Future direction for infrastructure research

Michael Regan

Article ID: 87
Vol 1, Issue 2, 2017, Article identifier:272-279

VIEWS - 430 (Abstract) 317 (PDF)

Abstract


Contemporary infrastructure research has its origins in the late 1980s as attempts were made to measure the economic impact of public expenditures with early mixed results. In the 1990s, infrastructure assumed greater importance as a policy solution to improve economic performance in low-income economies particularly by multilateral development and official development agencies. This interest led to greater research interest with the examination of infrastructure and economic development, foreign direct investment, the role of institutions and capital markets, procurement, regional economic effects and more recently, the productivity of public investment in specific regions and industries. 

This article identifies subjects that warrant further research in the future particularly the shortfall in current investment levels and how this will be met. This is a challenge for both low and high-income countries with fiscal and public debt constraints requiring governments to tap alternative sources of finance. Policy options available to government include wider use of bond markets and private participation in infrastructure provision and management. Other problems facing government include optimism bias and forecasting error that is a particular problem for projects in the transport sector. 

Many other research opportunities remain to be explored and this article is designed to provide an overview of several of the subjects that would benefit from further research at the present time. 


Keywords


infrastructure; research

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aschauer DA (1989). “Is public expenditure productive”? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2): 177–200.

Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2017). “Meeting Asia’s infrastructure needs”. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. doi: 10.22617/FLS168388-2.

Gwartney J, Lawson R and Hall J (2016). “Economic freedom of the world: 2016 annual report”. Toronto, Canada: Fraser Institute.

Hulten CR (1996). “Infrastructure capital and economic growth: How well you use it may be more important than how much you have”. Working Paper 5847. Cambridge, MA, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi: 10.3386/w5847.

Hume D (1787). “Idea of a perfect commonwealth”. In Miller EF (ed). Essays, Moral, Political and Literary. Library Fund Inc. Indianapolis.

Pereira AM and Andraz JM (2013). “On the economic effects of public infrastructure investment: A survey of the international evidence”. Journal of Economic Development, 38(4): 1–37.

Samuelson PA (1954). “The pure theory of public expenditure”. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4): 387–389. doi: 10.2307/1925895.

_____ (1955). “Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure”. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 37(4): 350–356. doi: 10.2307/1925849.

Sandmo A (2005). “Public goods”. In: Bagchi A (ed). Readings in public finance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Smith A (1974). “The wealth of nations, Books I-III”. In: Skinner A (ed). London, England, UK; Penguin Books.

Woetzel J, Garemo N, Mischke J, et al. (2016). “Bridging global infrastructure gaps”. New York, NY, USA: McKinsey and Company.

World Bank (2016). “Worldwide Governance Indicator”. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.

World Economic Forum (2016). “The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017”. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v1i2.87

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Michael Regan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.