Understanding the key driver of e-government services continuance usage intention: An integrated model of Expectation Confirmation Model and Technology Acceptance Model

Darmawan Napitupulu, Wendi Usino, Nurul Amira Azmi, Ray Septianis Kartika, Hadi Supratikta, Adi Suhendra, Witra Apdhi Yohanitas, Herie Saksono, Abdul Halik, Suhandojo Suhandojo

Article ID: 7957
Vol 8, Issue 12, 2024

VIEWS - 2029 (Abstract)

Abstract


Continuous usage is crucial for ensuring the longevity of technological advancements. The success of e-government is contingent upon its ongoing use, rather than its initial acceptance. Nevertheless, there has been a dearth of scholarly research on the ongoing use of e-government services. The objective of this study was to identify the primary factors that influences the continued use of e-government services in Indonesia. The research model was created by integrating both Expectation Confirmation Model and Technology Acceptance Model, two theories that are frequently employed in the adoption of technology. The data was obtained by administering an online survey to 217 Indonesian citizens who had previously utilized the Online Citizen Aspiration and Complaints Service (LAPOR) e-Government services. The results indicate that perceived ease of use had a substantial impact on citizen satisfaction and perceived usefulness. In contrast to previous research conducted in the context of e-Government, it was found that perceived usefulness did not have a significant correlation with the intention to continue using the system. The most significant predictor of continued intention to use was citizen satisfaction. Surprisingly, satisfaction was more significantly influenced by perceived ease of use than perceived usefulness. The implications of these findings are elaborated upon.


