This article using thematic and content analysis investigated the contribution of innovation in achieving sustainable economic development. The objective of the bibliometric research was to assess the literature on this subject it identified research trends, ideas, and authors who contributed to this area so that future research and policy directions could be suggested. The data was derived from the Scopus database and was extracted between January 2020 and February 2024 by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Scopus database search yielded 66 articles, published between 2020 and February 2024. Scopus analytics and Microsoft Excel were used for descriptive analysis and VOS Viewer software was used for network visualization of keywords. The descriptive analysis showed the trajectory of research, the prolific authors, their publication outlets, authors affiliation, and county of origin of the documents. The prolific visualization showed five clusters: red, green, blue, purple, and yellow. The main clusters are economic development, alternative energy, sustainable development, and innovation. This research showed where consideration should be given to drive sustainability and sustainable economic development. This research outcome will assist government agencies, corporations, and non-profit organizations in planning appropriate action and policies to support innovative and renewable energy initiatives so that participation in those fields could enhance the opportunity to achieve sustainable economic development.

1. Abid, N., Ceci, F., Ahmad, F., et al. (2022). Financial development and green innovation, the ultimate solutions to an environmentally sustainable society: Evidence from leading economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 369, 133223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133223
2. Afzaal, M., Shanshan, X., & El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2024). A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of speech acts in international journals (2013–2023). Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2380556
3. Ali, A., Xinagyu, G., & Radulescu, M. (2023). Nonlinear effects of urbanization routes (proportion of small cities, and proportion of large cities) on environmental degradation, evidence from China, India, Indonesia, the United States, and Brazil. Energy & Environment, 34(8), 3391–3416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231186843
4. Ali, W., Wen, J., Hussain, H., et al. (2021). Does green intellectual capital matter for green innovation adoption? Evidence from the manufacturing SMEs of Pakistan. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(5), 868–888. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-06-2020-0204
5. Altıntaş, H., & Kassouri, Y. (2020). The impact of energy technology innovations on cleaner energy supply and carbon footprints in Europe: A linear versus nonlinear approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124140
6. Bassi, A. M., Costantini, V., & Paglialunga, E. (2021). Modelling the European Union Sustainability Transition: A Soft-Linking Approach. Sustainability, 13(11), 6303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116303
7. Bicil, İ. M., Erkul, A., & Türköz, K. (2022). Energy R&D trends and sustainable energy strategies in IEA countries: efficiency, dependency, and environmental dynamics. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(40), 60012–60023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19950-0
8. Burrell, R., Jee, J. S., Hotte, K. & Ring, C. (2023). Intellectual property rights, climate technology transfer, and innovation in developing countries, INET Oxford Working, Paper No. 2023-14. Institute for New Economic Thinking, Oxford Martin School, 14, 1-93.
9. Calza, F., Parmentola, A., & Tutore, I. (2017). Types of Green Innovations: Ways of Implementation in a Non-Green Industry. Sustainability, 9(8), 1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081301
10. Cao, X., Li, P., Li, S., et al. (2022). The Belt and Road Initiative, Public Health Expenditure and Economic Growth: Evidence from Quasi-Natural Experiments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316234
11. Castaneda, M., Herrera, M. M., & Méndez-Morales, A. (2023). A simulation-based approach for assessing the innovation barriers in the manufacturing firms. Technology in Society, 75, 102391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102391
12. Castro, C. G., Trevisan, A. H., Pigosso, D. C. A., et al. (2022). The rebound effect of circular economy: Definitions, mechanisms and a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131136
13. Chen, Y., Chen, S., & Miao, J. (2024). Does smart city pilot improve urban green economic efficiency: Accelerator or inhibitor. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 104, 107328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107328
14. Chu, J. M. W. W. (2013). Developing and diffusing green technologies: the impact of intellectual property rights and their justification, Journal of Energy, Climate, and the Environment, 4 (1), 53-102.
