Art studies and activities for older adults have received significantly less attention as a result of prohibitively expensive materials that are unfit for commercial use, and research utilizing digital technology to investigate artistic activities for older adults is extremely limited. The purpose of this article is to analyze and review recent research in these fields to summarize the current trends. The literature review comprised 108 articles from databases that included Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The papers were subjected to a thorough examination by the VOSviewer program and researchers, who utilized content analysis to classify them into four themes: 1) inclusive design; 2) accessibility; 3) digital art therapy and 4) digital technology environments. Further investigation and development are necessary to propose a novel approach to instructing senior-level art utilizing cutting-edge technologies, which could be enhanced by the findings of this review article.

1. Ahmad, N. A., Abd Rauf, M. F., Mohd Zaid, N. N., et al. (2022). Effectiveness of Instructional Strategies Designed for Older Adults in Learning Digital Technologies: A Systematic Literature Review. SN Computer Science, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01016-0
2. Atkins, M. (2007). Using digital photography to record clients’ art work. International Journal of Art Therapy, 12(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/17454830701538410
3. Austin, B. D. (2009). Renewing the Debate: Digital Technology in Art Therapy and the Creative Process. Art Therapy, 26(2), 83–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2009.10129745
4. Bennington, R., Backos, A., Harrison, J., et al. (2016). Art therapy in art museums: Promoting social connectedness and psychological well-being of older adults. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 49, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2016.05.013
5. Berg-Weger, M., & Morley, J. E. (2020). Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Gerontological Social Work. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 24(5), 456–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1366-8
6. Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., et al. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The lancet, 395(10227), 912–920.
7. Bugos, J. A., Perlstein, W. M., McCrae, C. S., et al. (2007). Individualized piano instruction enhances executive functioning and working memory in older adults. Aging and mental health, 11(4), 464–471.
8. Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 571–580).
9. Carayon, P., Wooldridge, A., Hoonakker, P., et al. (2020). SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety. Applied Ergonomics, 84, 103033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033
10. Coleman, M. B., Cramer, E. S., Park, Y., et al. (2015). Art Educators’ Use of Adaptations, Assistive Technology, and Special Education Supports for Students with Physical, Visual, Severe and Multiple Disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27(5), 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-015-9440-6
11. Chen, Y. (2009). Usability analysis on online social networks for the elderly. Helsinki University of Technology.
12. Chippendale, T., & Bear-Lehman, J. (2012). Effect of life review writing on depressive symptoms in older adults: A randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(4), 438–446. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2012.004291
13. Clarkson, P. J., & Coleman, R. (2015). History of inclusive design in the UK. Applied Ergonomics, 46, 235–247.
14. Cristofovici, A. (2022). Aging and Photography. In: Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Springer International Publishing.
15. Coelho, J., Rito, F., Luz, N., & Duarte, C. (2015). Prototyping TV and tablet Facebook interfaces for older adults. In: Proceedings of the Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2015: 15th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Bamberg, Germany.
