The effects of corporate carbon performance on financing cost-evidence from S&P 500

Shiyi Feng, Thitinant Wareewanich

Article ID: 7997
Vol 8, Issue 10, 2024

VIEWS - 1538 (Abstract)

Abstract


This study investigates the impact of corporate carbon performance on financing costs, focusing on S&P 500 companies from 2015 to 2022. Utilizing a fixed-effects regression model, the research reveals a complex U-shaped nonlinear relationship between carbon intensity (CI) and cost of debt (COD). The sample comprises 2896 firm-year observations, with CI measured by the ratio of Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to annual sales. The findings indicate that companies with higher CI initially face increased COD due to heightened regulatory and operational risks. However, as CI falls below a certain threshold, further reductions in emissions can paradoxically lead to increased COD, likely due to the substantial investments required for advanced technologies. Additionally, a positive relationship between CI and cost of equity (COE) is observed, suggesting that shareholders demand higher returns from companies with greater environmental risks. These results underscore the importance of balancing short-term and long-term environmental strategies. The study highlights the need for corporate managers to communicate the long-term benefits of environmental efforts effectively to creditors and investors. Policymakers should consider these dynamics when designing regulations that incentivize lower carbon emissions.


Keywords


carbon intensity; cost of debts; cost of equity; environmental sustainability; creditors; shareholders

