This research aims to analyze the relationship between dynamic capabilities and organizational performance, networking, and organizational performance, and to analyze the relationship between spiritual motivation variables and organizational performance. This research method is a quantitative survey. The respondent sampling technique used in this research is a purposive sampling technique, namely samples taken based on certain considerations. Responses to this study came from 567 Organization members of education. The data collection method used in this research is an online questionnaire which provides a written list of questions to respondents. The questionnaire was designed using a Likert scale of 1 to 7. In this study, the data was analyzed using the Partial Least Square (PLS) method with SmartPLS version 3.0 software. The stages of research data analysis are outer model testing, namely integrated validity and reliability testing, inner model testing, and hypothesis testing. The independent variables of this research are dynamic capabilities, collaborative networks, and spiritual motivation and the dependent variable is Organization performance. The results of this research are that dynamic capabilities have a significant and positive influence on organization performance, collaboration networks have a significant and positive influence on organization performance, and motivation has a significant and positive influence on organization performance. The managerial implication of the results of this research is that to improve the performance of educational organizations, managers can apply dynamic capability variables because dynamic variables have been proven to significantly encourage increased organizational performance. Organizations could improve the performance of educational organizations, and managers bu implement collaboration network variables because collaboration networks have been proven significantly can significantly encourage the increased performance of educational organizations. To improve the performance of educational organizations, managers can apply motivation variables because motivation variables have been proven to significantly encourage increased performance of educational organizations.

Acosta-Prado, J. C., & Tafur-Mendoza, A. A. (2022). Examining the mediating role of dynamic capabilities in the relationship between information and communication technologies and sustainable performance. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(3), 561–577. https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-10-2021-0257

Asbari, M. (2024a). Investigating The Role of Organizational Culture and Knowledge Sharing on Teacher Innovation Capability. PROFESSOR: Professional Education Studies and Operations Research, 1(02), 11–21.

Asbari, M. (2024b). The Influence of Hard skills, Organizational learning and Soft skills on Teacher innovation capability during digital era. PROFESOR: Professional Education Studies and Operations Research, 1(02), 33–45.

Asbari, M., Purba, J. T., Hariandja, E. S., et al. (2023). The Mediating Role of Dynamic Leadership towards the Relationship between Knowledge-Sharing Behavior and Innovation Performance in Higher Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(11), 466–485. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.11.24

Araújo, G. R., Kato, H. T., & Del Corso, J. M. (2022). Dynamic capabilities, strategic planning and performance: a virtuous and mutually reinforcing cycle. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(5), 1116–1132. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.33

Ali, M. A., Hussin, N., Haddad, H., et al. (2021). Dynamic Capabilities and Their Impact on Intellectual Capital and Innovation Performance. Sustainability, 13(18), 10028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810028

Banerjee, C. S., Farooq, A., & Upadhyaya, S. (2018). The relationship between dynamic capabilities, competitive advantage & organizational performance. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations, 6(3), 603–610.

Baía, E. P., & Ferreira, J. J. M. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and performance: How has the relationship been assessed? Journal of Management & Organization, 30(1), 188–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.88

Cheng, X., Fu, S., Han, Y., et al. (2017). Investigating the individual trust and school performance in semi-virtual collaboration groups. Information Technology & People, 30(3), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-01-2016-0024

Czepielewski, L. S., Alliende, L. M., Castañeda, C. P., et al. (2021). Effects of socioeconomic status in cognition of people with schizophrenia: results from a Latin American collaboration network with 1175 subjects. Psychological Medicine, 52(11), 2177–2188. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291721002403

Díaz-Gibson, J., Zaragoza, M. C., Daly, A. J., et al. (2016). Networked leadership in Educational Collaborative Networks. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(6), 1040–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216628532

Gunawana, D., Wibisonob, C., Yantic, S., & Andrianid, D. (2019). Spiritual Motivation Determination, Psychology, and Physiology of Satisfaction with the Performance of the Religious Working as Employees Intervening. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang, 9(7), 95–114.

Heaton, S., Teece, D., & Agronin, E. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and governance: An empirical investigation of financial performance of the higher education sector. Strategic Management Journal, 44(2), 520–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3444

Hussein, A., Wibisono, C., Wijaya, D., et al. (2022). The Effect of Spiritual Motivation, Spiritual and Intellectual Intelligence on Religious Performance Mediated by Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v1i3.52

Indrawan, I., Ali, R., Hanif, M., et al. (2020). Develop Model of Transactional, Transformational, Democratic and Authocratic Leadership Style for Indonesian School Performance in Education 4.0 Era. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(9).

