Analysis of e-government implementation and factors affecting employee performance: Case study in Tangerang city government
Vol 8, Issue 10, 2024
VIEWS - 67 (Abstract) 51 (PDF)
Abstract
This study examines the factors influencing e-government adoption in the Tangerang city government from 2010 to 2022. We gathered statistics from multiple sources to reduce joint source prejudice, resulting in a preliminary illustration of 1670 annotations from 333 regions or cities. These regions included major urban centers such as Jakarta, Surabaya, Bandung, Medan, Makassar, and Denpasar, as well as other significant municipalities across Indonesia. After removing anomalous values, we retained a final illustration of 1656 annotations. Results indicate that higher-quality digital infrastructure significantly boosts e-government adoption, underscoring the necessity for resilient digital platforms. Contrary to expectations, increased budget allocation for digital initiatives negatively correlates with adoption levels, suggesting the need for efficient spending policies. IT training for staff showed mixed results, highlighting the importance of identifying optimal training environments. The study also finds that policy adaptability and organizational complexity moderate the relationships between digital infrastructure, budget, IT training, and e-government adoption. These findings emphasize the importance of a holistic approach integrating technological, organizational, and policy aspects to enhance e-government implementation. The insights provided are valuable for policymakers and practitioners aiming to improve digital governance and service delivery. This study reveals the unexpected negative correlation between budget allocation and e-government adoption and introduces policy adaptability and organizational complexity as critical moderating factors, offering new insights for optimizing digital governance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdoh, H. M. B., Saany, S. I. A., Jebur, H. H., & El-Ebiary, Y. (2020). The effect of PESTLE factors on E-government adoption in Jordan: A conceptual model. International journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 68, 19-23. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/cati3p203
Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2021). Demographic Factors as Determinants of E-Government Adoption. In: Recent Developments in Individual and Organizational Adoption of ICTs. IGI Global. pp. 60–81.
Aggarwal, P., & Agarwala, T. (2023). Relationship of green human resource management with environmental performance: mediating effect of green organizational culture. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(7), 2351–2376. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-08-2021-0474
Al Sayegh, A. J., Ahmad, S. Z., AlFaqeeh, K. M., et al. (2023). Factors affecting e-government adoption in the UAE public sector organisations: the knowledge management perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(3), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-09-2021-0681
Alassim, M., Alfayad, M., & Abbott-Halpin, E. F. (2017). Understanding factors influencing e-government implementation in saudiarabia from an organizational perspective. International Journal of Information and Communication Engineering, 11(7).
Baker, D. L. (2009). Advancing E-Government performance in the United States through enhanced usability benchmarks. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.004
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. V. (2013). Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.
Bhima, B., Zahra, A. R. A., Nurtino, T., &Firli, M. Z. (2023). Enhancing organizational efficiency through the integration of artificial intelligence in management information systems. APTISI Transactions on Management, 7(3), 282-289. https://doi.org/10.33050/atm.v7i3.2146
Böhmer, N., & Schinnenburg, H. (2023). Critical exploration of AI-driven HRM to build up organizational capabilities. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 45(5), 1057–1082. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-04-2022-0202
Bushman, R., Chen, Q., Engel, E., et al. (2004). Financial accounting information, organizational complexity and corporate governance systems. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(2), 167–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.005
Cabanela, L. C. (2023). Data-Driven Career Placement Examination System with Prediction Model in Forecasting Licensure Performance Using Regression Techniques. International Journal of Management Thinking, 1(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.56868/ijmt.v1i2.37
Dias, G. P. (2020). Determinants of e-government implementation at the local level: an empirical model. Online Information Review, 44(7), 1307–1326. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-04-2020-0148
Dooley, K. (2002). Organizational complexity. In: Warner, M. (editor). International encyclopedia of business and management. Thompson Learning. pp. 5013–5022.
