This research seeks to identify the value of a few common factors determining the speed of economic growth in Baltic states and analyzes their impact in detail on Latvia’s lagging. Latvia’s economic starting point after regaining independence because of the collapse of the Soviet Union was at least comparable to its neighbors. Still, after the implementation of liberal reforms towards a free market’ economy and 20 years of operation as an EU full member, Latvia is lagging in growth, prosperity, and innovation. Within the analysis, this scientific paper pays special attention to the three less discussed factors, namely, the impact of post-Soviet mind-set effects as a part of local innovation culture, lasting since regaining independence in 1991; the importance of the availability of talent pull, its density, diversity, and accessibility; and readiness and capability to capture external knowledge and technology adoption. The overall approach is the systemic assessment of the national innovation system and/or innovation ecosystem, trying to understand the differences between these two models. Research is performed by analysis of the performance of the local innovation ecosystem in connection with export- and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policies. The authors present a novel method for visually representing economic growth and its application in analyzing process development within transitional economic nations. The study uses an analytical and synthetical literature review. It offers a new GDP data visualization method useful for monitoring economic development and forecasting potential economic crises—the outcomes from aggregative literature analysis in a consolidated concept are provided for required talent policy proposals. The post-Soviet mindset is seen as a heritage and devious underdog that has left incredibly diverse consequences on today’s society, power structures, economic growth potential, and the emergence of healthy, well-managed, and sustainable innovation ecosystems. The post-Soviet mindset is a seemingly hidden and, at the same time, an intriguing factor that has a significant impact on the desire to make and implement the right decisions related to innovation, education, and other policies promoting business development. The key outcome of the article is that sociocultural aspects and differences in innovation culture led to a slow-down of Latvia’s economic growth compared to Estonia’s and Lithuania’s slightly more successful economic reforms.

Achim, M.V. (2016). Cultural dimension of corruption: a cross-country survey. Int.Adv.Econ.Res., Vol.22, 2016, pp.333-345.

Adner, R. (2016). Ecosystem as Structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451

Agapitova, N., & Watkins, A. (2004). Creating a 21st Century National Innovation System for a 21st Century Latvian Economy. In: Policy Research Working Papers. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3457

Allen, M., & Haas, R. (2001). The Transition in Central and Eastern Europe: The Experience of Two Resident Representatives. IMF Staff Papers, 48(S1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/4621688

Angel, R. (2006). Putting an innovation culture into practice. Ivey Business Journal.

Arezki, R., Fan, R. Y., & Nguyen, H. (2019). Technology Adoption and the Middle-Income Trap: Lessons from the Middle East and East Asia. Policy Research Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8870

Arogyaswamy, B., Elmer, W. (2005). Technology Absorption in Emerging Nations: An Institutional Approach. Journal of East-West Business, 10(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.1300/J097v10n04_05

Ash, T. G. (1990). The magic lantern: The revolution of '89 witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin, and Prague. Random House.

Ashbourne, A. E. G. (1997). Lithuania: the rebirth of a nation, 1991–1994. Available online: https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/handle/10023/14406 (accessed on 11 October 2022).

Aslund, A., Dombrovskis, V. (2011). How Latvia came through the financial crisis. Available online: https://www.piie.com/publications/chapters_preview/6024/01iie6024.pdf (accessed on 19 September 2023).

Audretsch, D. B. (2001). What’s New about the New Economy? Sources of Growth in the Managed and Entrepreneurial Economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.1.267

Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2000). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st Century: from the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(1–2), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001910050003

Audretsch, D. B., Grilo, I., Thurik, A. R. (2007). Explaining entrepreneurship and the role of policy: A framework (chapter 1). In: Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy. CBSS.

Autio, E. (2014) Innovation from big science: enhancing big science impact agenda. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London.

Avotins, V., Azanda, D., Baranovs, O., et al. (1998). The state and the private sector: creating a better environment for development. In: Latvia Human Development Report 1998. UNDP, Riga. pp. 73–96.

Avotins, V., Sloka, B., Jarohnovich, N. (2016). Global Talent War: Differences in Small Emerging Country. Engineering for Rural Development, LLU, Jelgava, 15(2016b), 1230–1237.

Baker, K. A. (2002). Organizational Culture 1. Retrieved from: https://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/doe/benchmark/ch11.pdf (accessed on 13 September 2023).

