The neobanks and sustainability
Vol 8, Issue 9, 2024
VIEWS - 119 (Abstract) 56 (PDF)
Abstract
The rise of fintech in the financial sector presents a transformative shift towards digitalisation and sustainability on a global scale, leveraging technologies like AI to minimise environmental footprint. Neobanks not only challenge traditional banking models but also offer innovative solutions that align with sustainable objectives. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the impact of neobanks on global sustainability from economic, environmental, and social points of view. A comprehensive literature review of existing literature and current sustainable practices of neobanks was conducted. Results reveal that neobanks significantly positively contribute towards environmental sustainability with reduced paper use and logistics requirements of banking services. By offering more accessible and affordable banking services they importantly contribute towards higher financial inclusion, and with innovative products towards more competitive and innovative financial markets. AI-based tools they employ are increasing financial literacy and social inclusion. This article also highlights concerns regarding electronic waste management, potential high energy consumption, required digital literacy and cybersecurity risks. In conclusion, despite the mentioned risks, neobanks importantly contribute to global sustainability in many ways and will even more in the future. These findings can help neobanks shape sustainable practices and guide policymaking, as well as spread awareness of the sustainable impact of banking services.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul-Rahim, R., Bohari, S. A., Aman, A., et al. (2022). Benefit–Risk Perceptions of FinTech Adoption for Sustainability from Bank Consumers’ Perspective: The Moderating Role of Fear of COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(14), 8357. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148357
Allen, P. (2023). French neobank Green-Got lands €5 million to fuel the future of sustainable banking. EU-Startups.
Almasri, B., & Sunoco, D. (2023). Toward Sustainability : Digital Banking. ReseacrhGate.
Amon, A., & Jagrič, T. (2023). Blockchain Technology in Banking as a Tool Towards the SDGs. Strengthening Resilience by Sustainable Economy and Business - towards the SDGs. https://doi.org/10.18690/um.epf.3.2023.46
Amon, A., & Oplotnik, Ž. (2024). Sustainable finance in the digital age: a review of the neobanking phenomenon. In: Proceedings of the ISERD International Conference; 26–27 January 2024; Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Amon, A., Bobek, S., Jagrič, T. (2023). Analiza digitalne transformacije poslovnih modelov bank z modelom Canvas. Bančni Vestnik, 72(1/2), 21-28.
Beloglavec, S.T., Zdolšek, D., Amon, A., et al. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of a neobanking phenomenon : a case study of N26. In: Challenges of the financial institutions in the digital and green transformation of economic ecosystem. Pearson. pp. 49-67.
Bradford, T. (2020). Neobanks: Banks by Any Other Name? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 12.
Chikalipah, S. (2020). The pyrrhic victory of FinTech and its implications for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: evidence from fieldwork in rural Zambia. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 17(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjstsd-06-2020-0058
Deng, X., Huang, Z., & Cheng, X. (2019). FinTech and Sustainable Development: Evidence from China Based on P2P Data. Sustainability, 11(22), 6434. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226434
Dillet, R. (2023). Green-Got is a neobank for climate-conscious customers. TechCrunch.
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., et al. (2019). Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.020
ECB. (2022). Digital euro glossary. Available online: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/digital_euro/investigation/profuse/shared/files/dedocs/ecb.dedocs220420.en.pdf?b268d673898445396fb1a59efbcf01f3 (accessed on 3 May 2023).
EFRAG. (2022). European Sustainability Reporting Guidelines 1 Double materiality conceptual guidelines for standard-setting. Available online: https://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=/sites/webpublishing/SiteAssets/Appendix 2.6 - WP on draft ESRG 1.pdf&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 (accessed on 3 May 2023).
European Commission. (2023). Questions and Answers on the Adoption of European Sustainability Reporting Standards. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_23_4043 (accessed on 3 May 2023).
Förster, P. (2023). The Double Materiality Principle (Article 19a NFRD) as Proposed by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive: An Effective Concept to Tackle Green Washing? European Yearbook of International Economic Law, 13, 345-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/8165_2022_90
Franco-Riquelme, J. N., & Rubalcaba, L. (2021). Innovation and SDGs through Social Media Analysis: Messages from FinTech Firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030165
Garg, P., Gupta, B., Chauhan, A. K., et al. (2021). Measuring the perceived benefits of implementing blockchain technology in the banking sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120407
Helios. (2024). helios. Available online: https://www.helios.do/ (accessed on 3 May 2023).
Jagrič, T., & Amon, A. (2023). Key factors of neobanking’s occurence. Mednarodno Inovativno Poslovanje. Journal of Innovative Business and Management, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.32015/jibm.2023.15.1.1
Jagrič, T., Fister, D., Amon, A., & Jagrič, V. (2021). Neobanks - eagles or pigeons of banking ecosystems? Bančni Vestnik, 70(11), 50-57.
