This study investigates the application of Operational Agility Management in Thai SMEs, examining its impact on Employee Dynamic Capability and the resulting Employee Value Proposition. Using a quantitative approach with a questionnaire survey targeted at Thai SME executives, the research analyzes the relationships between “Value of Work”, “Goal Orientation”, and “Network Communication” as independent variables, “Employee Dynamic Capability” as a mediating variable, and “Employee Value Proposition” as the dependent variable. The findings reveal that Thai Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) struggle particularly with “Network Communication” in enhancing their “Employee Value Proposition”, primarily due to their predominant hierarchical command structure. This challenge highlights the need for Thai SMEs to reassess their organizational structures and communication practices to improve employee dynamic capabilities and overall employee value proposition. The study provides novel insights into the application of Operational Agility Management in Thai SMEs, bridging the gap between high-performance management theories and the practical realities faced by SMEs in unpredictable business environments, thus offering a unique perspective on cultivating employee dynamic capabilities in this setting.

1. Asian Development Bank. (2023). Economics industry and trade private sector development. Available online: https://data.adb.org/media/11916/download (accessed on 3 May 2024).
2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
3. Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700602
4. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
5. Blumler, J.G., & Katz, E. (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6. Bocanegra, J. O., Gubi, A. A., & Cappaert, K. J. (2016). Investigation of social cognitive career theory for minority recruitment in school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000142
7. Bradley, W. C. (2002). NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.125.89
8. Breu, K., Hemingway, C. J., Strathern, M., et al. (2002). Workforce Agility: The New Employee Strategy for the Knowledge Economy. Journal of Information Technology, 17(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02683960110132070
9. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2009). Leader–follower values congruence: Are socialized charismatic leaders better able to achieve it? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 478–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014069
10. Burt, R. (2000). Decay functions. Social Networks. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378873399000155 (accessed on 3 May 2024).
11. Business Insights. (2020). Common types of organizational change & how to manage them. Available online: https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/types-of-organizational-change (accessed on 3 May 2024).
12. Charoenrat, T., & Harvie, C. (2021). Global Initiative towards post-COVID-Glo19 resurgence of the MSME sector: MSME surge project: Cluster “Access to Markets”. UN DESA Development Account Project coordinated by UNCTAD. Available online: https://msme-resurgence.unctad.org/sites/smesurge/files/documents/Thai%20Study%20SME%20-%20FINAL.1.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2024).
13. Chen, X., & Wei, S. (2019). Enterprise social media use and overload: A curvilinear relationship. Journal of Information Technology, 34(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396218802728
14. Cheng, P., Ouyang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2020). The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation, 47(5), 2067–2086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10001-1
15. Dahmaradeh, N., & Banihashemi, S. A. (2010). Organizational agility and agile manufacturing. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 27, 178–184.
16. Denning, S. (2012). Is Apple Truly Forbes ‘Agile’? Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2012/02/03/is-apple-truly-agile/?sh=f1488e9641e6 (accessed on 3 May 2024).
17. Easton, G. (1996). Only Connect: Networks and Organizations. Organization, 3(2), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849632011
18. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
19. Fagerholm, F., & Pagels, M. (2014). Examining the structure of lean and agile values among software developers. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-06862-6_15 (accessed on 3 May 2024).
20. Ghitulescu, B. E. (2012). Making Change Happen. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(2), 206–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886312469254
21. Gieles, H., & van der Meer, W. (2017). Talent management as the beating heart of an Agile Organization (White paper). Available online: https://www.prowareness.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/agile-hr-whitepaper.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2024).
22. Gollan, P. J. (2005). High involvement management and human resource sustainability: The challenges and opportunities. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 43(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411105050305
23. Guo, Y., Lu, Z., Kuang, H., et al. (2020). Information avoidance behavior on social network sites: Information irrelevance, overload, and the moderating role of time pressure. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102067
24. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall.
25. Hofstede, G. (1984). The Cultural Relativity of the Quality of Life Concept. The Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 389. https://doi.org/10.2307/258280
26. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
27. Janssen, M., Alexiev, A., den Hertog, P., & Castaldi, C. (2012). A multi-level multidimensional approach for measuring dynamic capabilities in service innovation management. Druid, 1–26.
28. Josserand, E., Teo, S., & Clegg, S. (2006). From bureaucratic to post-bureaucratic: The difficulties of transition. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810610643686
29. Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., et al. (2014). The management of change in public organizations: a literature review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1–20. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12040
30. Laoyan, S. (2022). Setting business goals: The first step to a successful business. Available online: https://asana.com/resources/business-goals-examples (accessed on 3 May 2024).
