Family benefits public spending: Centralization or decentralization?

Marina Sedova, Natalya Guz, Mikhail Dorofeev, Igor Balynin, Tatyana Burdelova, Alexey Mikhaylov

Article ID: 7881
Vol 8, Issue 10, 2024

VIEWS - 93 (Abstract) 26 (PDF)

Abstract


In order to overcome negative demographic trends in the Russian Federation, measures to stimulate the birth rate have been developed and financed at the federal and sub-federal levels. At the moment, on the one hand, there is a tendency to centralize expenditures for these purposes at the federal level, on the other hand, the coverage of the subjects of the Russian Federation, which introduce sub-federal (subnational) maternity capital (SMC), is expanding. The study was recognized to answer the question: whether the widespread introduction of SMC is justified, whether the effect of its use depends on the level of subsidization of the region and the degree of decentralization of expenditures.


Keywords


family allowance; family benefits public spending; fiscal federalism; fiscal centralization; fiscal decentralization; maternal capital

Full Text:

PDF


References


Aassve, A., Billari, F. C., & Spéder, Z. (2006). Societal Transition, Policy Changes and Family Formation: Evidence from Hungary. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 22(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-005-7434-2

Aksoy, O., & Billari, F. C. (2018). Political Islam, Marriage, and Fertility: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 123(5), 1296–1340. https://doi.org/10.1086/696193

Alijanzadeh, M., Bahrami, N., Jafari, E., et al. (2023). Iranian women’s attitude toward childbearing and its’ association with generalized trust, social support, marital satisfaction and governmental childbearing incentives. Heliyon, 9(5), e16162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16162

An, J., & Mikhaylov, A. (2020). Russian energy projects in South Africa. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 31(3), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2020/v31i3a7809

An, J., Mikhaylov, A., & Chang, T. (2024). Relationship between the popularity of a platform and the price of NFT assets. Finance Research Letters, 61, 105057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105057

An, J., Mikhaylov, A., & Jung, S.-U. (2020). The Strategy of South Korea in the Global Oil Market. Energies, 13(10), 2491. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102491

Becker, G. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In: Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, pp. 209-240. Columbia University Press.

Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2, Part 2), S279–S288. https://doi.org/10.1086/260166

Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1976). Child Endowments and the Quantity and Quality of Children. Journal of Political Economy, 84(4, Part 2), S143–S162. https://doi.org/10.1086/260536

Bergsvik, J., Fauske, A., & Hart, R. K. (2021). Can Policies Stall the Fertility Fall? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi‐) Experimental Literature. Population and Development Review, 47(4), 913–964. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12431

Budget (2024). Financial passport, Monthly data on execution of budgets of the Russian Federation. Available online: https://www.iminfin.ru/areas-of-analysis/budget (accessed on 3 May 2024).

Cohen, A., Dehejia, R., & Romanov, D. (2007). Do Financial Incentives Affect Fertility? National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w13700

Cohen, A., Dehejia, R., & Romanov, D. (2013). Financial incentives and fertility. Review of Economicsand Statistics, 95(1), 1 -20. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00342

Cowan, S. K., & Douds, K. W. (2022). Examining the Effects of a Universal Cash Transfer on Fertility. Social Forces, 101(2), 1003–1030. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soac013

Doepke, M., & Kindermann, F. (2019). Bargaining over Babies: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications. American Economic Review, 109(9), 3264–3306. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160328

Dorofeev, M. L. (2024). State financial regulation of demographic processes in Russia: problems and solutions. E-Management, 6(4), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-3445-2023-6-4-83-94

Fedstat (2024). Available online: www.https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/31517 (accessed on 27 Septemebr 2024).

Gauthier, A. H., & Hatzius, J. (1997). Family Benefits and Fertility: An Econometric Analysis. Population Studies, 51(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000150066

González, L. (2013). The Effect of a Universal Child Benefit on Conceptions, Abortions, and Early Maternal Labor Supply. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(3), 160–188. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.5.3.160

González, L., & Trommlerová, S. K. (2021). Cash Transfers and Fertility. Journal of Human Resources, 58(3), 783–818. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.59.1.0220-10725r2

Luci-Greulich, A., & Thévenon, O. (2013). The Impact of Family Policies on Fertility Trends in Developed Countries. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 29(4), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9295-4

Malak, N., Rahman, M. M., & Yip, T. A. (2019). Baby bonus, anyone? Examining heterogeneous responses to a pro-natalist policy. Journal of Population Economics, 32(4), 1205–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-019-00731-y

Mikhaylov, A. (2023). Understanding the risks associated with wallets, depository services, trading, lending, and borrowing in the crypto space. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 7(2), 2223. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v7i2.2223

Mikhaylov, A. Yu. (2021). Development of Friedrich von Hayekʼs theory of private money and economic implications for digital currencies. Terra Economicus, 19(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2021-19-1-53-62

Mikhaylov, A., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2023a). Analysis of financial development and open innovation oriented fintech potential for emerging economies using an integrated decision-making approach of MF-X-DMA and golden cut bipolar q-ROFSs. Financial Innovation, 9(1).

