The impact of government support on port industry competitiveness: A qualitative exploration

Yanling Guo, Yizhou Zeng

Article ID: 5552
Vol 8, Issue 5, 2024

VIEWS - 133 (Abstract) 59 (PDF)

Abstract


Focusing on Shanghai Port, this in-depth study explores how government support can make port organizations more competitive. This study shall implement qualitative analysis based on in-depth interviews with key industry and government leaders to break down the complicated actions taken by the government and how they have changed the operational and strategic skills of the port industry. Seven factors were found in our study to be the most crucial support factors: Financial, regulatory, infrastructure growth, talent, market, policy, and organizational support. In their ways, each of these groups undermines the ability of port businesses to compete. For instance, finance can make ports more competitive in aspects such as tax cuts, lower interest rates, innovation and R&D funds, financing programs, venture capital funds, and putting up R&D sites. Supporting regulations makes sure that there is fair competition and smooth operations. This is done by protecting intellectual property, keeping the market going smoothly, improving the business environment, and monitoring market regulations. Building new infrastructure, such as innovation and updated buildings, enables the smooth running of the port businesses and minimizes wastage of time; thus, more time is spent on production. Supporting talent, the market, and policy all work together to make the human capital, international cooperation, and strategic regulatory framework that a company needs to stay ahead in the long run. It is clear from organizational support how important collaborative networks are for making ports more competitive. These networks, for instance, can be of assistance in helping schools and businesses work together, create new technologies, and find ways for companies and colleges to study together. This study examines these support systems to determine where the government should step in and how the systems can be made better to make ports more competitive. In terms of practical contribution, this in-depth study helps policymakers and port workers plan for the future. This study shows a fair way for the government to support the port business, which changes with its needs and stays competitive in the world of trade.


Keywords


financial support; government support; industry-government collaboration; infrastructure development; international trade; market support; organizational support; policy interventions; port competitiveness; regulatory support; shanghai port; talent suppor

Full Text:

PDF


References


Aamodt, M. G. (2022). Industrial/organizational psychology: An applied approach, 8th ed. Cengage Learning.

Abbas, J., Zhang, Q., Hussain, I., et al. (2020). Sustainable innovation in small medium enterprises: the impact of knowledge management on organizational innovation through a mediation analysis by using SEM approach. Sustainability, 12(6), 2407. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062407

Acciaro, M., Renken, K., & El Khadiri, N. (2020). Technological change and logistics development in European ports. In: European Port Cities in Transition: Moving Towards More Sustainable Sea Transport Hubs. Springer.

Afsar, B., Al-Ghazali, B. M., Cheema, S., and Javed, F. (2020). Cultural intelligence and innovative work behaviour: the role of work engagement and interpersonal trust. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1082-1109. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-01-2020-0008

Afshari, L., and Hadia, N. A. (2021). Enhancing organizational learning capability through managing talent: mediation effect of intellectual capital. Human Resource Development International, 24(1), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1727239

Andersen, T., Aryee, J., Acheampong, G., and Hansen, A. S. (2023). The continuous search for new port governance models: Experiences from a developing country. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-023-00139-8

Antunes, H. D. J. G., and Pinheiro, P. G. (2020). Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 5(2), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002

Apriliyanti, I. D. (2022). A Problem Waits: Is it True that Resource-Based Theory (RBT) is an Empty Tautology? Policy and Governance Review, 6(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v6i2.543

Bai, X., Zhang, X., Li, K. X., et al. (2021). study topics and trends in the maritime transport: A structural topic model. Transport Policy, 102, 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.013

Balci, G., and Surucu, B. E. (2021). Blockchain adoption in the maritime supply chain: Examining barriers and salient stakeholders in containerized international trade. Transportation study Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 156, 102539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102539

Barrane, F. Z., Ndubisi, N. O., Kamble, S., et al. (2021). Building trust in multi-stakeholder collaborations for new product development in the digital transformation era. Benchmarking: an international Journal, 28(1), 205-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-04-2020-0164

Boxer, B. (2023). Shanghai. In: Encyclopaedia Britannica. Geography & Travel.

Bradsher, K. (2022). China’s Covid lockdowns set to further disrupt global supply chains. The New York Times.

Brandt, L. and Rawski, T. G. (2020). China’s Great Boom as a Historical Process. Available online: https://docs.iza.org/dp13940.pdf (accessed on 2 January 2024).

Brunila, O.-P., Kunnaala-Hyrkki, V., & Inkinen, T. (2021). Hindrances in port digitalization? Identifying problems in adoption and implementation. European Transport Research Review, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00523-0

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage.

Chao, H.-C., Wu, H.-T., & Tseng, F.-H. (2021). AIS Meets IoT: A Network Security Mechanism of Sustainable Marine Resource Based on Edge Computing. Sustainability, 13(6), 3048. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063048

Chaudhuri, A., Subramanian, N., and Dora, M. (2022). Circular economy and digital capabilities of SMEs for providing value to customers: combined resource-based view and ambidexterity perspective. Journal of Business Study, 142, 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.039

Chen, J., Zhang, H., Xue, J., Yuan, L., Yao, W., and Wu, H. (2022a). study on spatial distribution, potential sources and ecological risk of heavy metals in the surface water and sediments at Shanghai Port, China. Pollution Bulletin, 181, 113923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113923

Chen, X. H., Tee, K., & Chang, V. (2022b). Accelerating innovation efficiency through agile leadership: the CEO network effects in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121602

Chen, S., Nualnoom, P., and Lakkanawanit, P. (2022c). The Influence of Entrepreneurial Ability and Entrepreneurial Resources on the Growth of E-Commerce Startups in Ethnic Minority Areas-a Case study of Chongzuo City, Guangxi, China. Science, Technology, and Social Sciences Procedia, 2022(2), CiM10-CiM10.

