Harnessing the power of biomimicry for sustainable innovation in construction industry

Aruna M. Pugalenthi, Khaoula Khlie, Fathima Hassan Ahmed

Article ID: 6663
Vol 8, Issue 10, 2024

VIEWS - 115 (Abstract) 70 (PDF)

Abstract


Biomimicry is increasingly being used to drive sustainable constructional development in recent years. By emulating the designs and processes of nature, biomimicry offers a wealth of opportunities to create innovative and environmentally friendly solutions. Biomimicry in industrial development: versatile applications, advantages in construction. The text emphasizes the contribution of bio-mimetic technologies to sustainability and resilience in structural design, material selection, energy efficiency, and sensor technology. Aside from addressing technical constraints and ethical concerns, we address challenges and limitations associated with adopting biomimicry. A quantitative research approach is implemented, and respondents from the construction industry rank biomimicry principles as the optimal approach to enhance sustainability in the industry. Demographic and descriptive analyses are underway. By working together, sharing knowledge, and innovating responsibly, we suggest approaches to tackle these obstacles and fully leverage the transformative power of biomimicry in promoting sustainable construction industry practices. In an evolving global environment, biomimicry reduces environmental impact and enhances efficiency, resilience, and competitiveness in construction industries.


Keywords


biomimicry; construction industry; industrial development; nature-inspired design; environ-mental sustainability

Full Text:

PDF


References


Adekunye, A., Oke, A. (2022). Applicable areas of biomimicry principles for sustainable construction in Nigeria. Constr. Innov. https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-12-2021-0232.

Austin, M. C., Garzola, D., Delgado, N., et al. (2020). Inspection of Biomimicry Approaches as an Alternative to Address Climate-Related Energy Building Challenges: A Framework for Application in Panama. Biomimetics, 5, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics5030040

Baumgartner, R. (2013). Managing Corporate Sustainability and CSR: A Conceptual Framework Combining Values, Strategies and Instruments Contributing to Sustainable Development. Corp. Soc. Responsibility Environ. Mgmt, 21, 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1336

Bitar, A. L. B., Bergmans, I., Ritzen, M. (2022). Circular, Biomimicry-Based, and Energy-Efficient Façade Development for Renovating Terraced Dwellings in the Netherlands. J. Facade Des. Eng. https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2022.1.04

Blanco, E., Cruz, E., Lequette, C., et al. (2021). Biomimicry in French Urban Projects: Trends and Perspectives from the Practice. Biomimetics, 6, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics6020027

Buck, N. (2016). The art of imitating life: The potential contribution of biomimicry in shaping the future of our cities. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515611417

Butt. (2022). Biomimicry and the BREEAM Category of Energy for Sustainable Architecture and Sustainable Urbanism. GSC Adv. Res. Rev. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2022.12.3.0239.

Chairiyah. (2023). Biomimicry Architecture for Healthy Built Environment: A Review of Existing Literature. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci, 1218, 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1218/1/012027

Chayaamor-Heil, N. (2018). The impact of nature inspired algorithms on biomimetic approach in architectural and urban design. In: Biomimicry for Sustainable Innovation. Springer, Cham. pp. 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95972-6_11

Dyck, B., Walker, K., Caza, A. (2019). Antecedents of Sustainable Organizing: A Look at the Relationship between Organizational Culture and the Triple Bottom Line. J. Clean. Prod, 231, 1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.287

Elsakksa, A., Marouf, O. (2022). Biomimetic Approach for Thermal Performance Optimization in Sustainable Architecture: Case Study: Office Buildings in Hot Climate Countries. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci, 1113, 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1113/1/012004

Ergün, E., Aykal, E. G. (2022). The Use of Biomimicry in Architecture for Sustainable Building Design: A Sys-tematic Review. Alam Cipta Int. J. Sustain. Trop. Des. Pract. https://doi.org/10.47836/ac.15.2.paper03