15. Cortes, J. D., Guix, M., & Carbonell, K. B. (2021). Innovation for sustainability in the Global South: bibliometric findings from management & business and STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) fields in developing countries. Heliyon, 7(8), 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07809
16. Demir, G., Chatterjee, P., Kadry, S., et al. (2024). Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) Method: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(2), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame7220241137
17. Dobrovolska, O., Sonntag, R., Masiuk, Y., et al. (2023). Is increasing a share of R&D expenditure in GDP a factor in strengthening the level of innovation development in Ukraine compared with GII’s top countries? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(4), 713-723. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.53
18. Domazet, I., Marjanović, D., Ahmetagić, D., et al. (2023). Business Sector Investment in R&D as a Factor for Improving Innovation Evidence from Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and Serbia. Eastern European Economics, 62(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2023.2281453
19. Du, Q., Li, Z., Du, M., et al. (2024). Government venture capital and innovation performance in alternative energy production: The moderating role of environmental regulation and capital market activity. Energy Economics, 129, 107196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107196
20. Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., Ferreira, J. J. M., et al. (2021). Green growth versus economic growth: Do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 2021–2037. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2730
21. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., et al. (2017). The Circular Economy—A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
22. Grafström, J., Söderholm, P., Gawel, E., et al. (2020). Government support to renewable energy R&D: drivers and strategic interactions among EU Member States. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 32(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1857499
23. Guo, W., Yang, B., Ji, J., et al. (2023). Green finance development drives renewable energy development: Mechanism analysis and empirical research. Renewable Energy, 215, 118982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.118982
24. Gyamfi, B. A., Agozie, D. Q., Musah, M., et al. (2023). The synergistic roles of green openness and economic complexity in environmental sustainability of Europe’s largest economy: Implications for technology-intensive and environmentally friendly products. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 102, 107220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107220
25. Hassan, A. S. (2022). Modeling the linkage between coal mining and ecological footprint in South Africa: does technological innovation matter? Mineral Economics, 36(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-022-00330-6
26. Hintringer, T. M., Bobek, V., Milost, F., et al. (2021). Innovation as a Determinant of Growth in Outperforming Emerging Markets: An Analysis of South Korea. Sustainability, 13(18), 10241. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810241
27. Huang, J., Zhang, H., Peng, W., et al. (2021). Impact of energy technology and structural change on energy demand in China. Science of The Total Environment, 760, 143345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143345
28. Hussain, M., Rehman, R. U., & Bashir, U. (2023). Environmental pollution, innovation, and financial development: an empirical investigation in selected industrialized countries using the panel ARDL approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03860-3
29. Im, C. H., & Cho, K. T. (2021). Comparing and Identifying Influential Factors of Technological Innovation Efficiency in Manufacturing and Service Industries Using DEA: A Study of SMEs in South Korea. Sustainability, 13(23), 12945. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132312945
30. Ionescu, R. V., Zlati, M. L., & Antohi, V. M. (2021). European union’s regions between cohesion and sustainability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120862
31. IPCC, Methodological and technical issues in technology transfer. (2000). Special Report of IPCC Working Group III, Laura Van Wie McGrory. Available online: http://documentacion.ideam gov.co/openbiblio/bvirtual/005133/ipcc/tectran/IPCC_SRTT.pd (accessed on 13 May 2024).
32. Jakobsen, S., & Clausen, T. H. (2016). Innovating for a greener future: the direct and indirect effects of firms’ environmental objectives on the innovation process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.023
33. Khan, A., Hassan, M. K., Paltrinieri, A., et al. (2020). A bibliometric review of takaful literature. International Review of Economics & Finance, 69, 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.05.013
34. Khan, H., Dong, Y., Nuţă, F. M., et al. (2023). Eco-innovations, green growth, and environmental taxes in EU countries: a panel quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(49), 108005–108022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29957-w
35. Khatik, S. K., & Shrivastava, G. (2023). Government’s Role in Creating a Start-Up Ecosystem: The Indian Youth Perception. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(4), 61. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i4/172788
36. Khurshid, A., Rauf, A., Calin, A. C., et al. (2021). Technological innovations for environmental protection: role of intellectual property rights in the carbon mitigation efforts. Evidence from western and southern Europe. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(5), 3919–3934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03491-z
37. Kotlebova, J., Arendas, P., & Chovancova, B. (2020). Government expenditures in the support of technological innovations and impact on stock market and real economy: the empirical evidence from the US and Germany. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(4), 717–734. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.031
38. Kruse, M. (2024). Inter-organisational Sustainability Cooperation Among European Regions and the Role of Smart Specialisation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01760-z
39. Kruse, M., Somcutean, C., & Wedemeier, J. (2023). Productivity, Smart Specialisation, and Innovation: REGION, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v10i1.419
40. Li, L. (2023). The Impact of Eco-Innovation and Clean Energy on Sustainable Development: Evidence from USA. Engineering Economics, 34(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.34.1.32158
41. Li, S., & Shao, Q. (2021). Exploring the determinants of renewable energy innovation considering the institutional factors: A negative binomial analysis. Technology in Society, 67, 101680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101680
