The pursuit of good governance by companies confronts a fundamental challenge: defining what constitutes “good governance”. Existing corporate governance codes and their implementation documents fall short of offering a clear answer to this crucial question. Despite the establishment of a reference framework years ago, the focus has shifted from defining the objectives of good governance to a consensus on the means of achieving these objectives. Unfortunately, this consensus often absolves stakeholders from providing detailed explanations. Achieving effective good governance necessitates a shift in focus towards the underlying goals of governance structures. Two potential approaches emerge in this context. While many companies rely on codes without explicitly outlining their objectives, there is a compelling case for urging or mandating them to articulate the purposes of the governance methods they employ in their reports. This level of specificity has the potential to enhance the reflective qualities of the transparency process, fostering a more comprehensive understanding of the governance landscape. Beyond merely discussing the objectives of corporate governance, the pursuit of good governance necessitates the implementation of instruments whose efficacy transcends reliance solely on market discipline. The aim is not to undermine the imperatives of transparency and justification. Instead, the intention is to recognize that these elements, while essential, do not independently ensure the effectiveness of soft law instruments, such as governance codes. Nowadays, it is crucial to assess the extent to which traditional corporate governance codes respond to the needs of companies in the era of digitalization and sustainability. Therefore, conducting a critical analysis of the existing corporate governance codes will contribute in shedding light on the gaps of these instruments to come up with recommendations for improvements. Aims and objectives: This article will focus on the following areas: Defining the role and purpose of corporate governance codes in enhancing corporate performance and accountability and discussing the challenges and limitations of corporate governance codes, including compliance issues and enforcement challenges. Presenting empirical evidence on the impact of corporate governance codes on corporate behavior and analyzing, through the principle of comply or explain, whether code adherence leads to improved corporate governance practices and financial performance. Discussing emerging trends in corporate governance and offering recommendations for improving the effectiveness of corporate governance codes.

Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of Good Governance Worldwide: What is the Trigger? Organization Studies, 25(3), 415–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040669

Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040732

Allen, F. (2005). Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gri010

Alsnuaidi, W., & Albakjaji, M. (2023). The Importance of Shariah Governance in the Banking Industry in Saudi Arabia and the Case of Shariah Committee Members as Related Parties. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 148–162. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-6S012.

Bebchuk, L. (2006). Letting shareholders set the rules, Université de HARVARD—John M. OLIN Center for Law, Economics and Business, document de discussion (no. 548).

Bolton, P., Becht, M., & Röell, A. (2002). Corporate Governance and Control. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9371

Bracanović, S. N. (2021). Essential determinants of corporate governance. International Scientific Conference EMAN—Economics and Management: How to Cope with Disrupted Times. https://doi.org/10.31410/eman.2021.461

CBB. (2024). Central Bank of Bahrain Rulenbook. Available online: https://cbben.thomsonreuters.com/rulebook/esg-a11 (accessed on 5 March 2024)

Cernat, L. (2004). The emerging European corporate governance model: Anglo-Saxon, Continental, or still the century of diversity? Journal of European Public Policy, 11(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000164343

Cornford, A. (2004). Enron and Internationally Agreed Principles for Corporate Governance and the Financial Sector. Available online: https://www.g24.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/30.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2024).

Corporate Governance Code of Listed Corporations. (2022). Available online: https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/codes/documents/2022_code-afep-medef-version-de-decembre-2022_english.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2024)

Corporate Governance Committee. (2020). The 2020 Belgian Code on Corporate Governance. Available online: https://corporategovernancecommittee.be/assets/pagedoc/2003973319-1651062453_1651062453-2020-belgian-code-on-corporate-governance.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2024)

Corporate Governance Principles for US Listed Companies. (2017). Available online: https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/codes/documents/Corporate%20Governance%20principles.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2024)

Cuervo, A. (2002). Corporate Governance Mechanisms: a plea for less code of good governance and more market control. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10(2), 84–93. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00272

Cuñat, V., Gine, M., & Guadalupe, M. (2012). The Vote Is Cast: The Effect of Corporate Governance on Shareholder Value. The Journal of Finance, 67(5), 1943–1977. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01776.x

de Jong, A., DeJong, D. V., Mertens, G., et al. (2005). The role of self-regulation in corporate governance: evidence and implications from The Netherlands. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(3), 473–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.01.002

