Wages and return to capital in Thailand in a free trade agreement with the EU

Hugo Toledo

Article ID: 5291
Vol 8, Issue 16, 2024


Abstract


Thailand and the EU started negotiating a free trade agreement (FTA) in 2005, but negotiations were subsequently suspended in 2014 after the country’s military coup. The significance of these negotiations are important because of the mutual benefit of achieving higher levels of trade and investment between the world’s largest single market and the second largest ASEAN economy. The Specific Factors (SF) model of production and trade is applied to identify potential winner and loser industries and factors of production in Thailand. The model identifies short-run loses for some labor inputs, return to capital, and output in agriculture and services. In the manufacturing and energy sectors, higher output will benefit some labor inputs and capital owners. Understanding the short-run impact of an FTA could allow policymakers in Thailand to reinforce the institutional infrastructure such as implementing trade adjustment assistance programs (TAA), to help re-train workers who may become unemployed due to free trade.


Keywords


Free trade; Thailand-EU; factor payments; specific factors model; income redistribution

Full Text:

PDF


References


Allen, R. G. D. (1938). Mathematical Analysis for Economist. Macmillan And Company Limited.

ASEAN Briefing. (2023). Available online: https://www.aseanbriefing.com (accessed on 12 May 2023).

Central Bank of Thailand. (2021). Available online: https://www.bot.or.th (accessed on 29 October 2021).

Charoenrat, T., Harvie, C., & Amornkitvikai, Y. (2013). Thai manufacturing small and medium sized enterprise technical efficiency: Evidence from firm-level industrial census data. Journal of Asian Economics, 27, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2013.04.011

Chow, P., Ozturk, O., & Thompson, H. (2022). Short-Run Adjustments in Taiwan to Free Trade in a Multisector Specific Factors Model. The International Trade Journal, 37(6), 595–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2022.2090463

Evert, J., & Oh, J. (2019). The EU–South Korea FTA: Which Sector Benefits the Most? Journal of Korea Trade, 23(2), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2019.23.2.76

European Commission. (2016). Trade Boosted by Five Years of EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement. Available online https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/content/eu-south-korea-free-trade-agreement (accessed on 12 May 2023).

Gilbert, J. (2003). CGE Simulations of US Bilateral Free Trade Agreements. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.

Hsieh, P. L. (2021). Shaping new interregionalism: The EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement and beyond. Leiden Journal of International Law, 35(1), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156521000558

Hur, J., & Qiu, L. D. (2019). Tariffs and formation of free trade agreements networks. The World Economy, 43(1), 33–59. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12868

ILOSTAT. (2021). Available online: https://www.ilostat.ilo.org (accessed on 10 May 2021).

International Trade Administration. (2024). Available online: https://www.trade.gov (accessed on 15 February 2024).

Imbs, J., & Mejean, I. (2016). Trade Elasticities. Review of International Economics, 25(2), 383–402. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12270

Jones, R. W. (1971). A Three Factor Model in Theory and Trade History. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

Jung, B. (2022). The Trade Effects of the EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement: Heterogeneity Across Time, Country Pairs, and Directions of Trade within Country Pairs. Open Economies Review, 34(3), 617–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-022-09690-6

Kee, H. L., & Nicita, A. (2023). Quantifying economic impacts of trade agreements with heterogeneous trade elasticities. Review of International Economics, 32(3), 1270–1299. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12723

Khan, M. A., Walmsley, T., & Mukhopadhyay, K. (2021). Trade liberalization and income inequality: The case for Pakistan. Journal of Asian Economics, 74, 101310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101310

Mayer, W. (1974). Short-Run and Long-Run Equilibrium for a Small Open Economy. Journal of Political Economy, 82(5), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1086/260249

Mussa, M. (1974). Tariffs and the Distribution of Income: The Importance of Factor Specificity, Substitutability, and Intensity in the Short and Long Run. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1086/260271

Neary, J. P. (1978). Short-Run Capital Specificity and the Pure Theory of International Trade. The Economic Journal, 88(351), 488. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232049

Samuelson, P. A. (1953). Prices of Factors and Good in General Equilibrium. The Review of Economic Studies, 21(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296256

Samuelson, P. A. (1971). Ohlin Was Right. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 73(4), 365. https://doi.org/10.2307/3439219

Thailand Development Research Institute. (2024). Available online: https://www.tdri.or.th (accessed on 12 February 2024).

Thompson, H. (1994). An Investigation into the Quantitative Properties of the Specific Factors Model of International Trade. Japan and the World Economy, 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-1425(94)90003-5

Thompson, H. (1997). Free Trade and Income Redistribution Across Labor Groups: Comparative Statics for the US Economy. International Review of Economics and Finance, 6, 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-0560(97)90023-X

Thompson, H. (2002). Factor Intensity as Euclidean Distance. Keio Economic Studies, 39, 1-7.

Thompson, H. (2016). Services and income redistribution in specific factors models of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Path to Free Trade in the Asia-Pacific. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785360046.00018

Thompson, H., & Toledo, H. (2022). Renewable versus nonrenewable energy for Canada in a free trade agreement with China. Energy Economics, 105, 105716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105716

Thompson, H., and Hugo, T. (2007). General Equilibrium Production with Constant Elasticity of Substitution. Keio Economic Studies, 44, 27-36.

Yeboah, O. A., Victor, O. B., and Thompson, H. (2012). US Pork and China Trade in a Specific Factors Model. Agricultural Economics Review, 13, 76-82.

Yu, C. (2023). The impacts of trade liberalization on the local labor market: Older women are especially vulnerable. Review of International Economics, 32(3), 693–777. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12694




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd5291

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Hugo Toledo

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.