The global economic recession has caused pessimism in terms of prospects of sales recovering in the future. The present study is an attempt to investigate the cost stickiness behavior by focusing on specific characteristics of companies. The research was done through documentary analysis and access to quantitative data, with the use of statistical methods for analysis as panel data. The statistical population of the actual study included all companies listed on the India stock exchange from 2017 to 2021. They were selected after screening 128 listed companies. The regression method was used to examine the relationship between variables and to present a forecast model. The results of testing the first hypothesis showed that companies’ costs are sticky and according to the results of this hypothesis, an increase in costs when the level of activity increases is greater than the level of reduction in costs when the volumes of the activities are decreased. The results of the second hypothesis showed a remarkable relationship between the cost stickiness and specific characteristics of companies (size, number of employees, long-term assets, financial leverage, and accuracy of profits forecast). Based on the third hypothesis, there is a notable difference between cost stickiness at different levels of specific characteristics of companies. Therefore, the results show that environmental uncertainty such as COVID-19, increases cost stickiness.

1. Abdullah, A. A. H. (2021). Cost stickiness and firm profitability: A study in Saudi Arabian industries. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(3), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(3).2021.27
2. Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.00095
3. Anderson, M., Banker, R., Huang, R., & Janakiraman, S. (2007). Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x0702200103
4. Anderson, S. W., & Lanen, W. N. (2007). Understanding Cost Management: What Can We Learn from the Evidence on “Sticky Costs”? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.975135
5. Argilés‐Bosch, J. M., García Blandón, J., Ravenda, D., Valencia‐Silva, M. M., & Somoza, A. (2017). The influence of the trade-off between profitability and future increases in sales on cost stickiness. Estudios de Economía, 44(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52862017000100081
6. Balakrishnan, N., & Zhu, X. (2014a). An improved method of estimation for the parameters of the Birnbaum-Saunders distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 84(10), 2285–2294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2013.789029
7. Balakrishnan, N., & Zhu, X. (2014b). On the existence and uniqueness of the maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters of Birnbaum–Saunders distribution based on Type-I, Type-II and hybrid censored samples. Statistics, 48(5), 1013–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2013.800069
8. Balakrishnan, R., Labro, E., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2014). Cost structure and sticky costs. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50831
9. Balakrishnan, R., Petersen, M. J., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2004). Does capacity utilization affect the “stickiness” of cost? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 19(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x0401900303
10. Banker, R. D., & Chen, L. (2006). Predicting earnings using a model based on cost variability and cost stickiness. The Accounting Review, 81(2), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.285
11. Banker, R. D., Basu, S., Byzalov, D., et al. (2013). Asymmetries in Cost-Volume-Profit Relation: Cost Stickiness and Conditional Conservatism. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2312179
12. Bansal, P., Jiang, G. F., & Jung, J. C. (2015). Managing responsibly in tough economic times: Strategic and tactical CSR during the 2008–2009 global recession. Long Range Planning, 48(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.07.002
13. Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., & Thomas, D. C. (2006). A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.001
14. Cannon, J. N. (2014). Determinants of “sticky costs”: An analysis of cost behavior using United States air transportation industry data. The Accounting Review, 89(5), 1645–1672. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50806
15. Carolina, N., Su, X., Kwon, J., Huang, S., & Zhang, M. (2023). Impact of Green Supply Chain Management on Cost Stickiness of Chinese Fishery Enterprises. 2022, 403–407. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCR-SI116-082.1
16. Cebeci, H. İ., & Ghorbani, S. (2020). Integration of Bilateral Trade Between Turkey and Iran: An Application of Nonlinear Gravity Model. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(08).
