Criminal legal aspects of surrogacy for commercial purposes—Case of Vietnam

Thuy Ha Le

Article ID: 8985
Vol 8, Issue 13, 2024

VIEWS - 124 (Abstract) 9 (PDF)

Abstract


Surrogacy has opened new doors for many people who need children but are infertile or unable to have children. Through modern scientific technology, couples or mothers can find women to ask them to be surrogates using their eggs or sperm. The nature of surrogacy is reproductive support, but the complexity of the surrogacy procedure causes a lot of controversy not only in the field of criminal law but also regarding its implementation in practice. The article uses qualitative analysis to study current commercial surrogacy formulas. The main goal of this study is to clarify the legal aspects of commercial surrogacy in the world and in Vietnam. The article also concludes that Vietnam and other countries need to agree or develop common principles to avoid cross-border surrogacy as well as establish legal tools to prevent surrogacy for sexual purposes trade to protect human rights and prevent child trafficking.


Keywords


surrogacy; commercial purpose; criminal; responsibility; Vietnam

Full Text:

PDF


References


Abdullah, F.M. (2019). Aspects Beyond Commercial Surrogacy: Modern Form of Human Trafficking. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues. 22 (Special Issue 1), pp. 1–7.

Allan, S. (2016). The Surrogate in Commercial Surrogacy: Legal and Ethical Considerations. In Surrogacy, Law and Human Rights. Routledge, pp. 113–144.

Andrea, W. (2019). International Surrogacy as disruptive industry in Southeast Asia. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Banerjee, S. (2013). Gestational surrogacy contracts: Altruistic or commercial? A contract theoretic approach. The Manchester School, 81(3), pp. 438–460.

Brinsden, P. R. (2003). Gestational surrogacy. Human Reproduction Update, 9(5), pp. 483–491.

Brugger, K. (2011). International law in the gestational surrogacy debate. Fordham International Law Journal, 35 (3), pp. 665–697.

Cheney, K. E. (2014). Executive summary of the International Forum on Intercountry Adoption and Global Surrogacy. ISS Working Paper Series/General Series, Vol. 596, pp. 1–40.

Cheung, H. (2014). Surrogate babies: Where can you have them, and is it legal? BBC News. Available from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-28679020, (acccess to 20/8/2024).

Chintamani, R. (2012). Surrogacy–A conceptual and legal analysis in 21st century. Science, Technology and Law Reforms. Faculty of Law, Banaras Hindu.

Chukreev, V. A. (2022). On the criminal law measures of regulation of surrogacy in foreign countries. RUDN Journal of Law, 26(2), pp. 419–432.

Císařová, D., Sovová, O. Náhradní mateřství v právní praxi. Časopis zdravotnického práva a bioetiky. Journal of Medical Law and Bioethics, 5 (2), pp. 13–24.

Dhananjay, M. (2008). Baby Manji’s case throws up need for law on surrogacy. Available from: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/3400842.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst, (access to 22/8/2024).

French Penal Code. Available from: https://yurist-online.org/laws/foreign/criminalcode_fr/_doc-5-.pdf, (access to 22/8/2024).

Fulu, E., Jewkes, R., Roselli, T., Garcia, M. C. (2013). Prevalence of and factors associated with male perpetration of intimate partner violence: findings from the UN Multi-country Cross-sectional Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific. The Lancet Global Health, 1(4), pp.187–207.

Gerber, P., O’Byrne, K. (2015). Surrogacy, Law and Human Rights (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315611372

Hibino, Y. (2015). Implications of the legalization of non-commercial surrogacy for local kinship and motherhood in Vietnamese society. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 30(2), pp. 113–114.

Hyder, R. N. (2021). Commercial Gestational Surrogacy: Unravelling the threads between reproductive tourism and child trafficking. Anti-Trafficking Review, (16), pp. 123–143, https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201221168.