31. Leonardi, P. M., & Vaast, E. (2017). Social Media and Their Affordances for Organizing: A Review and Agenda for Research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 150–188. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0144
32. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705
33. Lu, Y., & Ramamurthy, K. (2011). Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 931. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409967
34. Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Goal-setting theory of motivation. International journal of management, business, and administration, 15(1), 1–6.
35. Mavengere, N. B. (2013). Role of Information Systems for Strategic Agility in Supply Chain Setting: Telecommunication Industry Study. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 16(4), 44–73.
36. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological methods, 7(1), 64. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/met/7/1/64/
37. Michael Page. (2020). Create a great employee value proposition. Available online: https://www.michaelpage.co.uk/advice/management-advice/attraction-and-recruitment/create-great-employee-value-proposition (accessed on 3 May 2023).
38. Miner, A. S., Amburgey, T. L., & Stearns, T. M. (1990). Interorganizational Linkages and Population Dynamics: Buffering and Transformational Shields. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 689. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393514
39. Moeller, K. (2009). Intangible and financial performance: causes and effects. Journal of intellectual capital, 10(2), 224–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930910952632
40. Nafei, W. A. (2016). Organizational agility: The key to organizational success. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(5), 296–309.
41. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
42. Olkkonen, R., Tikkanen, H., & AlajoutsijaÈrvi, K. (2000). The role of communication in business relationships and networks. Management Decision, 38(6), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005365
43. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2022). Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2022: An OECD Scoreboard. OECD library.
44. Pandita, D. (2011). The Employee Value Proposition A Key to Attract Performers. Available online: https://www.sibm.edu/assets/pdf/employeevalueproposition.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2024).
45. Porter, M. (2008). The Five Competitive Forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, January Issue, 1–36.
46. Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., et al. (2005). Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132–1205. https://doi.org/10.1086/421508
47. Riopel, L. (2019). Measuring Self-Efficacy with Scales and Questionnaires. Available online: https://positivepsychology.com/self-efficacy-scales/ (accessed on 3 May 2024).
48. Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2011). Towards a model of dynamic capabilities in innovation-based competitive strategy: Insights from project-oriented service firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1251–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.10.009
49. Sambamurthy, V., Wei, K.-K., Lim, K., & Lee, D. (2007). IT-enabled organizational agility and firms’ sustainable competitive advantage. ICIS 2007 Proceedings, 91(28), 14–28.
50. Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.01.007
51. Šochová, Z., & Kunce, E. (2014). Agile project management methods (Czech). Brno: Computer Press.
52. Stanton, J. M. (2001). Galton, Pearson, and the Peas: A Brief History of Linear Regression for Statistics Instructors. Journal of Statistics Education, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2001.11910537
53. Super, D. E., & Sverko. B., & Super, C. M. (1995). Life Roles, Values, and Careers: International Findings of the Work Importance Study. Josscy-Bass, Inc.
54. Tallon, P. P., Queiroz, M., Coltman, T., et al. (2019). Information technology and the search for organizational agility: A systematic review with future research possibilities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.12.002
55. Tsai, M. T., Chuang, S. S., & Hsieh, W. P. (2009). An integrated process model of communication satisfaction and organizational outcomes. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 37(6), 825–834. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.6.825
56. Tyagi, R. K., & Sawhney, M. S. (2010). High-Performance Product Management: The Impact of Structure, Process, Competencies, and Role Definition. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00701.x
57. Vakola, M., & Nikolaou, I. (2005). Attitudes towards organizational change: What is the role of employees’ stress and commitment? Employee Relations, 27, 190–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450510572685
58. Verlinden, N. (2021). The Employee Value Proposition: Definition, Key Elements and Examples. Available online: https://www.aihr.com/blog/employee-value-proposition-evp/ (accessed on 3 May 2024).
59. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x
60. Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2014). Strategic Agility: A State of the Art Introduction to the Special Section on Strategic Agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.5
61. Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003
62. Widhiastuti, H. (2012). The effectiveness of communications in hierarchical organizational structure. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(3), 185. https://www.ijssh.net/papers/93-CH210.pdf
63. Zhang, Z., He, R., Ai, B., et al. (2022). A general channel model for integrated sensing and communication scenarios. IEEE Communications Magazine, 61(5), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2200420
64. Zitkiene, R., & Deksnys, M. (2018). Organizational Agility Conceptual Model. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-2.7