Comparing co-teaching and single instructor approaches on student satisfaction in online medical English courses
Vol 8, Issue 9, 2024
VIEWS - 132 (Abstract) 45 (PDF)
Abstract
This study examined the dissatisfaction among Chinese medical students with online medical English courses, which overemphasize grammar yet fail to provide practical opportunities related to medical situations. This study compared co-teaching’s effects, involving native and non-native instructors, with a single-instructor (traditional) model on student satisfaction in online medical English courses. Using a qualitative design, pre- and post-course interviews were conducted with 49 second-year medical students across seven classes, exploring their perceptions of instruction, curriculum, and course satisfaction. The findings indicated that the co-teaching model improved student engagement and satisfaction, not specifically due to the native English-speaking instructor but likely because of the focus on more interactive and discussion-oriented strategies. In contrast, the single-instructor model maintained the traditional grammar-focused instruction, leading to lower satisfaction levels. Both instructional models faced limitations related to their reliance on textbooks for delivering core material needed for the course’s comprehensive exam. These results suggest that the instruction design and approach, rather than the native instructor alone, was the main driver of positive outcomes in co-teaching. The study’s findings suggest a need for curriculum reforms that reduce textbook dependence and incorporate more practical, interactive learning strategies. Future research should consider applying various research techniques, such as mixed-method approaches, longitudinal studies, and experimental designs, to comprehensively assess the long-term effects of instructional strategies and curriculum innovations on student outcomes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buschle, C., Reiter, H., & Bethmann, A. (2021). The qualitative pretest interview for questionnaire development: outline of programme and practice. Quality & Quantity, 56(2), 823–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01156-0
Çakmakkaya, Ö. S., Meydanlı, E. G., Kafadar, A. M., et al. (2024). Factors affecting medical students’ satisfaction with online learning: a regression analysis of a survey. BMC Medical Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04995-7
Cao, X. P. (2016). Exploration of ESP teaching for graduate students in medical colleges based on CBI teaching concept. Continuing Education Research, 8, 111-113.
Chen, F., Yang, X. L., Wen, X. Y., et al. (2020). Study on the study satisfaction of independent college students. Private Higher Education Research, 17(3), 19-29.
Chen, S., Morgado, M., Jiang, H., et al. (2024). Medical and nursing students’ satisfaction with e-learning platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of an experimental project in China. Heliyon, 10(4), e26233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26233
Chi, S. (2020). The role of ESP teachers in the post-university english era based on professionalization process exploring the path of transformation. Journal of Tonghua Normal College, 7(41), 130-134.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Crow, J., & Smith, L. (2005). Co‐teaching in higher education: reflective conversation on shared experience as continued professional development for lecturers and health and social care students. Reflective Practice, 6(4), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940500300582
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
DuFour, R., & Fullan, M. (2013). Cultures built to last: Systemic PLCs at work. Solution Tree Press.
Geraghty, J. R., Young, A. N., Berkel, T. D. M., et al. (2019). Empowering medical students as agents of curricular change: a value-added approach to student engagement in medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 9(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00547-2
Guan, W., & Asavisanu, P. (2023). Medical English Course Quality: A Study of Student and Instructor Perspectives. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(6), 97. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n6p97
Guan, W., & Scott, T. (2024). An Examination of Students’ Perspectives of Medical English Course Quality in Guangdong Medical Universities. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2024.2368074
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x05279903
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Jacob, S. A., & Furgerson, S. P. (2012). Writing interview protocols and conducting interviews: Tips for students new to the field of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(6), 1-10.
Ma, J. (2022). Analysis of the need for EMP curriculum and teaching needs in Chinese colleges - A case study of Yunnan University of traditional Chinese medicine. Overseas English, 21, 89-91.
McGrath, C., Palmgren, P. J., & Liljedahl, M. (2018). Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews. Medical Teacher, 41(9), 1002–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2018.1497149
Mofield, E. L. (2019). Benefits and Barriers to Collaboration and Co-Teaching: Examining Perspectives of Gifted Education Teachers and General Education Teachers. Gifted Child Today, 43(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519880588
Mogahoa, T. (2014). Applicability of constructivist theory in qualiative educational research. American international Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(7), 51-59.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., et al. (2017). Thematic Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Peng, C. (2021). The Academic Motivation and Engagement of Students in English as a Foreign Language Classes: Does Teacher Praise Matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.778174
Schumacher, R., & Stern, E. (2023). Promoting the construction of intelligent knowledge with the help of various methods of cognitively activating instruction. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.979430
Scott, T., & Guan, W. (2022). The Effects of Service Quality on English Majors’ Satisfaction: A Chinese Empirical Study. The International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7955/cgp/v29i01/131-150
Scott, T., Guan, W., Han, H., et al. (2023). The Impact of Academic Optimism, Institutional Policy and Support, and Self-Efficacy on University Instructors’ Continuous Professional Development in Mainland China. SAGE Open, 13(1), 215824402311533. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231153339
Sharma, S., Ravikirti, A, A., Takhelmayum, R., et al. (2017). Co-teaching: Exploring an Alternative for Integrated Curriculum. Journal of the National Medical Association, 109(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2017.02.002
Swanson, B. A., & Valdois, A. (2022). Acceptance of online education in China: A reassessment in light of changed circumstances due to the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100214
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yao, X. Y., & Zhu, Y. P. (2015). Self-developing ability: The core driving force for the professional growth of teachers. Educational Development Research, 10, 113-116.
Zhao, G. H. (2022). A Summary of research on College English demand analysis. Foreign Economic Relations & Trade, 3, 153-156.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.8686
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Wenyu Guan, Timothy Scott
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.