This study aims to explain the design of policy strengthening in forest and land fire disaster mitigation governance, through the integration of ecotourism development in Siak Regency. Based on the research topic, this study employs a qualitative approach to describe governance conditions and the design of policy strengthening in ecotourism-based disaster mitigation governance. Data analysis is performed using Nvivo 12 Plus software. The results of this study indicate that forest and land fire disaster mitigation governance based on ecotourism development still has shortcomings that need to be addressed in the principles of conservation, economy, and community involvement. Then, the design of a policy to strengthen ecotourism-based disaster mitigation governance includes three crucial policy recommendations, namely: the need for special regulations related to forest and land fire disaster mitigation prevention based on the integration of ecotourism principle development, the need for a balance of roles between actors in determining and implementing ecotourism-based disaster mitigation policies, and the need for effective and efficient implementation of ecotourism-based disaster mitigation policies through increasing the involvement of strategic actors. Substantially, the handling of forest and land fire disasters in Siak Regency can be combined with ecotourism activities, especially in tourist village areas, by developing policies to strengthen the utilization of village-owned disaster mitigation facilities such as reservoirs, lakes, or ponds that are converted into water supplies during the dry season for forest and land fire disaster prevention activities and local economy-based tourist destinations. Our findings are a strategic effort to raise awareness among actors and highlight the need for policy-strengthening design in ecotourism-based disaster mitigation. These findings can also contribute to the literature that will be useful for all stakeholders in developing future long-term disaster mitigation governance policies. This study relies heavily on information from key informants, who represent only the perspectives and expertise of the stakeholders encountered. However, it still refers to important elements based on the informants’ knowledge capabilities in the disaster and tourism sectors. Therefore, we propose to conduct future studies on a comprehensive analysis of sustainable ecotourism-based disaster mitigation governance to promote and accelerate the idea of disaster and tourism in the future.

1. Ahmad Salman, Mastura Jaafar, M. D. (2020). A comprehensive review of the role of Ecotourism in sustainable tourism development. E-Review of Tourism Research (ERTR), 18(2), 215–233. https://ertr-ojs-tamu.tdl.org/ertr/article/view/482/222
2. Aisharya, I. Y., Gunawan, B., Abdoellah, O. S. (2022). Role and interaction between local actors in community-based forest management in Upper Citarum Hulu. Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, 12(2), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.12.2.335-351
3. Andari, R. (2023). Educational Tourism and Community-Based Ecotourism: Diversification for Tourist Education. Journal of Tourism Education, 3(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.17509/jote.v3i2.66099
4. Andayani, S. A., Umyati, S., Dinar, Tampubolon, G. M. (2022). Prediction model for agro-tourism development using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system method. Open Agriculture, 7(1), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0086
5. Ansari, N. A., Agus, C., Nunoo, E. K. (2021). Foundations of ‘SDG15 – LIFE on Land’: Earth, Forests and Biodiversity. In SDG15 – Life on Land: Towards Effective Biodiversity Management (pp. 7–48). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-814-320211004
6. Bai, Y., Wang, L., Yuan, X. (2023). Remote monitoring, personnel extinguishment or helicopter extinguishment? How to control forest fires more effectively. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0289727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289727
7. Baloch, Q. B., Shah, S. N., Iqbal, N. (2023). Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: a suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(0), 5917–5930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22496-w
8. Brotestes Panjaitan, R., Sumartono, S., Sarwono, S. (2019). The role of central government and local government and the moderating effect of good governance on forest fire policy in Indonesia. Benchmarking, 26(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2017-0336
9. Budiyanto, M. A. K., Hadi, S., Aminah, T., Husamah, H. (2020). Ecotourism-Based Learning Models in Efforts to Implement Effective Learning: A conceptual research. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 8(2), 69–80.