Dedman, E. (2002). The Cadbury Committee recommendations on corporate governance—a review of compliance and performance impacts. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(4), 335–352. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00091

Dewing, I. P., & Russell, P. O. (2004). Regulation of UK Corporate Governance: lessons from accounting, audit and financial services. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(1), 107–115. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00347.x

Ecgi. (2018). Common Sense Principles 2.0. Available online: https://www.ecgi.global/publications/codes/commonsense-principles-20 (accessed on 5 March 2024)

EUR-Lex. (2017). Directive 2017/1132—Digital company law. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32017L1132 (accessed on 5 March 2024)

EUR-Lex. (2019a). Directive 2019/1151. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019L1151 (accessed on 5 March 2024)

EUR-Lex. (2019b). Directive 2019/2121. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32019L2121 (accessed on 5 March 2024)

Financial Reporting Council. (2018). The UK Corporate Governance Code. Available online: https://media.frc.org.uk/documents/UK_Corporate_Governance_Code_2018.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2024)

Financial Reporting Council. (2024a). The UK Corporate Governance Code. Available online: https://media.frc.org.uk/documents/UK_Corporate_Governance_Code_2024_kRCm5ss.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2024)

Financial Reporting Council. (2024b). UK Corporate Governance Code 2024 mythbuster. Available online: https://media.frc.org.uk/documents/UK_Corporate_Governance_Code_2024_Mythbuster_BdCPGoq.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2023).

Gola, C., Roselli, A. (2009). The Combined Code of Corporate Governance. In: The UK Banking System and Its Regulatory and Supervisory Framework. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 165–169.

Gorman, L., Ward, A. M. (2020). UK Corporate Governance Code (2010). In: Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. 1–5. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–5.

Gravohar, M., Åkesson, M. (2005). A Common Corporate Governance Code—Mission Impossible? Thesis, Kristianstad University College, Department of Business Administration.

Hart, O., & Zingales, L. (2022). The New Corporate Governance. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w29975

Hassan, L. S., Mohd Saleh, N., & Ibrahim, I. (2020). Board diversity, company’s financial performance and corporate social responsibility information disclosure in Malaysia. International Business Education Journal, 13(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.vol13.1.3.2020

Hemphill, T. (2013). The ISO 26000 guidance on social responsibility international standard: what are the business governance implications? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(3), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-08-2011-0062

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Capital Market Authority. (2024) Corporate Governance Regulations. Available online: https://cma.org.sa/en/RulesRegulations/Regulations/Documents/CorporateGovernanceRegulations1.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2024)

Macneil, I., & Esser, I. M. (2022). The Emergence of ‘Comply or Explain’ as a Global Model for Corporate Governance Codes. European Business Law Review, 33(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022001

MacNeil, I., & Li, X. (2006). “Comply or Explain”: market discipline and non‐compliance with the Combined Code. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 486–496. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00524.x

Ministry of Commerce. (2022) Companies Law. Available online: https://mc.gov.sa/ar/Documents/SEN.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2024)

Nordberg, D. (2020). Successes in Corporate Governance—Or Failures? In: The Cadbury Code and Recurrent Crisis. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–14.

OECD. (2023). OECD Corporate Governance Factbook 2023, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/6d912314-en

Parveen, R. (2021) Corporate Governance in Saudi Arabia: Analysis of Current Practices. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24.

Principles of Corporate Governance (2016). Available online: https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/codes/documents/Principles-of-Corporate-Governance-2016.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2024)

Prior, C., Cohen, S. R., & Fox, T. (2014). Profit-with-Purpose Businesses—Subject paper of the Mission Alignment Working Group. Social Impact Investment Taskforce, G8K.

Shiraishi, Y., Ikeda, N., Arikawa, Y., et al. (2019). Institutional investors, stewardship code, and corporate performance: International evidence. Corporate Governance: Search for the Advanced Practices. https://doi.org/10.22495/cpr19a13

Stewardship Framework for Institutional Investors (2017). Available online: https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/codes/documents/Stewardship%20Principles.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2024)

Thakhathi, A., De Jongh, D., & Langeni, P. (2021). What’s in a King? Unveiling the pragmatic micro-perceived value attributes of a fulfilling corporate governance code for responsible sustainable development. Journal of Global Responsibility, 12(4), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-03-2021-0037