16. Coelho, J., & Duarte, C. (2016). A literature survey on older adults’ use of social network services and social applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.053
17. Cohen, G. D., Perlstein, S., Chapline, J., et al. (2006). The impact of professionally conducted cultural programs on the physical health, mental health, and social functioning of older adults. The Gerontologist, 46(6), 726–734. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.6.726
18. Colbert, S., Cooke, A., Camic, P. M., et al. (2013). The art-gallery as a resource for recovery for people who have experienced psychosis. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 40(2), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2013.03.003
19. Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2014). Assistive technologies-e-book: principles and practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
20. Cornejo, R., Brewer, R., Edasis, C., et al. (2016). Vulnerability, Sharing, and Privacy: Analyzing Art Therapy for Older Adults with Dementia. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819960
21. Datlen, G. W., & Pandolfi, C. (2020). Developing an online art therapy group for learning disabled young adults using WhatsApp. International Journal of Art Therapy, 25(4), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2020.1845758
22. de Lima Flauzino, K., Manuel Pires Teixeira Gil, H., Sathler Tavares Batistoni, S., et al. (2022). Lifelong learning activities for older adults: a scoping review. Educational Gerontology, 48(11), 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2022.2052507
23. de Medeiros, K., Kennedy, Q., Cole, T., et al. (2007). The Impact of Autobiographic Writing on Memory Performance in Older Adults: A Preliminary Investigation. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15(3), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jgp.0000240985.10411.3e
24. Diggs, L. A., Lubas, M., & De Leo, G. (2015). Use of technology and software applications for therapeutic collage making. International Journal of Art Therapy, 20(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2014.961493
25. Dong, H., Clarkson, P. J., Ahmed, S., et al. (2004). Investigating Perceptions of Manufacturers and Retailers to Inclusive Design. The Design Journal, 7(3), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.2752/146069204789338398
26. Dong, H., McGinley, C., Nickpour, F., et al. (2015). Designing for designers: Insights into the knowledge users of inclusive design. Applied Ergonomics, 46, 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.003
27. Duque, E., Fonseca, G., Vieira, H., et al. (2019). A systematic literature review on user centered design and participatory design with older people. Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357155.3358471
28. Edwards, K., & Jensen, P. L. (2014). Design of systems for productivity and well being. Applied Ergonomics, 45(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.022
29. Elfert, M. (2019). Lifelong learning in Sustainable Development Goal 4: What does it mean for UNESCO’s rights-based approach to adult learning and education? International Review of Education, 65(4), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09788-z
30. Fancourt, D., & Finn, S. (2019). What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
31. Garattini, C., Wherton, J., & Prendergast, D. (2011). Linking the lonely: an exploration of a communication technology designed to support social interaction among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 11(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0235-y
32. Gibson, L., Moncur, W., Forbes, P., et al. (2010). Designing Social Networking Sites for Older Adults. Electronic Workshops in Computing. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2010.24
33. González, A., Ramírez, M. P., & Viadel, V. (2015). ICT Learning by Older Adults and Their Attitudes toward Computer Use. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 2015, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/849308
34. Gonzalez, I., & Morer, P. (2016). Ergonomics for the inclusion of older workers in the knowledge workforce and a guidance tool for designers. Applied Ergonomics, 53, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.002
35. Greer, N., Fleuriet, K. J., & Cantu, A. G. (2012). Acrylic Rx: A program evaluation of a professionally taught painting class among older Americans. Arts & Health, 4(3), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2012.696072
36. Groot, B., de Kock, L., Liu, Y., et al. (2021). The Value of Active Arts Engagement on Health and Well-Being of Older Adults: A Nation-Wide Participatory Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 8222. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158222
37. Guler, A. (2012). Art for All Ages: A Lifelong Desire and Hard Work. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.172
38. Hacmun, I., Regev, D., & Salomon, R. (2018). The Principles of Art Therapy in Virtual Reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02082
39. Hacmun, I., Regev, D., & Salomon, R. (2021). Artistic creation in virtual reality for art therapy: A qualitative study with expert art therapists. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 72, 101745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2020.101745
40. Harley, D., Howland, K., Harris, E., & Redlich, C. (2014). Online communities for older users: What can we learn from local community interactions to create social sites that work for older people. In: Proceedings of BCS HCI 2014 Sand, Sea and Sky-Holiday HCI.
41. Hayes, M., van Stolk-Cooke, K., & Muench, F. (2015). Understanding Facebook use and the psychological affects of use across generations. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.040
42. Helvacioglu, E., & Karamanoglu, N. N. (2012). Awareness of the Concept of Universal Design in Design Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.125
43. Hickman, J. M., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2007). Training older adults to use new technology. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62(s1), 77–84.