Fok, L., Zee, S., Morgan, Y. (2022). Green Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Exploratory Links of Organizational Culture and Quality Improvement Practices. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage, 33, 913–933. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-11-2021-0439

Franzini, F., Toivonen, R., Toppinen, A. (2018). Why Not Wood? Benefits and Barriers of Wood as a Multistory Construction Material: Perceptions of Municipal Civil Servants from Finland. Buildings, 8, 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8110159

Han, Y., Taylor, J. E., Pisello, A. L. (2015). Toward mitigating urban heat island effects: Investigating the thermal-energy impact of bio-inspired ret-ro-reflective building envelopes in dense urban settings. Energy Build. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.05.040

Imani, Vale. (2022). Developing a Method to Connect Thermal Physiology in Animals and Plants to the Design of Energy Efficient Buildings. Biomimetics, 7, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7020067

Jamei, E., Vrcelj, Z. (2021). Biomimicry and the Built Environment, Learning from Nature’s Solutions. Appl. Sci, 11, 67514. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167514

Khoja, A., Waheeb, S. (2020). Vernomimicry: bridging the gap between nature and sustainable architecture. J. Sustain. Dev. 13, 33. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v13n1p33

Klemm, Almeida. (2018). Towards More Sustainable Construction–Application of Superabsorbent Polymers in Cementitious Matrices with Reduced Carbon Footprint. MATEC Web Conf, 149, 01019. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814901019

Matinaro, Liu. (2017). Towards Increased Innovativeness and Sustainability through Organizational Culture: A Case Study of a Finnish Construction Business. J. Clean. Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.151.

Mirniazmandan, Rahimianzarif. (2017). Biomimicry an Approach toward Sustainability of High-Rise Buildings. J. Archit. Eng. Technol. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9717.1000203.

Oguntona, Aigbavboa. (2017). Promoting Biomimetic Materials for a Sustainable Construction Industry. Bioinspired Biomimetic Nanobiomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1680/jbibn.16.00014.

Oguntona, Aigbavboa. (2018). Benefits of Biomimicry Adoption and Implementation in the Construction Industry. In: Biomimicry for Sustainable Innovation. Springer, Cham, 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94199-8_49

Oguntona, Aigbavboa. (2019). Barriers Militating Against the Adoption of Biomimicry as a Sustainable Construction Practice. MATEC Web Conf, 266, 03010. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201926603010

Oguntona, Aigbavboa. (2023). Nature Inspiration, Imitation, and Emulation: Biomimicry Thinking Path to Sustainability in the Construction Industry. Front. Built Environ. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1085979.

Pacheco-Torgal. (2014). Eco-efficient Construction and Building Materials Research under the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020. Constr. Build. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.058.

Radwan, G., Osama, N. (2016). Biomimicry, an Approach, for Energy Efficient Building Skin Design. Procedia Environ. Sci, 34, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.017

Rosario, M., Beermann, K., Austin, M. C. (2023). Environmentally Responsive Materials for Building Envelopes: A Review on Manufacturing and Biomimic-ry-Based Approaches. Biomimetics, 8, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010052

Uchiyama, Y., Blanco, E., Kohsaka, R. (2020). Application of biomimetics to architectural and urban design: a review across scales. Sustainability, 12, 9813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239813

Verbrugghe, N., Rubinacci, E., Khan, A. Z. (2023). Biomimicry in Architecture: A Review of Definitions, Case Studies, and Design Methods. Biomimetics, 8, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010107

Webb. (2021). Biomimetic Building Facades Demonstrate Potential to Reduce Energy Consumption for Different Building Typologies in Different Climate Zones. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02183-z

Zari, M., Hecht, S. (2020). Biomimicry for Regenerative Built Environments: Mapping Design Strategies for Producing Ecosystem Services. Biomimetics, 5, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics5020018




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.6663

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Aruna M. Pugalenthi, Khaoula Khlie, Fathima Hassan Ahmed

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.