Cyclically, the debate on Keynes’ economic policies reemerge. The economic impact of the pandemic caused by COVID-19 has relaunched the discussion about the importance of Keynesian policies, the multipliers effects, and their impact on stimulating economies. This paper aims to analyze the importance and relevance of the Keynesian multiplier before the pandemic, in a period without experiencing exceptional aggregate shocks. The main focus of the research is to examine the shortcomings of the public investment multiplier, which plays a central role in Keynesian theory. Despite the undeniable relevance of the concept, the issue is to understand the extent to which the multiplier is still relevant in specific contexts. The research presents empirical evidence which suggests that the effects of public investment depend on structural characteristics of economies specifically trade liberalization, the dimension of internal markets, the question of countries having the freedom to issue their currency, and the issue of currencies being accepted as an international reserve. A sample of 35 OECD countries was used for the period 2010–2018. The Keynesian public investment multiplier was calculated for several countries and the obtained values were related to various correlations carried out to assess the relationship between public investment, national income, and specific characteristics of the economies to which the multipliers are sensitive. The results obtained contrast in terms of short-term and long-term impacts so, is at least dubious, that one can rely on Keynesian public policies to boost economies at least in the absence of substantial shocks to aggregate demand.

1. Abiad, A., Furceri, D., & Topalova, P. (2016). The macroeconomic effects of public investment: Evidence from advanced economies. Journal of Macroeconomics, 50, 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2016.07.005
2. Agénor, P. R., & Neanidis, K. C. (2015). Innovation, public capital, and growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 44, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.03.003
3. Aiyar, S. (2002). Globalisation undercuts Keynes. The Economic Times.
4. AMECO. (2024). Available online: https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/economic-research-and-databases/economic-databases/ameco-database_en (accessed on 2 May 2024).
5. Arestis, P., Filho, F., & Bittes, T. (2018). Keynesian macroeconomic policy: Theoretical analysis and empirical evidence. Panoeconomicus, 65(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2298/pan1801001a
6. Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (1998). Keynesian Economic Policies for the New Millennium. The Economic Journal, 108(446), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00281
7. Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Does Public Capital Crowd Out Private Capital? Journal of Monetary Economics, 24(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90002-0
8. Auerbach, A. J., Gale, W. G., & Harris, B. H. (2010). Activist Fiscal Policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(4), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.4.141
9. Azam, M., Ferré, C., & Ajwad, M. I. (2012). Did Latvia’s Public Works Program Mitigate the Impact of the 2008–2010 Crisis ? The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6144
10. Barnett, V. (2017). Keynes, Animal Spirits, and Instinct: Reason Plus Intuition is Better than Rational. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 39(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1053837216000274
11. Barrel, R., Holland, D., and Hurst, I. (2012). Fiscal consolidation: part 2. Fiscal Multipliers and Fiscal Consolidations. OECD Economics Department Working Paper, No. 933. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2012-5k8x6k5wc58x
12. Batini, N., Eyraud, L., Forni, L., et al. (2014). Fiscal Multipliers: Size, Determinants, and Use in Macroeconomic Projections. Technical Notes and Manuals, 14(04), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498382458.005
13. Bello, W. (2017). Keynesianism in the Great Recession: Right Diagnosis, Wrong Cure. Finance Working Papers. Global Finance Series.
14. Blinder, A. (2008). Keynesian Economics. In: Henderson, D. (editor). In: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. The Liberty Fund. pp. 316-319.
15. Born, B., Juessen, F., & Müller, G. J. (2013). Exchange rate regimes and fiscal multipliers. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(2), 446–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2012.09.014
16. Bortz, P. G. (2021). Keynes’s Theories of the Business Cycle: Evolution and Contemporary Relevance. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3802035
17. Byrialsen, Mikael R., Olesen, F. & Madsen, M. (2021). The macroeconomics effects of Covid-19: The imperative need for a Keynesian solution. Revue de la regulation – Capitalisme, institutions, pouviors, 29, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.18405
18. Cardoso, D., Carvalho, L., Sanches, M., et al. (2023). The Multiplier Effects of Government Expenditures on Social Protection: A Multi-Country Analysis. Department of Economics. FEA-USP.
19. Cogan, J., Cwik, T., Taylor, J., et al. (2009). New Keynesian versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14782
20. Congressional Budget Office, CBO. (2015). Estimated Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on Employment and Economic Output in 2014. Congressional Budget Office, CBO.
