Efficiency analysis of manufacturing industries in Singapore using the DEA-Malmquist productivity index

Behrooz Asgari, Sudipa Majumdar, Cosmos Amoah

Article ID: 5746
Vol 8, Issue 10, 2024

VIEWS - 1001 (Abstract)

Abstract


This study evaluated the efficiency and productivity of the manufacturing industries of Singapore. Singapore is one of the world’s most competitive countries and manufacturing giants. All 21 manufacturing industries as classified by Singapore’s Department of Statistics were included in the study as decision-making units (DMUs). Using the Malmquist DEA on data spanning 2015–2021, we found that excerpt for the Paper and Paper product industry, all industries recorded positive total factor productivity (TFP). TFP ranged from 0.977 to 1.481. In terms of technical efficiency, 14 out of 21 industries showed positive efficiency change. The highest TFP was recorded in 2020 and the lowest in 2016. By measuring and improving efficiency, industries in Singapore can achieve cost savings, increase output, and enhance their competitiveness in the global marketplace. In addition, efficiency measurement can help policymakers identify potential areas for improvement and develop targeted policies to promote sustainable economic growth. Given these benefits, performance measurement is inevitable for industries and policymakers in Singapore to achieve economic objectives. Manufacturing industries need to find ways to manage the size and scale of operations as we flag this as an area for improvement.


Keywords


data envelopment analysis; total factor productivity; Singapore; manufacturing industry; Malmquist index