Jeucken, M. (2010). Sustainable Finance and Banking. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776264
Laato, S., Islam, A. K. M. N., Farooq, A., et al. (2020). Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: The stimulus-organism-response approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102224
Larisa, G., Tetiana, N., & Viktoriia, V. (2019). Neobanks Operations and Security Features. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Scientific-Practical Conference Problems of Infocommunications, Science and Technology (PIC S&T). https://doi.org/10.1109/picst47496.2019.9061268
Monis, E., & Pai, R. (2023). Neo Banks: A Paradigm Shift in Banking. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education, 318–332. Internet Archive. https://doi.org/10.47992/ijcsbe.2581.6942.0275
Monis, E., & Pai, R. (2023a). Literature Review of Neo Banking: an Acceptability and Compatibility Study. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD), 8(12), 326-333.
Monzo. (2024a). Our approach to the environment. Available online: https://monzo.com/protecting-the-environment/ (accessed on 3 May 2023).
Monzo. (2024b). Our Business Practices. Available online: https://monzo.com/our-business-practices/ (accessed on 3 May 2023).
Moro-Visconti, R., Cruz Rambaud, S., & López Pascual, J. (2020). Sustainability in FinTechs: An Explanation through Business Model Scalability and Market Valuation. Sustainability, 12(24), 10316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410316
Museba, T. J., Ranganai, E., & Gianfrate, G. (2021). Customer perception of adoption and use of digital financial services and mobile money services in Uganda. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 15(2), 177–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-07-2020-0127
N26. (2024). The free bank account for your everyday. Available online: https://n26.com/en-eu/free-bank-account (accessed on 3 May 2023).
Nagy, S., Molnár, L., & Papp, A. (2023). Customer Adoption of Neobank Services from a Technology Acceptance Perspective – Evidence from Hungary. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(1), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame712024883
Oláh, J., Aburumman, N., Popp, J., et al. (2020). Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability, 12(11), 4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114674
Ortiz-Martínez, E., Marín-Hernández, S., & Santos-Jaén, J.-M. (2023). Sustainability, corporate social responsibility, non-financial reporting and company performance: Relationships and mediating effects in Spanish small and medium sized enterprises. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.015
Paul, M. (2022). Meet Helios, the sustainable neobank from Paris which has roped in €9 million to limit global warming. Available online: https://tech.eu/2022/04/25/meet-helios-the-sustainable-neobank-from-paris-which-has-roped-in-eur9-million-for-greener-world/ (accessed on 3 May 2023).
Prastyanti, R. A., Rezi, R., & Rahayu, I. (2023). Ethical Fintech is a New Way of Banking. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(1), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v11i1.353
Prentice, C., Chen, J., & Stantic, B. (2020). Timed intervention in COVID-19 and panic buying. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102203
Rakshitha, J., & Chaya, R. (2023). Driving Sustainability: Exploring Global Green Banking Initiatives for a Greener Future. Journal of Development Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/22297561231215188
Revolut. (2024). Get started for free. Available online: https://www.revolut.com/a-radically-better-account/ (accessed on 3 May 2023).
Sahoo, P., & Nayak, B. P. (2007). Green Banking in India. The Indian Economic Journal, 55(3), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019466220070306
Sardar, S., & Anjaria, K. (2023). The future of banking: how neo banks are changing the industry. International Journal of Management, Public Policy and Research, 2(2), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.55829/ijmpr.v2i2.153
Schinckus, C. (2020). The good, the bad and the ugly: An overview of the sustainability of blockchain technology. Energy Research & Social Science, 69, 101614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101614
Senyo, P., & Osabutey, E. L. C. (2020). Unearthing antecedents to financial inclusion through FinTech innovations. Technovation, 98, 102155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102155
Statista. (2024). Neobanking-Worldwide. Available online: https://www.statista.com/outlook/dmo/fintech/neobanking/worldwide (accessed on 3 May 2023).
Stewart, H., & Jürjens, J. (2018). Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany. Information & Computer Security, 26(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/ics-06-2017-0039
Temelkov, Z. (2020). Overview of neobanks model and its implications for traditional banking. ISCTBL. 3(1), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.46763/yfnts2031156t
Temelkov, Z. (2020a). Differences Between Traditional Bank Model and Fintech Based Digital Bank and Neobanks Models. SocioBrains, 5721(74), 8-15.
Temelkov, Z. (2022). Factors affecting neobanks sustainability and development. Journal of Economics, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.46763/joe227.1001t
United Nations. (2024). Sustainability. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/sustainability (accessed on 3 May 2023).
UNSGSA. (2018). Annual Report to The Secretary-General: Financial Inclusion: Technology, Innovation, Progress. Available online: https://www.unsgsa.org/sites/default/files/resources-files/2020-09/_AR_2018_web.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2023).
Varga, D. (2018). Fintech: Supporting Sustainable Development By Disrupting Finance. Budapest Management Review, 8(11), 231-249.
Ziemba, E. (2019). The contribution of ICT adoption to sustainability: households’ perspective. Information Technology & People, 32(3), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-02-2018-0090
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.7623
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Aleksandra Amon, Timotej Jagrič, Žan Jan Oplotnik
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.