Barni D., Vieno A., Roccato M. (2016). Living in a non-communist versus in a post-communist European country moderates the relation between conservative values and political orientation: a multilevel study. European Journal of Personality, Vol.30, 2016, pp.92-104.

Beno, M. (2021). E-working: Country versus culture dimension. Agris on-line papers in economics and informatics, 13(2), 23-34.

Callon, M. (1999). Actor-Network Theory-The Market Test. The Sociological Review, 46(S), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.46.s.10

CIVITTA. (2022). The Baltic startup scene up-close: today’s realities, tomorrow’s possibilities. Available on: https://civitta.com/upload/files/BSE_Research_Short_2022_10_17.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2023).

Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2000). Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7552

Cooke, R. A., Clayton, J. (2016). White paper. Building a culture for innovation. Available online: https://www.human-synergistics.com.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/building_a_culture_for_innovation_wp.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (accessed on 22 September 2023).

Correa, P. (2007). Technology adoption and the investment climate: Enabling the private sector to acquire and use modern technologies. Presentation at Knowledge Economy Forum VI, Cambridge, England.

Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Practice and principles. New York, NY, HarperCollins Publishers.

EC Country. (2023). EC Country Report—Latvia. Available on: https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-05/LV_SWD_2023_614_en.pdf (accessed on 12 May 2024).

EC, DG Enterprise and Industry. (2005). Innovation regions in Europe. Today’s network for tomorrow. EC, DG Enterprise and Industry.

Economic Development of Latvia. (2023). Riga, MoE. Available on: https://www.em.gov.lv/en/economic-situation-0 (accessed on 12 May 2024).

Enderwick, P., Tung, R. L., & Chung, H. F. L. (2011). Immigrant effects and international business activity: an overview. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 5(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/15587891111100778

ETAG. (2022). TA Statistics in International Trade. Available on: https://www.sgi-network.org/2022/Estonia/Economic_Policies (accessed on 2 June 2023).

Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2”to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

EU DG Enterprise. (2002). Innovation tomorrow. Innovation policy and the regulatory framework: making innovation an integral part of the broader structural agenda. EU DG Enterprise, 28, 221.

EU RIS / RITTS Focus Group. (2003). “Fostering an innovation culture” discussion paper. Cardiff Business Technology Centre.

European Commission. (2018). European Innovation Scoreboard 2018: Comparative analysis of innovation performance across EU countries. Publications Office of the European Union. https://euraxess.ec.europa.eu/worldwide/japan/european-innovation-scoreboard-2018-srip-report-2018 (accessed on 7th October 2022).

European Commission. (2023). Commission staff working document: 2023 country report – Latvia. Accompanying the document recommendation for a council recommendation on the 2023 national reform programme of Latvia and delivering a council opinion on the stability programme of Latvia (SWD/2023/614 final). European Commission. https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-05/LV_SWD_2023_614_en.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2023).

Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, Basic books.

Frese, M., Mertins, J. C., Hardt, J. V., et.al. (2010). Innovativeness of firms and organizational culture: the role of error management culture and pro-initiative climate. Univ. of Glessen.

Goldberg, I., Branstetter, L., Goddard J.G., et al. (2010). Globalization and technology absorption in Europe and Central Asia. In: The role of trade, FDI7, and Cross-border knowledge flows. World Bank. 150. p. 149.

Goldberg, I., Trajtenberg, M., Jaffe, A., et al. (2006). Public financial support for commercial innovation. In: Europe and Central Asia. Knowledge Economy. 1(1). p. 78.

Grancelli, B. (1992). Social Change and Modernization: Lessons from Eastern Europe. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Granstrand, O., Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 2020, 90–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098

Gruszewska E. (2014) Changes in informal institutions in Poland and transition countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic policy, 2014, Vol.9, Issue 1, pp.39-55.

Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Fayolle, A., et al. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities: Emerging models in the new social and economic landscape. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9755-4

Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., Wasti, S. A., & Sidkar, A. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 397-417.

Harward Business School Press. (2004) Coaching and mentoring. How to develop top talent and achieve stronger performance. Harward Business School Press, Boston. p. 159.

Hofstede G., Minkov M. (2010). Long- versus short-term orientation: new perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol.16, No.4, 2010, pp.493-504.

Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.

