This study investigates university students’ understanding of the mole concept and its implications for chemistry education, highlighting the critical role of mathematical education. A questionnaire was administered to 303 students from universities in Panama, Mexico, Cuba, Chile, and Spain. The results reveal that only 29.7% of participants recognize the mole as a fundamental unit, while 20.8% confuse the amount of substance with a non-existent “Chemical System.” Only 18.5% correctly identified the substance quantity symbol as “n” and 32.7% were aware that Wilhelm Ostwald introduced the term mole, indicating deficiencies in historical knowledge. The significance of these findings highlights major misconceptions and gaps in both conceptual understanding and historical knowledge, underscoring the urgent need for revised teaching strategies. Addressing these issues is crucial for bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, thereby enhancing instructional methods and optimizing chemistry education to improve students’ comprehension of fundamental concepts.

Azcona, R. (1997). Critical analysis of the teaching-learning of the concepts of quantity of substance and mole. A didactic alternative based on inquiry-based learning (Spanish) [PhD thesis]. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad del País Vasco, San Sebastián.

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Bär, N. (2010). What lies behind the fear of hard sciences? La Nación Newspaper (Spanish). Available online: http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1288859 (accessed on 3 March 2015)

Cataldi, Z., Chiarenza, D., Dominighini, C., et al. (2011). Classification of virtual chemistry laboratories and proposal for heuristic evaluation (Spanish). En XIII Workshop de Investigadores en Ciencias de la Computación.

Dierks, W. (1981). Teaching the Mole. European Journal of Science Education, 3(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528810030205

Fiad, S., & Quiroga, V. (2010). Difficulties in the learning of General Chemistry I and actions to improve its teaching, within the framework of PACENI (Spanish). En VI Jornadas Internacionales-IX Nacionales de la Enseñanza Universitaria de la Química.

Furió-Mas, C., Azcona, R., & Guisasola Aranzabal, J. (2002). Review of research on the teaching-learning of the concepts quantity of substance and mole (Spanish). Enseñanza de Las Ciencias. Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 20(2), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3967

Furió-Mas, C., Azcona, R., Guisasola, G., et al. (1993). Students’ conceptions of a “forgotten” quantity in chemistry teaching: the quantity of substance (Spanish). Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 11(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.4525

Furió-Mas, C., Azcona, R., & Guisasola Aranzabal, J. (2007). Teaching the concepts of substance quantity and mole based on a model of learning as guided inquiry (Spanish). Enseñanza de Las Ciencias. Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 24(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3813

Gabel, D. L., & Bunce, D. M. (1994). Research on problem solving: Chemistry. Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. MacMillan Publishing Company. pp. 302-326.

García Sepúlveda, S. (2010). Let’s learn the concept of substance quantity (Spanish). Revista Digital Innovación y Experiencias Educativas, 27, 1-8.

Gil, D., Carrascosa, J., Furió, C., & Martínez Torregrosa, J. (1991). Science teaching in secondary education (Spanish). ICE-Horsori.

Gulacar, O., Milkey, A., & Eilks, I. (2020). Exploring Cluster Changes in Students’ Knowledge Structures Throughout General Chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7860

Hanson, R. (2019). The Impact of Two-tier Instruments on Undergraduate Chemistry Teacher Trainees: An Illuminative Assessment. International Journal for Infonomics, 12(4), 1920–1928. https://doi.org/10.20533/iji.1742.4712.2019.0198

Huey Chong, S., Goolamally, N., & Eu Leong, K. (2019). Post-secondary Science Students’ Understanding on Mole Concept and Solution Concentration. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 986–1000. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070410

Kolb, D. (1978). The mole. Journal of Chemical Education, 55(11), 728. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed055p728

Krishnan, S. R., & Howe, A. C. (1994). The Mole Concept: Developing an Instrument to Assess Conceptual Understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(8), 653. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed071p653

Mazzitelli, C. (2013). Prospective teachers and their representations of science education (Spanish). Avances en Ciencias e Ingeniería, 4(2), 99-110.

Merino de la Fuente, M. (2002). The Crisis of Physics: A Chronicle of the European Science and Technology Week 2000 (Spanish). Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 20(1), 185-190.

Millar, R. (1989). Constructive criticisms. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 587-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110510

Mol-BIPM. (2023). Available online: https://www.bipm.org/en/history-si/mole (accessed on 4 May 2024).

Moss, K., & Pabari, A. (2010). The mole misunderstood. New Directions, 6, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.11120/ndir.2010.00060077

Núñez, J. C., & González-Pumariega, S. (1996). Motivation and school learning (Spanish). En Congreso Nacional sobre Motivación e Instrucción.

Pozo, J. I. (1993). Learning strategies (Spanish). In: En Desarrollo psicológico y educación II. Alianza. pp. 235-258.

Pozo, J. I., & Gómez Crespo, M. A. (1998). Learning and teaching science (Spanish). Morata.

Paoloni, L. (1981). Chemistry as Part of Culture: a Challenge to Chemical Education. European Journal of Science Education, 3(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528810030204

Quijano Cedeño, A. A., & Navarrete Pita, Y. (2022). Chemistry teaching: the need for reinforcement and understanding in high school students (Spanish). Revista Oratores, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.37594/oratores.n15.603

Ratto, J. (2012). Dissertation: Science Education (Spanish). Academia Nacional de Educación (Argentina). Available online: http://www.acaedu.edu.ar/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id (accessed on 3 March 2015).

Reboiras, M. D. (2006). Chemistry, the basic science (Spanish). Thomson.

Rosado, L., & Herreros, J. (2009). New didactic contributions of virtual and remote laboratories in physics teaching (Spanish). En Recent Research Developments in Learning Technologies, International Conference on Multimedia and ICT in Education, 22-24.

Schmidt, H. (1994). Stoichiometric problem solving in high school chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069940160207

Staver, J. R., & Lumpe, A. T. (1995). Two investigations of students’ understanding of the mole concept and its use in problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2), 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320208

Vorsah, R. E., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2021). High School chemistry teachers’ perspectives and practices on teaching mole concept. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(2).

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.