed. The findings show informational and training barriers and a weak or non-existent technological platform for effective entrepreneurial development. Added to the low development of plans and alliances mediated by technologies, whose experience supports public policies that strengthen entrepreneurship as an emerging economy. The architecture supports the functional and operational aspects of the system. Its scalability in other regions dynamizes the services-processes required prior to the detection of needs directed towards the projection of sustainable entrepreneurship.

1. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
2. Albarracín, C. E. M., Salgado, W. E. B., & Salgado, N. M. G. (2021). Information source observatories: Concepts and theoretical review. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurial Studie, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.37956/JBES.V5I3.187
3. Al-Obaidy, H., Ebrahim, A., Aljufairi, A., Mero, A., & Eid, O. (2024). Software Engineering for Developing a Cloud Computing Museum-Guide System. International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcac.339200
4. Castillo-Anzules, M., & Guaña-Moya, J. G.-M. (2024). Kanban: An agile methodology for efficient workflow management in software development, a systematic review (Spanish). Revista Ingenio Global, 3(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.62943/rig.v3i1.68
5. Chincoya-Benitez, L. I., & Barrón-Villaverde, D. (2023). Using analytical methods as part of strategic planning for an astronomical observatory housed in a public research institute. DYNA, 90(228), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v90n228.108585
6. Educational maps of Peru. [Maps of Peru]. Recovered: December 2023. Available: http://mapasenpdf.com/didacticos/peru
7. Elias, M., Ruckhaus, E., Draffan, E. A., James, A., Suarez-Figueroa, M. C., Lohmann, S., Khiat, A., & Auer, S. (2020). Accessibility and personalization in opencourseware: An inclusive development approach. Proceedings - IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2020, 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00091
8. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. GEM Report review. (Spanish) Informe GEM España 2022-2023. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.22429/euc2023.003.
9. International Labour Organization (2023). World Employment and Social Outlook. ILO. https://doi.org/10.54394/szdi5436
10. Khattak, M. S., Wu, Q., Ahmad, M., & Hattab, I. (2024). The role of managerial overconfidence in digital transformation and sustainable competitive performance in emerging SMEs: The role of digital culture. Business Strategy & Development, 7(3), e403. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSD2.403
11. Khribi, M. K., Othman, A., & Al-Sinani, A. (2022). Toward Closing the Training and Knowledge Gap in ICT Accessibility and Inclusive Design Harnessing Open Educational Resources. Proceedings - 2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2022, 289–291. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00093
12. Law, P., Page, A., & Storrar, R. (2020). Using an Open Educational Resources Platform to Support Underserved Groups. 25, 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120200000025005
13. Lerman, L. V., Benitez, G. B., Müller, J. M., de Sousa, P. R., & Frank, A. G. (2022). Smart green supply chain management: a configurational approach to enhance green performance through digital transformation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 27(7), 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-02-2022-0059
14. Li, J., & Yao, M. (2021). New Framework of Digital Entrepreneurship Model Based on Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing. Mobile Information Systems, 2021(1), 3080160. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3080160
15. Lin, Y. K., & Maruping, L. M. (2021). Open Source Collaboration in Digital Entrepreneurship. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Orsc.2021.1538, 33(1), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1287/ORSC.2021.1538
16. Maps to Color. (s.f). [Maps of Colombia]. Recovered: December 2023. Available: https://www.mapasparacolorear.com/colombia/mapa-colombia.php
17. Mihale-Wilson, C., & Carl, K. V. (2024). Designing incentive systems for participation in digital ecosystems—An integrated framework. Electronic Markets, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00703-5
18. Miller, H., Clifton, K., Akar, G., Tufte, K., Gopalakrishnan, S., MacArthur, J., Irwin, E., Ramnath, R., & Stiles, J. (2021). Urban Sustainability Observatories: Leveraging Urban Experimentation for Sustainability Science and Policy. Harvard Data Science Review, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608F92.2025202B
19. National Institute of Statistics and Informatics (2023). National production decreased by 0. 43% in the first quarter of 2023. https://www.comexperu.org.pe/articulo/produccion-nacional-disminuyo-un-043-en-el-primer-trimestre-de-2023
20. Nguyen, B., Schinckus, C., Canh, N. P., & Thanh, S. D. (2021). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Entrepreneurship: A Bad for a Good? The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 30(1), 81–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355720974819
21. Odrekhivskyi, M., Pshyk-Kovalska, O., Zhezhukha, V., & Ivanochko, I. (2022). Intelligent Management of Enterprise Business Processes. Mathematics 2023, Vol. 11, Page 78, 11(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/MATH11010078
22. Paredes-Chacín, A.J., Díaz-Bejarano, S., Marín-González, F., & Vega-Ramírez, E. (2024) Relationship between knowledge transfer and sustainable innovation in interorganizational environments of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 20(1), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.7341/2024201
23. Passaro, R., Quinto, I., Rippa, P., & Thomas, A. (2020). Evolution of Collaborative Networks Supporting Startup Sustainability: Evidences from Digital Firms. Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 9437, 12(22), 9437. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12229437
24. Pathak, S., & Muralidharan, E. (2020). A two-staged approach to technology entrepreneurship: Differential effects of intellectual property rights. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(6), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1364
25. Pichugina, M., & Artemenko, L. (2022). Project development of open education platform for the company competitiveness. Serbian Journal of Management, 17(2), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm17-31970
26. Puente Márquez, Y. (2016). Social Observatories: Information Science Research Notebooks. (Spanish). 1, 80–100. https://doi.org/10.34295/cuinci.vi1.8
27. Shinkevich, A., Lubninа, A. A., & Raiskiy, I. A. (2021). Trends of innovative development of processing industries. Izvestiya of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 23(4), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.37313/1990-5378-2021-23-4-51-56
28. Sodhi, S., & Dwivedi, A. K. (2024). Differently Abled Entrepreneurs: A Systematic Literature Review on Fifty Years of Research—Exploring Thoughts and Debate with Reference to Entrepreneurship. The Journal of Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557241234022
29. Sotnyk, I., Zavrazhnyi, K., Kasianenko, V., Roubík, H., & Sidorov, O. (2020). Investment Management of Business Digital Innovations. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.1-07
30. Tariq, N., Alsirhani, A., Humayun, M., Alserhani, F., & Shaheen, M. (2024). A fog-edge-enabled intrusion detection system for smart grids. Journal of Cloud Computing, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-024-00609-9
31. Tironi Rodo, M., & Valderrama Barragán, M. (2023). From copper mining to data extractivism? Data worth making at Chile’s Data Observatory Foundation. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/02637758231183719, 41(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758231183719
32. Velychko, V., Omelchenko, S., & Fedorenko, O. (2021). Open Access to ICT and Electronic Educational Resources as a Guarantee of Sustainable Development of Society. 79–85. https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210120.017
33. Vieira, J. K. M., de Farias, I. H., & de Moura, H. P. (2023). Evaluating a Conceptual Model for Projects Observatories through a Survey. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1145/3592813.3592928
34. Vieira, J. K. M., Farias, I. H. De, & Moura, H. P. De. (2022). Evaluating and Evolving a Conceptual Model for Projects Observatories. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Par F180474. https://doi.org/10.1145/3535511.3535540
35. Voloshchuk, V. (2020). Methodological approaches to determining the effectiveness of innovative development of enterprises. innovative economy, 0(7–8), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.37332/2309-1533.2020.7-8.10
36. Yáñez-Valdés, C. (2022). Technological entrepreneurship: present conditions and future perspectives for Latin America. Management Research, 20(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-09-2021-1230/FULL/XML