Application of Maqasid al-Shariah in responsible investment (MSRI) and practices towards ESG

Nur Ainna Ramli, Fauzias Mat Nor, Muhammad Ridhwan Ab. Aziz, Syahidawati Shahwan, Ainulashikin Marzuki, Mohamad Yazis Ali Basah, Hisham Sabri

Article ID: 5864
Vol 8, Issue 16, 2024


Abstract


This paper aims to develop a holistic framework for the Maqasid al-Shariah in Responsible Investment (MSRI) index for selected publicly listed companies in the Malaysian capital market. To test the validity of the MSRI framework, a sample of 30 publicly listed companies from 2021 was selected using purposive sampling. The framework consists of eight themes with forty-five elements to evaluate companies based on their annual reports, sustainability reports, and public disclosures. The scores are classified into three categories: Shariah compliant, Shariah non-compliant, and Hajiyyat. Out of the 30 selected companies, the summary of MSRI scores concludes that twenty (20) companies were identified as Shariah compliant, while the remaining four (4) were classified as Shariah non-compliant, and six (6) as Hajiyyat. Overall, the results of the analyses show that the sustainability of the company and society has a higher percentage than the wealth preservation of companies. This research differs substantially from prior work by offering a novel approach that develops a holistic framework integrating Maqasid al-Shariah with elements of responsible investment. This study believes it can provide valuable guidance for formulating Islamic investment public policy for selected investment portfolios.


Keywords


environmental, social and governance (ESG); sustainable and responsible investment (SRI); Maqasid al-Shariah; MSRI

Full Text:

PDF


References


Abu Zahrah, Muhammad (1997). Usul al-fiqh. Qahirah: Dar al-Fikr al-’Arabi.

Akram Laldin, M., & Furqani, H. (2013). Developing Islamic finance in the framework of Maqasid al-Shari’ah: Understanding the ends (Maqasid) and the means (wasa’il). International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 6(4), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2013-0057

Al-Ghazali, A. H. (1937). Al-Mustasfa min ‘Ilm al-Usul. Cairo: al-Maktabah al-Tijariyyah al-Kubra.

Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid Muhammad bin Muhammad. (1997). Al-Mustasfa min ‘Ilm al-Usul (1st ed. Vol. 1). Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah.

Al-Hasan, K. B. (2000). Falsafah Maqasid Al-Tasyri’fi Al-Fiqh Al-Islami, Kaherah: Maktabah Wahbah.

Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf bin Abdillah. (2010). Kayfa Nata’amal Ma’a al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah. Kaherah: Dar al-Shuruq

Al-Tirmidhi. (2007). Jami’ At-Tirmidhi (Abu Khaliyl, English Trans.). Riyadh: Darus Salam.

Attia, G. E. (2008). Nahwa Taf’il Maqasid al-Shari’ah. The International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). Virginia, USA.

Attia, G. E. (2010). Towards Realization of The Higher Intents of Islamic Law (N. Roberts, Trans.). Islamic Book Trust. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Auda, J. (2010). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of law: a system approach.

Bauer, R., Guenster, N., & Otten, R. (2004). Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe: The effect on stock returns, firm value, and performance. Journal of Asset Management, 5(2), 91–104.

Chang, Hai-Yen, Lien-Wen Liang, and Yu-Luan Liu. (2021). Using environmental, social, governance (ESG) and financial indicators to measure bank cost efficiency in Asia. Sustainability, 13: 11139.

Cremers, K. J. M., & Nair, V. B. (2005). Governance mechanisms and equity prices. The Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2859–2894.

De Colle, S., & York, J. G. (2009). Why wine is not glue? The unresolved problem of negative screening in socially responsible investing. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 83–95.

Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.

Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2011). Fundamentals of Islamic banking. Kuala Lumpur: IBFIM.

Erragraguy, E., & Revelli, C. (2015). Should Islamic investors consider SRI criteria in their investment strategies? Finance Research Letters, 14, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2015.07.003

Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazines, 13, 32

Global Sustainable Development Report (2015) Latest edition Major Publications, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 30 June 2015, New York.

Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–155.

Hanic, Aida, Olivera Jovanovi´c, and Slavica Stevanovi´c. 2021. Environmental disclosure practice in the Serbian banking sector. Management. Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 26: 115–44.

Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.

Hurayra, M. A. (2015). Achievement of Maqasid-al-Shari`ah in Islamic Banking: An Evaluation of Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited.

Ibn Ashur, Muhammad Altahir. (2006). Treatise on Maqasid al-Shari’ah (Mohammad El-Tahir El-Mesawi, Trans.). Washinghton: The International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) and Islamic Book Trust (Southeast Asia Publisher).

Islamic Corporation for the Development of the Private Sector (ICD)-Refinitiv Islamic Finance Development Indicator (IFDI). (2022). Embracing change. https://icd-ps.org/uploads/files/ICD%20Refinitiv%20ifdi-report-20221669878247_1630.pdf.

Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia (2016). Laporan Penyelidikan Indeks Syariah Malaysia-Ekonomi, 2016, p.1-83

Kamali, M. H. (2009). Diversity and pluralism: A Qur’anic perspective. ICR Journal, 1(1).

Kolstad, I., 2016. Three questions about engagement and exclusion in responsible investment. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 25 (1), 45–58.

Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–289.

Mergaliyev, A; Asutay, M; Avdukic, A; and Karbhari, Y. (2019); Higher Ethical Objective (Maqasid al Shari’ah) Augmented Framework for Islamic Banks: Assessing Ethical Performance and Exploring Its Determinants; Journal of Business Ethics; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04331-4

Nations, U. (2015). Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta- analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.

Paltrinieri, A., Dreassi, A., Migliavacca, M., & Piserà, S. (2020). Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101100.

Qaradawi, Y. A. (2007). Dirasah fi al-Fiqh Maqasid al-Shariah Bayn al-Maqasid al-Kuliyyah Wa al-Nusus al-Juz’iyyah, ed. ke-2. Kaherah: Dar al-Shuruq.

Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J. R., & Zhang, C. (2008a). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 302–322.

Salma Sairally, B. (2015). Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in islamic finance: towards the realization of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. In ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance. (Vol. 7).

Thomson Reuters Responsible Finance Institute. (2015). The emerging convergence of SRI, ESG and Islamic finance: Thomson Reuters - RFI responsible finance report 2015. Thomson Reuters.

Viviers, S., & Eccles, N. S. (2012). 35 years of socially responsible investing (SRI) research - General trends over time. South African Journal of Business Management, 43(4), 1-16.

Wamba, Léopold Djoutsa. 2022. The determinants of environmental performance and its effect on the financial performance of European-listed companies. Journal of General Management47, 97–110.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd5864

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Nur Ainna Ramli, Fauzias Mat Nor, Muhammad Ridhwan Ab. Aziz, Syahidawati Shahwan, Ainulashikin Marzuki, Mohamad Yazis Ali Basah, Hisham Sabri

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.