Ikemoto, L. C. (2009). Reproductive tourism: Equality concerns in the global market for fertility services. Law & Inequality, 27(2), pp. 277–309.

Ivana H., Roman S. (2021). Surrogacy–a comparison of criminal law in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic, 11(2), pp. 48–59.

Janys M., Scott, Q. C. (2010). A brief guide to who is a parent and parental orders under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. pp.2–3

Jean, M. S. (1997). Surrogacy and Prostitution: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Gender & the Law, 5(2), pp. 315–342.

Jennifer, R. (2009). Booming Baby Business: Regulating Commercial Surrogacy in India. Penn Carey Law Journals, University of Pennsylvania, 30(4), pp. 1429–1462.

Johnson, I., Li, C. (2014). China experiences a booming underground market in surrogate motherhood. The New York Times. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/03/world/asia/china-experiences-a-boomingblack-market-in-child-surrogacy.html?_r=0, (access to 22/8/2024).

Journey to Parenthood, Oprah Winfrey Show (Jan. 1, 2006). Available from: http://www.oprah.com/world/Wombs-for-Rent, (access to 22/8/2024).

Kalsang, B., et al. (2009). Surrogate Pregnancy: An Essential Guide for Clinicians. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 11(1), pp. 49–52.

Knoppers, B. M. (1986). Reproductive technology and international mechanisms of protection of the human person. McGill Law Journal, 32, pp.336–358.

Kuchma O. L., Siniova L. M. (2019). Surrogate motherhood as a way of implementing the demographic function of social security law. Comparative Analytical Law. Vol 3, pp. 108–111.

Le, V. Q. (2017). Crime of organizing surrogacy for commercial purposes: Adjustments for uniform application. Available from: https://cand.com.vn/Ban-doc-cand/Toi-to-chuc-mang-thai-ho-vi-muc-dich-thuong-mai-Dieu-chinh-de-ap-dung-thong-nhat-i433619/, (access to 25/8/2024)

Marek, T.I. Š., Renáta a kol. (2013). Aktuální problémy rodinněprávní regulace: rodičovství, výchova a výživa nezletilého. Praha: Leges.

Markens, S. (2007). Surrogate motherhood and the politics of reproduction. Univ of California Press.

Minh, P., Kim, T. (2022), Final episode: Need for more strict sanctions. Available from: https://laodongthudo.vn/ky-cuoi-can-them-che-tai-xu-phat-that-nghiem-143356.html, (access to 16/9/2024)

Miranda, D. (2017). Mapping feminist views on commercial surrogacy Emma Maniere. In Babies for Sale?: Transnational Surrogacy, Human Rights and the Politics of Reproduction, Zed Books, London

Nayana, H. P., et al. (2018). Insight into different aspects of surrogacy practices. Journal of Human Reproductive Science. 11 (3), pp. 212–218. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_138_17.

Nelson, E. (2013). Global trade and assisted reproductive technologies: Regulatory challenges in international surrogacy. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 41(1), pp. 240–253.

Nguyen T. L. H., Vu, T. H. (2021). Legislative views on surrogacy of some countries in the world and the experience of Vietnam in completing the law on surrogacy for humanitarian purposes. Hue University Journal of Science: Social Sciences and Humanities. Vol 130, No. 6E, 2021, pp. 189–203

Nisand, I. (2010). Grossesse pour autrui: pour le cas par cas. Gynécologie obstétrique & fertilité, 38(3), pp. 226–229.

Pande, A. (2014). Power of narratives. Teoksessa Sayantani DasGupta & Shamita Das Dasgupta. Globalization and transnational surrogacy in India. Outsourcing life. Lanham ym.: Lexington Books, pp. 87–105.

Reznik, O. M., Yakushchenko, Y. M. (2020). Legal considerations surrounding surrogacy in Ukraine. Wiadomości Lekarskie, 73(5), pp. 1048–1052.