Hofstede, G. (1998). Masculinity/femininity as a dimension of culture. In G. Hofstede (Ed.), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures (pp. 3–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage Publications.

Hofstede, G. (2015). The Hofstede Centre: Strategy, culture, change. The Hofstede Centre. http://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html (accessed on 10 July 2023).

IMD. (2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2020). World Competitiveness Rank (online). Available on: https://worldcompetitiveness.imd.org/ https://worldcompetitiveness.imd.org/rankings/Digital (accessed on 9 September 2023).

IMF. (2023). World Economic Outlook Database. Available on: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2023/April/weo-report?c=939,941,946,&s=NGDPRPPPPC,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,PCPIPCH,&sy=1980&ey=2028&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=,&br=1 (accessed on 10 July 2023).

Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904

Jarohnovicz, N., Avotins, V. (2013). The changing role of Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.entrepreneurial university in developing countries: The case of Latvia. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 13 (2), 121–148.

Jarohnovitch, N., Avotins, V. (2012). Absorption of new technology capacity opportunities of Latvian enterprises. In: Processing of the XVII Int. Conference “The role of science and technology parks in supporting entrepreneurial community”; September 12–14; Vilnius, Lithuania. pp. 54–55.

Kattel, R., Raudla, R. (2022). Estonia’s radical transformation. Successes and failures of “crazy ideas”. Available on: https://economy2030.resolutionfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Estonias_radical_transformation.pdf (accessed on 9 September 2023).

Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2010). Enhancing Firm Performance and Innovativeness Through Error Management Culture. In: The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate. Sage Publications. 137–157. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483307961.n9

Kudela, J. J., Avotins, V. (1999). An evaluation of Phare SME programmers. Available on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321155380_An_Evaluation_of_Phare_SME_Programmes_Latvia_Final_Report (accessed on 9 September 2023).

Lachmann, L. M. (1970). The legacy of Max Weber. Heinemann Educational Books.

Lankhuizen, M. (1998). Catching Up, Absorption Capability and the Organisation of Human Capital. UNU-MERIT Research Memoranda. UNU-MERIT.

Laruelle, M. (2015). The “Russian World”. Russia’s soft power and geopolitical imagination. Available on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344222398_The_’Russian_World’_Russia’s_Soft_Power_and_Geopolitical_Imagination_Center_for_Global_Interests_Papers_May (accessed on 2 June 2023).

LU Biznesa, vadības un ekonomikas fakultātes Produktivitātes zinātniskais institūts. (2020). Latvijas Produktivitātes ziņojums. Available on: https://www.bvef.lu.lv/petnieciba/petnieciba/zinatniskie-instituti/recovery-lv/ (accessed on 8 September 2023).

Lundvall, B.A. (1992). National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London, Pinter.

Luthans, F., Patrisck R.R., Luthans B.C. (1995). Doing business in Central and Eastern Europe: political, economic, and cultural diversity. Business Horizons, 1995, pp.9-16.

LV PEAK (2022). Economic Barometer. Available on: https://www.lvpeak.lu.lv/en/about-us/news/detail-view/t/72655/ (accessed on 2 June 2023).

Marody, M. (1987) Technologie intelektu: językowe determinanty wiedzy potocznej i ludzkiego działania, Wydawnictwo PWN, Warszawa 1987.

Megginson, W. L., & Netter, J. M. (2001). From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.262311

Merheim-Eyre, I. (2018). After homo sovieticus: Democratic governance gaps and societal vulnerabilities in the EU’s eastern neighborhood. European View, 17(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685818808715

Miłosz, C. (1953). Zniewolony umysł [The Captive Mind] (K. Jaspers, Preface). Paris: Institut Littéraire.

Monck, C., Bateman, M., Kudela, J. J., et al. (2000). An evaluation of Phare SME programmers. Final Synthesis Report. EC DG1, 2000, 153.

Mudrakov, V., Polishchuk, O., Popovych, M., et al. (2020). Identity of Homo Sovieticus in Retrospective and Modernity: value and Anthropological Objectivations of Phenomenological and Literary Senses. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Philosophy & Humanistic Sciences, 8(2), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenphs/8.2/45

Muiznieks, N. (2009). Responsibility of Latvia’s relations with the diaspora (Latvia). In: Human Development Report, Riga, LU Advanced Social and Political Research Institute. pp. 130–135.

