Research on retailer’s pricing and stocking strategy in two-stage green supply chain considering bounded rationality and non-green product
Vol 8, Issue 9, 2024
VIEWS - 170 (Abstract) 82 (PDF)
Abstract
Due to the bounded rationality of decision-makers and the substitution effect of non-green products, retailers are not always profitable when selling green products. To assist retailers who may be disadvantaged in the game, this study constructs a two-stage green supply chain game model, considering the bounded rationality of decision-makers and the substitution effect of non-green products, and analyzes the impacts of two operational strategies that retailers can adopt—price-cutting strategy and early replenishment strategy. The research reveals that retailers tend to lower prices in the second stage when price reductions stimulate consumer purchases, enhancing their profitability. However, strategic retailers may raise prices in the first stage to create room for discounts later, potentially harming consumer interests. Contrary to expectations, anticipating future demand does not always improve supply chain profitability in the early replenishment strategy, which mainly depends on the market environment. Early replenishment deprives retailers of negotiation leverage in the second stage, and bulk orders may lead manufacturers to over-invest in green innovation. Therefore, this strategy is effective only when green innovation costs are low, consumer environmental awareness is high, or price sensitivity is low.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adenso-Díaz, B., Lozano, S., & Palacio, A. (2017). Effects of dynamic pricing of perishable products on revenue and waste. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 45, 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.12.024
Chen, Y., Su, X., & Zhao, X. (2011). Modeling Bounded Rationality in Capacity Allocation Games with the Quantal Response Equilibrium. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2064854
Chow, P., Choi, T., Shen, B., et al. (2014). Supply Contracting with Risk‐Sensitive Retailers under Information Asymmetry: An Exploratory Behavioral Study. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(4), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2298
Dong, C., & Liu, Q. (2021). Who carries strategic inventory? Manufacturer or retailer. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 69(3), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22016
Du, X., Zhan, H., Zhu, X., et al. (2021). The upstream innovation with an overconfident manufacturer in a supply chain. Omega, 105, 102497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2021.102497
Erkoc, M., Gurnani, H., Ray, S., et al. (2023). Quality investment, inspection policy, and pricing decisions in a decentralized supply chain. Production and Operations Management, 32(1), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13831
Feng, L., & Jin, M. (2022). Platform vs. Manufacturer: Who should implement innovation in e-commerce supply chains? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 166, 102858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102858
Genc, T. S., & De Giovanni, P. (2020). Closed-loop supply chain games with innovation-led lean programs and sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 440–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.026
He, P., Zhang, G., Wang, T. Y., et al. (2023). Optimal two-period pricing strategies in a dual-channel supply chain considering market change. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 179, 109193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109193
He, W., Yang, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2022). Empirical study on long-term dynamic coordination of green building supply chain decision-making under different subsidies. Building and Environment, 208, 108630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108630
Jiang, H., Feng, Z., & Jiang, G. (2017). Dynamics of an advertising competition model with sales promotion. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 42, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.05.007
Khanlarzade, N., & Farughi, H. (2024). Modeling the Stackelberg game with a boundedly rational follower in deterioration supply chain-based interaction with the leader’s hybrid pricing strategy. Expert Systems with Applications, 237, 121302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121302
Khorshidvand, B., Guitouni, A., Govindan, K., et al. (2023). Pricing strategies in a dual-channel green closed-loop supply chain considering incentivized recycling and circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 423, 138738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138738
Li, P., Rao, C., Goh, M., et al. (2021). Pricing strategies and profit coordination under a double echelon green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123694
Mahmoudi, A., Govindan, K., Shishebori, D., et al. (2021). Product pricing problem in green and non-green multi-channel supply chains under government intervention and in the presence of third-party logistics companies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 159, 107490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107490
MahmoumGonbadi, A., Genovese, A., & Sgalambro, A. (2021). Closed-loop supply chain design for the transition towards a circular economy: A systematic literature review of methods, applications and current gaps. Journal of Cleaner Production, 323, 129101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129101
McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1995). Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 6–38. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1023
Mondal, C., & Giri, B. C. (2024). Pricing and bundling strategies for complementary products in a closed-loop green supply chain under manufacturers’ different behaviors. Expert Systems with Applications, 238, 121960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121960
Peng, Y., Wang, W., Li, S., et al. (2022). Competition and cooperation in the dual-channel green supply chain with customer satisfaction. Economic Analysis and Policy, 76, 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.08.001
Qiu, R., Sun, Y., & Sun, M. (2022). A robust optimization approach for multi-product inventory management in a dual-channel warehouse under demand uncertainties. Omega, 109, 102591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2021.102591
Saputro, T. E., Figueira, G., & Almada-Lobo, B. (2020). Integrating supplier selection with inventory management under supply disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 59(11), 3304–3322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1866223
Song, H., Chu, H., Yue, H., et al. (2022). Green supply chain coordination with substitutable products under cost sharing contract. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 1112–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.141
Sun, C., Zhang, Z., Xia, L., et al. (2023). Implications of selling format on product innovation in platform supply chains under asymmetric information. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 183, 109532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109532
Sun, H., Wan, Y., Zhang, L., et al. (2019). Evolutionary game of the green investment in a two-echelon supply chain under a government subsidy mechanism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1315–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.329
Wang, G., Ai, X., Zheng, C., et al. (2020). Strategic inventory under suppliers competition. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 16(5), 2159–2173. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2019048
Wenlong, W., Fule, W., Suxian, Z. (2021). Coordination Contract in a Dual Channel Supply Chain with Low Carbon Efforts. Management Review, 33(4), 315.
Xi, X., & Zhang, J. (2020). Complexity analysis of a decision-making game concerning governments and heterogeneous agricultural enterprises with bounded rationality. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 140, 110220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110220
Xu, C. Q., Zhao, D. Z., Yuan, B. Y., et al. (2016). Differential game model on joint carbon emission reduction and low-carbon promotion in supply chains. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 19(2), 53-65.
Ye, T., Guan, Z. M., Zhang, D. R., et al. (2021). Dynamic optimization and coordination on joint carbon emission reduction and advertising in a supply chain of low-carbon goodwill considering Nash bargaining fairness concerns. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 29(3), 119-132.
Ye, X., Zhou, Y. (2021). Dynamic pricing and joint emission reduction strategies in a dual-channel supply chain considering goodwill. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 29(02), 117-128.
Zhang, C., Liu, Y., & Han, G. (2021). Two-stage pricing strategies of a dual-channel supply chain considering public green preference. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 151, 106988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106988
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.6972
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Andy Lin
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.