Mikhaylov, A., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., et al. (2023b). Bitcoin mempool growth and trading volumes: Integrated approach based on QROF Multi-SWARA and aggregation operators. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(3), 100378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100378

Moiseev, N., Mikhaylov, A., Dinçer, H., et al. (2023). Market capitalization shock effects on open innovation models in e-commerce: golden cut q-rung orthopair fuzzy multicriteria decision-making analysis. Financial Innovation, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00461-x

Mutalimov, V., Kovaleva, I., Mikhaylov, A., et al. (2021). Assessing regional growth of small business in Russia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(3), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2021.090308

Nieto, A. (2022). Can subsidies to permanent employment change fertility decisions? Labour Economics, 78, 102219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102219

OECD. (2024). Family benefits public spending (indicator). Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/family-benefits-public-spending/indicator/english_8e8b3273-en?parentId=http%3A%2F%2Finstance.metastore.ingenta.com%2Fcontent%2Fthematicgrouping%2F3ddf51bf-en (accessed on 3 May 2024).

Olivetti, C., & Petrongolo, B. (2017). The Economic Consequences of Family Policies: Lessons from a Century of Legislation in High-Income Countries. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23051

Parada, C. (2024). Fertility responses to cash transfers in Uruguay. World Development Perspectives, 33, 100574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2024.100574

Parker, S. W., & Ryu, S. (2023). Do Conditional Cash Transfers Reduce Fertility? Nationwide Evidence from Mexico. Population and Development Review, 49(3), 599–616. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12576

Proshin, A. (2023). Impact of Child Subsidies on Child Health, Well-Being, and Investment in Child Human Capital: Evidence from Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey 2010–2017. European Journal of Population, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-023-09653-8

Raute, A. (2019). Can financial incentives reduce the baby gap? Evidence from a reform in maternity leave benefits. Journal of Public Economics, 169, 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco. 2018.07.010

Riphahn, R. T., & Wiynck, F. (2017). Fertility effects of child benefits. Journal of Population Economics, 30(4), 1135–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0647-y

Rosstat (2024). Statistics. Available online: www.rosstat.ru (accessed on 27 September 2024).

Schoppa, L. J. (2020). The Policy Response to Declining Fertility Rates in Japan: Relying on Logic and Hope Over Evidence. Social Science Japan Journal, 23(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyz046

Spéder, Z., Murinkó, L., & Oláh, L. Sz. (2019). Cash support vs. tax incentives: The differential impact of policy interventions on third births in contemporary Hungary. Population Studies, 74(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2019.1694165

Stepanova, D., Yousif, N. B. A., Karlibaeva, R., Mikhaylov, A. (2024). Current analysis of cryptocurrency mining industry. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(7), 4803. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.4803

Tan, J. (2023). Perceptions towards pronatalist policies in Singapore. Journal of Population Research,40(14). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546 -02309309-8

Tinkoff (2024). Analytics. Available online: www.tbank.ru (accessed on 27 September 2024).

Tinkoff.ru. (2024). Amount of regional maternity capital in the regions of the Russian Federation (Russian). Available online: https://journal.tinkoff.ru/regionalny-kapital/ (accessed on 3 May 2024).

Tudor, S. (2020). Financial incentives, fertility and early life child outcomes. Labour Economics, 64, 101839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101839

Vakulenko, E. S., Ivashina, N. V., & Svistyilnik, Y. O. (2023). Regional Maternity Capital Programmes: Impact on Fertility in Russia. Ekonomika regiona/Economy of regions, 19(4), 1077-1092. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-4-10

van Wijk, D., & Billari, F. C. (2024). Fertility Postponement, Economic Uncertainty, and the Increasing Income Prerequisites of Parenthood. Population and Development Review, 50(2), 287–322. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12624

Vikat, A. (2004). Women’s Labor Force Attachment and Childbearing in Finland. Demographic Research, Special 3, 177–212. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2004.s3.8

Vonk, G., & Schoukens, P. (editors) (2019). Devolution and Decentralisation in Social Security: A comparative European Perspective. Eleven International Publishing.

Zhang, J., Li, X., & Tang, J. (2022). Effect of public expenditure on fertility intention to have a second child or more: Evidence from China’s CGSS survey data. Cities, 128, 103812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103812




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.7881

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Marina Sedova, Natalya Guz, Mikhail Dorofeev, Igor Balynin, Tatyana Burdelova, Alexey Mikhaylov

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.