The impact of quality certificates on sustainable food production: An analysis of selected systems in Poland

Katarzyna Brukało, Anna Dolipska, Piotr Romaniuk

Article ID: 7892
Vol 8, Issue 13, 2024

VIEWS - 148 (Abstract) 103 (PDF)

Abstract


This study evaluates the influence of quality certificates on sustainable food production in Poland, considering economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Analyzing 25 different certificates, the research explores their criteria, procedures, and costs across various food product categories, including meat, fish, and plant-based products. The study provides a detailed review of certification processes, from initiation to audits and inspections. It identifies both commonalities and differences among certificates, each addressing unique aspects such as environmental impact, worker rights, and product origins. Despite the diversity in standards and procedures, the study underscores the need for standardized international criteria to improve transparency and meet consumer expectations, highlighting the significant role of quality certificates in advancing sustainable food production.


Keywords


food industry; quality certificates; sustainable food production; food policy; nutrition policy

Full Text:

PDF


References


Albuquerque, T. G., Beatriz, M., Oliveira, P. P., & Costa, H. S. (2017). 25 years of European Union (EU) quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs across EU Member States. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 98, 2475–2489.

Anderson, K., Meloni, G., & Swinnen, J. (2018). Global alcohol markets: Evolving consumption patterns, regulations, and industrial organizations. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10, 105–132.

Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2015). Research handbook on climate governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Becker, T. (2009). European Food Quality Policy: The importance of geographical indications, organic certification and food quality assurance schemes in European countries. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 10, 111–130.

Blackmore, E., Keeley, J., Pyburn, R., et al. (2012). Pro-poor certification: Assessing the benefits of sustainability certification for small-scale farmers in Asia. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).

Brancalion, P. H. S., Lamb, D., Ceccon, E., et al. (2017). Using markets to leverage investment in forest and landscape restoration in the tropics. Forest Policy and Economics, 85, 103–113.

Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED).

Cheftel, J. C. (2005). Food and nutrition labelling in the European Union. Food Chemistry, 93, 531–550.

Darko, E., Lynch, A., & Smith, W. (2017). The impact of Fairtrade: A review of research evidence 2009–2015. Overseas Development Institute.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

FAO. (2020). Terminal evaluation of “Strengthening global capacity to effectively manage areas beyond national jurisdiction”. FAO.

FAO. (2022). Thinking about the future of food safety—A foresight report. FAO.

Froese, R., Demirel, N., Coro, G., et al. (2017). Estimating fisheries reference points from catch and resilience. Fish and Fisheries, 18, 506–526.

Gawron, J. C., & Theuvsen, L. (2009). Certification schemes in the European agri-food sector: Overview and opportunities for Central and Eastern Europe. SAGE Journals, 38, 4–5.

Glogovetan, A., Dabija, D. C., Fiore, M., & Pocol, C. B. (2022). Consumer perception and understanding of European Union quality schemes: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 14, 61–67.

Hajdukiewicz, A. (2014). European Union agri-food quality schemes for the protection and promotion of geographical indications and traditional specialities: An economic perspective. Folia Horticulturae, 26, 3–17.

Halpern, B. S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K. A., et al. (2008). A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science, 319(5865), 948–952.

Hsiang, S., & Kopp, R. E. (2018). An economist’s guide to climate change science. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 3–32.

Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. (2019). Working landscapes certificate information. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.

Kabaja, B., & Varese, E. (2022). The popularity of EU ecolabel product certification in Poland. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, 163, 185–198.

Kaczorowska, J., Rejman, K., & Nosarzewska, J. (2018). Perception of food products marked with certificates fulfilling the idea of sustainable consumption (Polish). Domestic Trade, 373, 222–234.

Kafel, P., & Sikora, T. (2011). Benefits of implementation and certification of management systems in the food industry enterprises. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Quality Conference.

Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Boelee, E., Cools, J., et al. (2018). Identifying barriers and levers of biodiversity mainstreaming in four cases of transnational governance of land and water. Environmental Science & Policy, 85, 132–140.

Konefal, J., Mascarenhas, M., & Hatanaka, M. (2005). Governance in the global agro-food system: Backlighting the role of transnational supermarket chains. Agriculture and Human Values, 22, 291–302.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.

Lawrence, M. G., Schäfer, S., Muri, H., et al. (2018). Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Nature Communications, 9.

Lyu, Y., Shi, P., Han, G., et al. (2020). Desertification control practices in China. Sustainability, 12(8), 3258.

Mie, A., Andersen, H. R., Gunnarsson, S., et al. (2017). Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: A comprehensive review. Food Policy, 68, 19–31.

Murphy, B., Martini, M., Fedi, A., et al. (2022). Consumer trust in organic food and organic certifications in four European countries. Food Control, 133.

Precedence Research. (2024). Food certification market size, share, and trends 2024 to 2033. Available online: https://www.precedenceresearch.com/food-certification-market (accessed on 1 July 2024).

Rajic, S., Djordjevic, V., Tomasevic, I., & Djekic, I. (2022). The role of food systems in achieving the sustainable development goals: Environmental perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 988–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2930

Sampalean, N. I., Rama, D., & Giulio, V. (2021). An investigation into Italian consumers’ awareness, perception, knowledge of European Union quality certifications, and consumption of agri-food products carrying those certifications. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 10, 35–49.

Schleifer, P., & Sun, Y. (2020). Reviewing the impact of sustainability certification on food security in developing countries. Global Food Security, 24.

Shahbandeh, M. (2024). Worldwide sales of organic food from 1999 to 2022. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/273090/worldwide-sales-of-organic-foods-since-1999/ (accessed on 1 July 2024).

Smith, S., & Paladino, A. (2010). Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(2), 93–104.

Smith, W. R. (1956). Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 21(1), 3–8.

Steinfeld, H. (2019). Livestock and climate change: What are the options? Landbauforschung-Journal of Sustainable and Organic Agricultural Systems, 69, 1–4.

Sumaila, U. R., & Pauly, D. (2007). All fishing nations must unite to cut subsidies. Nature, 450, 945.

Verbeke, W., Van Wezemael, L. de Barcellos, M. D., et al. (2010). European beef consumers’ interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee: Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries. Appetite, 54(2), 289–296.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i13.7892

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Katarzyna Brukało, Anna Dolipska, Piotr Romaniuk

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.