Cheng, J., Lian, F., and Yang, Z. (2022). The impacts of port governance reform on port competition in China. Transportation study Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 160, 102660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102660

De, M. M. (2021). Value creation for sustainability in Port: Perspectives of analysis and future study directions. Sustainability, 13(21), 12268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112268

Degooyert, V. (2020). Long term investments in critical infrastructure under environmental turbulence: Dilemmas of infrastructure responsiveness. Sustainable Futures, 2, 100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100028

Del, G. M., Di, V. A., Hassan, R., and Palladino, R. (2022). Digitalization and new technologies for sustainable business models at the ship-port interface: A bibliometric analysis. Maritime Policy and Management, 49(3), 410-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1903600

Deng, G., Chen, J., and Liu, Q. (2022). Influence mechanism and evolutionary game of environmental regulation on green port construction. Sustainability, 14(5), 2930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052930

Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S. D., and Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757-1770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993576

Fetterman, D. M. (2019). Ethnography: Step-by-step. Sage publications.

Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., and Schaltegger, S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z

Furr, N. R., and Eisenhardt, K. M. (2021). Strategy and uncertainty: Resource-based view, strategy-creation view, and the hybrid between them. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1915-1935. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211011760

Garcia, D. S. B., Agusti, J. I., Joss, S., and Hunhevicz, J. (2022). significances of Construction 4.0 to the workforce and organizational structures. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(2), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1616414

Hopf, V. (2022). Artificial intelligence in German SMEs: Barriers and challenges to AI adoption in the German Mittelstand. Available online: https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/138589/1/2021-22_fall_45825_valerie_hopf.pdf (accessed on 2 January 2024).

Hossain, M. S., Hussain, K., Kannan, S., et al. (2022). Determinants of sustainable competitive advantage from resource-based view: significances for hotel industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 5(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhti-08-2020-0152

Li, S., Haralambides, H., and Zeng, Q. (2022). Economic forces shaping the evolution of integrated Port systems-The case of the container port system of China’s Pearl River Delta. Transportation Economics, 94, 101183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2022.101183

Li, X., and Yuen, K. F. (2022). Autonomous ships: A study of critical success factors. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 24(2), 228-254. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00212-2

Liang, Y., Zhang, S., Li, J., and Guo, L. (2022). study on Financial Support, Technological Improvement and Marine Economic Development for China’s Coastal Regions. Water, 14(17), 2740. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14172740

Liu, J., Ma, Y., Appolloni, A., and Cheng, W. (2021). How external stakeholders drive the green public procurement practice? An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Public Procurement, 21(2), 138-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-04-2020-0035

Liu, W., Long, S., Wei, S., et al. (2022). Smart logistics ecological cooperation with data sharing and platform empowerment: an examination with evolutionary game model. International Journal of Production study, 60(13), 4295-4315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1925173

Liu, Z., Yang, D., and Ng, Y. N. (2020). A competitive analysis of Port of Hong Kong: from external to internal. Journal of shipping and trade, 5(1), 1-17.

Notteboom, T. E., and Haralambides, H. E. (2020). Port management and governance in a post-COVID-19 era: Quo vadis? Maritime Economics and Logistics, 22, 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00162-7

Notteboom, T., Pallis, A., and Rodrigue, J. P. (2022). Port economics, management and policy. Routledge.

Notteboom, T., Pallis, T., and Rodrigue, J. P. (2021). Disruptions and resilience in global container shipping and ports: the COVID-19 pandemic versus the 2008-2009 financial crisis. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 23, 179-210. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00180-5

Saeed, M. A., Jiao, Y., Zahid, M. M., et al. (2021b). Organizational flexibility and project portfolio performance: the roles of innovation, absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(3), 600-624. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-02-2020-0058

Saeed, M. A., Tabassum, H., Zahid, M. M., et al. (2022). Organizational flexibility and project portfolio performance: the roles of environmental uncertainty and innovation capability. engineering Management Journal, 34(2), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2021.1884450

DO. (2023). Shanghai. Available online: https://www.6do.world/t/shanghai-6do-encyclopedia/73208 (accessed on 2 January 2024).

Wanjogo, J. W., & Muathe, S. M. (2022). Gaining competitive advantage through generic strategies in medical training colleges in Kenya. International Journal of study in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 11(2), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i2.1681

Wang, C. (2021). Legal and political practices in China’s central-local dynamics. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 14, 523-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-021-00331-9

Yeh, C., Macaluso, C., and Hershbein, B. (2022). Monopsony in the US labour market. American Economic Review, 112(7), 2099-2138. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200025

Yeni, K., Bastug, S. (2021). Sustaining a resilience of competitive advantage during Covid-19 in maritime supply chains: From perspective of resource-based theory. Honorary Chair, 65.

World Container Port Throughput Rankings (2023). Available online: https://www.by56.com/news/24567.html (accessed on 26 June 2023).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i5.5552

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Yanling Guo, Yizhou Zeng

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.