17. Chen, C. X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x
18. Chen, L. S., Tzeng, I. S., & Lin, C. T. (2014). Bivariate generalized gamma distributions of Kibble’s type. Statistics, 48(4), 933–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2012.760092
19. Cheng, S., Jiang, W., & Zeng, Y. (2018). Does access to capital affect cost stickiness? Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 25(1–2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2016.1253483
20. Connaughton, J. E., Cebula, R. J., & Amato, L. H. (2023). The regional economic impact of the 2020 COVID-19 recession in the USA. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 15(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-11-2022-0284
21. Costa, M. D., & Habib, A. (2021). Trade credit and cost stickiness. Accounting & Finance, 61(1), 1139–1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12606
22. Di Giuli, A., & Kostovetsky, L. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.002
23. Dias, G. C., Hernandez, C. T., & Oliveira, U. R. de. (2020). Supply chain risk management and risk ranking in the automotive industry. Gestão & Produção, 27. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x3800-20
24. Dierynck, B., Landsman, W. R., & Renders, A. (2012). Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in private Belgian firms. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1219–1246. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50153
25. Dirks, K. T., Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., & Cooper, C. D. (2011). Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.003
26. Habib, A., & Costa, M. D. (2021). Debt maturity structure and cost stickiness. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 32(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22479
27. Habib, A., & Costa, M. D. (2022). Cost stickiness and stock price crash risk. Accounting & Finance. 62(4), 4247–4278. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12935
28. Han, S., Rezaee, Z., & Tuo, L. (2019). Is cost stickiness associated with management earnings forecasts? Asian Review of Accounting, 28(2), 173–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-04-2018-0096
29. Hartlieb, S., Loy, T. R., & Eierle, B. (2020). The effect of generalized trust on cost stickiness: Cross-country evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 55(04), 2050018. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1094406020500183
30. Hassanein, A., & Younis, M. (2020). Cost stickiness behavior and financial crisis: Evidence from the UK chemical industry. Corporate Ownership and Control, 17(2), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i2art4
31. Homburg, C., Hoppe, A., Nasev, J., Reimer, K., & Uhrig-Homburg, M. (2019). How cost stickiness affects credit risk.
32. Javalgi, R. (Raj) G., Martin, C. L., & Young, R. B. (2006). Marketing research, market orientation and customer relationship management: a framework and implications for service providers. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040610646545
33. Jin, X., & Wu, H. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and cost stickiness. Management Accounting Research, 52, 100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2021.100750
34. Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2010). Do Managers’ Deliberate Decisions Induce Sticky Costs? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1558953
35. Karuppiah, K., Sankaranarayanan, B., Ali, S. M., et al. (2021). Key Challenges to Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(11), 5850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115850
36. Khamnei, H. J., Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., Fathi, M., Valackienė, A., & Ghorbani, S. (2022). Parameter Estimation of the Exponentiated Pareto Distribution Using Ranked Set Sampling and Simple Random Sampling. Axioms, 11(6), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11060293
37. Khamnei, H. J., Nikannia, S., Fathi, M., & Ghorbani, S. (2023). Modeling income distribution: An econophysics approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 20(7), 13171–13181. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023587
38. Khan, H. A., Ghorbani, S., Shabani, E., et al. (2023). Enhancement of Neural Networks Model’s Predictions of Currencies Exchange Rates by Phase Space Reconstruction and Harris Hawks’ Optimization. Computational Economics, 63(2), 835–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10361-y
39. Krisnadewi, K. A., & Soewarno, N. (2021). Optimism and profit-based incentives in cost stickiness: an experimental study. Journal of Management Control, 32(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00309-w
40. Krisnadewi, K. A., Niroula, B., & Singh, S. K. (2022). Research on Cost Stickiness in International Journals: A Bibliometric Study. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v13n2.p144-158
41. Lee, E., Kim, C., & Leach-López, M. A. (2021). Banking competition and cost stickiness. Finance Research Letters, 41, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101859
42. Lee, W., Pittman, J., & Saffar, W. (2020). Political uncertainty and cost stickiness: Evidence from national elections around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 1107–1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12547
43. Li, W., Natarajan, R., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, K. (2021). The effect of management control mechanisms through risk-taking incentives on asymmetric cost behavior. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 56, 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-020-00891-z
44. Masoomi, B., Sahebi, I. G., Ghobakhloo, M., & Mosayebi, A. (2023). Do industry 5.0 advantages address the sustainable development challenges of the renewable energy supply chain? Sustainable Production and Consumption, 43, 94–112.
45. Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., & Ghorbani, S. (2021). Supply chain contract selection in the healthcare industry: a hybrid mcdm method in uncertainty environment. In Independent Journal of Management & Production (Vol. 12, Issue 4, pp. 1160–1187). https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i4.1356
46. Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., Davidaviciene, V., Ghorbani, S., & Sahebi, I. G. (2021). Optimal Allocation of Gas Resources to Different Consumption Sectors Using Multi-Objective Goal Programming. Sustainability, 13(10), 5663. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105663
47. Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., Davidaviciene, V., Karakaya, G., & Ghorbani, S. (2021). The measurement of organizational social media integration impact on financial and innovative performance: An integrated model. Sustainability, 13(18), 10397. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810397
48. Nuridah, S., & Zulfiati, L. (2019). Analysis of Behavior and Factors Affecting Cost stickiness On Manufacturing Company Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2014-2018. Indonesian Journal of Business, Accounting and Management, 2(01), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.36406/ijbam.v2i2.599
49. Prabowo, R., Hooghiemstra, R., & Van Veen-Dirks, P. (2018). State ownership, socio-political factors, and labor cost stickiness. European Accounting Review, 27(4), 771–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1329659
50. Qin, J., Wang, J., & Zheng, T. (2022). Chinese Commodity Price Evidence Study for COVID-19 Shock and Price Stickiness Model Design. Scientific Programming, 2022, 5178538. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5178538
51. Restuti, M. D., Gani, L., Shauki, E. R., & Leo, L. (2022). Does Managerial Ability Lead to Different Cost Stickiness Behavior? Evidence from ASEAN Countries. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10030048
52. Sadeghi Moghadam, M., & Ghasemian Sahebi, I. (2018). A Mathematical Model to Improve the Quality of Demand Responding in Emergency Medical Centers in a Humanitarian Supply chain. Modern Research in Decision Making, 3(1), 217–242.
53. Salehi, M., Ziba, N., & Gah, A. D. (2018). The relationship between cost stickiness and financial reporting quality in Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 1550–1565. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-10-2017-0255
54. Schätter, F., Hansen, O., Wiens, M., & Schultmann, F. (2019). A decision support methodology for a disaster-caused business continuity management. Decision Support Systems, 118, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.12.006
55. Scherf, M., Matschke, X., & Rieger, M. O. (2022). Stock market reactions to COVID-19 lockdown: A global analysis. Finance Research Letters, 45, 102245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102245
56. Shafeeq Nimr Al-Maliki, H., Salehi, M., & Kardan, B. (2023). The effect of COVID 19 on risk-taking of small and medium-sized, family and non-family firms. Journal of Facilities Management, 21(2), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-09-2021-0105
57. Sun, X., Tang, W., Zhang, J., & Chen, J. (2021). The impact of quantity-based cost decline on supplier encroachment. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 147, 102245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102245
58. Tang, L., Huang, Y., Liu, J., & Wan, X. (2022). Cost Stickiness and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(2), 544–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2020.1787148
59. Weidenmier, M. L., & Subramaniam, C. (2003). Additional evidence on the sticky behavior of costs. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.369941
60. Yang, Y., & Chen, D. (n.d.). Influence of COVID-19 on asymmetric cost behavior and intellectual capital efficiency: a comparison of Australian and Chinese listed firms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2023.2194887
61. Zhao, L., You, J., & Fang, S.-C. (2021). A dual-channel supply chain problem with resource-utilization penalty: Who can benefit from sales effort? Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 17(5).
62. Zhong, T., Sun, F., Zhou, H., & Lee, J. Y. (2020). Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms. Sustainability, 12(5), 1850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051850
63. Zimon, G., Tarighi, H., Salehi, M., & Sadowski, A. (2022). Assessment of Financial Security of SMEs Operating in the Renewable Energy Industry during COVID-19 Pandemic. In Energies (Vol. 15, Issue 24). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249627
64. Zulfiati, L., Gusliana, R., & Nuridah, S. (2020). Cost Stickiness: Behavior and Factors. Annual International Conference on Accounting Research (AICAR 2019), 143–145. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200309.032