Jutidharabongse, J., Imjai, N., Pantaruk, S., et al. (2024). Exploring the effect of management control systems on dynamic capabilities and sustainability performance: The role of open innovation strategy amidst COVID-19. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100224

Kareem, M. A., & Alameer, A. A. A. (2019). The Impact of Dynamic Capabilities on Organizational Effectiveness. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 14(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2019-0028

Li, W., Waris, I., & Bhutto, M. Y. (2023). Understanding the nexus among big data analytics capabilities, green dynamic capabilities, supply chain agility and green competitive advantage: the moderating effect of supply chain innovativeness. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 35(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-07-2023-0263

Lee, C. W., & Kusumah, A. (2020). Analysis of the Influence of the Emotional, Intellectual and Spiritual Intelligence on Employee Performance with Work Motivation as a Moderating Variable. Management and Economics Review, 5(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.24818/mer/2020.06-05

Macher, J. T., & Mowery, D. C. (2009). Measuring Dynamic Capabilities: Practices and Performance in Semiconductor Manufacturing. British Journal of Management, 20(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00612.x

Makkonen, H., Pohjola, M., Olkkonen, R., et al. (2014). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2707–2719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.020

Martínez-Alonso, R., Martínez-Romero, M. J., & Rojo-Ramírez, A. A. (2022). Heterogeneous collaborative networks and firm performance: Do the contingent effects of family management and intellectual property rights matter? Baltic Journal of Management, 17(3), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-09-2021-0354

Muijs, D. (2015). Collaboration and Networking Among Rural Schools: Can It Work and When? Evidence From England. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(2), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2015.1022386

Mele, G., Capaldo, G., Secundo, G., et al. (2023). Revisiting the idea of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities for digital transformation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(2), 532–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-02-2023-0121

Nagoya, R., Bernarto, I., Antonio, F., et al. (2021). Exploring intention to enroll university using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1–12.

Nyachanchu, T. O., Chepkwony, J., & Bonuke, R. (2017). Role of Dynamic Capabilities in the Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Nairobi County, Kenya. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(31), 438. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n31p438

Nedzinskas, Š., Pundzienė, A., Buožiūtė-Rafanavičienė, S., et al. (2013). The impact of dynamic capabilities on SME performance in a volatile environment as moderated by organizational inertia. Baltic Journal of Management, 8(4), 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-01-2013-0003

Nugroho, B. S., Widdah, M. E., Hakim, L., et al. (2020). Effect of Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Work Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment toward Indonesian School Performance. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(9).

Nugroho, B. S., Hakim, L., Irawan, B., et al. (2020). Exchange (LMX) and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) to Indonesian Lectures’ Performance. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(9).

Pfajfar, G., Mitręga, M., & Shoham, A. (2023). Systematic review of international marketing capabilities in dynamic capabilities view—calibrating research on international dynamic marketing capabilities. International Marketing Review, 41(1), 237–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-12-2022-0276

Nuhujanan, R. P., Troeno, E. A., Noermijati, & Sudiro, A. (2016). Working motivation as mediating variable for the influence of spiritual quotient towards working performance: A study in the regional secretary of Puncak Jaya. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 60(12), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2016-12.19

Prayuda, R. Z. (2023). The role of perceptions of transformational leadership style on organizational citizenship behavior in employees. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 4(6), 56–64.

Praditya, R. A., & Purwanto, A. (2024). Linking The Influence of Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation Capabilities on Competitive Advantage: PLS-SEM Analysis. PROFESOR: Professional Education Studies and Operations Research, 1(02), 6–10.

Purwanto, A., Purba, J. T., Bernarto, I., et al. (2023). Investigating the role digital transformation and human resource management on the performance of the universitie. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(4), 2013–2028. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.6.011

Purwanto, A., & Juliana, J. (2022). The effect of supplier performance and transformational supply chain leadership style on supply chain performance in manufacturing companies. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(2), 511–516. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.12.001

Quddus, A., Nugroho, B. S., Hakim, L., et al. (2020). Effect of ecological, servant dan digital leadership style influence university performance? Evidence from Indonesian universities. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(10), 408–417.

Roberson, Q., Holmes, O., & Perry, J. L. (2017). Transforming Research on Diversity and Firm Performance: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0019

Ryu, S., & Johansen, M. S. (2015). Collaborative Networking, Environmental Shocks, and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Hurricane Rita. International Public Management Journal, 20(2), 206–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1059915

Sartika, N. S., Subroto, D. E., Mauladaniyati, R., et al. (2020). Effect of Pedagogic, Professional Competency, and Work Motivation Toward Indonesian Primary School Teachers Performance. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(9).

Takahashi, A., Bulgacov, S., Semprebon, E., et al. (2017). Dynamic capabilities, Marketing Capability and Organizational Performance. Brazilian Business Review, 14(5), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2017.14.5.1

Tsai, K. H. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.012

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Utomo, H. J. N., Irwantoro, I., Wasesa, S., et al. (2023). Investigating The Role of Innovative Work Behavior, Organizational Trust, Perceived Organizational Support: An Empirical Study on SMEs Performance. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(2), e417. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i2.417

Vargas, D. L., Bridgeman, A. M., Schmidt, D. R., et al. (2018). Correlation between student collaboration network centrality and academic performance. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.020112

Wijayaa, O. Y. A., Sulistiyanib, S., Pudjowatic, J., et al. (2021). The role of social media marketing, entertainment, customization, trendiness, interaction and word-of-mouth on purchase intention: An empirical study from Indonesian smartphone consumers. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 231–238. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.6.011

Wendra, W., Sule, E. T., Joeliaty, J., et al. (2019). Exploring dynamic capabilities, intellectual capital and innovation performance relationship: evidence from the garment manufacturing. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2019.12