44. Ienca, M., Fabrice, J., Elger, B., et al. (2017). Intelligent Assistive Technology for Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias: A Systematic Review. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 56(4), 1301–1340. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-161037
45. Imran, N., Zeshan, M., & Pervaiz, Z. (2020). Mental health considerations for children & adolescents in COVID-19 Pandemic. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.covid19-s4.2759
46. Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult Education and Lifelong Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561560
47. Juznic, P., Blazic, M., Mercun, T., et al. (2006). Who says that old dogs cannot learn new tricks? New Library World, 107(7/8), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800610677308
48. Kaimal, G., Carroll-Haskins, K., Berberian, M., et al. (2020). Virtual Reality in Art Therapy: A Pilot Qualitative Study of the Novel Medium and Implications for Practice. Art Therapy, 37(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2019.1659662
49. Kattenstroth, J.-C., Kalisch, T., Kolankowska, I., et al. (2011). Balance, Sensorimotor, and Cognitive Performance in Long-Year Expert Senior Ballroom Dancers. Journal of Aging Research, 2011, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/176709
50. Kasemsarn, K., & Nickpour, F. (2016). A conceptual framework for inclusive digital storytelling to increase diversity and motivation for cultural tourism in Thailand. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 229, 407–415.
51. Kasemsarn, K., & Nickpour, F. (2017). Inclusive Digital Storytelling to Understand Audiences’ Behaviours. The International Journal of Visual Design, 11(4), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1581/cgp/v11i04/35-51
52. Kasemsarn, K. (2022). Creating a Cultural Youth Tourism eBook Guidelines with Four Design Factors. The International Journal of Visual Design, 16(2), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1581/cgp/v16i02/31-51
53. Kasemsarn, K., Harrison, D., & Nickpour, F. (2023). Digital Storytelling Guideline Applied with Inclusive Design for Museum Presentation from Experts’ and Audiences’ Perspectives for Youth. The International Journal of the Inclusive Museum, 16(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-2014/cgp/v16i01/99-118
54. Kimura, K., & Hozumi, N. (2012). Investigating the acute effect of an aerobic dance exercise program on neuro-cognitive function in the elderly. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(5), 623–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.04.001
55. Kueider, A. M., Parisi, J. M., Gross, A. L., et al. (2012). Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e40588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040588
56. Lai, H.-J. (2020). Investigating older adults’ decisions to use mobile devices for learning, based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(7), 890–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1546748
57. Liberati, A. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4). https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
58. Lohrius, J., & Malchiodi, C. (2018). Virtual reality art therapy. In: Handbook of Art Therapy and Digital Technology. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
59. MacNeil, M., Hirslund, E., Baiocco-Romano, L., et al. (2023). A scoping review of the use of intelligent assistive technologies in rehabilitation practice with older adults. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2239277
60. McGinley, C., & Dong, H. (2011). Designing with Information and Empathy: Delivering Human Information to Designers. The Design Journal, 14(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630611x12984592780005
61. Michailidou, E., Parmaxi, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2015). Culture effects in online social support for older people: perceptions and experience. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(2), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0346-3
62. Morrell, W., Denise, C. P., Christo, R. (2000). Effects of age and instructions on teaching older adults to use eldercomm, an electronic bulletin board system. Educational Gerontology, 26(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/036012700267213
63. Morris, M. E. (2005). Social Networks as Health Feedback Displays. IEEE Internet Computing, 9(5), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/mic.2005.109
64. Noice, T., Noice, H., & Kramer, A. F. (2014). Participatory Arts for Older Adults: A Review of Benefits and Challenges. The Gerontologist, 54(5), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt138
65. Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User Centered System Design. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15703
66. Notess, M., & Lorenzen-Huber, L. (2007). Online learning for seniors. ELearn, 2007(5), 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/1266885.1266893
67. O’Brien, A. M., & Mc Guckin, C. (2016). The Systematic Literature Review Method: Trials and Tribulations of Electronic Database Searching at Doctoral Level. Sage.
