Providing and using energy efficiently is hampered by concerns about the environment and the unpredictability of fossil fuel prices and quantities. To address these issues, energy planning is a crucial tool. The aim of the study was to prioritize renewable energy options for use in Mae Sariang’s microgrid using an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to produce electricity. A prioritization exercise involved the use of questionnaire surveys to involve five expert groups with varying backgrounds in Thailand’s renewable energy sector. We looked at five primary criteria. The following four combinations were suggested: (1) Grid + Battery Energy Storage System (BESS); (2) Grid + BESS + Solar Photovoltaic (PV); (3) Grid + Diesel Generator (DG) + PV; and (4) Grid + DG + Hydro + PV. To meet demand for electricity, each option has the capacity to produce at least 6 MW of power. The findings indicated that production (24.7%) is the most significant criterion, closely followed by economics (24.2%), technology (18.5%), social and environmental (18.1%), and structure (14.5%). Option II is strongly advised in terms of economic and structural criteria, while option I has a considerable advantage in terms of production criteria and the impact on society and the environment. The preferences of options I, IV, and III were ranked, with option II being the most preferred choice out of the four.

Ahmad, S., & Tahar, R. M. (2014). Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia. Renewable Energy, 63, 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.001

Alanazi, A., Hassan, I., Jan, S. T., et al. (2023). Multi-criteria analysis of renewable energy technologies performance in diverse geographical locations of Saudi Arabia. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26(4), 1165–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02669-y

Algarín, C. R., Llanos, A. P., & Castro, O. A. (2017). An Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Approach for Evaluating Renewable Energy Sources. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(4), 38-47.

Chaichan, W., Waewsak, J., Nikhom, R., et al. (2022). Optimization of stand-alone and grid-connected hybrid solar/wind/fuel cell power generation for green islands: Application to Koh Samui, southern Thailand. Energy Reports, 8, 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.024

Chanchawee, R., & Usapein, P. (2018). Ranking of renewable energy for the national electricity plan in Thailand Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 8(3), 1553-1562.

Cherubini, F., Bird, N. D., Cowie, A., et al. (2009). Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(8), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013

Frick, S., Kaltschmitt, M., & Schröder, G. (2010). Life cycle assessment of geothermal binary power plants using enhanced low-temperature reservoirs. Energy, 35(5), 2281–2294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.016

Fthenakis, V. M., & Kim, H. C. (2011). Photovoltaics: Life-cycle analyses. Solar Energy, 85(8), 1609–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2009.10.002

Fthenakis, V. M., Kim, H. C., & Alsema, E. (2008). Emissions from Photovoltaic Life Cycles. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(6), 2168–2174. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071763q

Goepel, K. D. (2018). Business Performance Management Singapore (BPMSG). Available online: https://bpmsg.com/ (accessed on 13 April 2024).

Hertwich, E. G. (2013). Addressing Biogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydropower in LCA. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(17), 9604–9611. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401820p

IEA. International Energy Agency. (2017). Key World Energy Statistics. IEA.

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2020). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019. IRENA.

IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2015). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415416

Kaewvata, C., Sirisamphanwong, C., & Suriwong, T. (2021). Simulation of the Appropriate Capacity and Mouthing Position of Distributed Battery Storage Systems for Maintaining the Power Quality in Maesariang Microgrid System, Thailand. GMSARN International Journal, 15, 166-174.

Kulkarni, S. H., Jirage, B. J., & Anil, T. R. (2017). Alternative Energy Options for India—A Multi-criteria Decision Analysis to Rank Energy Alternatives using Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Logic with an Emphasis to Distributed Generation. Distributed Generation & Alternative Energy Journal, 32(2), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/21563306.2017.11869108

Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., et al. (2020). Multicriteria decision-making methodologies and their applications in sustainable energy system/microgrids. In: Decision Making Applications in Modern Power Systems. Academic Press. pp. 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-816445-7.00001-3

Meenual, T., & Usapein, P. (2021a). A Comparative Study of Microgrid Policies for Rural Electricity Transition between Bangladesh and Thailand. International Energy Journal, 21(Special Issue 1A), 93-100.

Meenual, T., & Usapein, P. (2021b). Developing Microgrids in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Countries: Policy Implication and Challenges. GMSARN International Journal, 15, 269-276.

Meenual, T., & Usapein, P. (2021c). Microgrid Policies: A Review of Technologies and Key Drivers of Thailand. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.591537

NREL. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2013). Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Electricity Generation: Update. NREL.

Numata, M., Sugiyama, M., & Mogi, G. (2020). Barrier Analysis for the Deployment of Renewable-Based Mini-Grids in Myanmar Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Energies, 13(6), 1400. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061400

Nykvist, B., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles. Nature Climate Change, 5(4), 329–332. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2564

Saaty, T. L. (1979). Optimization by the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada214804

Sindhu, S. P., Nehra, V., & Luthra, S. (2016). Recongnition and Prioritization of Challenges in Growth of Solar Energy using Analytical Hierarchy Process: Indian Outlook. Energy, 100, 332-348.

Tephiruk, N., Kanokbannakorn, W., Kerdphol, T., et al. (2018). Fuzzy Logic Control of a Battery Energy Storage System for Stability Improvement in an Islanded Microgrid. Sustainability, 10(5), 1645. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051645

Thidarat. (2020). Mae Sariang District General Information. Mae Sariang Hospital. Available online: http://mrh.go.th/web/index.php/2016-04-30-10-43-54/2016-04-30-10-45-12/2020-06-17-06-41-35 (accessed on 2 March 2024).

United Nations. (2024). Energy. United Nations. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/energy (accessed on 10 March 2024).

Wang, C. N., Nguyen, N. A. T., Dang, T. T., et al. (2021). A Two-Stage Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Site Selection of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Power Plant: A Case Study in Taiwan. IEEE Access, 9, 75509–75525. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3081995

Warner, E. S., & Heath, G. A. (2012). Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Nuclear Electricity Generation. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00472.x

Wood, E. (2024). Microgrid Benefits: Eight Ways a Microgrid will Improve your Operation … and the World. Endeavor Business Media. Available online: https://www.microgridknowledge.com/about-microgrids/article/11430613/microgrid-benefits-eight-ways-a-microgrid-will-improve-your-operation-and-the-world (accessed on 10 March 2024).

Zhang, L., Wang, F., Xu, Y., et al. (2021). Evaluating and Selecting Renewable Energy Sources for a Microgrid: A Bi-Capacity-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 12(2), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2020.3024553