42. Li, X., Guo, D., & Feng, C. (2022). The Carbon Emissions Trading Policy of China: Does It Really Promote the Enterprises’ Green Technology Innovations? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114325
43. Liao, Z., Hu, M., Gao, L., et al. (2022). Is air pollution detrimental to regional innovation? An empirical heterogeneity test based on Chinese cities. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.981306
44. Liu, Q., Qu, X., Wang, D., et al. (2022). Product Market Competition and Firm Performance: Business Survival Through Innovation and Entrepreneurial Orientation Amid COVID-19 Financial Crisis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790923
45. Liu, T., Zhu, X., & Cao, M. (2022). Impacts of Reduced Inequalities on Quality Education: Examining the Relationship between Regional Sustainability and Higher Education. Sustainability, 14(21), 14112. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114112
46. Lu, Y., Yi, F., Yu, S., et al. (2022). Pathways to Sustainable Deployment of Solar Photovoltaic Policies in 20 Leading Countries Using a Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sustainability, 14(10), 5858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105858
47. Martí, L., Cervelló-Royo, R., & Puertas, R. (2022). Analysis of the nexus between country risk, environmental policies, and human development. Energy Research & Social Science, 92, 102767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102767
48. Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2019). One for All and All for One: Collaboration and Cooperation in Triple Helix Knowledge Cocreation. International Regional Science Review, 43(4), 316–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017619889677
49. McManus, C., Baeta Neves, A. A., & Prata, A. T. (2021). Scientific publications from non-academic sectors and their impact. Scientometrics, 126(11), 8887–8911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04159-8
50. Nham, N. T. H., & Ha, L. T. (2023). The role of financial development in improving marine living resources towards sustainable blue economy. Journal of Sea Research, 195, 102417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2023.102417
51. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Eco-innovation in Industry: Enabling Green Growth. OECD, Paris.
52. Pattak, D. C., Tahrim, F., Salehi, M., et al. (2023). The Driving Factors of Italy’s CO2 Emissions Based on the STIRPAT Model: ARDL, FMOLS, DOLS, and CCR Approaches. Energies, 16(15), 5845. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155845
53. Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Mäkinen, S. J. (2018). Creating value in the circular economy: A structured multiple-case analysis of business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 988–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.072
54. Riehl, K., Kiesel, F., & Schiereck, D. (2022). Political and Socioeconomic Factors That Determine the Financial Outcome of Successful Green Innovation. Sustainability, 14(6), 3651. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063651
55. Rimmer, M. (2012). Climate-Ready Crops: Intellectual Property, Agriculture and Climate Change. Intellectual Property and Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001189.00023
56. Rimmer, M. (2018). Intellectual Property and Clean Energy. Springer Singapore.
57. Santos, A. M., & Coad, A. (2023). Monitoring and evaluation of transformative innovation policy: Suggestions for Improvement. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 90, 101714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101714
58. Shahzadi, I., Yaseen, M. R., Iqbal Khan, M. T., et al. (2022). The nexus between research and development, renewable energy and environmental quality: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Renewable Energy, 190, 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.050
59. Shaikh, I. A., & Randhawa, K. (2022). Industrial R&D and national innovation policy: an institutional reappraisal of the US national innovation system. Industrial and Corporate Change, 31(5), 1152–1176. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtac019
60. Sharif, A., Mehmood, U., & Tiwari, S. (2023). A step towards sustainable development: role of green energy and environmental innovation. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(4), 9603–9624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03111-5
61. Shkarupa, O., Vlasenko, D., Makedon, H., et al. (2022). Economy of knowledge and transfer of innovations: Ukraine’s progress through the lens of European development trends. Knowledge and Performance Management, 6(1), 100-113 https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.06(1).2022.09
62. Siddique, N., Rehman, S. U., Ahmad, S., et al. (2023). Research Productivity of Pakistani Female LIS Authors, 1977 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231207188
63. Siddiqui, S. A., & Afzal, M. N. I. (2022). Sectoral diversification of UAE toward a knowledge-based economy. Review of Economics and Political Science, 7(3), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/reps-07-2021-0075
64. Solaymani, S., Villamor, G., Dunningham, A., et al. (2023). The relationship between energy and non-energy factors and CO2 emissions in New Zealand. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(47), 104270–104283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29784-z
65. Stefan, A., & Paul, L. (2008). Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2008.35590353
66. Sun, H., Edziah, B. K., Kporsu, A. K., et al. (2021). Energy efficiency: The role of technological innovation and knowledge spillover. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120659
67. Terzis, D. (2022). Monitoring innovation metrics in construction and civil engineering: Trends, drivers and laggards. Developments in the Built Environment, 9, 100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100064
68. Tingbani, I., Salia, S., Hussain, J. G., et al. (2023). Environmental Tax, SME Financing Constraint, and Innovation: Evidence from OECD Countries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(3), 1006–1025. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2021.3110812
69. Topliceanu, L., Puiu, P. G., Drob, C., et al. (2022). Analysis Regarding the Implementation of the Circular Economy in Romania. Sustainability, 15(1), 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010333
70. Traerup, S., George, C., Pathak. M., et al. (2022). UNEP and UNFCCC, Climate technology progress report. United Nations Environment Programme Copenhagen Climate Center (UNEPCCC) and United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Technology Executive Committee (TEC), Copenhagen, Denmark.
71. Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023). Striving for the United Nations (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs) in BRICS economies: The role of green finance, fintech, and natural resource rent. Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3657–3672. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2618
72. Umar, I. K., Adamu, M., Mostafa, N., et al. (2024). The state-of-the-art in the application of artificial intelligence-based models for traffic noise prediction: a bibliographic overview. Cogent Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2297508
73. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a c.omputer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
74. Vimalnath, P., Tietze, F., Jain, A., et al. (2022). Intellectual property strategies for green innovations—An analysis of the European Inventor Awards. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377, 134325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134325
75. Wen, J., Li, L., Zhao, X., et al. (2022). How Government Size Expansion Can Affect Green Innovation—An Empirical Analysis of Data on Cross-Country Green Patent Filings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 7328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127328
76. Wen, J., Okolo, C. V., Ugwuoke, I. C., et al. (2022). Research on influencing factors of renewable energy, energy efficiency, on technological innovation. Does trade, investment and human capital development matter? Energy Policy, 160, 112718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112718
77. Wibisono, E. (2023). Knowledge input and innovation in Visegrad Group (V4) regions: A spatial econometric approach. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 59, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2023-0008
78. Wu, C., Tan, N., Lu, Z., et al. (2021). Strategies of Knowledge Pricing and the Impact on Firms’ New Product Development Performance. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2021.08.020
79. Wu, L., Wang, L., & Lin, L. (2023). Learn to be green: FDI spillover effects on eco-innovation in China. Industrial and Corporate Change, 32(5), 1192–1216. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtad047
80. Xiao, W., Kong, H., Shi, L., et al. (2022). The Impact of Innovation-Driven Strategy on High-Quality Economic Development: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(7), 4212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074212
81. Xing, L., Khan, Y. A., Arshed, N., et al. (2023). Investigating the impact of economic growth on environment degradation in developing economies through STIRPAT model approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 182, 113365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113365
82. Xu, X., Chen, X., Xu, Y., et al. (2022). Improving the Innovative Performance of Renewable Energy Enterprises in China: Effects of Subsidy Policy and Intellectual Property Legislation. Sustainability, 14(13), 8169. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138169
83. Yang, B., Jahanger, A., & Ali, M. (2021). Remittance inflows affect the ecological footprint in BICS countries: do technological innovation and financial development matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(18), 23482–23500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12400-3
84. Yi, J., Dai, S., Li, L., et al. (2024). How does digital economy development affect renewable energy innovation? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 192, 114221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114221
85. Zerbino, P. (2022). How to manage the Circular Economy Rebound effect: A proposal for contingency-based guidelines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 134584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134584
86. Zha, D., Jiang, P., Zhang, C., et al. (2023). Positive synergy or negative synergy: An assessment of the carbon emission reduction effect of renewable energy policy mixes on China’s power sector. Energy Policy, 183, 113782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113782
87. Zhao, S., Cao, Y., Feng, C., et al. (2022). How do heterogeneous R&D investments affect China’s green productivity: Revisiting the Porter hypothesis. Science of The Total Environment, 825, 154090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154090
88. Zheng, P., Zheng, Z., Wu, J., et al. (2020). XBlock-ETH: Extracting and Exploring Blockchain Data from Ethereum. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 1, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/ojcs.2020.2990458
89. Zhussipova, E. E., Beisenova, M. U., Kuralbayeva, A. S., et al. (2023). The scientific and innovative world of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 42(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbis.2023.128669