I am, therefore I preserve: Exploring middle-class imagery, biased status perceptions, and pro-environmental behaviour
Vol 8, Issue 13, 2024
VIEWS - 38 (Abstract) 22 (PDF)
Abstract
Extensive research on pro-environmental behaviour (PEB) reveals a significant knowledge gap in understanding the influence of social class, perceived status and the middling tendency on pro-environmental behaviour. Using the International Social Survey Programme Environment dataset, and conducting multilevel mixed-effects linear regressions, we find that the middling tendency and biased status perceptions significantly influences pro-environmental behaviour. Those who deflate their social position have higher pro-environmental behavior and this reinforces the idea that pro-environmental behaviour is driven by a post-materialist effect rather than a status enhancement effect. Moreover, the objective middle class is still a stronger contributor to higher PEB levels compared to subjective middle class. We also find the relation between class, status and PEB vary by country. These findings provide vital insights into the intricate and heterogenous dynamics between class, status and pro-environmental behaviour among different countries and shed light on class and status as driving forces behind pro-environmental behaviour.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Babutsidze, Z., & Chai, A. (2018). Look at me Saving the Planet! The Imitation of Visible Green Behavior and its Impact on the Climate Value-Action Gap. Ecological Economics, 146, 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.017
Brick, C., & Lai, C. K. (2018). Explicit (but not implicit) environmentalist identity predicts pro-environmental behavior and policy preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 58, 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.07.003
Brooks, J. S., & Wilson, C. (2015). The influence of contextual cues on the perceived status of consumption-reducing behavior. Ecological Economics, 117, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.015
Chen, Y., & Fan, X. (2015). Discordance between subjective and objective social status in contemporary China. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 2(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-015-0017-7
Clapp, J., & Dauvergne, P. (2011). Paths to a Green World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment. MIT Press
Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R. L., Verheggen, B., et al. (2016). Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 048002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., & Tetaz, M. (2013). Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.009
Derndorfer, J., & Kranzinger, S. (2021). The Decline of the Middle Class: New Evidence for Europe. Journal of Economic Issues, 55(4), 914–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2021.1982338
Domazet, Mladen and Ančić, Branko (2017) How far for the money? affluence and democratic degrowth potential in Europe. In: Green European: environmental behaviour and attitudes in Europe in a historical and cross-cultural comparative perspective. Studies in European Sociology. Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 157-181. ISBN 978-1-138-12395-3 (Print), 978-1-315-64849-1 (Online)
Domazet, Mladen and Marinović Jerolimov, Dinka, eds. (2014) Sustainability perspectives from the European semi-periphery. Edition Science and society (35). Institute for Social Research, Zagreb. ISBN 978-953-6218-58-5
Dilotsotlhe, N., & Duh, H. I. (2021). Drivers of Middle-Class Consumers’ Green Appliance Attitude and Purchase Behavior: A Multi-Theory Application. Social Marketing Quarterly, 27(2), 150–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/15245004211013737
Echegaray, F., & Hansstein, F. V. (2017). Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: the case of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 180-190.
Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The Constant Flux. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2004). Subjective Social Location: Data From 21 Nations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/16.1.3
Fang, X., Wang, L., Sun, C., Zheng, X., & Wei, J. (2021). Gap between words and actions: Empirical study on consistency of residents supporting renewable energy development in China. Energy Policy, 148.
Fuhrmann-Riebel, H., D’Exelle, B., & Verschoor, A. (2021). The role of preferences for pro-environmental behaviour among urban middle class households in Peru. Ecological Economics, 180, 106850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106850
Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
Gomes, S., Lopes, J. M., & Nogueira, S. (2023). Willingness to pay more for green products: A critical challenge for Gen Z. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390, 136092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136092
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.
Hodge, R. W., & Treiman, D. J. (1968). Class identification in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 73(5), 535–547. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2775556
Hout, M. (2008). How Class Works: Objective and Subjective Aspects of Class Since the 1970s. In Lareau, A. & Conley, D. (Eds.), Social Class: How Does It Work? (pp. 25–64). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004). Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 677-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernisation and Postmodernisation: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
ISSP Research Group (2023). International Social Survey Programme: Environment IV - ISSP 2020. GESIS, Cologne. ZA7650 Data file Version 2.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14153.
Karadja, M., Mollerstrom, J., & Seim, D. (2017). Richer (and Holier) Than Thou? The Effect of Relative Income Improvements on Demand for Redistribution. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00623
Kirsten, F., Biyase, M., Pretorius, M., & Botha, I. (2023a). Determinants of Bias Perceptions in South Africa: The Case of a Highly Unequal Society. Sociological Inquiry, 93(4), 701-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12536
Kirsten, F., Botha, I., Biyase, M., & Pretorius, M. (2023b). Determinants of Subjective Social Status in South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 168(1-3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03122-9
Marx, K. (1972). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844: Selections. In Tucker, R. C. (Ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader (pp. 52-103). New York: WW Norton
Maheshwari, A., & Malhotra, G. (2011). Green marketing study on Indian youth. International Journal of Management Strategy, 2(3), 31–46.
Niu, L., Lu, C., & Fan, L. (2023). Social class and private-sphere green behavior in China: The mediating effects of perceived status and environmental concern. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4329. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054329
Oddsson, G. (2018). Class imagery and subjective social location during Iceland's economic crisis, 2008–2010. Sociological Focus, 52(1), 14–30.
Oreg, S., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2006). Predicting proenvironmental behavior cross-nationally: Values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief-norm theory. Environment and Behavior, 38, 462–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505286012
Posel, D. R., & Casale, D. M. (2011). Relative standing and subjective well-being in South Africa: The role of perceptions, expectations, and income mobility. Social Indicators Research, 104(2), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9740-2
Shenoy, S., Gorinevsky, D., Trenberth, K. E., & Chu, S. (2022). Trends of extreme US weather events in the changing climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(47). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207536119
Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (2007). Structuring the religion-environment connection: Identifying religious influences on environmental concern and activism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 71–85.
Sosnaud, B., Brady, D., & Frenk, S. M. (2013). Class in name only: Subjective class identity, objective class position, and vote choice in American presidential elections. Social Problems, 60(1), 81–99.
Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., de Vinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams Jr., R. M. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sudo, N. (2021). Two latent groups influencing subjective social status: Middle class tendency and clear class consciousness. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02731-6
Sulemana, I., James, H. S., Jr., & Valdivia, C. B. (2016). Perceived socio-economic status as a predictor of environmental concern in African and developed countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.002
Uren, H. V., Roberts, L. D., Dzidic, P. L., & Leviston, Z. (2019). High-status pro-environmental behaviors: Costly, effortful, and visible. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916519882773
Waquil, H.D., (2014). Challenges of sustainable consumption in the popular classes in Brazil: study of the relationship between everyday consumption practices and their levels of sustainability. Unisinos Library Digital Repository
Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2012). Explaining gender differences in concern about environmental problems in the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 25, 1067–1084.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd8358
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Frederich Kirsten, Mduduzi Biyase, Marinda Pretorius
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.