The urgency of ecological problems has become increasingly complex, so responses from diverse parties are needed, including in the context of ecological citizenship. The general hypothesis proposed in this research is that the problem of climate change has an influence on the high level of attention of the global community, including academics, to environmental issues related to the active role of citizens demanding environmental justice and sustainable development. This study aims to explore globally published documents to provide an in-depth discussion concerning ecological citizenship. Bibliometric analysis was employed from the Scopus database. The main findings confirm the significant contribution of ecological citizenship in shaping global understanding of the role of individuals in maintaining environmental sustainability. The research theme mapping shows the diversity of issues that have been explored, with particular emphasis on environmental education and social justice, providing a basis for recommendations for future research. In particular, environmental education has been recognized as a critical element in shaping society’s understanding of environmental issues, while social justice underscores the importance of fair distribution and critical analysis of inequality in social and ecological contexts. Future research recommendations include the exploration of effective strategies in promoting the concept of ecological citizenship, developing a holistic environmental education curriculum, and more active research in the context of social justice in various regions, including Asia. This bibliometric analysis is expected to contribute substantially to formulating policies and practical actions that support the vision of inclusive ecological citizenship, which positively impacts overcoming global environmental challenges.

1. Ahmad, M., & Satrovic, E. (2024). Modeling natural resources for ecological sustainability. Gondwana Research, 126, 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.09.015
2. Ardian Feriandi, Y., Budimansyah, D., & Komalasari, K. (2023). Developing measurement instrument of students’ citizenship ecological behavior on citizenship education course in middle school. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 33(7), 954–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2022.2120590
3. Asilsoy, B., & Oktay, D. (2018). Exploring environmental behaviour as the major determinant of ecological citizenship. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.036
4. Binawan, A. L. (2023). New Concepts of Ecological-Social Justice: A Micro-Optic Reflection on Ecological Citizenship Education in Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 14(1), 143–168.
5. Boix-Fayos, C., Martínez-López, J., Albaladejo, J., & de Vente, J. (2023). Finding common grounds for conflict resolution through value analysis of stakeholders around the socio-ecological crisis of the Mar Menor coastal lagoon (Spanish). Landscape and Urban Planning, 238, 104829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104829
6. Bourban, M. (2022). Ethics, Energy Transition, and Ecological Citizenship. Comprehensive Renewable Energy, 2nd ed. pp. 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819727-1.00030-3
7. Chen, R., Chen, Y., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). Interplay of Urbanization and Ecological Environment: Coordinated Development and Drivers. Land, 12(7), 12071459. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12071459
8. Cole, A., Fontana, L., Hirzel, M., et al. (2023). On burning ground: Theatre of the Oppressed and ecological crisis in Bolivia. Cultural Geographies, 30(4), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740231154259
9. Cruz, J. P., Malafaia, C., Silva, J. E., et al. (2023). Educating for participatory active citizenship: an example from the ecological activist field. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02866-7
10. Dash, A. (2014). The moral basis of sustainable society: the Gandhian concept of ecological citizenship. International Review of Sociology, 24(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.894343
11. Dhital, S., & Rupakheti, D. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of global research on air pollution and human health: 1998–2017. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(13), 13103–13114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04482-x
12. Engel, J. R. (1998). The Faith of Democratic Ecological Citizenship. The Hastings Center Report, 28(6), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3528277
13. Evans, D. (2011). Consuming conventions: Sustainable consumption, ecological citizenship and the worlds of worth. Journal of Rural Studies, 27(2), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.02.002
14. Hawa, N. I., Antriyandarti, E., Martono, D. N., & Maulana, R. A. (2023). Improvement of Environmental, Social, and Cultural Attributes in the Slum Settlements on the Riverbanks of Yogyakarta City under the Sultan’s Rule. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(11), 8974. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118974
15. Howles, T., Reader, J., & Hodson, M. J. (2018). ‘Creating an Ecological Citizenship’: Philosophical and Theological Perspectives on The Role of Contemporary Environmental Education. Heythrop Journal - Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology, 59(6), 997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.13015
16. Jagers, S. C., Martinsson, J., & Matti, S. (2014). Ecological citizenship: A driver of pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Politics, 23(3), 434–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.835202
17. Latta, P. A. (2007). Locating democratic politics in ecological citizenship. Environmental Politics, 16(3), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701251631
18. Lestaluhu, S., Baharuddin, T., & Wance, M. (2023). Indonesian Policy Campaign for Electric Vehicles to Tackle Climate Change: Maximizing Social Media. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(8), 2547–2553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180826
19. Macgregor, S. (2014). Only resist: Feminist ecological citizenship and the post-politics of climate change. Hypatia, 29(3), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12065
20. Malik, I., Prianto, A. L., Roni, N. I., et al. (2023). Multi-level Governance and Digitalization in Climate Change: A Bibliometric Analysis. In: Motahhir S, Bossoufi B (editors). International Conference on Digital Technologies and Applications. Springer, Cham. pp. 95–104.
