The architecture and engineering industry employs resource-efficient sustainable building design (SBDC) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate environmental damage. This study examines the understanding and practice of SBDC among Chinese architecture students. A survey of 555 undergraduates from China’s architecture universities was conducted. Two independent and seven dependent variables were analyzed to evaluate the impact of academic stages and practical experiences on students’ awareness. The findings reveal that over 70% of respondents consider SBDC important in architecture. More than half have taken courses with over 30% SBDC content. However, 45.85% of respondents only have a basic understanding of SBDC. This result underscores the significance of educational disparities, this insufficiency is likely due to inadequate coverage and representation of SBDC in the curriculum. Our study highlights the necessity of enhancing SBDC-related education within the current curriculum framework to ensure all students receive a systematic and comprehensive knowledge of sustainable building design.

TRANSLATE with xEnglishArabicHebrewPolishBulgarianHindiPortugueseCatalanHmong DawRomanianChinese SimplifiedHungarianRussianChinese TraditionalIndonesianSlovakCzechItalianSlovenianDanishJapaneseSpanishDutchKlingonSwedishEnglishKoreanThaiEstonianLatvianTurkishFinnishLithuanianUkrainianFrenchMalayUrduGermanMalteseVietnameseGreekNorwegianWelshHaitian CreolePersian   TRANSLATE with COPY THE URL BELOW BackEMBED THE SNIPPET BELOW IN YOUR SITE Enable collaborative features and customize widget: Bing Webmaster PortalBack

Chinese institutes; curriculum design; Chinese architecture students; resource-efficient designs; practical experiences

Agresti, A. (2018). Statistical methods for the social sciences. Pearson. Attia, S. (2018). Regenerative and Positive Impact Architecture. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66718-8 Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research. Wadsworth Publishing. Bailey, P. J. (2013). Globalization and Chinese Education in the Early 20th Century. Frontiers of Education in China, 8(3), 398–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03396982 Bian, J., Liu, C., Zuo, C., et al. (2024). Reducing Carbon Emissions from Prefabricated Decoration: A Case Study of Residential Buildings in China. Buildings, 14(2), 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020550 Council, U. G. B. (1998). US green building council. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/ (accessed on 3 May 2023). Creswell, J. W. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555 Denison, E. (2017). Architecture and the Landscape of Modernity in China before 1949. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315567686 Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Deshpande, A. (2017). Building a comprehensive framework for sustainable education using case studies. Industrial and Commercial Training, 49(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-08-2016-0051 Fowler, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage publications. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (1993). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill Education. Grosso, R., Mecca, U., Moglia, G., et al. (2020). Collecting Built Environment Information Using UAVs: Time and Applicability in Building Inspection Activities. Sustainability, 12(11), 4731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114731 Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage publications. Katiyar, N. K., Goel, G., Hawi, S., et al. (2021). Nature-inspired materials: Emerging trends and prospects. NPG Asia Materials, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-021-00322-y Khahro, S. H., Kumar, D., Siddiqui, F. H., et al. (2021). Optimizing Energy Use, Cost and Carbon Emission through Building Information Modelling and a Sustainability Approach: A Case-Study of a Hospital Building. Sustainability, 13(7), 3675. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073675 Krosnick, J. A., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2018). The measurement of attitudes. In: The Handbook of Attitudes, Volume 1: Basic Principles. Routledge. pp. 45-105. Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications. Lemke, P., Ren, J. F., Alley, R. B., et al. (2007). Climate Change 2007. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511546013 Li, H., Yang, X., & Zhu, H. L. (2023). Reducing carbon emissions in the architectural design process via transformer with cross-attention mechanism. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1249308 McMillan, J. H. (1996). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer. Pearson. Patten, M. L., & Newhart, M. (2017). Understanding Research Methods. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213033 Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to Psychometric Theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841624 Shahid, M., Bakhat, H. F., Shah, G. M., et al. (2023). Recent trends in environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(44), 99198–99201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29348-1 Strielkowski, W., Civín, L., Tarkhanova, E., et al. (2021). Renewable Energy in the Sustainable Development of Electrical Power Sector: A Review. Energies, 14(24), 8240. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248240 Vagtholm, R., Matteo, A., Vand, B., et al. (2023). Evolution and Current State of Building Materials, Construction Methods, and Building Regulations in the U.K.: Implications for Sustainable Building Practices. Buildings, 13(6), 1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061480 Wang, J. (2023). Study on regional differences and convergence of the green development quality of the construction industry: evidence from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.972980 Wang, J., & He, D. (2015). Sustainable urban development in China: challenges and achievements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20(5), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9644-1 Wang, Y. (2018). Beaux-Arts Composition and Its Evolution in China’s Architectural Education A Case Study of Architectural Education at Nanjing Institute of Technology. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 17(2), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.17.199 Winter, J., Zhai, J., & Cotton, D. R. E. (2021). Teaching environmental sustainability in China: opportunities and challenges for business and economics faculty in higher education. Environmental Education Research, 28(2), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.2012560 Xie, X., Qin, S., Gou, Z., et al. (2021). Incorporating green building into architectural education: what can we learn from the value-belief-norm theory? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(3), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-06-2020-0200 Xue, C. Q. (2005). Building a revolution: Chinese architecture since 1980. Hong Kong University Press. Yang, D., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., et al. (2021). Changes in anthropogenic particulate matters and resulting global climate effects since the Industrial Revolution. International Journal of Climatology, 42(1), 315–330. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7245 Yuan, R., Vengadasamy, R., & Zheng, Y. (2024). A Bibliometric Analysis of Study on Eileen Chang Using Cite Space. Sage Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241254892 Zhang, L., Chu, Z., He, Q., et al. (2019). Investigating the Constraints to Buidling Information Modeling (BIM) Applications for Sustainable Building Projects: A Case of China. Sustainability, 11(7), 1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071896 Zheng, Y., Tang, L. C. M., & Chau, K. W. (2021). Analysis of Improvement of BIM-Based Digitalization in Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) Projects in China. Applied Sciences, 11(24), 11895. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411895 Zou, Y., Kiviniemi, A., & Jones, S. W. (2017). A review of risk management through BIM and BIM-related technologies. Safety Science, 97, 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.027