Doran, N. M., Puiu, S., Bădîrcea, R. M., et al. (2023). E-Government Development—A Key Factor in Government Administration Effectiveness in the European Union. Electronics, 12(3), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030641
Eaves, D., Mazzucato, M., & Vasconcellos, B. (2024). Digital public infrastructure and public value: What is ‘public’ about DPI (IIPP WP 2024-05). UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Available online: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/ wp2024-05 (accessed on 20 March 2024).
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bhatia, M. M. (2017). Organizational complexity and computation. In: Joel, A. C. B. (editor). The Blackwell companion to organizations. Blackwell Publishers Ltd. pp. 442–466.
Fan, K. Y. (2023). Institutional designs and environmental governance [PhD thesis]. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Fan, Z., Christensen, T., & Ma, L. (2023). Policy attention and the adoption of public sector innovation. Public Management Review, 25(10), 1815–1834. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2050283.
Fan, Z., Meng, Q., & Wei, N. (2019). Fiscal slack or environmental pressures: Which matters more for technological innovation assimilation? A configurational approach. International Public Management Journal, 23(3), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1647318
Gathungu, J., & Mungai, A. N. (2012). Contextual factors affecting e-government strategy implementation and its impact on public sector performance in Kenya. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 1(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v1i1.14
George, G., Fewer, T. J., Lazzarini, S., et al. (2024). Partnering for grand challenges: A review of organizational design considerations in public–private collaborations. Journal of Management, 50(1), 10–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221148992
Gonzalez-Varona, J. M., López-Paredes, A., Poza, D., & Acebes, F. (2024). Building and development of an organizational competence for digital transformation in SMEs. Journal of industrial Engeneering and Management 14(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3279
Grassmuck, V. R. (2021). Towards an infrastructure for a democratic digital public sphere. In: Baratsits, A. (editor). European public spheres, digitisation and public welfare orientation. iRights Media. pp. 15–22.
Gupta, K. P., Bhaskar, P., & Singh, S. (2017). Prioritization of factors influencing employee adoption of e-government using the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 19(1/2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsit-04-2017-0028
Hajela, M., Sharma, G., & Chaudhary, S. (2023). Envisioning Smart Real Estate Digital Infrastructure for Madhya Pradesh. In: Prakash, A., Jain, A., Singh, P., Sarkar, A. (editors). Technology, Policy, and Inclusion. Routledge India. pp. 75–115.
He, L., Xue, M., & Gu, B. (2020). Internet-of-things enabled supply chain planning and coordination with big data services: Certain theoretic implications. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2020.03.002
Hickey, J. W., Becker, W. R., Nevins, S. A., et al. (2023). Organization of the human intestine at single-cell resolution. Nature, 619(7970), 572–584. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05915-x
Horobeț, A. L., Mnohoghitnei, I., Zlatea, E. M. L., et al. (2023). Determinants of E-Government Use in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis. Societies, 13(6), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13060150
Hustad, E., & Olsen, D. H. (2021). Creating a sustainable digital infrastructure: The role of service-oriented architecture. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.210
Iong, K. Y., & Phillips, J. O. L. (2023). The transformation of government employees’ behavioural intention towards the adoption of E-government services: An empirical study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100485
Ioppolo, G., Cucurachi, S., Salomone, R., et al. (2016). Sustainable Local Development and Environmental Governance: A Strategic Planning Experience. Sustainability, 8(2), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020180
Jun, K. N., & Weare, C. (2011). Institutional Motivations in the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of E-Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq020
Kakarougkas, C., & Papageorgakis, E. (2023). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Training Methods on the Performance of Human Resources in Greek Hotel Businesses. Journal of Advances in Humanities Research, 2(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.56868/jadhur.v2i1.102
Karunia, R. L., Budiaji, R., Suzana, R., et al. (2023). Analysis of the Factors that Affect the Implementation of E-Government in Indonesia. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(3), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i3.1216
Khoso, A. K., Darazi, M. A., Mahesar, K. A., et al. (2022). The impact of ESL teachers’ emotional intelligence on ESL Students academic engagement, reading and writing proficiency: mediating role of ESL students motivation. Int. J. Early Childhood Spec. Educ, 14, 3267–3280.