21. Chian Koh, W. (2016). Fiscal multipliers: new evidence from a large panel of countries. Oxford Economic Papers, gpw066. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpw066
22. Dimand, R. W., Mundell, R. A., & Vercelli, A. (editors). (2010). Keynes’s General Theory After Seventy Years. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
23. Eichengreen, B. (2020). Keynesian economics: can it return if it never died? Review of Keynesian Economics, 8(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.03
24. Fournier, J. M. (2016). The Positive Effect of Public Investment on Potential Growth. OECD Publishing.
25. Gbohoui, W. (2021). Uncertainty and Public Investment Multipliers: The Role of Economic Confidence. IMF Working Papers, 2021(272), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781616356200.001
26. Gechert, S., & Rannenberg, A. (2018). Which Fiscal Multipliers are Regime-Dependent? A Meta-Regression Analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(4), 1160–1182. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12241
27. Gurara, D., Kpodar, K., Presbitero, A., and Tessema, D. (2020). On the capacity to absorb public investment: how much is too much? International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3579668
28. Hanlu. (2022). Comparison between Classical Liberalism and Keynesianism-Keynes Is Interested In the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. J Adv Educ Philos, 6(4), 254-258. https://doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2022.v06i04.008
29. IBGE. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Available online: https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/access-to-information/institutional/the-ibge.html (accessed on 15 June 2024).
30. Ilzetzki, E., Mendoza, E. G., & Végh, C. A. (2013). How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers? Journal of Monetary Economics, 60(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011
31. International Monetary Fund. (2014). It is Time for an Infrastructure Push? The Macroeconomic Effects of Public Investment. In: World Economic Outlook. Washington, DC.
32. International Monetary Fund. (2020). Public Investment for the Recovery. In: Fiscal Monitor. International Monetary Fund.
33. Jahan, S., Mahmud, A. S., Papageorgiou, C. (2014). What Is Keynesian Economics? Back To Basics. IMF, Finance & Development, 51(3).
34. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Macmillan & Co.
35. Marglin, S. A. (2018). Raising Keynes: A General Theory for the 21st century. EconomiA, 19(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2018.02.001
36. Mineshima, A., Poplawski-Ribeiro, M., and Weber, A. (2014). Size of Fiscal Multipliers. The MIT Press. pp. 315-372.
37. Miyamoto, H., Gueorguiev, N., Honda, J., et al. (2020). Growth Impact of Public Investment and the Role of Infrastructure Governance. International Monetary Fund. Washington, DC.
38. Moretti, E., Steinwender, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2019). The Intellectual Spoils of War? Defense R&D, Productivity and International Spillovers. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26483
39. Mourougane, A., Botev, J., Fournier, J., et al. (2016). Can an Increase in Public Investment Sustainably Lift Economic Growth? OECD Economics Department.
40. OECD. (n.d.). Available online: https://data-explorer.oecd.org/ (accessed on 16 June 2024).
41. Palley, T. (2017). The General Theory at 80: Reflections on the history and enduring relevance of Keynes’ economics. Investigación Económica, 76(301), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inveco.2017.12.003
42. Pereira, A. and Pereira, R. (2017). Is All Infrastructure Investment Created Equal? The Case of Portugal. GEE Papers.
43. Perez-Montiel, J., & Manera, C. (2021). Government public infrastructure investment and economic performance in Spain (1980–2016). Applied Economic Analysis, 30(90), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/aea-03-2021-0077
44. Petrović, P., Arsić, M., & Nojković, A. (2021). Increasing public investment can be an effective policy in bad times: Evidence from emerging EU economies. Economic Modelling, 94, 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.004
45. Presbitero, A. F. (2016). Too much and too fast? Public investment scaling-up and absorptive capacity. Journal of Development Economics, 120, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.12.005
46. Ramey, V. A. (2019). Ten Years After the Financial Crisis: What Have We Learned from the Renaissance in Fiscal Research? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.89
47. Rooney, B., Johnson, G. and Priebe, M. (2021). How Does Defense Spending Affect Economic Growth? RAND Corporation Report. Available online: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA739-2.html (accessed on 12 May 2024).
48. Rowthorn, R. (2020). The Godley-Tobin lecture. Review of Keynesian Economics, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.01
49. Scandizzo, P. L., & Pierleoni, M. R. (2020). Short and Long-Run Effects of Public Investment: Theoretical Premises and Empirical Evidence. Theoretical Economics Letters, 10(04), 834–867. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2020.104050
50. Singer, H. W. (1996). How Relevant is Keynesianism Today for Understanding Problems of Development? Economic Thought and Practice, 5(3), 545-560.
51. Spilimbergo, A., Schindler, M., & Symansky, S. (2009). Fiscal Multipliers. IMF Staff Position Notes, 2009(11), 2. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781462372737.004
52. Temin, P., & Vines, D. (2014). Keynes: Useful Economics for the World Economy. The MIT Press.
53. Zimmermann, L. (2020). Why Guarantee Employment? Evidence from a Large Indian Public Works Program. Global Labor Organization (GLO), Essen.