Purpose: There have been many studies on corporate social responsibility. Still, research on the dual relationship showing the impact of management control on corporate social responsibility and business performance has not been exciting researchers. The article also identifies and measures the elements of management control that affect compliance with corporate social responsibility and business performance. At the same time, the paper also analyzes the influence of compliance with corporate social responsibility on business performance. From the research results, listed companies will see the importance of designing management control and complying with corporate social responsibility to maximize the business’s profits. Findings: The article demonstrates the practicality of institutional theory in the relationship between management control, corporate social responsibility, and business performance. Institutional theory influences the relationship between management control, CSR, and business performance by highlighting the role of external institutional pressures, legitimacy, and conformity to societal norms. Companies that strategically integrate institutional expectations into their management control systems can enhance their CSR efforts, improve their reputation, and contribute to better business performance. Methodology: We collect data on 195 manufacturing enterprises listed on the Vietnam stock market in 6 sectors. This study’s main data analysis method is the structural equation modeling method (SEM). The article used AMOS software to evaluate and measure the influence of each factor. Practical implications: The article has analyzed five aspects of management control to corporate social responsibility and business performance: Size of the Board of Directors (BOD), percentage of independent members in the BOD, and concurrence. CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors, state ownership ratio and foreign shareholder ownership rate. The results show that a company with a CEO who is not the Chairman of the BOD will have a higher level of CSR compliance than a company with a CEO who is also the Chairman of the BOD. The larger the Board size, the higher the level of CSR, but This has not been verified for the company’s business performance. The higher the foreign ownership ratio, the better the CSR compliance; however, this has the opposite direction for the state ownership rate. The higher the percentage of independent members on the Board of Directors, the lower the level of CSR compliance. In terms of impact on business performance in the enterprise: The higher the company’s compliance with corporate social responsibility, the better it’s business performance. A company with a CEO who holds the position of BOD will have lower business performance than companies with a CEO who does not hold the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors. Companies with a high percentage of state ownership will have lower business performance. The higher the percentage of independent members on the Board of Directors, the lower the business performance. Originality: This attests that the research paper I submitted is the result of my original and independent work. I have duly acknowledged all sources from which the ideas and quotations have been obtained. The project does not contain any plagiarism and has not been sent elsewhere for publication.

Abdel Magid, A., Hussainey, K., De Andrés, J., et al. (2023). The Moderating Role of Online Social Media in the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Investment Decisions: Evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11020060

Adib, M., Zhang, X., A.A.Zaid, M., et al. (2021). Management control system for corporate social responsibility implementation – a stakeholder perspective. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 410–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-06-2020-0247

Afolabi, H., Ram, R., Hussainey, K., et al. (2023). Exploration of small and medium entities’ actions on sustainability practices and their implications for a greener economy. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(4), 655–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-09-2022-0252

Alabdullah, T. T. Y., Ahmed, E. R., & Muneerali, M. (2019). Effect of Board Size and Duality on Corporate Social Responsibility: What has Improved in Corporate Governance in Asia? Journal of Accounting Science, 3(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v3i2.2810

Anthony, R., Govindarajan, V., Hartmann, F., et al. (2014). Management control systems. EILM University.

Arjaliès, D.-L., & Mundy, J. (2013). The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.003

Azhar, Z., Alfan, E., Kishan, K., et al. (2022). Accrual Accounting at Different Levels of the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review. Australian Accounting Review, 32(1), 36–62. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12357

Battaglia, M., Passetti, E., Bianchi, L., et al. (2016). Managing for integration: a longitudinal analysis of management control for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.108

Ben Brik, A., Rettab, B., & Mellahi, K. (2011). Market Orientation, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Business Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0658-z

Berry, A. J., Coad, A. F., Harris, E. P., et al. (2009). Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature. The British Accounting Review, 41(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.09.001

Cheffi, W., Abdel-Maksoud, A., & Farooq, M. O. (2021). CSR initiatives, organizational performance and the mediating role of integrating CSR into management control systems: Testing an inclusive model within SMEs in an emerging economy. Journal of Management Control, 32(3), 333–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-021-00323-6

Crutzen, N., & Herzig, C. (2013). A review of the empirical research in management control, strategy and sustainability. Accounting and control for sustainability, 26, 165–195.

Doanh, D. C., & Gadomska-Lila, K. (2021). Customers’ Awareness of Corporate Social Responsibility in Vietnam and Poland: A Comparative Analysis. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 1(346), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.346.03

Endrikat, J., de Villiers, C., Guenther, T. W., et al. (2020). Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Business & Society, 60(8), 2099–2135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320930638

Emmanuel, C., Otley, D., & Merchant, K. (1990). Accounting for Management Control. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6952-1

Feder, M., & Weißenberger, B. E. (2021). Towards a holistic view of CSR-related management control systems in German companies: Determinants and corporate performance effects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126084

Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: Integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), 149–178.

Gond, J.-P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., et al. (2012). Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003

Guerrero-Villegas, J., Pérez-Calero, L., Hurtado-González, J., et al. (2018). Board Attributes and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Meta-Analysis. Sustainability, 10(12), 4808. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124808

Hofstede, G. (1981). Management control of public and not-for-profit activities. Accounting, Organizations and society, 6(3), 193–211.