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. AHK Singapur. (2016). Future of Manufacturing—Contribution to the CFE’s Goal to Position Singapore for the Future. SGC, 1–14.
  2. Al-Refaie, A., Hammad, M., & Li, M. H. (2016). DEA window analysis and Malmquist index to assess energy efficiency and productivity in Jordanian industrial sector. Energy Efficiency, 9(6), 1299–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9424-0
  3. Al-Refaie, A., Wu, C. W., & Sawalheh, M. (2018). DEA window analysis for assessing efficiency of blistering process in a pharmaceutical industry. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(8), 3703–3717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3303-2
  4. Amirteimoori, A., Allahviranloo, T., Kordrostami, S., et al. (2023). Improving decision-making units in performance analysis methods: a data envelopment analysis approach. Mathematical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-023-00512-5
  5. Aneja, R., & Arjun, G. (2021). Estimating components of productivity growth of Indian high and medium-high technology industries: A non-parametric approach. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100180
  6. Banjerdpaiboon, A., & Limleamthong, P. (2023). Assessment of national circular economy performance using super-efficiency dual data envelopment analysis and Malmquist productivity index: Case study of 27 European countries. Heliyon, 9(6), e16584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16584
  7. Biener, C., Eling, M., & Wirfs, J. H. (2016). The determinants of efficiency and productivity in the Swiss insurance industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.055
  8. Bloch, H., & Tang, S. H. K. (2007). The effects of exports, technical change and markup on total factor productivity growth: Evidence from Singapore’s electronics industry. Economics Letters, 96(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.12.010
  9. Bower, J. L. (2017). Resource Allocation Theory. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity. Econometrica, 50(6), 1393. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913388
  11. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  12. Debreu, G. (1951). The Coefficient of Resource Utilization. Econometrica, 19(3), 273. https://doi.org/10.2307/1906814
  13. Drake, L., Hall, M. J. B., & Simper, R. (2009). Bank modelling methodologies: A comparative non-parametric analysis of efficiency in the Japanese banking sector. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2007.05.002
  14. Economic Development Board. (2018). Singapore: A leading manufacturing hub, 2018. Available online: https://www.edb.gov.sg/en/news-andevents/insights/innovation/singapore-a-leading-manufacturinghub.html (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  15. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., et al. (1992). Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980?1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1–2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00158770
  16. Farell, P. (1957). DEA in production center: An input-output mode. Journal of Econometrics, 3, 23–49.
  17. Flegl, M., Cerón-Monroy, H., Krejčí, I., et al. (2022). Estimating the hospitality efficiency in Mexico using Data Envelopment Analysis. OPSEARCH, 60(1), 188–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-022-00619-8
  18. Gascón, F., Lozano, J., Ponte, B., et al. (2016). Measuring the efficiency of large pharmaceutical companies: an industry analysis. The European Journal of Health Economics, 18(5), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-016-0812-3
  19. Habib, A. M., & Mourad, N. (2022). Analyzing the Efficiency of Working Capital Management: a New Approach Based on DEA-Malmquist Technology. Operations Research Forum, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-022-00155-7
  20. Hasanov, F. J., & Mikayilov, J. I. (2021). The impact of total factor productivity on energy consumption: Theoretical framework and empirical validation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 38, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100777
  21. Hjalmarsson, L., & Veiderpass, A. (1992). Productivity in Swedish Electricity Retail Distribution. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, S193. https://doi.org/10.2307/3440259
  22. Huang, X. (2023). The roles of competition on innovation efficiency and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 29(1), 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100201
  23. Hwang, H., Jang, S., Chung, Y., et al. (2021). How do technological intensity and competition affect R&D persistence?: a new approach using cost asymmetry model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35(8), 962–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1990254
  24. Isaksson, A. (2007). Determinants of total factor productivity: a literature review. Research and Statistics Branch, UNIDO, 1(101), 1–97.
  25. Jarraya, B., Afi, H., & Omri, A. (2023). Analyzing the Profitability and Efficiency in European Non-Life Insurance Industry. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-023-10043-0
  26. Kim, J. I., & Lau, L. J. (1994). The Sources of Economic Growth of the East Asian Newly Industrialized Countries. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 8(3), 235–271. https://doi.org/10.1006/jjie.1994.1013
  27. Kong, N. Y. C., & Tongzon, J. (2006). Estimating total factor productivity growth in Singapore at sectoral level using data envelopment analysis. Applied Economics, 38(19), 2299–2314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500427544
  28. Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Efficient Allocation of Resources. Econometrica, 19(4), 455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907467
  29. Leung, H. M. (1997). Total factor productivity growth in Singapore’s manufacturing industries. Applied Economics Letters, 4(8), 525–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/758536639
  30. Li, X., & Cui, J. (2008). A Comprehensive Dea Approach for the Resource Allocation Problem based on Scale Economies Classification. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 21(4), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-008-9134-6
  31. Lin, T. X., Wu, Z. H., & Yang, J. J. (2023). The evaluation of innovation efficiency of China’s high-tech manufacturing industry based on the analysis of the three-stage network DEA-Malmquist model. Production Planning & Control, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2023.2165189
  32. Lucas, R. E. (1993). Making a Miracle. Econometrica, 61(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951551