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, M., et al. (2011). Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.018
  2. Batoon, A. J., & Rroji, E. (2024). Analyzing the Impact of Carbon Risk on Firms’ Creditworthiness in the Context of Rising Interest Rates. Risks, 12(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12010016
  3. Bauer, R., & Hann, D. (2010). Corporate Environmental Management and Credit Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1660470
  4. Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549.
  5. Broadstock, D. C., Matousek, R., Meyer, M., et al. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.014
  6. Bui, B., Moses, O., & Houqe, M. N. (2019). Carbon disclosure, emission intensity and cost of equity capital: multi‐country evidence. Accounting & Finance, 60(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12492
  7. Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. (2007). Emerging carbon constraints for corporate risk management. Ecological Economics, 62(3–4), 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.019
  8. Capasso, G., Gianfrate, G., & Spinelli, M. (2020). Climate change and credit risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121634
  9. Caragnano, A., Tunyi, A. A., Nicolò, G., & Airoldi, G. (2020). Carbon risk, low-carbon policy, and lending decisions: The role of organizational structure and information processing. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(4), 711-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3991-4
  10. CEIC Data. (2024). US Market Capitalization, 1975–2024. Available online: https://www.ceicdata.com (accessed on 3 May 2024).
  11. Chava, S. (2014). Environmental Externalities and Cost of Capital. Management Science, 60(9), 2223–2247. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1863
  12. Chen, X., Li, X., & Huang, X. (2020). The impact of corporate characteristics and external pressure on environmental information disclosure: a model using environmental management as a mediator. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9), 12797–12809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11410-x
  13. Choi, G. (2022). Determinants of target location selection for acquirers in the manufacturing sector: Pollution intensity, policy enforcement, and civic environmentalism. Journal of Business Research, 146, 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.026
  14. Clarkson, P. M., Fang, X., Li, Y., et al. (2013). The relevance of environmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(5), 410–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.06.008
  15. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Pinnuck, M., et al. (2014). The Valuation Relevance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the European Union Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme. European Accounting Review, 24(3), 551–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.927782
  16. Climate Bonds Initiative. (2023). State of the Market Q3 2023. Climate Bonds Initiative. Available online: https://www.climatebonds.net/resources/reports/state-market-q3-2023 (accessed on 3 May 2024).
  17. Datt, R. R., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2019). Corporate voluntary carbon disclosure strategy and carbon performance in the USA. Accounting Research Journal, 32(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-02-2017-0031
  18. Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resources, organizations, and sustainability: An institutional perspective. Business and Society, 49(1), 88-111.
  19. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., et al. (2011). Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
  20. Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., et al. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013
  21. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kim, H., & Park, K. (2018). Corporate environmental responsibility and the cost of capital: International evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 335-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3000-4
  22. Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2021). ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102097
  23. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
  24. Gerged, A. M., Matthews, L., & Elheddad, M. (2020). Mandatory disclosure, greenhouse gas emissions and the cost of equity capital: UK evidence of a U‐shaped relationship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 908–930. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2661
  25. Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., et al. (2019). The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006
  26. Giese, G., Lee, L. E., Melas, D., et al. (2019). Foundations of ESG Investing: How ESG Affects Equity Valuation, Risk, and Performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2019.45.5.069
  27. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, J. M., & Ramírez, C. Z. (2016). Voluntary carbon disclosure by Spanish companies: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 8(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-07-2014-0084
  28. Griffin, P. A., Lont, D. H., & Sun, E. Y. (2017). The Relevance to Investors of Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1265–1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12298
  29. Guastella, G., Pareglio, S., & Schiavoni, C. (2023). An Empirical Approach to Integrating Climate Reputational Risk in Long-Term Scenario Analysis. Sustainability, 15(7), 5886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075886
  30. Guenther, E., Guenther, T., Schiemann, F., et al. (2016). Stakeholder Relevance for Reporting. Business & Society, 55(3), 361–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315575119
  31. Hart, S. L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963
  32. He, P., Shen, H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). External Pressure, Corporate Governance, and Voluntary Carbon Disclosure: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 11(10), 2901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102901
  33. He, Y., Tang, Q., & Wang, K. (2013). Carbon disclosure, carbon performance, and cost of capital. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 1(3–4), 190–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697221.2014.855976
  34. Hoffmann, V. H., & Busch, T. (2008). Corporate Carbon Performance Indicators. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(4), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00066.x
  35. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM_final.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2024).
  36. International Energy Agency. (2024). World Energy Investment 2024. International Energy Agency. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2024 (accessed on 3 May 2024).
  37. Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2016). Carbon Risk, Carbon Risk Awareness and the Cost of Debt Financing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1151–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6
  38. Kabir, H., Ashraf, M. A., & Hassan, M. K. (2021). Carbon risk and cost of capital: Evidence from carbon emissions trading scheme in China. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04902-1
  39. Kim, Y. B., An, H. T., & Kim, J. D. (2015). The effect of carbon risk on the cost of equity capital. Journal of Cleaner Production, 93, 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.006
  40. Krishnamurti, C., & Velayutham, E. (2018). The influence of board committee structures on voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: Australian evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 50, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.09.003
  41. Kumar, P., & Firoz, M. (2018). Impact of carbon emissions on cost of debt-evidence from India. Managerial Finance, 44(12), 1401–1417. https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-03-2018-0108
  42. Lemma, T. T., Feedman, M., Mlilo, M., et al. (2018). Corporate carbon risk, voluntary disclosure, and cost of capital: South African evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2242
  43. Li, H., Fu, S., Chen, Z., et al. (2019). The motivations of Chinese firms in response to the Carbon Disclosure Project. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(27), 27792–27807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05975-5
  44. Li, L., Liu, Q., Wang, J., et al. (2019). Carbon Information Disclosure, Marketization, and Cost of Equity Financing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010150
  45. Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
  46. Long, R., Wang, X., Wu, M., et al. (2023). The impact of carbon information disclosure on the cost of capital: The moderating role of regulatory pressures. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 193, 106970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106970
  47. Luo, L. (2017). The influence of institutional contexts on the relationship between voluntary carbon disclosure and carbon emission performance. Accounting & Finance, 59(2), 1235–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12267
  48. Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The Means and End of Greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332
  49. Maaloul, A. (2018). The effect of greenhouse gas emissions on cost of debt: Evidence from Canadian firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1407–1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1662
  50. Misani, N., & Pogutz, S. (2015). Unraveling the effects of environmental outcomes and processes on financial performance: A non-linear approach. Ecological Economics, 109, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.010
  51. Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2015). Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.08.003
  52. Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52, 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.019
  53. Palea, V., & Drogo, F. (2020). Carbon emissions and the cost of debt in the eurozone: The role of public policies, climate‐related disclosure and corporate governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 2953–2972. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2550
  54. Siddique, M. A., Akhtaruzzaman, M., Rashid, A., et al. (2021). Carbon disclosure, carbon performance and financial performance: International evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 75, 101734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101734
  55. Sullivan, R., & Gouldson, A. (2016). The Governance of Corporate Responses to Climate Change: An International Comparison. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1925
  56. Sun, M., Wang, Q., & Zhang, H. (2018). General Bayesian networks analysis of the correlation between corporate environmental management activities and financial performance. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 6, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00053
  57. Trinks, A., Ibikunle, G., Mulder, M., et al. (2022). Carbon Intensity and the Cost of Equity Capital. The Energy Journal, 43(2), 181–214. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.43.2.atri
  58. Velte, P., Stawinoga, M., & Lueg, R. (2020). Carbon performance and disclosure: A systematic review of governance-related determinants and financial consequences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120063
  59. Wang, G., Lou, X., Shen, J., et al. (2022). Corporate Carbon Information Disclosure and Financing Costs: The Moderating Effect of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 14(15), 9159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159159
  60. Wang, J., & Deng, J. (2021). Research on the Effect of Executive Incentive Institutional Innovation on the Cost of Equity—Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686955
  61. Zhao, Y., Zhu, S., & Zhang, G. (2022). Local and spatial spillover effects of corporate financing costs on regional carbon emissions: evidence from Chinese listed firms. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(9), 24242–24255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23896-8
  62. Zhou, Z., Zhang, T., Wen, K., et al. (2018). Carbon risk, cost of debt financing and the moderation effect of media attention: Evidence from Chinese companies operating in high‐carbon industries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1131–1144. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2056


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.7997

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Shiyi Feng, Thitinant Wareewanich

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.