10. Canadas, M. J., Leal, M., Soares, F. (2023). Wildfire mitigation and adaptation: Two locally independent actions supported by different policy domains. Land Use Policy, 124(March 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106444
11. Cazzolla Gatti, R., Liang, J., Velichevskaya, A., Zhou, M. (2019). Sustainable palm oil may not be so sustainable. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 48–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.222
12. Dewi, I. G. S., Turisno, B. E., Handayani, E. (2022). Policy on Forest Land Use Change for Oil Palm Plantations in Lamandau Regency, Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. Environment and Ecology Research, 10(4), 461–466. https://doi.org/10.13189/eer.2022.100404
13. Dharma, A. B., Marlinda, P., Adianto, A., Simanjuntak, H. T. R. F. (2024). The implementation of peat ecosystems in mitigating the disaster of Riau forest fires. E3S Web of Conferences, 506, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450608002
14. Dharma, A. B., Sujianto, S., Yustina, Y., Yuliani, F. (2024). Forest Fire Disaster Mitigation Through Social Policy Implementation in Peat Ecosystem Management. Khazanah Sosial, 6(2), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v6i2.34897
15. Econusantara.org. (2024). Green Siak, Multi-Party Collaboration Breaks Deadlock in Handling Forest Fires. https://econusantara.org/siak-hijau-kolaborasi-multipihak-memecah-kebuntuan-penanganan-kebakaran-hutan/
16. Eshun, G., Tichaawa, T. M. (2020). Towards sustainable ecotourism development in Ghana: Contributions of the local communities. Tourism, 68(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.37741/T.68.3.2
17. Fadhillah, A., Pandin, M. G. R., Koesbardiati, T. (2023). Analyzing Forest and Land Fire Disaster Prevention Programs in Riau, Indonesia. Qubahan Academic Journal, 3(4), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.58429/qaj.v3n4a173
18. Friedman, R. S., Guerrero, A. M., McAllister, R. R. J., Rhodes, J. R. (2020). Beyond the community in participatory forest management: A governance network perspective. Land Use Policy, 97(January 2019), 104738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104738
19. Go, H., Kang, M., Nam, Y. (2020). The traces of ecotourism in a digital world: spatial and trend analysis of geotagged photographs on social media and Google search data for sustainable development. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 11(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-07-2019-0101
20. Hai-Jew, S. (2020). NVivo 12 Plus’s New Qualitative Cross-Tab Analysis Function. Kansas State University.
21. Harrison, M. E., Ottay, J. B., D’Arcy, L. J. (2020). Tropical forest and peatland conservation in Indonesia: Challenges and directions. People and Nature, 2(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10060
22. Indra, M., Artina, D., Diana, L. (2023). The Political Law of Forest and Land Fire Management: A Case Study in Bengkalis and Meranti Islands Regency, Riau Province, Indonesia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(1), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0024
23. Indra, M., Rafi, M., Handoko, T. (2024). The Importance of Strengthening Land Law Enforcement in Regulation of Land Registration. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 13(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv13i1art7
24. Jackson, P. B. and K. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVIVO. In SAGE Publications Ltd. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2013.866724
25. Jun Zhou, T., May Chiun, L., Abang Azlan, M. (2024). Determining the drivers of sustainable ecotourism destination competitiveness from a supply-side perspective: a case of UNESCO World Heritage Site in Sarawak, Borneo, Malaysia. Enlightening Tourism, 14(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.33776/et.v14i1.8245
26. Juniyanti, L., Purnomo, H., Kartodihardjo, H. (2021). Powerful actors and their networks in land use contestation for oil palm and industrial tree plantations in Riau. Forest Policy and Economics, 129(April), 102512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102512
27. Katadata.co.id. (2024). Forest Fires Become the Most Disaster in 2023, Reaching 1,802 Incidents. https://katadata.co.id/ekonomi-hijau/ekonomi-sirkular/659ca314b6936/kebakaran-hutan-jadi-bencana-terbanyak-pada-2023-capai-1802-kejadian
28. Kathrin, B. (2019). Collaborative governance in the making: Implementation of a new forest management regime in an old-growth conflict region of British Columbia, Canada. Land Use Policy, 86, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.019
29. Khaspuria, G., Ranjan, A., Sahil, Soni, P., Dadhich, K. (2024). Natural Disaster Mitigation Strategies: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 30(8), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i82221
30. Khazinatul Khaeriah, R. H. M. (2021). Sustainable Tourism Development In Tangerang City: How To Build A Community-Based Ecotourism Concept. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 12(1), 542–550. http://www.enrichment.iocspublisher.org/index.php/enrichment/article/view/264/192
31. Mockrin, M. H., Fishler, H. K., Stewart, S. I. (2020). After the fire: Perceptions of land use planning to reduce wildfire risk in eight communities across the United States. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 45(December 2019), 101444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101444
32. Monique, H., Inge, H., Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods (Alysha Owens (ed.); Second Edi). Londong: SAGE Publications Ltd.