  33. Mahadevan, R. (2002). A DEA approach to understanding the productivity growth of Malaysia’s manufacturing industries. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020577811369
  34. Mahadevan, R., & Kalirajan, K. (2000). Singapore’s Manufacturing Sector’s TFP Growth: A Decomposition Analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28(4), 828–839. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2000.1682
  35. Mahadevan, R., & Suardi, S. (2011). The effects of uncertainty dynamics on exports, imports and productivity growth. Journal of Asian Economics, 22(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2010.11.001
  36. Majumdar, S., & Asgari, B. (2017). Performance analysis of listed companies in the UAE-using DEA Malmquist Index Approach. American Journal of Operations Research, 7, 133-15. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3345138
  37. Malmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica, 4(2), 209–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03006863
  38. Mazumdar, M., & Rajeev, M. (2009). A comparative analysis of efficiency and productivity of the Indian pharmaceutical firms: A malmquist-meta-frontier approach. Institute for Social and Economic Change, Working Papers 223.
  39. Ngo, T., & Tran, D. H. (2014). Performance of the Vietnamese automobile industry: A measurement using DEA. Asian Journal of Business and Management, 2(3), 184–191.
  40. Patra, B., Padhan, P. C., & Padhi, P. (2022). Efficiency of Indian Banks—private versus public sector banks: A two-stage analysis. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2163081
  41. Pérez-Granja, U., & Inchausti-Sintes, F. (2021). On the analysis of efficiency in the hotel sector: Does tourism specialization matter? Tourism Economics, 29(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166211039301
  42. Phung, M. T., & Dao, V. T. (2024). The relation between efficiency of credit operation and non-performing loans—An application of network DEA model with undesirable outputs. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(6), 5372. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i6.5372
  43. Phung, M. T., Kao, C. Y., Cheng, C. P., et al. (2024). Mobile payment-banking efficiency nexus—A concise review of the evolution and empirical exploration of the Taiwan banking industry. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(6), 6057. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i6.6057
  44. Price, C. W., & Weyman-Jones, T. (1996). Malmquist indices of productivity change in the UK gas industry before and after privatization. Applied Economics, 28(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849600000004
  45. Priyadarshini, P., & Abhilash, P. C. (2023). An empirical analysis of resource efficiency and circularity within the agri-food sector of India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, 135660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135660
  46. Rao, B. V., & Lee, C. (1995). Sources of growth in the Singapore economy and its manufacturing and service sectors. Singapore Economic Review, 40(1), 83–115.
  47. Rella, A., Rubino, M., Raimo, N., et al. (2024). Does the digitalization of municipalities affect the efficiency of universities? An Italian case study using DEA and Malmquist index approaches. Technology in Society, 77, 102506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102506
  48. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
  49. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
  50. Sharma, D., Sharma, A. K., & Barua, M. K. (2013). Efficiency and productivity of banking sector. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 5(2), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrfm-10-2011-0025
  51. Solana Ibáñez, J., Caravaca Garratón, M., & Soto Meca, A. (2020). A literature review of DEA efficiency methodology in defence sector. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 33(3/4), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/arla-11-2019-0228
  52. Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
  53. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047
  54. Song, M., Ai, H., & Li, X. (2015). Political connections, financing constraints, and the optimization of innovation efficiency among China’s private enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.003
  55. Sun, C. H. (2007). The Conundrum of Economic Miracle: Manufacturing Growth without TFP Growth. The Journal of Developing Areas, 40(2), 157–158. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2007.0023
  56. Suntherasegarun, S., & S. Devadason, E. (2023). Firm Ownership and Technical Efficiency: Production Frontier Analysis of Malaysian Manufacturing. Jurnal Institutions and Economies, 15(1), 45–74. https://doi.org/10.22452/ijie.vol15no1.3
  57. Tsao, Y. (1985). Growth without productivity: Singapore manufacturing in the 1970s. Journal of Development Economics, 19(1-2), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(85)90037-9
  58. Wang, Y., Pan, J., Pei, R., et al. (2020). Assessing the technological innovation efficiency of China’s high-tech industries with a two-stage network DEA approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 71, 100810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100810
  59. WIPO. (2015). Global Innovation Index 2015. Available online: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_gii_2015.pdf (accessed on 7 March 2024).
  60. WIPO. (2021). Global Innovation Index 2021. Available online: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2021.pdf (accessed on 8 March 2024).
  61. Witte, K. D., & López-Torres, L. (2017). Efficiency in education: a review of literature and a way forward. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(4), 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.92
  62. Wong, F. C., & Gan, W. B. (1994). Total factor productivity growth in the Singapore manufacturing industries during the 1980’s. Journal of Asian Economics, 5(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/1049-0078(94)90023-X
  63. World Economic Forum. (2022). The Global Smart Industry Readiness Index Initiative: Manufacturing Transformation Insights 2022.
  64. Young, A. (1995). The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 641–680. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946695
  65. Yue, C. S. (2014). Singapore: Towards a knowledge-based economy. Available online: https://www.nomurafoundation.or.jp/en/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/20000127-28_Siow-Yue_Chia.pdf (accessed on 18 March 2024).


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.5746

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Behrooz Asgari, Sudipa Majumdar, Cosmos Amoah

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.