Hosoda, M., & Suzuki, K. (2015). Using Management Control Systems to Implement CSR Activities: An Empirical Analysis of 12 Japanese Companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(7), 628–642. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1896

Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32–61. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112

Jeong, Y.-C., & Kim, T.-Y. (2019). Between Legitimacy and Efficiency: An Institutional Theory of Corporate Giving. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1583–1608. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0575

Jie, F., Standing, S., Janjua, N., et al. (2023). Research agenda for supply chain management 4.0. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 16(3), 317–346. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijasm.2023.132467

Kober, R., Ng, J., & Paul, B. J. (2007). The interrelationship between management control mechanisms and strategy. Management Accounting Research, 18(4), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2007.01.002

Krechovská, M., & Procházková, P. T. (2014). Sustainability and its Integration into Corporate Governance Focusing on Corporate Performance Management and Reporting. Procedia Engineering, 69, 1144–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.103

Lueg, R., & Radlach, R. (2016). Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review. European Management Journal, 34(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.11.005

Marques, P., Presas, P., & Simon, A. (2014). The Heterogeneity of Family Firms in CSR Engagement. Family Business Review, 27(3), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514539004

Ng, P. M. L., Wut, T. M., Lit, K. K., et al. (2022). Drivers of corporate social responsibility and firm performance for sustainable development—An institutional theory approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(4), 871–886. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2241

Niehm, L. S., Swinney, J., & Miller, N. J. (2008). Community Social Responsibility and Its Consequences for Family Business Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2008.00247.x

Otley, D. (1994). Management control in contemporary organizations: towards a wider framework. Management Accounting Research, 5(3–4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1994.1018

Otley, D., Broadbent, J., & Berry, A. (1995). Research in Management Control: An Overview of its Development. British Journal of Management, 6(s1). Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1995.tb00136.x

Otley, D. (2003). Management control and performance management: whence and whither? The British Accounting Review, 35(4), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2003.08.002

Langfield-Smith, K. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: a critical review. Accounting, organizations and society, 22(2), 207–232.

Mai, K. N., Nguyen, P. N., Nguyen, A. K., & Tran, N. M. (2020). The effects of managerial perceptions on CSR practices and corporate financial performance: An Evidence from Vietnam. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2

Matuszak, Ł., & Różańska, E. (2017). An examination of the relationship between CSR disclosure and financial performance: The case of Polish banks. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2017.04005

Nam, N. N. (2018). Research on awareness of social responsibility of employees at Vietnam Maritime Commercial Joint Stock Bank (Vietnamese). Bo of Education and Training in taotruungdai hoc Kinh Tet HCMC.

Na, C., Tian, G., Rauf, F., et al. (2022). Do financial performance and firm’s value affect the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Moderating role of chief executive officer’s power in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925323

Nasir, W., Hassan, A., & Khan, M. H. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance nexus: Moderating role of CEO chair duality. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0289037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289037

Okafor, A., Adeleye, B. N., & Adusei, M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from U.S tech firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 126078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126078

Rinawiyanti, E. D., Huang, X., & As-Saber, S. (2020). Adopting management control systems through CSR strategic integration and investigating its impact on company performance: evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-04-2020-0150

Rosini, I., Gunawan, J., & Rahman Hakim, D. (2020). The Contingent Fit between Management Control System and Capabilities on Sustainability Performance. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 7(6), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.62.2020.76.375.386

Roszkowska-Menkes, M., & Aluchna, M. (2017). Institutional isomorphism and corporate social responsibility: towards a conceptual model. Journal of Positive Management, 8(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.12775/jpm.2017.007

Singh, A., Dwivedi, A., Agrawal, D., et al. (2024). A framework to model the performance indicators of resilient construction supply chain: An effort toward attaining sustainability and circular practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 1688–1720. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3563

Taghian, M., D’Souza, C., & Polonsky, M. (2015). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, reputation and business performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-06-2012-0068

Thao, M. F. M. L. T., & Chuong, M. N. T. (2021). Responsibility (CSR): Empirical evidence from Vietnam. In: Proceedings of the 13th NEU-KKU International Conference on Socio-Economic and Environmental Issues in Development (ICSEED 2021)

Tien, N. H., Anh, D. B. H., & Ngoc, N. M. (2019). Corporate financial performance due to sustainable development in Vietnam. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 694–705. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1836

Tien, N. H., Thuong, T. M., & Yen, N. T. H. (2019). Enhancing independence of local auditing services by profiting from experiences of the Big4 group (KPMG, Deloitte, PWC E&Y) operating in Vietnam market. Cogent Business & Management.

Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 99–128. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n4

Tran, T. T. (2017). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) situation in Vietnam. Springer.

Usman, A. B., & Amran, N. A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility practice and corporate financial performance: evidence from Nigeria companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 749–763. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-04-2014-0050

Uyar, A., Kilic, M., Koseoglu, M. A., et al. (2020). The link among board characteristics, corporate social responsibility performance, and financial performance: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100714

Voinea, C. L., Rauf, F., Naveed, K., et al. (2022). The Impact of CEO Duality and Financial Performance on CSR Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from State-Owned Enterprises in China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15010037

Yakubu, I. N., Kapusuzoglu, A., & Ceylan, N. B. (2023). Revisiting the corporate governance and corporate performance nexus: evidence from value-based metrics. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-02-2023-0043

Wijethilake, C., Munir, R., & Appuhami, R. (2018). Environmental Innovation Strategy and Organizational Performance: Enabling and Controlling Uses of Management Control Systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3259-7