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391211
Lee, S. Y., & Whitford, A. B. (2013). Assessing the effects of organizational resources on public agency performance: Evidence from the us federal government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(3), 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus050
Leventsov, V., Kornienko, A., Yakovleva, E., et al. (2023). The state and dynamics of the intellectual infrastructure of technological development of industrial enterprises: methodological tools for assessing sustainability. E3S Web of Conferences, 419, 01017. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341901017
Liao, H., & Chuang, A. (2004). A Multilevel Investigation of Factors Influencing Employee Service Performance and Customer Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159559
Liu, H., Zhu, Q., Muhammad Khoso, W., et al. (2023). Spatial pattern and the development of green finance trends in China. Renewable Energy, 211, 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.014
Luarn, P., & Huang, K. L. (2009). Factors influencing government employee performance via information systems use: an empirical study. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 7(3), 227–240.
Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2018). Does e-government performance actually boost citizen use? Evidence from European countries. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1513–1532. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1412117
Mahajan, K., Pal, A., & Desai, A. (2023). Revolutionizing Fan Engagement: Adopting Trends and Technologies in The Vibrant Indian Sports Landscape. International Journal of Management Thinking, 1(2), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.56868/ijmt.v1i2.35
Martín-Rojas, R., Garrido-Moreno, A., & García-Morales, V. J. (2023). Social media use, corporate entrepreneurship and organizational resilience: A recipe for SMEs success in a post-Covid scenario. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122421
Moldoveanu, M. C., & Bauer, R. M. (2004). On the Relationship Between Organizational Complexity and Organizational Structuration. Organization Science, 15(1), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0058
Muhammad, A. S., & Kaya, T. (2023). Factors affecting the citizen’s intention to adopt e-government in Nigeria. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 21(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-05-2022-0054
Mursitama, T. N., Karim, M. F., Natanael, K. A. C., et al. (2023). Developmental state and digital infrastructure: The case of Indonesia. In: Proceeding of the AIP Conference Proceedings.
Nguyen Trong, H., Dang, T. V., Nguyen, V., et al. (2022). Determinants of e-government service adoption: an empirical study for business registration in Southeast Vietnam. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 15(3), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1805396
Onunwor, A. A. (2022). Digital Infrastructure and Organizational Performance of First Bank Plc, In Rivers State. Journal of Management, Accounting and Development Studies, 9(2), 5382–6134.
Pribadi, U. (2024). Impact of Organizational Structure and Culture on E-Government Implementation. Innovar: Revista de ciencias administrativas y sociales, 34(92), 1–23.
Rahayu, A. (2023). Analysis of the influence of performance management through the implementation of a performance-based remuneration system and the use of e-government on employee performance. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 20(2), 2417–2426.
Reddick, C. G. (2006). Information Resource Managers and E-government Effectiveness: A Survey of Texas State Agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.006
Rodríguez-Abitia, G., Martínez-Pérez, S., Ramirez-Montoya, M. S., et al. (2020). Digital Gap in Universities and Challenges for Quality Education: A Diagnostic Study in Mexico and Spain. Sustainability, 12(21), 9069. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219069
Schmitz, C., & Ganesan, S. (2014). Managing Customer and Organizational Complexity in Sales Organizations. Journal of Marketing, 78(6), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.12.0296
Scholta, H., Mertens, W., Kowalkiewicz, M., et al. (2019). From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: An e-government stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.010
Schwandt, A. (2009). Measuring organizational complexity and its impact on organizational performance—A comprehensive conceptual model and empirical study [PhD thesis]. Technische Universität Berlin.
Sciulli, L. M. (2024). Innovations in the retail banking industry: the impact of organizational structure and environment on the adoption process, 1st ed. Routledge.