68. Olguntürk, N., & Demirkan, H. (2009). Ergonomics And Universal Design in Interior Architecture Education. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 26(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2009.2.7
69. Ostroff, E. (2011). Universal design: An evolving paradigm. In: Universal Design Handbook. McGraw Hill.
70. Pappas, M. A., Demertzi, E., Papagerasimou, Y., et al. (2019). Cognitive-Based E-Learning Design for Older Adults. Social Sciences, 8(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010006
71. Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
72. Portet, F., Vacher, M., Golanski, C., et al. (2013). Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: acceptability and objection aspects. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0470-5
73. Quan-Haase, A., Martin, K., & Schreurs, K. (2016). Interviews with digital seniors: ICT use in the context of everyday life. Information, Communication & Society, 19(5), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1140217
74. Reynolds, F. (2010). ‘Colour and communion’: Exploring the influences of visual art-making as a leisure activity on older women’s subjective well-being. Journal of Aging Studies, 24(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2008.10.004
75. Rikard, R. V., Berkowsky, R. W., & Cotten, S. R. (2018). Discontinued Information and Communication Technology Usage among Older Adults in Continuing Care Retirement Communities in the United States. Gerontology, 64(2), 188–200. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1159/000482017
76. Rodrigues, L., Bherer, L., Bosquet, L., et al. (2020). Effects of an 8-week training cessation period on cognition and functional capacity in older adults. Experimental Gerontology, 134, 110890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2020.110890
77. Sanford, J. A. (2012). Universal design as a rehabilitation strategy: Design for the ages. Springer Publishing Company.
78. Scott, I., Mclachlan, F., & Brookfield, K. (2018). Inclusive Design and Pedagogy: An Outline of Three Innovations. Built Environment, 44(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.44.1.9
79. Seo, W., Jun, J., Chun, M., et al. (2022). Toward an AI-assisted Assessment Tool to Support Online Art Therapy Practices: A Pilot Study. In: Proceedings of 20th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).
80. Shang, L., & Zuo, M. (2020). Investigating older adults’ intention to learn health knowledge on social media. Educational Gerontology, 46(6), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2020.1759188
81. Shrivastava, P., Ivanaj, V., & Ivanaj, S. (2012). Sustainable development and the arts. International Journal of Technology Management, 60(1/2), 23. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2012.049104
82. Smriti, D., Ambulkar, S., Meng, Q., et al. (2022). Creative arts therapies for the mental health of emerging adults: A systematic review. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 77, 101861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2021.101861
83. Stephenson, R. C. (2006). Promoting self-expression through art therapy. Generations, 30(1), 24–26.
84. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
85. Thalhammer, V. (2014). E-learning: An opportunity for older persons. In: Learning across generations in Europe: contemporary issues in older adult education. Brill.
86. Thompson, J. (2009). Performance affects: Applied theatre and the end of effect. Springer.
87. Tongsubanan, S., & Kasemsarn, K. (2023). Sustainability at Home: The Development of an Efficient Framework for Home Energy-Saving Applications. Designs, 7(4), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs7040101
88. Tyler, M., De George-Walker, L., & Simic, V. (2020). Motivation matters: Older adults and information communication technologies. Studies in the Education of Adults, 52(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2020.1731058
89. Vavik, T. (2011). Strategies for teaching universal design. In: Proceedings of the E&PDE 2011, the 13th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education.
90. Verghese, J., Lipton, R. B., Katz, M. J., et al. (2003). Leisure Activities and the Risk of Dementia in the Elderly. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(25), 2508–2516. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa022252
91. Vichitvanichphong, S., Talaei-Khoei, A., Kerr, D., et al. (2014). Adoption of Assistive Technologies for Aged Care: A Realist Review of Recent Studies. In: Proceedings of the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2014.341
92. Vollmer Dahlke, D., & Ory, M. G. (2020). Emerging Issues of Intelligent Assistive Technology Use Among People with Dementia and Their Caregivers: A U.S. Perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00191
93. Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2010). Computer use by older adults: A multi-disciplinary review. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029
94. Waller, S., Bradley, M., Hosking, I., et al. (2015). Making the case for inclusive design. Applied Ergonomics, 46, 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.012
95. Wargnier, P., Benveniste, S., Jouvelot, P., et al. (2018). Usability assessment of interaction management support in LOUISE, an ECA-based user interface for elders with cognitive impairment. Technology and Disability, 30(3), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-180189