Rotabi, K. S., Bromfield, N. F. (2012). The decline in intercountry adoptions and new practices of global surrogacy: Global exploitation and human rights concerns. Affilia, 27(2), pp. 129–141.

Ruby L. L. N. (2009). New Trends in Global Outsourcing of Commercial Surrogacy: A Call for Regulation. Hastings Women’s L.J. 275, pp. 276–284.

Sally, H. (2015). US Army wives: the most sought-after surrogates in the world. Daily Telegraph, Available from: www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/11583541/US-army-wives-the-most-sought-after-surrogates-in-the-world.html, (access to 22/8/2024).

Shestak, V. A. Sukhorukova, P. A. (2021). Legal regulation of surrogacy in France. Regulation of legal relations: problems theory and practice. XX annual international student scientific and practical conference (1–2 April 2021). Moscow: Russian State University of Justice.

Simmons, P. D. (1983). Birth and death: Bioethical decision making. Westminster John Knox Press.

Statucki, T. (2016). Illegal Motherhood: A Response to Contemporary Fertility Issues in China [Thesis]. University of Nevada Reno.

Sunčana, R. V., Dijana, H., Zrinka, K. (2012). Bioethical and legal challenges of surrogate motherhood in the Republic of Croatia. JAHR: European Journal of Bioethics, 3(5), pp. 37–67.

Susan, D. J. (2008). More Gay Men Choose Surrogacy to Have Children. ABC NEW, http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/OnCall/ story?id=4439567&page=1, (access to 22/8/2024).

Susan, D. J. (2011). Surrogate Mom Damages Heart After Four Babies, ABC NEWS. Available from http://abcnews.go.com/Health/surrogate-mother-suffersheart-damage-giving-birth-children/story?id=13028197, (access to 22/8/2024).

Svatoš, R., Konečná, H. (2019). Surrogacy with respect to criminal law. The Lawyer Quarterly, 9(3), pp. 197–212.

Taylor, A. L. (2007). The Evolution of global health law in a globalized World. The Global Community Yearbook of International Law & Jurisprudence (1), pp.19–37.

Tazia, S. (2016), Illegal Motherhood: A Response to Contemporary Fertility Issues in China, Thesis, University of Nevada Reno.

Teman, E. (2010). Birthing a mother: The surrogate body and the pregnant self. Univ of California Press., pp. 292.

Tran, T. H. L. (2016). Theoretical and practical issues on protecting women’s rights by criminal law in Vietnam. PhD thesis. Faculty of Law. Vietnam National University. Hanoi.

Trimmings, K., Beaumont, P. (Eds.) (2013). International surrogacy arrangements: legal regulation at the international level. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Trowse, P. (2011). Surrogacy: Is it harder to relinquish genes? Journal of Law and Medicine, 6(14), pp. 617–645.

Tuong Lam by Uyen Phuong Translation (2013). Authorized for surrogacy since 2014. Vietnam News, 2012, 2013. Available from: http://www.kenfoxlaw.com/resources/legal-documents/governmental-decrees/2123-vbpl.html, (access to 20/8/2024).

Vietnam’s Marriage and Family Law 2014, Available at https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Quyen-dan-su/Luat-Hon-nhan-va-gia-dinh-2014-238640.aspx, (access to 25/8/2024).

Vladimír Čečot, Jozef Madliak, Vojtech Tkáč, CSc. a kol. (2015). Obchodovanie s deťmi a nelegálne adopcie. Právnická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela. Banská Bystrica.

Wolf, T. A. (2014). Why Japan should legalize surrogacy. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, 23(2), pp. 477–478.

Yuri, H. (2015). Implications of the legalization of noncommercial surrogacy for local kinship and motherhood in Vietnamese society. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 30, pp. 113–114.

Чукреев, В. А. (2022). уголовно-правовые меры охраны суррогатного материнства в зарубежных странах. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов: Юридические науки, 26 (2), pp. 419–432.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd8985

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Thuy Ha Le

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.