33. Moore, P. F. (2019). Global Wildland Fire Management Research Needs. Current Forestry Reports, 5(4), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-019-00099-y
34. Mourao, P. R., Martinho, V. D. (2019). Forest fire legislation: Reactive or proactive? Ecological Indicators, 104(October 2018), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.080
35. Mubarak, R., Syahrin, A., Dani, E., Marlina, M. (2024). Government Efforts Towards Land Restoration for Sustainable Development. Proceedings of the International Conference on Law, Economic & Good Governance (IC-LAW 2023): Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 827, 591–595. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-218-7_99
36. Mulyadi, A., Efriyeld, Hamidy, R., Nofrizal. (2021). Development of Mangrove Ecotourism in Bandar Bakau Dumai Based on Disaster Mitigation. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(7), 1359–1367. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160716
37. Mustofa, R., Syahza, A., Manurung, G. M. E. (2024). Land tenure conflicts in forest areas: obstacles to rejuvenation of small-scale oil palm plantations in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-09-2023-0216
38. Nugraha, D., Alikodra, H. S., Kusmana, C., Setiawan, Y. (2022). Ecotourism Development Model Based on Disaster Risk Reduction in an Ecotourism Site in Indonesia. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 17(9), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2022.09.007
39. Nurjanah, A., Prawoto, N., Apriliani, R., Nabilazka, C. R. (2023). The Role of Stakeholders as Disaster Communicators at Disaster-Prone Tourist Attraction Objects. Komunikator, 15(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.20158
40. Prayoga, M. B. R., Koestoer, R. H. (2021). Improving Forest Fire Mitigation in Indonesia: A Lesson from Canada. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 9(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.9.3.293-305
41. Purnomo, E. P., Anand, P. B., Choi, J. W. (2018). The complexity and consequences of the policy implementation dealing with sustainable ideas. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 37(3), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1406373
42. Purnomo, E. P., Ramdani, R., Agustiyara, Nurmandi, A. (2021). Bureaucratic inertia in dealing with annual forest fires in Indonesia. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 30(10), 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF20168
43. Purnomo, H., Kusumadewi, S. D., Ilham, Q. P. (2021). A political-economy model to reduce fire and improve livelihoods in Indonesia’s lowlands. Forest Policy and Economics, 130(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102533
44. Rafi, M., Rahmat, A. F., Nasution, H. F. (2024). Stakeholder Perceptions as Strategic Communication Strategy in the Management of Forest Park Conservation in Riau. Komunikator, 16(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.21949
45. Rizky, F. K., Alhayyan, R., Shahreiza, D. (2022). Indonesian Government Policy in Forest and Land Fire Management. Budafest International Research and Critic Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(1), 959–971. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.3693
46. Robins, L., van Kerkhoff, L., Rochmayanto, Y. (2022). Knowledge systems approaches for enhancing project impacts in complex settings: community fire management and peatland restoration in Indonesia. Regional Environmental Change, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01960-w
47. Rozaki, Z., Wijaya, O., Rahmawati, N., Rahayu, L. (2021). Farmers’ Disaster Mitigation Strategies in Indonesia. Reviews in Agricultural Science, 9(0), 178–194. https://dx.doi.org/10.7831/ras.9.0_178
48. Safitri, M. A. (2021). The Prevention of Peatland Fires in Indonesia: ‘Law in Action’ to Implement the ASEAN Haze Treaty. The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v5i1.65027
49. Saidmamatov, O., Matyakubov, U., Rudenko, I. (2020). Employing ecotourism opportunities for sustainability in the Aral sea region: Prospects and challenges. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219249
50. Sarmiasih, M., Pratama, P. Y. (2019). The Problematics Mitigation of Forest and Land Fire District Kerhutla) in Policy Perspective (A Case Study : Kalimantan and Sumatra in Period 2015-2019). Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 6(3), 270–292. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.63113
51. Schultz, C. A., Thompson, M. P., McCaffrey, S. M. (2019). Forest Service fire management and the elusiveness of change. Fire Ecology, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-019-0028-x
52. Selivanov, V., Kazak, A., Shulga, M. (2024). Ecotourism as an effective direction for a healthy lifestyle. BIO Web of Conferences, 120, 01025. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202412001025
53. Siti, R., Sidiq, S., Yogie Prawira, R. (2019). Environmental Protection To Mitigate The Annual Forest And Land Fires Crisis In Riau Province Indonesia. International Journal on Social Science, Economics and Art, 9(3), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijosea.v9i3.37