NESTA. (2008). Innovation by Absorption. Measuring & Mapping Innovation in UK Nations & Regions, NESTA, 6.

Nissinen M. (1993). The Baltics as a business location for information technology and electronics industries. VTT Technology studies. Research Notes No.2169, 221.

Nissinen, M. (2002). The Baltics as a business location for information technology and electronics industries. VTT Technology Studies, Research Notes No.2169, 2002, 221 p.

Ontario. (2013). What is a culture of innovation? Available on: https://www.marsdd.com/news/what-is-a-culture-of-innovation/#:~:text=A%20culture%20of%20innovation%20is,improved%20products%2C%20services%20or%20processes (accessed on 20 September 2022).

Oxford Research Baltics. (2022). Assessment of the Latvian startup ecosystem and identifying the current state (Latvian) Available online: https://petijumi.mk.gov.lv/node/4042 (accessed on 30 May 2023).

Ozols, A., & Avotins, V. (2021). Regional centre development management factors: Case study of Liepaja. Available on: http://www.tf.llu.lv/conference/proceedings2021/ (accessed on 13 June 2023).

Ozols, A., Bicans, J., & Avotins, V. (2023). The labor supply to the growing digital ecosystem: the challenge to Latvia. In: Conf. Proceed. Challenges, trends and inspirations within the Labor Market. Publ.House A.Dubček University in Trenčin. pp. 200–210.

Pisano, G. P. (2019). The hard truth about innovative cultures. Harvard Business Review, 62–71.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1

Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.

Porter, M. E., Stern, S. (2002). National innovation capacity. In: The Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002. New York, Oxford University Press. 2002.

Putniņš, T. J., & Sauka, A. (2015). Measuring the shadow economy using company managers. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(2), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.04.001

Radavičius, R. (2016). Culture and economic development: emigration as evaluation of Lithuanian cultural environment. Ekonomika, 2016, Vol.95, No.2, pp.57-72.

Radosevic, S. (2017). Upgrading technology in Central and Eastern European economies. IZA World of Labor. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.338

Reid, A. (2012). A smart, sustainable nation? A review of Scottish research and innovation policy in the context of the smart specialization agenda. Technical Report, 68.

RIS Latvia. (2004). The Latvian Innovation System. Strategy and action plan 2005–2010. Available on: http://petijumi.mk.gov.lv/sites/default/files/file/32%20-%20Latvian%20Innovation%20System_Strategy%20and%20Action%20Plan.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2022).

Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420

Ronis, I. (1995). Red capital in Latvia (Latvian). Available on: http://periodika.lv/periodika2-viewer/?lang=fr#panel:pp|issue:90315|page:8 (accessed on 2 June 2023).

Roper, S., Love, J., Cooke, P., et al. (2005). The Scottish innovation System: actors, roles and actions. Final Report, Aston Business School.

Roy, A., & Sikdar, A. (2003). Technology Absorption in Large and Small Enterprises: A Proposal for Comparative Research 1. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/097135570301200202

Sachs, J. (1994). Understanding shock therapy, London, Social Market Foundation, 25.

Sauka, A., Putnins, T. (2023). Shadow economy index for the Baltic Countries 2009–2022. Available on: https://www.sseriga.edu/shadow-economy-index-baltic-countries (accessed on 2 June 2023).

Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco, Joddey-Bass Publishers.

Shapira, P., Stuart, R. (1996). An Overview of Technology Diffusion Policies and Programs to Enhance the Technological Absorptive Capabilities of Small and Medium Enterprises, Organization for Economic Cooperation Development (OECD), Directorate of Science, Technology and Industry, Paris.

Sharafutdinova, G. (2019). Was There a “Simple Soviet” Person? Debating the Politics and Sociology of “Homo Sovieticus.” Slavic Review, 78(01), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/slr.2019.13

Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513

Spurga, S., Žalėnienė, I. (2021). The Changing Role of Universities in Lithuanian Society. In: The Promise of Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67245-4_35

Stein, J. (1997). How Institutions Learn: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 31(3), 729–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1997.11505962

Šteinbuka, I. (2021). Part of the state support went to non-viable companies (Latvian). Available on: https://lat.bb.lv/raksts/ekonomika/2021/08/09/steinbuka-dala-valsts-atbalsta-nonaca-pie-dzivotnespejigiem-uznemumiem (accessed on 20 April 2023).

