Impact of populism and economic policy on state growth: A systematic literature review
Vol 8, Issue 13, 2024
VIEWS - 1258 (Abstract)
Abstract
This research systematically reviews the relationship between populism and economic policies, analyzing their impact on state development and growth. It is the first study to comprehensively examine the interaction between these two concepts through a systematic literature review. The review process adhered to the PRISMA protocol, utilizing the Scopus, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases, covering the period from 2012 to 2024. The findings reveal a deep interconnection between populism and economic policies, with significant implications for governance and socioeconomic well-being. The review identifies that neoliberal populism combines pro-corporate elements with populist rhetoric, favoring economic elites while presenting itself as beneficial for the “people.” Additionally, it underscores that neoliberal globalization has facilitated market liberalization but also increased inequality and undermined national sovereignty. The review concludes that while populism may offer quick fixes to immediate economic issues, its simplistic and polarizing approaches can be counterproductive in the long term. Thus, there is a critical need to reevaluate and reformulate economic and governance policies to balance global economic integration with the protection of citizens’ rights and well-being.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
- Alexandro, R., & Basrowi. (2024). The influence of macroeconomic infrastructure on supply chain smoothness and national competitiveness and its implications on a country’s economic growth: Evidence from BRICS countries. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.10.007
- Anwar, S. U., Yuan, P. Z., Wuyi, Z., et al. (2024). Nexus among the perceived infrastructural, social, economic, and environmental impact of CPEC: A case of Pakistan. Heliyon, 10(13), e33355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33355
- Arès, M., & Bernard C. (2021). From populist rhetoric to economic pragmatism President Trump’s trade policy (French). Etudes Internationales. 52(1/2): 75–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/1086930ar.
- Arzo, S., & Hong, M. (2024). Resilient green infrastructure: Navigating environmental resistance for sustainable development, social mobility in climate change policy. Heliyon, 10(13), e33524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33524
- Ausserladscheider, V. (2024). Constructing a neoliberal exclusionary state: The role of far-right populism in economic policy change in post-war Austria. Comparative European Politics, 22(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-022-00315-3
- Bernal, D., Raheem, A. A., Inti, S., et al. (2024). Assessment of economic viability of direct current fast charging infrastructure investments for electric vehicles in the United States. Sustainability, 16(15), 6701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156701
- Binder, N. (2023). Economic and social policy attitudes and populism: Vertical axes of conflict instead of ideological consistency. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 65(3), 505–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-023-00513-y
- Dong, G., Witlox, F., & Bie, Y. (2024). Decentralizing e-bus charging infrastructure deployment leads to economic and environmental benefits. Communications in Transportation Research, 4, 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2024.100139
- Erickson, E. D., Tominac, P. A., Ma, J., et al. (2024). Evaluating the economic and environmental benefits of deploying a national-scale, thermo-chemical plastic waste upcycling infrastructure in the United States. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 189, 108800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108800
- Favaretto, F., & Masciandaro, D. (2022). Populism, financial crises and banking policies: Economics and psychology. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 69(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12297
- Feldmann, M., & Popa, M. (2022). Populism and economic policy: Lessons from Central and Eastern Europe. 69(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12297
- Guardino, M. (2018). Neoliberal populism as hegemony: a historical-ideological analysis of US economic policy discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(5), 444–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1442361
- Hunger, S., & Paxton, F. (2022). What’s in a buzzword? A systematic review of the state of populism research in political science. Political Science Research and Methods, 10(3), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.44
- Jayasuriya, S., Zhang, G., & Yang, R. J. (2024). Towards successful economic infrastructure partnership project delivery through effective stakeholder management. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 26, 101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101173
- Lawson, J. (2022). Mounting Turbulence in Neoliberal Globalization: Political Economy, Populist Discourse, and Policy in Alberta, Canada. Social Sciences, 11(5), 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050221
- Li, M., Wang, J., Dong, Y., et al. (2024). What combinations drive the urban green infrastructure development in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt?—An empirical study based on fs/QCA methodology. Ecological Indicators, 166, 112190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112190
- Li, X., He, P., Liao, H., et al. (2024). Does network infrastructure construction reduce urban—rural income inequality? Based on the “Broadband China” policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, 123486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123486
- Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000062
- McDonald, I. M. (2018). Policy Forum: Economics and Populism. Australian Economic Review, 51(3), 396-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12293
- Monteiro, S. M. M., & Fonseca, P. C. D. (2012). Credibility and populism: the economic policy of the Goulart administrations in Brazil. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 42(3), 511–544. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-41612012000300004
- Oleg, T. (2024). Economic populism in colour—portraits from East-Central Europe (Hungarian). Economic Review/Kozgazdasagi Szemle, 71, 344–349. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2024.3.344
- Panigrahi, R. (2021). Economics of subsidies in a welfare state: Dynamics of populist policies and farm profitability. Global Business Review, 22(3), 705-717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918816902
- Phumma, N., & Vechsuruck, T. (2022). Economic Paradigm and Demand-Side Populist Policies in Thailand. TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 10(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2021.23
- Rewizorski, M. (2021). Between hyperglobalization and national policy. Is there a way to mitigate populist risks for global economic governance in the post-Covid-19 world? International Organisations Research Journal, 16(2), 132–156. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2021-02-07
- Rosenau, J. N. (1997). Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Röth, L., Afonso, A., & Spies, D. C. (2018). The impact of Populist Radical Right Parties on socio-economic policies. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773917000133
- Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
- Scott, A., & Hislop, M. (2024). What does good green and blue infrastructure policy look like: A comparative assessment of UK national planning guidance. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 99, 128440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128440
- Shahriar, M. F., Khanal, A., Khan, M. I., et al. (2024). Current status of underground hydrogen storage: Perspective from storage loss, infrastructure, economic aspects, and hydrogen economy targets. Journal of Energy Storage, 97, 112773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.112773
- Sokolovska, A. M., & Kotlyarevsky, Ya. V. (2020). Scientific Discourse of Populism: Aspects of Economy and Tax Policy. Science and Innovation, 16(5), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine16.05.036
- Sun, J., Sun, S., Chen, B., et al. (2024). Charging change: Analysing the UK’s electric vehicle infrastructure policies and market dynamics. Energy Policy, 191, 114178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114178
- Urrútia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). PRISMA Statement: a proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Spanish). Medicina Clínica, 135(11), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015
- Usman, M., Khan, N., & Omri, A. (2024). Environmental policy stringency, ICT, and technological innovation for achieving sustainable development: Assessing the importance of governance and infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management, 365, 121581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121581
- Zhang, W., Burgis, C. R., Hayes, G. M., et al. (2024). Evaluation of maintenance efficiency for multiple green infrastructure designs based on water quality performance and economic costs. Ecological Engineering, 206, 107326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107326
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd8302
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Aleixandre Brian Duche-Pérez, Obed Vargas-Salas, Yigliola Glenda Arias-Huiza, Gerardo Zegarra-Florez
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.