21. Marzall, K. (2005). Environmental extension: Promoting ecological citizenship. Environments, 33(3), 65–77.
22. Mattijssen, T. J. M. (2022). A synthesis on active citizenship in European nature conservation: social and environmental impacts, democratic tensions, and governance implications. Ecology and Society, 27(2), 270241. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13336-270241
23. Middlemiss, L. (2010). Reframing individual responsibility for sustainable consumption: Lessons from environmental justice and ecological citizenship. Environmental Values, 19(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327110X12699420220518
24. Misra, M. (2023). Practicing ecological citizenship through community supported agriculture: Opportunities, challenges, and social justice concerns. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, 45(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/cuag.12306
25. Molotoks, A., Smith, P., & Dawson, T. P. (2021). Impacts of land use, population, and climate change on global food security. Food and Energy Security, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.261
26. Mpandeli, S., Naidoo, D., Mabhaudhi, T., et al. (2018). Climate change adaptation through the water-energy-food nexus in Southern Africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102306
27. Omoregbe, O., Mustapha, A. N., Steinberger-Wilckens, R., et al. (2020). Carbon capture technologies for climate change mitigation: A bibliometric analysis of the scientific discourse during 1998–2018. Energy Reports, 6, 1200–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.05.003
28. Paphitis, K., Pearl, D. L., Berke, O., & Trotz-Williams, L. (2023). Investigating the association between socioeconomic and agricultural risk factors and the incidence of Salmonella Heidelberg and Salmonella Typhimurium in Ontario in 2015: A multi-level ecological approach. Zoonoses and Public Health, 70(7), 604–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.13069
29. Rao, P. K., & Shukla, A. (2023). Sustainable strategic management: A bibliometric analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3902–3914. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3344
30. Rietig, K., & Dupont, C. (2021). Presidential leadership styles and institutional capacity for climate policy integration in the European Commission. Policy and Society, 40(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1936913
31. Rutti-Marín, J. M., Yuli-Posadas, R. A., & Cóndor-Salvatierra, E. J. (2022). Environmental Education: Challenges for the Construction of an Ecological Citizenship. Revista de Filosofia (Venezuela), 39(100), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6003820
32. Seyfang, G. (2005). Shopping for sustainability: Can sustainable consumption promote ecological citizenship? Environmental Politics, 14(2), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010500055209
33. Seyfang, G. (2006). Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: Examining local organic food networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(4), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.01.003
34. Sharma, R., Sinha, A., & Kautish, P. (2021). Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124867
35. Simanjuntak, F. N., Utomo, S. W., Sika Ery Seda, F. S., et al. (2023). Learning Chemistry, Connecting Ecological Citizenship and Environmental Sustainability: “A Plate of Food” as a Learning Medium. ECNU Review of Education, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231179737
36. Sippel, S., Meinshausen, N., Fischer, E. M., et al. (2020). Climate change now detectable from any single day of weather at global scale. Nature Climate Change, 10(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0666-7
37. Sovacool, B. K., Linnér, B. O., & Klein, R. J. T. (2017). Climate change adaptation and the Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF): Qualitative insights from policy implementation in the Asia-Pacific. Climatic Change, 140(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1839-2
38. Umar, M., Ji, X., Kirikkaleli, D., & Alola, A. A. (2021). The imperativeness of environmental quality in the United States transportation sector amidst biomass-fossil energy consumption and growth. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124863
39. Wang, H., Liu, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Assessing urban resilience in China from the perspective of socioeconomic and ecological sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 102, 107163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107163
40. Wang, Y., Su, Y., & Araral, E. K. (2022). Migration and collective action in the commons: application of social-ecological system framework with evidence from China. Ecology and Society, 27(1), 270136. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13008-270136
41. Wheeler, D. (2001). Racing to the bottom? Foreign investment and air pollution in developing countries. Journal of Environment and Development, 10(3), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965-0101003-02
42. Wolf, J., Brown, K., & Conway, D. (2009). Ecological citizenship and climate change: Perceptions and practice. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903007377
43. Zhao, S., Peng, C., Jiang, H., et al. (2006). Land use change in Asia and the ecological consequences. Ecological Research, 21(6), 890–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0048-2