Slot, M., Fraikin, M., Damgrave, R., et al. (2022). Digital infrastructures as the basis for implementing digital twinning. Procedia CIRP, 109, 568–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.296
Tremblay-Cantin, C. A., Mellouli, S., Cheikh-Ammar, M., et al. (2023). E-government Service Adoption by Citizens: A Literature Review and a High-level Model of Influential Factors. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 4(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3580369
Trieu, H. D. X., Van Nguyen, P., Nguyen, T. T., Vu, H. M., & Tran, K. (2023). Information technology capabilities and organizational ambidexterity facilitating organizational resilience and firm performance of SMEs. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(4), 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.03.004
Uitdewilligen, S., Waller, M. J., Roe, R. A., & Bollen, P. (2023). The effects of team mental model complexity on team information search and performance trajectories. Group & Organization Management, 48(3), 755–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601121102
Umiyati, S. (2023). Reinforce Human Resource Performance Through the Implementation of E-Government and Leadership in the Government Organization. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(11), e1949. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1949
Ushenko, N., Metelytsia, V., Lytovchenko, I., et al. (2023). Development of digital infrastructure and blockchain in Ukraine. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6, 162–168. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2023-6/162
Van de Wetering, R., Doe, J., van den Heuvel, R., et al. (2023). How do SMEs shape business model innovation? A digital infrastructure, improvisational, and dynamic capability perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4599211
Veit, W. (2023). Complexity and the Evolution of Consciousness. Biological Theory, 18(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-022-00407-z
Walker, R. M. (2008). An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591–615. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum026
Wang, J., Zhang, J., Cifuentes-Faura, J., et al. (2024). Exploring Factors Influencing the Digital Economy: Uncovering the Relationship Structure to Improve Sustainability in China. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(2), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.20600.
World Health Organization. (2020). Digital health platform handbook: building a digital information infrastructure (infostructure) for health. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013728 (accessed on 20 March 2024).
Wu, W., Wang, S., Jiang, X., et al. (2023). Regional digital infrastructure, enterprise digital transformation and entrepreneurial orientation: Empirical evidence based on the broadband China strategy. Information Processing & Management, 60(5), 103419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103419.
Yang, Y., Chai, Y., Xie, H., et al. (2023). Responses of soil microbial diversity, network complexity and multifunctionality to three land-use changes. Science of The Total Environment, 859, 160255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160255
Yera, A., Arbelaitz, O., Jauregui, O., et al. (2020). Characterization of e-Government adoption in Europe. PloS one, 15(4), e0231585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231585
Yesilkagit, K., & Christensen, J. G. (2009). Institutional design and formal autonomy: Political versus historical and cultural explanations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup002
Zhang, W., Fan, H., & Zhao, Q. (2023). Seeing green: How does digital infrastructure affect carbon emission intensity? Energy Economics, 127, 107085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107085
Zhang, W., Zhao, S., Wan, X., et al. (2021). Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China. PloS one, 16(9), e0257365. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257365
Zheng, D., Chen, J., Huang, L., et al. (2013). E-government adoption in public administration organizations: integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.28
Zheng, Y., Graham, L., Epitropaki, O., et al. (2020). Service Leadership, Work Engagement, and Service Performance: The Moderating Role of Leader Skills. Group & Organization Management, 45(1), 43–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601119851978
Zhuo, C., Wen, Y., & Wu, H. (2023). The environmental externality of China’s digital infrastructure: does institution supply matter? Applied Economics, 56(41), 4875–4888. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2219887
Zorali, S., & Kanipek, K. (2023). An Empirical Research on the Determination of Effective Factors in E-Government Acceptance and Use: Northern Cyprus Case. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824402312140
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.7774
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Indri Astuti, Ria Mardiana Yusuf, Mursalim Nohong, Fauziah Umar, Sabbar Dahham Sabbar
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.