54. Sukuryadi, Harahab, N., Primyastanto, M., Semedi, B. (2021). Collaborative-based mangrove ecosystem management model for the development of marine ecotourism in Lembar Bay, Lombok, Indonesia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(5), 6838–6868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00895-8
55. Sundari, C., Purnomo, E. P., Fathani, A. T. (2022). Civil society participation model: forest and land fire prevention policy in Jambi Province. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Dan Lingkungan, 12(4), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.12.4.669-678
56. Susilawati, Rahmawati Normela, Rezekiah Arfa Agustina, R. G. S. (2022). The Participation of the Fire Care Community (MPA) in the Control of Forest and Land Fires in Awang Bangkal Barat Village of South Kalimantan, Indonesia. RJOAS: Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 5(125), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2022-05.19
57. Syamsuadi, A., Arisandi, D., Trisnawati, L. (2022). A Model of Development Mitigation Disaster Based on Digital Eco-Tourism as a Prevention Effort of Forest and Land Fire Disaster Management. Journal of International Conference Proceedings, 5(2), 612. https://ejournal.aibpmjournals.com/index.php/JICP/article/view/1749/1739
58. Thahir, B. (2022). Is There Any Collaborative Governance on Post-disaster Social Policy in Banten Province? Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(2), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.329-338
59. Thongdejsri, M., Nitivattananon, V. (2019). Assessing impacts of implementing low-carbon tourism program for sustainable tourism in a world heritage city. Tourism Review, 74(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-04-2017-0082
60. Tiarantika, R., Soemarno, Efani, A., Koderi. (2024). Developing a Decision Support System for Sustainable Management of Community-Based Ecotourism: A Case Study of CMC Tiga Warna. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(6), 2205–2219. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190620
61. Unik, M., Rizki, Y., Sitanggang, I. S., Syaufina, L. (2024). Knowledge Management System for Forest and Land Fire Mitigation in Indonesia: A Web-Based Application Development. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 30(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.30.1.12
62. Vladimir Stojanović, Dubravka Milić, Sanja Obradović, Jovana Vanovac, D. R. (2021). The role of ecotourism in community development: The case of the Zasavica Special Nature Reserve, Serbia. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 61(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.9411
63. Wagner, C., Kawulich, B., Garner, M. (2019). A Mixed Research Synthesis of Literature on Teaching Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Open, 9(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861488
64. Windiani, W. (2021). Pentahelix Collaboration Approach in Disaster Management: Case Study on Disaster Risk Reduction Forum-East Java. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 0(7), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2020i7.9540
65. Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D. P., Macklin, R. (2015). Advancing Qualitative Research Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS)? Reviewing Potential Versus Practice in Published Studies using ATLAS.ti and NVivo, 1994–2013. Social Science Computer Review, 34(5), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315596311
66. Woolf, N. H., Silver, C. (2018). Qualitative Analysis Using NVivo: The Five-Level QDA® Method. New York: Routledge.
67. Wunder, S., Calkin, D. E., Charlton, V. (2021). Resilient landscapes to prevent catastrophic forest fires: Socioeconomic insights towards a new paradigm. Forest Policy and Economics, 128(September 2020), 102458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102458
68. Xiong, Q., Luo, X., Liang, P. (2020). Fire from policy, human interventions, or biophysical factors? Temporal–spatial patterns of forest fire in southwestern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 474(April), 118381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118381
69. Yasir, Y., Nurjanah, N., Samsir, S. (2023). Environmental Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Fire Disaster Mitigation on Peatlands. Anuario Do Instituto de Geociencias, 46. https://doi.org/10.11137/1982-3908_2023_46_49559
70. Zakia. (2021). Ecotourism in Indonesia: Local Community Involvement and The Affecting Factors. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 8(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v8i2.10789
71. Zamarreño-Aramendia, G., Cristòfol, F. J., De-San-eugenio-vela, J., Ginesta, X. (2020). Social-media analysis for disaster prevention: Forest fire in artenara and valleseco, Canary Islands. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040169