The impact of Bitcoin mining on the carbon footprint in the Republic of Kazakhstan

Aigerim Kaskyrbekova, Marat Yerken, Aidana Kaskyrbek, Sergey Lee, Ildar Fakhradiyev

Article ID: 7139
Vol 8, Issue 11, 2024

VIEWS - 46 (Abstract) 51 (PDF)

Abstract


Background: Bitcoin mining, an energy-intensive process, requires significant amounts of electricity, which results in a particularly high carbon footprint from mining operations. In the Republic of Kazakhstan, where a substantial portion of electricity is generated from coal-fired power plants, the carbon footprint of mining operations is particularly high. This article examines the scale of energy consumption by mining farms, assesses their share in the country’s total electricity consumption, and analyzes the carbon footprint associated with bitcoin mining. A comparative analysis with other sectors of the economy, including transportation and industry is provided, along with possible measures to reduce the environmental impact of mining operations. Materials and methods: To assess the impact of bitcoin mining on the carbon footprint in Kazakhstan, electricity consumption from 2016 to 2023, provided by the Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan, was used. Data on electricity production from various types of power plants was also analyzed. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology was used to analyze the environmental performance of energy systems. CO2 emissions were estimated based on emission factors for various energy sources. Results: The total electricity consumption in Kazakhstan increased from 74,502 GWh in 2016 to 115,067.6 GWh in 2023. The industrial sector’s electricity consumption remained relatively stable over this period. The consumption by mining farms amounted to 10,346 GWh in 2021. A comparative analysis of CO2 emissions showed that bitcoin mining has a higher carbon footprint compared to electricity generation from renewable sources, as well as oil refining and car manufacturing. Conclusions: Bitcoin mining has a significant negative impact on the environment of the Republic of Kazakhstan due to high electricity consumption and resulting carbon dioxide emissions. Measures are needed to transition to sustainable energy sources and improve energy efficiency to reduce the environmental footprint of cryptocurrency mining activities.


Keywords


bitcoin mining; carbon footprint; Kazakhstan; electricity; CO2 emissions; sustainable development

Full Text:

PDF


References


Bureau of National Statistics KZ. (n.d.). Bureau of National Statistics KZ. Available online: https://stat.gov.kz/en/ (accessed on 21 April 2024).

Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index. (n.d.). Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index. Available online: https://ccaf.io/cbnsi/cbeci (accessed on 14 April 2024).

Chamanara, S., Ghaffarizadeh, S. A., & Madani, K. (2023). The Environmental Footprint of Bitcoin Mining Across the Globe: Call for Urgent Action. Earth’s Future, 11(10). Portico. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023ef003871

de Vries, A. (2021). Bitcoin boom: What rising prices mean for the network’s energy consumption. Joule, 5(3), 509–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.02.006

Di Febo, E., Ortolano, A., Foglia, M., et al. (2021). From Bitcoin to carbon allowances: An asymmetric extreme risk spillover. Journal of Environmental Management, 298, 113384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113384

Dickert, C., Aboulazm, Z. (2023). Top 10 Bitcoin Mining Countries & Their Renewable Electricity Mix. Available online: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/top-10-bitcoin-mining-countries-their-renewable-electricity-mix/ (accessed on 12 March 2024).

Digital Development, Innovations, and Aerospace Industry of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2020). On Approval of the Rules for Informing about Digital Mining Activities. Available online: https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/V2000021445 (accessed on 4 May 2024).

He, Y., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Kiehbadroudinezhad, M., et al. (2023). Environmental footprint analysis of gold recycling from electronic waste: A comparative life cycle analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 432, 139675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139675

IPCC. (n.d.). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the United Nations body for assessing the science related to climate change. 2014. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/ (accessed on 10 March 2024).

IRENA. (2020). Renewable capacity statistics 2020 International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). IRENA.

Krause, M. J., & Tolaymat, T. (2018). Quantification of energy and carbon costs for mining cryptocurrencies. Nature Sustainability, 1(11), 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0152-7

Lal, A., & You, F. (2024). Climate sustainability through a dynamic duo: Green hydrogen and crypto driving energy transition and decarbonization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(14). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2313911121

Liu, F., Wang, L., Kong, D., et al. (2023). Is there more to bitcoin mining than carbon emissions? Heliyon, 9(4), e15099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15099

McGinn, D., McIlwraith, D., & Guo, Y. (2018). Towards open data blockchain analytics: a Bitcoin perspective. Royal Society Open Science, 5(8), 180298. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180298

Mora, C., Rollins, R. L., Taladay, K., et al. (2018). Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2°C. Nature Climate Change, 8(11), 931–933. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0321-8

Nakamoto, S. (2009). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Cryptography Mailing list. Available online: https://metzdowdcom. (accessed on 21 December 2023).

Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., et al. (2016). Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction: Princeton University Press.

OECD. (2021). OECD Economic Outlook. OECD.

Sagers, M., Mirenkova, P., Bond, A., et al. (2023). Kazakhstan’s National Energy Report 2023. KAZENERGY Eurasian Energy Forum and World Energy Congress. Available online: https://kazenergyforum.com/wp-content/uploads/files/Kazakhstans-National-Energy-Report-2023.pdf (accessed on 17 February 2024).

Stoll, C., KlaaBen, L., & Gallersdörfer, U. (2019). The Carbon Footprint of Bitcoin. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3335781

Sun, W., Jin, H., Jin, F., et al. (2022). Spatial analysis of global Bitcoin mining. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14987-0

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (n.d.). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available online: https://unfccc.int/ (accessed on 11 March 2024).

Zade, M., Myklebost, J., Tzscheutschler, P., et al. (2019). Is Bitcoin the Only Problem? A Scenario Model for the Power Demand of Blockchains. Frontiers in Energy Research, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00021

Ziegler, T., Shneor, R., Wenzlaff, K., et al. (2021). The 2nd Global Alternative Finance Market Benchmarking Report. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3957488




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i11.7139

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Aigerim Kaskyrbekova, Marat Yerken, Aidana Kaskyrbek, Sergey Lee, Ildar Fakhradiyev

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.