Sztompka, P. (1991). Dilemmas of the great transition. In: Sisyphus: Social Studies. Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences. Volume 2 (VIII). pp. 9–28.

Sztompka, P. (1993a). Civilizational Incompetence: The Trap of Post-Communist Societies. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 22(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1993-0201

Sztompka, P. (1993b). The sociology of social change. Oxford, Blackwell, 368.

Sztompka, P. (1995). “Vertrauen: Die fehlende Ressource in der postkommunistischen Gesellschaft.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 35/1995 “Politische Institutionen im Wandel,” edited by B. Nedelmann, pp. 254–276.

The World Bank. (2008). Globalization and Technology Absorption in Europe and Central Asia. The World Bank.

Tidd, J. (2021). Managing Knowledge, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation. Series on Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1142/q0303

Timofejevs, A., Avotins, V., & Skutans, V. (2019). Roadmap for transnational utilization of existing and planned R&I infrastructure. Available on: https://www.baltic-science.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/7-bsn-roadmap-for-transnational-utilisation.pdf (accessed on 20 August 2022).

Tischner, J. (1992). A view from the ruins. In G. Weigel (Ed.), A new worldly order: John Paul II and human freedom (pp. 166). Washington, D.C.: Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Tovstulaks, J., Avotins, V., & Jarohnovica, N. (2011). Enterprise technology absorption readiness assessment model in Latvia (Latvian). In: Proceedings of 7th Annual Int. Sci. Conf. “New dimensions in the development of society”; 6–7 October 2011; Jelgava, Latvia University of Agriculture.

Tsujimoto, M., Kajikawa, Y., Tomita, J., et al. (2018). A review of the ecosystem concept—Towards coherent ecosystem design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032

Tureac, C. E. (2005). The components of the organizational culture. Acta Universitatis Danubius, 1, 77–91.

UNCTAD. (2020). World Investment Report 2020. International production beyond pandemic. Available on: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2020_en.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2021).

Valuzis, M. (2015). Overview of promoting technology - based innovations and investments in R&D in Lithuania. Applied Technologies and Innovations. 11. 47-51. 10.15208/ati.2015.05.

van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., et al. (2005). Organizational Error Management Culture and Its Impact on Performance: A Two-Study Replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1228–1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1228

Vasks, A. (2022). Estonia and Lithuania have higher wages and faster growing economies. Latvia lags behind. Why? (Latvian). Available on: https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/zinu-analize/igaunija-un-lietuva-ir-lielakas-algas-un-atrak-augosa-ekonomika-latvija-atpaliek-kapec.a475575/ (accessed at 20 April 2023).

Visionary Analytics. (2017). Study to support the impact assessment on the Strategic Innovation Agenda of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT). European Commission Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. https://www.visionary.lt/expertises/innovation-research-and-development/ (accessed at 17 May 2023).

Wach, K. (2015). Modern policy for the entrepreneurial economy: theoretical considerations. In: Institutional aspects of entrepreneurship. Univ. of Miskolc, Poland, 9–18.

Walrave, B., Talmar, M., Podoynitsyna, K. S., et al. (2018). A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011

Watkins, A. (2005). Education, science, technology, and innovation. In: Proceedings of the Presentation at the WB Workshop on Technology innovation, private sector development, and economic growth; 25–27 May 2005; Hangzhou, China.

Wesner, M. S. (2004). Understanding innovation in corporate environments. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 123-140.

Witte, P., Slack, B., Keesman, M., et al. (2018). Facilitating start-ups in port-city innovation ecosystems: A case study of Montreal and Rotterdam. Journal of Transport Geography, 71, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.03.006

Woźniak, W. (2014). From underclass to Homo sovieticus: The human factor a brake on modernization. Praktyka Teoretyczna, 13(3), 171. https://doi.org/10.14746/pt.2014.3.7

Zaslavsky, V. (1994). The Neo-Stalinist state: Class, ethnicity, and consensus in Soviet society. M. E. Sharpe.

Zemmer, A., Homestead, S., & Covit, R. (2018). Fostering culture of innovation: a framework for understanding organizational capacity for innovation. Available on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325539222_Fostering_a_Culture_of_Innovation_A_Framework_for_Understanding_Organizational_Capacity_for_Innovation (accessed at 20 August 2022).