Keywords


e-government services; continuance intention; perceived ease of use; perceived usefulness; satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Abbasi, G. A., Jagaveeran, M., Goh, Y. N., & Tariq, B. (2021). The impact of type of content use on smartphone addiction and academic performance: Physical activity as moderator. Technology in Society, 64, 101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101521
  2. Abdul Rahim, N. F., Abbasi, G. A., Iranmanesh, M., et al. (2023). Determinants of continuous intention to use e-government services: an extension of technology continuance theory. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 25(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-09-2020-0166
  3. Afrizal, D., & Wallang, M. (2021). Attitude on intention to use e-government in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 22(1), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v22.i1.pp435-441
  4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  5. Alalwan, J. A. (2013). Continuance intention to use government 2.0 services: The impact of citizens’ satisfaction and involvement. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 9(3), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2013070104
  6. Ali, M. H., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., et al. (2019). Impacts of environmental factors on waste, energy, and resource management and sustainable performance. Sustainability, 11(8), 2443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082443
  7. Almahamid, S. M., & McAdams, A. C. (2010). Determinants of user continuance intention to use e-government. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 3(4), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2010.038606
  8. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  9. Avazov, S., & Lee Seohyun, P. (2020). E-government adoption in Uzbekistan: Empirical validation of the unified model of electronic government acceptance (UMEGA). In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research.
  10. Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., et al. (2014). Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services. Information and Management, 51(6), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.05.016
  11. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  12. Chou, S. W., & Chen, P. Y. (2009). The influence of individual differences on continuance intentions of enterprise resource planning (ERP). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(6), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.01.001
  13. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  14. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  15. Foroughi, B., Iranmanesh, M., & Hyun, S. S. (2019). Understanding the determinants of mobile banking continuance usage intention. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(6), 1015–1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2018-0237
  16. Gardini, S., Mattei, M. M., & Orelli, R. L. (2012). Gov 2.0 theory and practice for service delivery. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.021
  17. Hair Joseph, F., Black William, C., Babin Barry, J., et al. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  18. Hernandez-Ortega, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Gomez-Meneses, F. (2014). The firm’s continuance intentions to use inter-organizational ICTs: The influence of contingency factors and perceptions. Information & Management, 51(6), 747–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.06.003
  19. Hong, S., Thong, J. Y. L., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1819–1834. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.03.009
  20. Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W. M., et al. (2002). Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045692
  21. Hossain, M. A., & Quaddus, M. (2012). Expectation–confirmation theory in information system research: A review and analysis. Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, 1, 441–469.
  22. Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., et al. (1999). Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247
  23. Iqbal, M., & Virginia, C. Y. (2020). User Behavior of Online Public Complaint and Aspiration Service (LAPOR!) in Mataram City. TRANSFORMASI: Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan, 12(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v12i2.947
  24. Iranmanesh, M., Zailani, S., & Nikbin, D. (2017). RFID continuance usage intention in health care industry. Quality Management in Healthcare, 26(2), 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000134
  25. Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122, 260–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003
  26. Kim, N. K., Rahim, N. F. A., Iranmanesh, M., et al. (2019). The role of the safety climate in the successful implementation of safety management systems. Safety Science, 118, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.008
  27. Kumar, A., Adlakaha, A., & Mukherjee, K. (2018). The effect of perceived security and grievance redressal on continuance intention to use M-wallets in a developing country. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(7), 1170-1189. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2017-0077
  28. Leino, H., & Puumala, E. (2021). What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(4), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420957337
  29. Marzuki, A. (2015). Challenges in the Public Participation and the Decision Making Process. Sociology & Space/Sociologija i Prostor, 53(1), 21-39 https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.53.1.2
  30. Minh, K. S., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., et al. (2019). Do lean manufacturing practices have negative impact on job satisfaction? International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 10(1), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-11-2016-0072
  31. Nabavi, A., Taghavi-Fard, M. T., Hanafizadeh, P., et al. (2016). Information technology continuance intention: A systematic literature review. International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), 12(1), 58–95. https://doi.org/ 10.4018/IJEBR.2016010104
  32. Napitupulu, D. (2017). A conceptual model of e-government adoption in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(4), 1471–1478.
  33. Napitupulu, D., Adiyarta, K., & Albar. (2019). Public Participation Readiness Toward E-Gov 2.0: Lessons from Two Countries. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326397
  34. Napitupulu, D., Kadar, J. A., & Jati, R. K. (2017). Validity testing of technology acceptance model based on factor analysis approach. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 5(3), 697–704. https://doi.org/ 10.11591/ijeecs.v5.i3.pp697-704
  35. Napitupulu, D., Pamungkas, P. D. A., Sudarsono, B. G., et al. (2020). Proposed TRUTAUT model of technology ddoption for LAPOR! IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 725(1), 12120. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1757-899X/725/1/012120
  36. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/002224378001700405
  37. Olivia, M., & Marchyta, N. K. (2022). The influence of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness on E-wallet continuance intention: intervening role of customer satisfaction. Available online: https://repository.petra.ac.id/19617/3/Published_%2DJTI_merged_cover%2C_dftr_isi%2C_editorial_board.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2024)
  38. Phuong, N. N. D., Luan, L. T., Dong, V. Van, et al. (2020). Examining customers’ continuance intentions towards e-wallet usage: The emergence of mobile payment acceptance in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no9.505
  39. Pinem, A. A., Immanuella, I. M., Hidayanto, A. N., et al. (2018). Trust and its impact towards continuance of use in government-to-business online service. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(3/4), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2018-0008
  40. Puthur, J. K., George, A. P., & Mahadevan, L. (2020). Understanding citizen’s continuance intention to use e-government services: the case of the Indian railway e-ticket booking site. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 34(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2020.108343
  41. Rahi, S., Othman Mansour, M. M., Alghizzawi, M., et al. (2019). Integration of UTAUT model in internet banking adoption context: The mediating role of performance expectancy and effort expectancy. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 13(3), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0032
  42. Razak, F. Z. B. A., Bakar, A. A., & Abdullah, W. S. W. (2017). How perceived effort expectancy and social influence affects the continuance of intention to use e-government. A study of a Malaysian government service. Electronic Government, An International Journal, 13(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2017.083943
  43. Reichheld, F. F., & Schefter, P. (2000). E-loyalty: your secret weapon on the web. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 105–113.
  44. Santhanamery, T., & Ramayah, T. (2014). Explaining the e-Government usage using expectation confirmation model: The case of electronic tax filing in Malaysia. In: Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. (editors). Government e-Strategic Planning and Management. Public Administration and Information Technology. Springer. pp. 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8462-2_15
  45. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In: Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Vomberg, A. (editors). Handbook of Market Research. Springer. pp. 587–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
  46. Shah, H. J., & Attiq, S. (2016). Impact of technology quality, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness in the formation of consumer’s satisfaction in the context of e-learning. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 124–140.
  47. Shen, Y. C., Huang, C. Y., Chu, C. H., et al. (2010). A benefit–cost perspective of the consumer adoption of the mobile banking system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290903490658
  48. Shuib, L., Yadegaridehkordi, E., & Ainin, S. (2019). Malaysian urban poor adoption of e-government applications and their satisfaction. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1) https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1565293
  49. Sun, P. L., Ku, C. Y., & Shih, D. H. (2015). An implementation framework for E-Government 2.0. Telematics and Informatics, 32(3), 504–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.12.003
  50. Thusi, P., & Maduku, D. K. (2020). South African millennials’ acceptance and use of retail mobile banking apps: An integrated perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106405
  51. Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 11(2), 5-40.
  52. Utomo, S. D. (2011). Penanganan Pengaduan Masyarakat Mengenai Pelayanan Publik. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, 15(3), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v15i3.596
  53. Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004
  54. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., et al. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  55. Wang, T., Lin, C. L., & Su, Y. S. (2021). Continuance intention of university students and online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A modified expectation confirmation model perspective. Sustainability, 13(8), 4586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084586
  56. Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2008). Understanding Citizen’s Continuance Intention to Use e‑Government Website: a Composite View of Technology Acceptance Model and Computer Self‑Efficacy. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 6(1), 55-64.
  57. Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., et al. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.006
  58. Yusuf Dauda, S., & Lee, J. (2015). Technology adoption: A conjoint analysis of consumers׳ preference on future online banking services. Information Systems, 53, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2015.04.006


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.7957

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Authors

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.